切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (07) : 489 -492. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2019.07.002

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

精子DNA完整性对男性生育力的补充预测价值
陈宇捷1, 宋兵1, 贺小进1, 曹云霞1,()   
  1. 1. 230022 合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科 国家卫生健康委配子及生殖道异常研究重点实验室 出生人口健康教育部重点实验室 生殖健康与遗传安徽省重点实验室 安徽省生命资源保存与人工器官工程技术研究中心(安徽医科大学)
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-07 出版日期:2019-04-01
  • 通信作者: 曹云霞
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然基金培育基金(2015KJ04); 生殖与遗传安徽省重点实验室开放基金(9021407201)

Value of sperm DNA integrity as a supplementary predictor of male fertility

Yujie Chen1, Bing Song1, Xiaojin He1, Yunxia Cao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University NHC Key Laboratory of Study on Abnormal Gametes and Reproductive Tract Key Laboratory of Population Health Across Life Cycle, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Anhui Provincial Engineering Research Center, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China
  • Received:2019-03-07 Published:2019-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yunxia Cao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cao Yunxia, Email:
引用本文:

陈宇捷, 宋兵, 贺小进, 曹云霞. 精子DNA完整性对男性生育力的补充预测价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(07): 489-492.

Yujie Chen, Bing Song, Xiaojin He, Yunxia Cao. Value of sperm DNA integrity as a supplementary predictor of male fertility[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(07): 489-492.

目的

探究精子DNA完整性检测相对传统的精液常规在男性生育力评价中的辅助预估价值。

方法

采集收集2017年4月至10月共1076例不育男性精液标本,男性患者来源于安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科,每份标本分成2份,分别行精液常规及精子DNA完整性检测,根据精子DNA碎片指数(DFI)分为精子DNA完整性良好组(DFI≥30%)、完整性一般组(15%<DFI<30%)及完整性差组(DFI≤15%)。根据患者年龄分为21~30岁、31~40岁及≥41岁;按照精子浓度分为浓度正常(≥15×106/ml)及少精症(<15×106/ml),按照精子前向活动率分为正常(≥32%)及弱精子症(<32%),采用χ2检验分析不同精子DNA完整性组之间的年龄、浓度和前向活动率的差异,采用Pearson相关分析分析患者年龄、精子浓度及前向活动率分别与精子DFI的相关性。

结果

不同精子DNA完整性组间,精子浓度正常与少精症水平差异具有统计学意义(χ2=96.82,P<0.001)、活力正常与弱精子症水平差异均具有统计学意义(χ2=2.06,P<0.001)。年龄与DFI成正相关(r=0.154,P<0.001),精子浓度及前向活动率与DFI成负相关(r=-0.231,P<0.001;r=-0.564,P<0.001)。

结论

精子DFI与精子浓度及活动率呈负相关,与年龄呈正相关,精子DNA完整性检测一定程度上可以弥补精液常规参数分析在评价男性生育能力上的不足,具有重要参考价值。

Objective

To evaluate the value of sperm DNA integrity test compared with traditional semen analysis in the supplementary assessment of male fertility.

Methods

A total of 1076 semen samples were collected at the Reproductive Medicine Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from April to October 2017. Each specimen was divided into two parts for conventional semen analysis and sperm DNA integrity test. Sperm DNA integrity was assessed to be good (DFI≥30%), fair (15%<DFI<30%), or poor (DFI≤15%) according to sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI). According to the age of the patients, the specimens were divided into three groups: 21-30 years old, 31-40 years old, and ≥40 years old. According to sperm concentration, the specimens were divided into normal (≥15×106/ml) and oligospermia groups (<15×106/ml). According to sperm forward motility rate, the specimens were divided into normal (≥32%) and asthenospermia groups (<32%). The Chi-square test was used to compare the differences in sperm DNA integrity between different groups. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation of patient age, sperm concentration, and forward motility rate with sperm DFI.

Results

There were significant differences in sperm DNA integrity between the normal and oligospermia groups and between the normal and asthenospermia groups (χ2=96.82, P<0.001; χ2=2.06, P<0.001). Age was positively correlated with DFI (r=0.154, P<0.001), and sperm concentration and forward motility rate were negatively correlated with DFI (r=-0.231, P<0.001). r=-0.564, P<0.001).

Conclusion

Sperm DFI is negatively correlated with sperm concentration and forward motility rate, and positively correlated with age. Sperm DNA integrity test can make up for the deficiency of semen analysis in evaluating male fertility.

表1 3组患者年龄及精液常规参数的比较[例(%)]
[1]
Evgeni E, Charalabopoulos K, Asimakopoulos B. Human sperm DNA fragmentation and its correlation with conventional semen parameters [J]. J Reprod Infertil, 2014, 15(1): 2-14.
[2]
Giwercman A, Lindstedt L, Larsson M, et al. Sperm chromatin structure assay as an independent predictor of fertility in vivo: a case-control study [J]. Int J Androl, 2010, 33(1): e221-e227.
[3]
世界卫生组织. 世界卫生组织人类精液检查与处理实验室手册 [M]. 谷翊群, 陈振文, 卢文红, 等, 译. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2011: 192-193.
[4]
Fraser L. Structural damage to nuclear DNA in mammalian spermatozoa: its evaluation techniques and relationship with male infertility [J]. Pol J Vet Sci, 2004, 7(4): 311-321.
[5]
Bungum M, Humaidan P, Axmon A, et al. Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome [J]. Hum Reprod, 2007, 22(1): 174-179.
[6]
Bungum M, Bungum L, Giwercman A. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA): a tool in diagnosis and treatment of infertility [J]. Asian J Androl, 2011, 13(1): 69-75.
[7]
郑九嘉, 楼哲丰, 郑蔚虹, 等. 线粒体呼吸功能与精子活力、核DNA损伤的相关性分析 [J].中国细胞生物学学报, 2012, 34(1): 39-45.
[8]
Zini A. Are sperm chromatin and DNA defects relevant in the clinic? [J]. Syst Biol Reprod Med, 2011, 57(1-2): 78-85.
[9]
Buck Louis GM, Sundaram R, Schisterman EF, et al. Semen quality and time to pregnancy: the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment Study [J]. Fertil Steril, 2014, 101(2): 453-462.
[10]
Evenson DP, Wixon R. Data analysis of two in vivo fertility studies using sperm chromatin structure assay-derived DNA fragmentation index vs. pregnancy outcome [J]. Fertil Steril, 2008, 90(4): 1229-1231.
[11]
Osman A, Alsomait H, Seshadri S, et al. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on live birth rate after IVF or ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2015, 30(2): 120-127.
[12]
Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, et al. Whether sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation has an effect on pregnancy and miscarriage after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Fertil Steril, 2014, 102(4): 998-1005. e8.
[13]
Robinson L, Gallos ID, Conner SJ, et al. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Hum Reprod, 2012, 27(10): 2908-2917.
[14]
Carlini T, Paoli D, Pelloni M, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation in Italian couples with recurrent pregnancy loss [J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2017, 34(1): 58-65.
[15]
Agarwal A, Cho CL, Majzoub A, et al. The Society for Translational Medicine: clinical practice guidelines for sperm DNA fragmentation testing in male infertility [J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2017, 6(Suppl 4): S720-S733.
[1] 朱洪宇, 曹越, 赵鑫洋, 周毅. 三孔全腔镜手术治疗中重度男性乳房发育症[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 152-157.
[2] 刘洋, 盛赵莹, 孙琳琳. 白细胞介素6启动子通过调控人端粒酶逆转录酶减轻细胞炎症和DNA损伤[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 104-110.
[3] 曾凡英, 阮洁, 刘兴会, 何国琳. 新生育形势下的围产医学研究现状及孕期保健中的应对策略[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 519-524.
[4] 高青卓, 康宜凡, 王治鸿. 体外受精周期中单原核胚胎的临床研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 260-265.
[5] 谭娟, 谭建新, 邵彬彬, 王艳, 许争峰. 胎儿单基因遗传病无创产前检测的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 245-250.
[6] 陈海涛, 章敬尧, 朱冰, 管佳佳, 傅军. 血清循环DNA在胃癌中的诊断及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 18-22.
[7] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[8] 赵海燕, 靳海涛, 孔莺, 何瑞远. 血浆NGS-ctDNA对EGFR-TKIs治疗晚期NSCLC患者的预后意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 385-391.
[9] 杨智義, 赵成俊, 胡欣芫, 潘佰猛, 张秋雨, 张挽乾, 曹芮, 张灵强. 外周血cfDNA液体活检技术在肝棘球蚴病诊治中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 389-393.
[10] 陈园园, 颜宏利. 遗传性结直肠癌的基因阻断[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 1-5.
[11] 孙晗, 于冰, 武侠, 周熙朗. 基于循环肿瘤DNA 甲基化的结直肠癌筛查预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 500-506.
[12] 杨琬芳, 许晶, 张耀方, 王青, 杨智超, 任方刚, 王宏伟. NK和NKT细胞对急性髓系白血病患者的临床影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(09): 932-938.
[13] 李玛, 闫凌, 席云, 李尚霞, 朱冬林. HBV RNA用于监测慢性乙型肝炎患者临床治愈的研究和应用[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 70-74.
[14] 张续乾, 宫一凡, 翟爱军. 多靶点粪便DNA检测与噗噗管法FIT在体检人群结直肠癌筛查中的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 33-36.
[15] 吴晓明, 翟仰魁, 王娟, 张硕, 许杰, 潘从清. 男性2 型糖尿病患者空腹C 肽和定量胰岛素敏感性检测指数与血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数的相关性[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 288-294.
阅读次数
全文


摘要