切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (07) : 489 -492. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2019.07.002

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

精子DNA完整性对男性生育力的补充预测价值
陈宇捷1, 宋兵1, 贺小进1, 曹云霞1,()   
  1. 1. 230022 合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科 国家卫生健康委配子及生殖道异常研究重点实验室 出生人口健康教育部重点实验室 生殖健康与遗传安徽省重点实验室 安徽省生命资源保存与人工器官工程技术研究中心(安徽医科大学)
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-07 出版日期:2019-04-01
  • 通信作者: 曹云霞
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然基金培育基金(2015KJ04); 生殖与遗传安徽省重点实验室开放基金(9021407201)

Value of sperm DNA integrity as a supplementary predictor of male fertility

Yujie Chen1, Bing Song1, Xiaojin He1, Yunxia Cao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University NHC Key Laboratory of Study on Abnormal Gametes and Reproductive Tract Key Laboratory of Population Health Across Life Cycle, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Anhui Provincial Engineering Research Center, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China
  • Received:2019-03-07 Published:2019-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yunxia Cao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cao Yunxia, Email:
引用本文:

陈宇捷, 宋兵, 贺小进, 曹云霞. 精子DNA完整性对男性生育力的补充预测价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(07): 489-492.

Yujie Chen, Bing Song, Xiaojin He, Yunxia Cao. Value of sperm DNA integrity as a supplementary predictor of male fertility[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(07): 489-492.

目的

探究精子DNA完整性检测相对传统的精液常规在男性生育力评价中的辅助预估价值。

方法

采集收集2017年4月至10月共1076例不育男性精液标本,男性患者来源于安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科,每份标本分成2份,分别行精液常规及精子DNA完整性检测,根据精子DNA碎片指数(DFI)分为精子DNA完整性良好组(DFI≥30%)、完整性一般组(15%<DFI<30%)及完整性差组(DFI≤15%)。根据患者年龄分为21~30岁、31~40岁及≥41岁;按照精子浓度分为浓度正常(≥15×106/ml)及少精症(<15×106/ml),按照精子前向活动率分为正常(≥32%)及弱精子症(<32%),采用χ2检验分析不同精子DNA完整性组之间的年龄、浓度和前向活动率的差异,采用Pearson相关分析分析患者年龄、精子浓度及前向活动率分别与精子DFI的相关性。

结果

不同精子DNA完整性组间,精子浓度正常与少精症水平差异具有统计学意义(χ2=96.82,P<0.001)、活力正常与弱精子症水平差异均具有统计学意义(χ2=2.06,P<0.001)。年龄与DFI成正相关(r=0.154,P<0.001),精子浓度及前向活动率与DFI成负相关(r=-0.231,P<0.001;r=-0.564,P<0.001)。

结论

精子DFI与精子浓度及活动率呈负相关,与年龄呈正相关,精子DNA完整性检测一定程度上可以弥补精液常规参数分析在评价男性生育能力上的不足,具有重要参考价值。

Objective

To evaluate the value of sperm DNA integrity test compared with traditional semen analysis in the supplementary assessment of male fertility.

Methods

A total of 1076 semen samples were collected at the Reproductive Medicine Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from April to October 2017. Each specimen was divided into two parts for conventional semen analysis and sperm DNA integrity test. Sperm DNA integrity was assessed to be good (DFI≥30%), fair (15%<DFI<30%), or poor (DFI≤15%) according to sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI). According to the age of the patients, the specimens were divided into three groups: 21-30 years old, 31-40 years old, and ≥40 years old. According to sperm concentration, the specimens were divided into normal (≥15×106/ml) and oligospermia groups (<15×106/ml). According to sperm forward motility rate, the specimens were divided into normal (≥32%) and asthenospermia groups (<32%). The Chi-square test was used to compare the differences in sperm DNA integrity between different groups. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation of patient age, sperm concentration, and forward motility rate with sperm DFI.

Results

There were significant differences in sperm DNA integrity between the normal and oligospermia groups and between the normal and asthenospermia groups (χ2=96.82, P<0.001; χ2=2.06, P<0.001). Age was positively correlated with DFI (r=0.154, P<0.001), and sperm concentration and forward motility rate were negatively correlated with DFI (r=-0.231, P<0.001). r=-0.564, P<0.001).

Conclusion

Sperm DFI is negatively correlated with sperm concentration and forward motility rate, and positively correlated with age. Sperm DNA integrity test can make up for the deficiency of semen analysis in evaluating male fertility.

表1 3组患者年龄及精液常规参数的比较[例(%)]
[1]
Evgeni E, Charalabopoulos K, Asimakopoulos B. Human sperm DNA fragmentation and its correlation with conventional semen parameters [J]. J Reprod Infertil, 2014, 15(1): 2-14.
[2]
Giwercman A, Lindstedt L, Larsson M, et al. Sperm chromatin structure assay as an independent predictor of fertility in vivo: a case-control study [J]. Int J Androl, 2010, 33(1): e221-e227.
[3]
世界卫生组织. 世界卫生组织人类精液检查与处理实验室手册 [M]. 谷翊群, 陈振文, 卢文红, 等, 译. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2011: 192-193.
[4]
Fraser L. Structural damage to nuclear DNA in mammalian spermatozoa: its evaluation techniques and relationship with male infertility [J]. Pol J Vet Sci, 2004, 7(4): 311-321.
[5]
Bungum M, Humaidan P, Axmon A, et al. Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome [J]. Hum Reprod, 2007, 22(1): 174-179.
[6]
Bungum M, Bungum L, Giwercman A. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA): a tool in diagnosis and treatment of infertility [J]. Asian J Androl, 2011, 13(1): 69-75.
[7]
郑九嘉, 楼哲丰, 郑蔚虹, 等. 线粒体呼吸功能与精子活力、核DNA损伤的相关性分析 [J].中国细胞生物学学报, 2012, 34(1): 39-45.
[8]
Zini A. Are sperm chromatin and DNA defects relevant in the clinic? [J]. Syst Biol Reprod Med, 2011, 57(1-2): 78-85.
[9]
Buck Louis GM, Sundaram R, Schisterman EF, et al. Semen quality and time to pregnancy: the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment Study [J]. Fertil Steril, 2014, 101(2): 453-462.
[10]
Evenson DP, Wixon R. Data analysis of two in vivo fertility studies using sperm chromatin structure assay-derived DNA fragmentation index vs. pregnancy outcome [J]. Fertil Steril, 2008, 90(4): 1229-1231.
[11]
Osman A, Alsomait H, Seshadri S, et al. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on live birth rate after IVF or ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2015, 30(2): 120-127.
[12]
Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, et al. Whether sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation has an effect on pregnancy and miscarriage after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Fertil Steril, 2014, 102(4): 998-1005. e8.
[13]
Robinson L, Gallos ID, Conner SJ, et al. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Hum Reprod, 2012, 27(10): 2908-2917.
[14]
Carlini T, Paoli D, Pelloni M, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation in Italian couples with recurrent pregnancy loss [J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2017, 34(1): 58-65.
[15]
Agarwal A, Cho CL, Majzoub A, et al. The Society for Translational Medicine: clinical practice guidelines for sperm DNA fragmentation testing in male infertility [J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2017, 6(Suppl 4): S720-S733.
[1] 张旭, 徐建平, 苏冬明, 王彩芬, 王大力, 张文智. 男性乳腺肿块的超声造影特征[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 854-859.
[2] 满婷婷, 郝晓艳, 刘晓伟, 孙海瑞, 何怡华. 法洛四联症常见心内合并畸形及遗传学异常分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(08): 779-784.
[3] 庄蕙嘉, 岳志成, 钟坤岑, 朱慧莉. 乳腺癌患者生育力保存的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 238-242.
[4] 孙云, 侯海涛, 聂存伟, 马凯丽. 家族性青春期男性乳腺发育症一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 53-54.
[5] 刘路浩, 李国君, 熊韫祎, 陈荣鑫, 尹威, 张磊, 李光辉, 方佳丽, 马俊杰, 陈正. 胰肾联合移植供者来源细胞游离DNA水平变化与术后急性排斥反应的相关研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 353-358.
[6] 郭新宇, 李林强, 杨广超, 张成鹏, 陆朝阳. 无张力疝修补术对男性生殖功能影响的研究进展[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 251-254.
[7] 孙中华, 王晓晗, 接贵涛, 刘淑芳. EGFR突变非小细胞肺癌胸腔积液与外周血ctDNA丰度及EGFR-TKI疗效分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 101-103.
[8] 褚依然, 岳麓. 液体活检技术在肺癌中的应用进展[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 125-127.
[9] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[10] 李峻峰, 李军, 孙勤丰, 孙建光, 孔祥兴. 九例结肠髓样癌的临床病理特征分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 248-252.
[11] 刘骞, 崔巍, 高亦博, 张泽跃, 李典格, 王治杰, 王洁, 赫捷, 中国结直肠癌筛查与早诊早治指南制定专家组. 结直肠肿瘤早诊筛查新策略:基于液体活检技术的筛查方案[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 17-20.
[12] 杨琬芳, 许晶, 张耀方, 王青, 杨智超, 任方刚, 王宏伟. NK和NKT细胞对急性髓系白血病患者的临床影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 932-938.
[13] 汪德海, 李天君, 于磊, 郭昌龙, 方明霞, 高华方, 高建恩, 马旭. 肿瘤患者生殖储备协作网络系统设计与建设[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 84-88.
[14] 吴文诗, 魏宋荃, 李桂民, 郑晓芳, 孙雯, 陈敦金, 余琳. 胎盘植入性疾病患者行子宫部分切除术后再次妊娠的临床研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 180-186.
[15] 于乾雪, 廖学梅, 孙龙龙, 范梦莹, 蒋明超, 孟慧, 李瑞基. 线粒体功能障碍与卵巢早衰的研究进展[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 283-288.
阅读次数
全文


摘要