切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 170 -174. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2020.03.004

所属专题: 文献

医疗援藏·临床研究

慢性肾脏病3~5期非糖尿病非透析患者动脉僵硬度及其对预后的影响
王宓1, 张昕1, 隋准1,(), 白丽1, 王琰1, 左力1, 王梅1   
  1. 1. 100044 北京大学人民医院肾内科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-17 出版日期:2020-03-15
  • 通信作者: 隋准
  • 基金资助:
    中华医学会临床医学科研专项资金(09010050160); 首都卫生发展科研专项项目(首发2011-4022-04)

Impact of arterial stiffness on prognosis in non-diabetic pre-dialysis patients with stages 3-5 chronic kidney disease

Mi Wang1, Xin Zhang1, Zhun Sui1,(), Li Bai1, Yan Wang1, Li Zuo1, Mei Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Nephrology, People's Hospital of Peking University, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2020-02-17 Published:2020-03-15
  • Corresponding author: Zhun Sui
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sui Zhun, Email:
引用本文:

王宓, 张昕, 隋准, 白丽, 王琰, 左力, 王梅. 慢性肾脏病3~5期非糖尿病非透析患者动脉僵硬度及其对预后的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 170-174.

Mi Wang, Xin Zhang, Zhun Sui, Li Bai, Yan Wang, Li Zuo, Mei Wang. Impact of arterial stiffness on prognosis in non-diabetic pre-dialysis patients with stages 3-5 chronic kidney disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 170-174.

目的

检测慢性肾脏病(CKD)3~5期非糖尿病非透析患者动脉僵硬度,并探讨其对患者心脑血管死亡及全因死亡的影响。

方法

纳入北京大学人民医院2006年4月至2012年11月收治的CKD 3~5期非糖尿病非透析住院患者161例,所有患者住院后检测颈-股动脉脉搏波速度(CFPWV)。根据CFPWV水平,将患者分为CFPWV正常组(CFPWV<12 m/s)和CFPWV升高组(CFPWV≥12 m/s),随访入选患者的生存情况。采用Kaplan-Meier法对患者的生存情况进行评价,Cox比例风险回归对影响患者预后的因素进行分析。

结果

平均随访时间为(99.15±49.57)个月。CFPWV升高组心脑血管死亡率及全因病死率均明显高于CFPWV正常组[37.6%(19/51) vs 11.0%(9/82),50.7%(26/51) vs 20.7%(17/82),P均<0.05]。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示CFPWV升高组心脑血管病死率及全因病死率均明显高于CFPWV正常组(P<0.05)。多因素Cox回归分析显示,年龄及CFPWV是患者心血管死亡及全因死亡的独立危险因素,此外,白蛋白及血红蛋白还是全因死亡的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。

结论

高CFPWV的CKD 3~5期非糖尿病非透析患者心脑血管死亡率及全因死亡率均明显高于CFPWV正常的CKD患者,且CFPWV升高是CKD 3~5期非糖尿病非透析患者发生心脑血管死亡及全因死亡的独立危险因素。

Objective

To assess the impact of arterial stiffness on prognosis in non-diabetic pre-dialysis patients with stages 3-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) .

Methods

A total of 161 non-diabetic pre-dialysis patients who suffered from stages 3-5 CKD were enrolled in this study between April 2006 and November 2012. An automatic pulse wave velocity (PWV) measuring system was used to measure carotid-femoral PWV (CFPWV). According to CFPWV level, we divided the patients into a high CFPWV group (CFPWV≥12 m/s) and a normal group (CFPWV<12 m/s). The patients were followed for the occurrence of cardiovascular death and all-cause death. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to identify the risk factors.

Results

The mean follow-up duration was (99.15±49.57) months. The incidence of cardiac-cerebralvascular death and all-cause death was significantly higher in the high CFPWV group than in the control group [37.6% (19/51) vs 11.0% (9/82), 50.7% (26/51) vs 20.7% (17/82), P<0.05]. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis for overall survival and cardiac-cerebral vascular event free survival showed that cardiac-cerebralvascular mortality and all-cause mortality were significantly higher in the high CFPWV group than in the control group (P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that increased CFPWV and age were the independent risk factors for cardiac-cerebralvascular mortality and all-cause mortality, and decreased albumin and hemoglobin were the independent risk factors for all-cause mortality (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The incidence of cardiac-cerebral vascular mortality and all-cause mortality is significantly higher in stages 3-5 CKD patients with elevated CFPWV than in those with normal CFPWV. Elevated CFPWV is one of independent risk factors for cardiac-cerebral vascular mortality and all-cause mortality in non-diabetic pre-dialysis patients with CKD.

表1 CFPWV升高组、CFPWV正常组患者心脑血管死亡率及全因死亡率比较[%(例)]
图1 2组患者心血管死亡率的Kaplan-Meier曲线
图2 2组患者全因死亡的Kaplan-Meier曲线
表2 CKD 3~5期非糖尿病非透析患者发生心血管死亡的多因素Cox分析结果
表3 CKD 3~5期非糖尿病非透析患者全因死亡的多因素Cox分析结果
8
Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ. Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease [J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 1998, 32(5 Suppl 3): S112-S119.
9
Townsend RR, Wimmer NJ, Chirinos JA, et al. Aortic PWV in Chronic Kidney Disease: A CRIC Ancillary Study [J]. Am J Hypertens, 2010, 23(3): 282-289.
10
Blacher J, Guérin AP, Pannier B, et al. Impact of aortic stiffness on survival in end-stage renal disease [J]. Circulation, 1999, 99(18): 2434-2439.
11
Shoji T, Emoto M, Shinohara K, et al. Diabetes mellitus, aortic stiffness, and cardiovascular mortality in end-stage renal disease [J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2001, 12(10): 2117-2124.
12
Zoungas S, Cameron JD, Kerr PG, et al.Association of carotid intima-medial thickness and indices of arterial stiffness with cardiovascular disease outcomes in CKD [J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2007, 50(4): 622-630.
13
Chandra P, Sands RL, Gillespie BW, et al. Relationship between heart rate variability and pulse wave velocity and their association with patient outcomes in chronic kidney disease [J]. Clinical Nephrology, 2014, 81(1): 9-19.
14
Townsend RR, Anderson AH, Chirinos JA, et al. Association of Pulse Wave Velocity With Chronic Kidney Disease Progression and Mortality: Findings From the CRIC Study (Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort) [J]. Hypertension, 2018, 71(6): 1101-1107.
15
Townsend RR. Arterial Stiffness in CKD: A Review of Findings From the CRIC Study [J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2019, 73(2): 240-247.
16
隋准,张昕,王宓. 糖尿病肾病非透析患者动脉僵硬度及其对预后的影响[J]. 重庆医科大学学报, 2018, 43(12): 1609-1612.
1
Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness:methodological issues and clinical applications [J]. Eur Heart J, 2006, 27(21): 2588-2605.
2
Zanoli L, Lentini P, Boutouyrie P, et al. Pulse wave velocity differs between ulcerative colitis and chronic kidney disease [J]. Eur J Intern Med, 2018, 47(1): 36-42.
3
王宓,王梅,芦丽霞,等 .慢性肾脏病非糖尿病非透析患者动脉僵硬度及其相关因素 [J]. 中华肾脏病杂志, 2009, 25(4): 277-281.
4
Haydar AA, Covic A, Colhoun H, et al. Coronary artery calcification and aortic pulse wave velocity in chronic kidney disease patients [J]. Kidney Int, 2004, 65(5): 1790-1794.
5
Aoun S, Blacher J, Safar M, et al. Diabetes mellitus and renal failure: effects on large artery stiffness [J]. J Hum Hypertens, 2001, 15(10): 693-700.
6
王宓,王梅,芦丽霞,等. 慢性肾脏病5期非透析的糖尿病与非糖尿病患者动脉僵硬度的比较 [J]. 北京医学, 2009, 31(3): 155-158.
7
Shoji T, Emoto M, Shinohara K, et al. Diabetes mellitus, aortic stiffness, and cardiovascular mortality in end-stage renal disease [J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2001, 12(10): 2117-2124.
17
贾利敏,张昕,王宓,等. 3-5期慢性肾脏病非透析患者动脉僵硬度及其对预后的影响. 中国实用内科杂志, 2019, 39(12): 1053-1059.
18
Suzuki H, Inoue T, Dogi M, et al. Role of Pulse Wave Velocity in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3-5 on Long-Term Follow-Up [J]. Pulse (Basel), 2014,2(1-4): 1-10.
[1] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[2] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[3] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[4] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[5] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[6] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[7] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[8] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[9] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[10] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[11] 陆萍, 邹健. 凝血和纤维蛋白溶解标志物的动态变化对急性胰腺炎患者预后的评估价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 427-432.
[12] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[13] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[14] 易成, 韦伟, 赵宇亮. 急性肾脏病的概念沿革[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 906-910.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要