切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (08) : 719 -724. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2022.08.003

心身医学·临床研究

S-氯胺酮治疗重度抑郁症疗效、安全性观察及机制讨论
林邹卿1, 徐晓燕2, 曹磊明1, 王志强1, 王国强1,(), 张凯3,()   
  1. 1. 214100 江苏无锡,南京医科大学附属无锡精神卫生中心临床心理科
    2. 214100 江苏无锡,无锡市中医医院临床心理科
    3. 238000 合肥,安徽医科大学附属巢湖医院精神科
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-06 出版日期:2022-08-15
  • 通信作者: 王国强, 张凯
  • 基金资助:
    MICB-NKG2D信号通路参与R氯胺酮抗抑郁作用机制研究(M202010)

Efficacy and safety of S-ketamine in treatment of major depressive disorder

Zouqing Lin1, Xiaoyan Xu2, Leiming Cao1, Zhiqiang Wang1, Guoqiang Wang1,(), Kai Zhang3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Wuxi Mental Health Center, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214100, China
    2. Department of Psychiatry, Wuxi Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuxi 214100, China
    3. Department of Psychiatry, Chaohu Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei 238000, China
  • Received:2021-07-06 Published:2022-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Guoqiang Wang, Kai Zhang
引用本文:

林邹卿, 徐晓燕, 曹磊明, 王志强, 王国强, 张凯. S-氯胺酮治疗重度抑郁症疗效、安全性观察及机制讨论[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(08): 719-724.

Zouqing Lin, Xiaoyan Xu, Leiming Cao, Zhiqiang Wang, Guoqiang Wang, Kai Zhang. Efficacy and safety of S-ketamine in treatment of major depressive disorder[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(08): 719-724.

目的

本研究目的是观察S-氯胺酮治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)疗效、安全性,并初步探讨S-氯胺酮抗抑郁及可能的急性副反应的机制。

方法

采用治疗前后对照的方法,于2020年10月至2021年12月在无锡市精神卫生中心临床心理科、无锡市中医医院临床心理科以及安徽医科大学附属巢湖医院精神科招募首发或复发的MDD患者40例,受试者入组后被随机归入使用S-氯胺酮联合抗抑郁药治疗组(研究组,20例)和生理盐水加抗抑郁药组(对照组,20例)。S-氯胺酮按0.4 mg/kg单次静脉微量泵缓慢注射给药。分别在S-氯胺酮或生理盐水给药前、给药后24 h、1周末、4周末时采用蒙哥马利抑郁评定量表(MADRS)等评估患者症状;采用6项临床解离症状量表评估患者解离症状。采用重复测量方差分析比较研究组和对照组治疗前后症状评分差异,当P<0.05时,认为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

研究组和对照组经治疗均出现MARDS评分下降趋势,并且2组存在分组差异(P<0.05);研究组评分在24 h,1周末和4周末时均优于对照组,其中24 h差异最显著。在S-氯胺酮给药24 h后,有5例患者(25%)达到了完全缓解(MADRS≤10),另有5例患者达到有效缓解(MARDS降分≥30%),9例患者部分缓解。

结论

S-氯胺酮是一种快速、有效、安全的新型抗抑郁药,单次小剂量静脉用药也有较好的疗效。

Objective

To observe the efficacy and safety of S-ketamine in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), and to preliminarily explore the mechanism of antidepressant and possible acute side effects of S-ketamine.

Methods

From October 2020 to December 2021, 40 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent MDD were recruited at the Department of Clinical Psychology of Wuxi Mental Health Center, the Department of Clinical Psychology of Wuxi Hospital of traditional Chinese Medicine, and the Department of Psychiatry of Chaohu Hospital affiliated to Anhui Medical University. The subjects were randomly divided into either a study group, which was treated with S-ketamine combined with antidepressants (n=20), or a control group (n=20), which was treated with normal saline combined with antidepressants. S-ketamine was administered at 0.4 mg/kg by single injection with a micropump. The symptoms of patients were evaluated by the Montgomery-?sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) before the administration of S-ketamine or normal saline and at 24 hours, 1 week, and 4 weeks after administration. The dissociative effects were evaluated by 6-item clinician administered dissociative symptom scale. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare the differences in symptom scores pre- and post-treatment between the two groups. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The scores of MARDS decreased after treatment in both group, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). The MARDS score of the study group was better than that of the control group at 24 hours, 1 week, and 4 weeks, among which the 24-hour difference was the most significant. Twenty-four hours after administration of S-ketamine, five patients achieved complete remission (MADRS score ≤10), five achieved remarked remission (MARDS scores decreased by ≥30% from baseline), and nine achieved partial remission.

Conclusion

S-ketamine is a rapid, effective, and safe new antidepressant, and single low-dose intravenous administration has a good effect.

表1 一般信息比较(
xˉ
±s
表2 研究组与对照组蒙哥马利量表评分结果(
xˉ
±s
表3 研究组与对照组蒙哥马利量表评分多变量检验结果
图1 研究组与对照组蒙哥马利量表评分边际平均值变化趋势示例图
1
Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report [J]. Am J Psychiatry, 2006, 163(11): 1905-1917.
2
Murrough J-W, Iosifescu D-V, Chang L-C, et al. Antidepressant efficacy of ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression: a two-site randomized controlled trial [J]. Am J Psychiatry, 2013, 170(10): 1134-1142.
3
Correia-Melo FS, Leal GC, Vieira F, et al. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive therapy using esketamine or racemic ketamine for adult treatment-resistant depression: A randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study [J]. J Affect Disord, 2020, 264: 527-534.
4
Xu Y, Hackett M, Carter G, et al. Effects of low-dose and very low-dose ketamine among patients with major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol, 2016, 19(4): pyv124.
5
Traynor K. Esketamine nasal spray approved for treatment-resistant depression [J]. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2019, 76(9): 573.
6
Li N, Lee B, Liu RJ, et al. mTOR-dependent synapse formation underlies the rapid antidepressant effects of NMDA antagonists [J]. Science, 2010, 329(5994): 959-964.
7
Koike H, Chaki S. Requirement of AMPA receptor stimulation for the sustained antidepressant activity of ketamine and LY341495 during the forced swim test in rats [J]. Behav Brain Res, 2014, 271: 111-5.
8
Milak M-S, Proper C-J, Mulhern S-T, et al. A pilot in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of amino acid neurotransmitter response to ketamine treatment of major depressive disorder [J]. Molecular psychiatry, 2016, 21(3): 320-327.
9
Cornwell BR, Salvadore G, Furey M, et al. Synaptic potentiation is critical for rapid antidepressant response to ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression [J]. Biol Psychiatry, 2012, 72(7): 555-561.
10
Rodrigues NB, McIntyre RS, Lipsitz O, et al. A simplified 6-Item clinician administered dissociative symptom scale (CADSS-6) for monitoring dissociative effects of sub-anesthetic ketamine infusions [J]. J Affect Disord, 2021, 282: 160-164.
11
Singh Jaskaran-B, Maggie Fedgchin, Ella Daly, et al. Intravenous esketamine in adult treatment-resistant depression: a double-blind, double-randomization, placebo-controlled study [J]. Biol Psychiatry, 2016, 80(6): 424-431.
12
Wilkinson S-T, Ballard E-D, Bloch M-H, et al. The effect of a single dose of intravenous ketamine on suicidal ideation: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis [J]. Am J Psychiatry, 2018, 175(2): 150-158.
13
Basso L, Bönke L, Aust S, et al. Antidepressant and neurocognitive effects of serial ketamine administration versus ECT in depressed patients [J]. J Psychiatr Res, 2020, 123: 1-8.
14
Marije Aan Het Rot, Katherine-A Collins, James-W Murrough, et al. Safety and efficacy of repeated-dose intravenous ketamine for treatment-resistant depression [J]. Biological Psychiatry, 2010, 67(2): 139-145.
15
Lodge DJ, Grace AA. Aberrant hippocampal activity underlies the dopamine dysregulation in an animal model of schizophrenia [J]. J Neurosci, 2007, 27(42): 11424-11430.
16
Zarate CAJr, Singh JB, Carlson PJ, et al. A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression [J]. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2006, 63(8): 856-864.
17
Yang C, Shirayama Y, Zhang JC, et al. R-ketamine: a rapid-onset and sustained antidepressant without psychotomimetic side effects [J]. Transl Psychiatry, 2015, 5(9): e632.
18
Yang C, Han M, Zhang JC, et al. Loss of parvalbumin-immunoreactivity in mouse brain regions after repeated intermittent administration of esketamine, but not R-ketamine [J]. Psychiatry Res, 2016, 239: 281-283.
19
Hashimoto K, Kakiuchi T, Ohba H, et al. Reduction of dopamine D2/3 receptor binding in the striatum after a single administration of esketamine, but not R-ketamine: a PET study in conscious monkeys [J]. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 2017, 267(2): 173-176.
20
Farber NB. The NMDA receptor hypofunction model of psychosis [J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2003, 1003: 119-130.
[1] 张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[2] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[3] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[4] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[5] 汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞. 胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.
[6] 熊风, 林辉煌, 陈晓波. 铥激光在泌尿外科中的临床应用及研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 533-536.
[7] 王峰杰, 王礼光, 廖珊, 刘颖, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性与疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 517-522.
[8] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[9] 邰清亮, 施波, 侍新宇, 陈国梁, 陈俊杰, 武冠廷, 王索, 孙金兵, 顾闻, 叶建新, 何宋兵. 腹腔镜次全结肠切除术治疗顽固性慢传输型便秘的疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 478-483.
[10] 徐红莉, 杨钰琳, 薛清, 张茜, 马丽虹, 邱振刚. 体外冲击波治疗非特异性腰痛疗效的系统评价和Meta分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 307-314.
[11] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[12] 高显奎, 赵太云, 陆兴俊, 张洪领, 房修罗, 闫碧春, 王胤, 王永翠, 刘苗苗, 冉若男. 内镜电凝止血与组织胶注射治疗上消化道溃疡伴出血的疗效观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 452-455.
[13] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[14] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 冯健, 安峰铎, 李强, 谈明坤, 赵娜, 冷建军. 局部晚期右半结肠癌行结肠癌根治联合胰十二指肠切除术疗效分析:附5例报告[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-670.
[15] 李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要