切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 149 -153. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2023.02.007

临床研究

腹腔镜全子宫切除术对子宫肌瘤患者机体氧化应激损伤及术后并发症的影响
孙凤兰, 周萍, 程兴璞, 张倩倩()   
  1. 232007 安徽淮南,安徽理工大学第一附属医院妇科
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-12 出版日期:2023-02-15
  • 通信作者: 张倩倩

Effect of laparoscopic total hysterectomy on oxidative stress injury and postoperative complications in patients with uterine fibroids

Fenglan Sun, Ping Zhou, Xingpu Cheng, Qianqian Zhang()   

  1. Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Technology, Huai'nan 232007, China
  • Received:2022-05-12 Published:2023-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Qianqian Zhang
引用本文:

孙凤兰, 周萍, 程兴璞, 张倩倩. 腹腔镜全子宫切除术对子宫肌瘤患者机体氧化应激损伤及术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 149-153.

Fenglan Sun, Ping Zhou, Xingpu Cheng, Qianqian Zhang. Effect of laparoscopic total hysterectomy on oxidative stress injury and postoperative complications in patients with uterine fibroids[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(02): 149-153.

目的

探讨腹腔镜全子宫切除术对子宫肌瘤患者机体氧化应激损伤和术后并发症的影响。

方法

选择安徽理工大学第一附属医院妇科于2019年6月~2021年6月收治的子宫肌瘤患者102例,依据手术方法不同分为腹腔镜组与开腹组,各51例。腹腔镜组行腹腔镜全子宫切除术治疗,开腹组行开腹全子宫切除术治疗。比较2组手术指标和术后并发症情况,术前和术后3天机体氧化应激损伤指标,术前和术后3个月卵巢功能变化。

结果

腹腔镜组子宫肌瘤患者术中出血量少于开腹组,术后排气时间快于开腹组,手术时间短于开腹组(P<0.05)。腹腔镜组子宫肌瘤患者术后并发症少于开腹组(P<0.05)。2组术后3天子宫肌瘤患者氢氧根离子(OH-)、超氧阴离子(O-)、丙二醛(MDA)、皮质醇(Cor)水平较术前升高(P<0.05);腹腔镜组术后3天子宫肌瘤患者OH-、O-、MDA和Cor水平低于开腹组(P<0.05)。2组术后3个月子宫肌瘤患者血清雌二醇(E2)水平较术前降低,而促卵泡激素(FSH)、黄体生成素(LH)水平较术前升高(P<0.05);腹腔镜组术后3个月子宫肌瘤患者血清E2水平高于开腹组,而FSH和LH水平低于开腹组(P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜全子宫切除术对子宫肌瘤患者机体氧化应激损伤和卵巢功能影响小,且术后并发症少,安全性良好。

Objective

To investigate the effect of laparoscopic hysterectomy on oxidative stress injury and postoperative complications in patients with uterine fibroids.

Methods

A total of 102 patients with uterine fibroids admitted to the Department of Gynecology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Science and Technology from June 2019 to June 2021 were selected. According to the surgical method used, they were divided into a laparoscopic surgery group and open surgery group, with 51 cases in each group. Laparoscopic total hysterectomy was performed in the laparoscopic surgery group, and open total hysterectomy was performed in the open surgery group. The surgical indicators and postoperative complications, the oxidative stress damage indicators before and 3 days after the operation, and the changes in ovarian function before and 3 months after the operation were compared between the two groups.

Results

Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less, and time to postoperative exhaust time and operation time were significantly shorter in the laparoscopic surgery group than in the open surgery group (P<0.05). Postoperative complications were significantly less in the open surgery group (P<0.05). The levels of hydroxide ion (OH-), superoxide anion (O-), malondialdehyde (MDA), and cortisol (Cor) at 3 days after operation were higher those before operation in both groups (P<0.05); the levels of OH-, O-, MDA, and Cor at 3 days after operation were significantly lower in the laparoscopic surgery group than in the open surgery group (P<0.05). E2 level at 3 months after operation was significantly lower and FSH and LH levels were significantly higher than those before operation in both groups (P<0.05); serum E2 level at 3 months after operation was significantly higher and the levels of FSH and LH were significantly lower in the laparoscopic surgery group than in the open surgery group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic total hysterectomy has little effect on oxidative stress damage and ovarian function in patients with uterine fibroids, and it has fewer postoperative complications with good safety.

表1 2组子宫肌瘤患者手术指标比较(
x¯
±s
表2 2组子宫肌瘤患者术后并发症比较
表3 2组子宫肌瘤患者机体氧化应激损伤指标比较(
x¯
±s
表4 2组子宫肌瘤患者卵巢功能变化比较(
x¯
±s
1
Gomez E, Nguyen MLT, Fursevich D, et al. MRI-based pictorial review of the FIGO classification system for uterine fibroids [J]. Abdom Radiol, 2021, 46(5): 2146-2155.
2
Chen YQ, Lin MY, Guo P, et al. Uterine fibroids increase the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a prospective cohort study [J]. J Hypertens, 2021, 39(5): 1002-1008.
3
林琳, 牛华, 任红莲. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫肌瘤患者的疗效对比及对免疫功能的影响 [J]. 贵州医药, 2021, 45(1): 67-68.
4
阙兴芹, 姚婷婷, 范玉兰, 等. 阴式与开腹全子宫切除术在治疗子宫肌瘤中的临床效果比较 [J]. 检验医学与临床, 2016, 13(8): 1121-1123.
5
Kotani Y, Murakami K, Fujishima R, et al. Research Article Quality of life after laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy [J]. BMC Womens Health, 2021, 21(1): 219.
6
Ishidera Y, Furugori M, Hirata G, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for anterior cervical Myoma: Possible Significance of presurgical assessment by magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther, 2021, 10(1): 61-64.
7
Aninye IO, Laitner MH. Uterine Fibroids: Assessing unmet needs from bench to bedside [J]. J Womens Health, 2021, 30(8): 1060-1067.
8
Cai E, Shao YH, Suathana E, et al. A case series of patients with large uterine fibroids and venous thromboembolisms [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2021, 43(3): 352-360.
9
王蓓玉. 268例围绝经期妇女子宫肌瘤流行病学调查及危险因素分析 [J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2018, 33(16): 3737-3740.
10
王玉琴, 蔡婉静, 李振阁, 等. 海口市女性体检人群子宫肌瘤检出情况及影响因素研究 [J]. 华南预防医学, 2021, 47(5): 642-644.
11
陈宇东, 梁少凤. 经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统多孔腹腔镜手术治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效及术后康复效果比较 [J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2021, 29(10): 1760-1765.
12
李红, 王莉. 腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术与全子宫切除术治疗围绝经期子宫肌瘤对患者卵巢功能的影响研究 [J]. 贵州医药, 2021, 45(10): 1554-1555.
13
宋玮, 刘华. 垂体后叶素联合腹腔镜切除术治疗良性子宫肌瘤疗效及安全性 [J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2021, 29(9): 1854-1857.
14
Miyabe U, Kanayama N. Hand-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterine fibroids [J]. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther, 2019, 8(3): 123-128.
15
吴海燕, 徐瑶, 徐蕾, 等. 经脐单孔腹腔镜与多孔腹腔镜对子宫肌瘤患者NRS评分及卵巢功能的影响 [J]. 川北医学院学报, 2022, 37(1): 88-91.
16
彭春潮, 曾和清, 周荣胜. 不同剂量羟考酮超前镇痛对经腹子宫肌瘤剔除术术后疼痛及应激反应的影响 [J]. 山西医药杂志, 2018, 47(5): 498-501.
[1] 马桥桥, 张传开, 郭开今, 蒋涛, 王子豪, 刘勇, 郝亮. 可降解止血粉减少初次全膝关节置换术失血量的研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 585-589.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[8] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[9] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[10] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[11] 王维花, 王楠, 乔庆, 罗红. 完全腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术两种腔内消化道重建方案对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 574-577.
[12] 李康虎, 王继伟, 王光远. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术后并发症及防治进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 369-375.
[13] 李澄清, 郭文毅, 王磊. 腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术:微创胰腺外科的合理决策[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 620-624.
[14] 罗柳平, 吴萌萌, 陈欣磊, 林科灿. 胰腺全系膜切除在胰头癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 651-656.
[15] 韩青雷, 丛赟, 李佳隆, 邵英梅. 术前减黄方式对壶腹周围癌胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 665-669.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?