切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 507 -512. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2023.05.002

临床研究

股骨前皮质切割在前、后参考系统全膝关节置换术中发生的对比研究及锯片摆动偏差分析
刘新光, 杨滨(), 刘晨, 王晓华, 张克   
  1. 102206 北京,北京大学国际医院骨科部
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-01 出版日期:2023-05-15
  • 通信作者: 杨滨
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学国际医院院内科研基金(YN2021QN08)

A comparative study of incidence of anterior femoral notching during total knee arthroplasty using anterior versus posterior reference system and analysis of cutting error caused by oscillation of saw blade

Xinguang Liu, Bin Yang(), Chen Liu, Xiaohua Wang, Ke Zhang   

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 102206, China
  • Received:2023-03-01 Published:2023-05-15
  • Corresponding author: Bin Yang
引用本文:

刘新光, 杨滨, 刘晨, 王晓华, 张克. 股骨前皮质切割在前、后参考系统全膝关节置换术中发生的对比研究及锯片摆动偏差分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 507-512.

Xinguang Liu, Bin Yang, Chen Liu, Xiaohua Wang, Ke Zhang. A comparative study of incidence of anterior femoral notching during total knee arthroplasty using anterior versus posterior reference system and analysis of cutting error caused by oscillation of saw blade[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 507-512.

目的

对比前、后参考系统全膝关节置换术(TKA)中股骨前皮质切割的发生情况,并通过计算截骨时因锯片在截骨导向器导槽内上下摆动产生的截骨偏差以探寻前皮质切割发生的原因。

方法

选取2015年9月至2020年12月在北京大学国际医院骨科因原发性膝关节骨关节炎行初次TKA的连续病例资料并进行回顾性分析。依据股骨假体的测量方式,将患者分为前参考组和后参考组,对比2组术后膝关节侧位X线的前皮质切割发生情况。测量截骨导向器的导槽深度和高度、摆锯锯片厚度和切入骨内长度,计算锯片的最大摆动幅度和前皮质最大切割深度。

结果

患者共纳入膝195例、239例,前参考组膝107例,后参考组膝132例。前、后参考组的前皮质切割发生率分别为26.2%、18.9%;Tayside分级Ⅲ级及Ⅳ级的发生率分别为4.7%、6.1%。2组间前皮质切割发生率(χ2=1.789,P=0.181)、Ⅲ级及Ⅳ级前皮质切割发生率(χ2=0.221,P=0.638)的差异无统计学意义。当锯片切入骨内长度为5 cm时,前参考组的锯片最大摆动幅度为2.98 mm,前皮质最大切割深度为0.75 mm;后参考组的锯片最大摆动幅度为3.15 mm,前皮质最大切割深度为0.80 mm。

结论

在避免前皮质切割方面,前参考系统并未比后参考系统更具有优势,原因在于后参考系统股骨假体的特殊设计。包括锯片在导槽内上下摆动在内的多种因素所引起的截骨偏差在前皮质切割发生中起到了重要作用。

Objective

To compare the incidence of anterior femoral notching in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the anterior versus posterior reference system, and to investigate the reason of anterior femoral notching by calculating the cutting error caused during osteotomy by the oscillation of saw blade through the guide-slot.

Methods

Patients who underwent TKA for primary osteoarthritis between September 2015 and December 2020 were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into either an anterior reference group or a posterior reference group according to the femoral component sizing method used. The incidence of anterior femoral notching was compared between the two groups according to the Tayside classification on postoperative lateral X-ray images of the knee joint. The height and depth of the slot as well as the thickness and the cutting length of saw blade were measured. The maximum oscillatory amplitude of blade and the maximum cutting depth of the anterior cortex were calculated using the measured value of the slot height, slot depth and saw blade thickness.

Results

A total of 195 patients (239 knees) were enrolled in the study with 107 and 132 knees in the anterior and posterior reference groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of general anterior femoral notching (26.2% vs 18.9%, χ2=1.789, P=0.181) or the incidence of severe anterior femoral notching (Tayside grades Ⅲ and Ⅳ; 4.7% vs 6.1%, χ2=0.221, P=0.638). The maximum oscillatory amplitude of blade and the maximum cutting depth of the anterior cortex at a cutting length of 5 cm were 2.98 mm and 0.75 mm in the anterior reference group and 3.15 mm and 0.80 mm in the posterior reference group, respectively.

Conclusion

The anterior reference system does not seem to be definite advantages over the posterior reference system in avoiding anterior femoral notching during TKA. The reason may be the special design of the femoral prosthesis of the posterior reference system. The cutting error caused by the oscillation of saw blade in the guide-slot during osteotomy and other factors may play an important role in leading to anterior femoral notching.

图1 全膝关节置换术患者影像学测量图。图a为前髁厚度(实箭头):前皮质切线与前髁顶点的垂直距离;后髁厚度(虚箭头):后皮质切线与后髁顶点的垂直距离;图b为股骨远端外侧角(LDFA,双实箭头):股骨内外髁切线与股骨机械轴之间的夹角;髋-膝-踝角(HKA,双虚箭头):股骨和胫骨机械轴之间的夹角;LDFA为股骨远端外侧角;HKA为髋-膝-踝角
图2 截骨偏差的计算示意图。a为导槽深度;b为锯片厚度;c为导槽高度;d为锯片切入骨内长度;e为锯片最大摆动幅度;f为前皮质最大切割深度
表1 2组全膝关节置换术患者的一般资料
图3 2组锯片最大摆动幅度随锯片切入骨内长度的变化
图4 2组前皮质最大切割深度随锯片切入骨内长度的变化
1
Minarro JC, Urbano-Luque MT, Lopez-Jordan A, et al. Is the fracture pattern in periprosthetic fractures around the knee related with the anterior femoral notch? [J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2018, 9(4): 289-291.
2
Gujarathi N, Putti AB, Abboud RJ, et al. Risk of periprosthetic fracture after anterior femoral notching [J]. Acta Orthop, 2009, 80(5): 553-556.
3
Puranik HG, Mukartihal R, Patil SS, et al. Does femoral notching during total knee arthroplasty influence periprosthetic fracture. A prospective study [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2019, 34(6): 1244-1249.
4
Ritter MA, Thong AE, Keating EM, et al. The effect of femoral notching during total knee arthroplasty on the prevalence of postoperative femoral fractures and on clinical outcome [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005, 87(11): 2411-2414.
5
Lesh ML, Schneider DJ, Deol G, et al. The consequences of anterior femoral notching in total knee arthroplasty. A biomechanical study [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2000, 82(8): 1096-1101.
6
Zalzal P, Backstein D, Gross AE, et al. Notching of the anterior femoral cortex during total knee arthroplasty characteristics that increase local stresses [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2006, 21(5): 737-743.
7
Kawahara S, Mawatari T, Iwamoto Y, et al. Femoral sizer design can increase anterior notching during total knee arthroplasty [J]. Knee, 2016, 23(5): 890-894.
8
Page SR, Pinzuti JB, Deakin AH, et al. Profile of the distal femur anterior cortex-a computer-assisted cadaveric study [J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2011, 97(8): 821-825.
9
Shekhar A, Chandra Krishna C, Patil S, et al. Does increased femoral component size options reduce anterior femoral notching in total knee replacement? [J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2020, 11(Suppl 2): S223-S227.
10
Choudhury P, Billings SJ, Bestic JM, et al. Radiologists should use the hip-knee-ankle angle rather than the mechanical axis deviation to describe knee alignment [J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2023, 52(6): 1159-1167.
11
Thienpont E, Schwab PE, Cornu O, et al. Bone morphotypes of the varus and valgus knee [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2017, 137(3): 393-400.
12
Fokin AA, Heekin RD. Anterior referencing versus posterior referencing in total knee arthroplasty [J]. J Knee Surg, 2014, 27(4): 303-308.
13
Charette RS, Sheth NP, Boettner F, et al. Femoral component sizing during total knee arthroplasty: anterior versus posterior referencing [J]. JBJS Rev, 2018, 6(1): e4.
14
Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, et al. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2002, 84(1): 50-53.
15
Otani T, Whiteside LA, White SE. Cutting errors in preparation of femoral components in total knee arthroplasty [J]. J Arthroplasty, 1993, 8(5): 503-510.
16
Macdonald W, Styf J, Carlsson LV, et al. Improved tibial cutting accuracy in knee arthroplasty [J]. Med Eng Phys, 2004, 26(9): 807-812.
[1] 吴香敏, 吴鹏. 超声引导下收肌管阻滞联合腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙阻滞在老年患者全膝关节置换术中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 516-522.
[2] 邢浩, 刘强, 吴斗, 梁乐乐, 王凯. 膝关节假体周围胫骨骨折研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2019, 14(01): 67-70.
[3] 付庆鹏, 邓晓强, 高伟, 姜福民, 范永峰, 吴海贺, 齐岩松, 包呼日查, 徐永胜. 新型股骨测量定位器在全膝关节置换术中的临床应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 980-987.
[4] 齐岩松, 吴海贺, 徐永胜, 王一帆. 外翻膝患者全膝关节置换术中股骨远端外翻截骨应用的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(07): 552-555.
[5] 程爱, 何万军, 张艳. 从患肌角度探讨浮针在全膝关节置换术后康复中的临床思路[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2021, 10(04): 161-164.
[6] 王月鹏, 杨溯, 秦石磊, 韩鹏飞, 徐云峰. 间隙平衡与测量截骨技术对全膝关节置换术疗效影响的Meta分析[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2022, 09(04): 30-39.
阅读次数
全文


摘要