切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (11) : 1000 -1006. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2024.11.005

临床研究

VEGF、IL-6 在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征诊断及手术治疗中的价值
龚何燕1, 戴俊1, 杨惠明1, 李硕1, 徐敏2, 宋红毛1,(), 怀德1,()   
  1. 1.223022 江苏淮安,徐州医科大学附属淮安医院(淮安市第二人民医院)耳鼻咽喉头颈外科
    2.223022 江苏淮安,徐州医科大学附属淮安医院(淮安市第二人民医院)影像科
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-07 出版日期:2024-11-15
  • 通信作者: 宋红毛, 怀德
  • 基金资助:
    淮安市基础研究计划(联合专项)卫生健康类项目(项目编号:HABL2023078)江苏省淮安市2023 科技创新计划(项目编号:HAP202304)淮安市2022 年度自然科学研究计划(项目编号:HAB202213)江苏省第五期“333工程”资助项目(项目编号:BRA2017239)

Value of VEGF and IL-6 in diagnosis and surgical treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apneahypopnea syndrome

HeYan Gong1, Jun Dai1, Huiming Yang1, Shuo Li1, Min Xu2, Hongmao Song1,(), De Huai1,()   

  1. 1.Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Huai’an Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University (Huai’an Second People’s Hospital), Huai’an 223022, China
    2.Department of Imaging, Huai’an Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University (Huai’an Second People’s Hospital), Huai’an 223022, China
  • Received:2024-09-07 Published:2024-11-15
  • Corresponding author: Hongmao Song, De Huai
引用本文:

龚何燕, 戴俊, 杨惠明, 李硕, 徐敏, 宋红毛, 怀德. VEGF、IL-6 在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征诊断及手术治疗中的价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(11): 1000-1006.

HeYan Gong, Jun Dai, Huiming Yang, Shuo Li, Min Xu, Hongmao Song, De Huai. Value of VEGF and IL-6 in diagnosis and surgical treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apneahypopnea syndrome[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(11): 1000-1006.

目的

探讨血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、炎症因子(IL-6)在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)患者诊断及手术治疗中的价值。

方法

选取2022 年6 月~ 2023 年8 月就诊于徐州医科大学附属淮安医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科的225 例成人OSAHS 手术患者。收集所有患者的一般资料,并检测术前、术后1 周、术后6 个月、术后1 年血清VEGF 和IL-6。采用Logsitic 逐步回归法计算VEGF、IL-6 联合预测OSAHS 患者改善情况的概率值,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价各项指标,通过单项检测和联合检测预测OSAHS 患者合并VEGF 及IL-6 水平变化的效能。

结果

与轻度组和中度组相比,重度组患者男性比例更高(81.7%,P=0.048),体重、颈围存在组间差异,重度组的中位体重更高[83(75,90),P=0.023]、颈围更大[42.0(40.0,45.0),P=0.002]。且术前AHI、最低血氧饱和度、平均血氧饱和度、Stop-Bang 评分和Epworth 嗜睡量表等临床参数在各组间均显示出显著差异。重度组在术后各个时间点的VEGF 和IL-6 水平均高于轻度组和中度组,且各时间点、各组内,VEGF、IL-6 均表现出与OSAHS 相关指标有较高相关性。VEGF、IL-6 单项检测和联合检测预测OSAHS 患者的术后6 个月疗效ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.746、0.781,联合预测模型的AUC 为0.787。术后1 年疗效ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.691、0.723,联合预测模型的AUC 为0.740。与轻中度组患者相比,重度组出现术后并发症人数较多,但差异无统计学意义。

结论

VEGF、IL-6 对预测OSAHS 患者术前病情严重程度及术后预后效果具有重大意义,两者联合临床指标对OSAHS 的诊断及治疗预测效能更高。

Objective

To assess the value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome(OSAHS).

Methods

A total of 225 adult OSAHS patients who underwent surgery at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Huaian Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University from June 2022 to August 2023 were included in this study. The patients were divided into severe, moderate, and mild groups based on the severity of OSAHS. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and serum levels of VEGF and IL-6 were measured preoperatively and one week, six months, and one year post-surgery. Logistic stepwise regression was employed to assess the predictive ability of combined VEGF and IL-6 levels for postoperative improvement. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of these biomarkers.

Results

Patients with severe OSAHS had a significantly higher male-to-female ratio (81.7%, P=0.048) compared to those with mild and moderate OSAHS. Additionally,patients with severe OSAHS exhibited significantly greater median weight [83 kg (75, 90), P=0.023] and neck circumference [42.0 cm (40.0, 45.0), P=0.002]. Preoperative metrics, including the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), minimum and average oxygen saturation, Stop-Bang score, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, showed significant differences among the groups. Postoperatively, VEGF and IL-6 levels in the severe group remained elevated compared to the mild and moderate groups at all time points, demonstrating a strong correlation with OSAHS-related parameters. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for predicting sixmonth postoperative efficacy was 0.746 for VEGF, 0.781 for IL-6, and 0.787 for the combined model. For predicting one-year postoperative efficacy, the AUC was 0.691 for VEGF, 0.723 for IL-6, and 0.740 for the combined model. Although the severe group experienced a higher incidence of postoperative complications,the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

VEGF and IL-6 are significant biomarkers in assessing the severity and prognosis of OSAHS. The combined use of these biomarkers, alongside clinical indicators, enhances diagnostic accuracy and prognostic precision in the management of OSAHS.

表1 基线人口学特征表[例(%)]
特征 组别 H P2
全部(n=225)1 轻度组(n=44)1 中度组(n=55)1 重度组(n=126)1
性别 6.08 0.048
男性 170(75.6) 29(65.9) 38(69.1) 103(81.7)
女性 55(24.4) 15(34.1) 17(30.9) 23(18.3)
年龄(岁) 42(34,53) 43(35,54) 46(35,54) 42(34,52) 0.76 0.683
身高(cm) 1.70(1.65,1.75) 1.70(1.65,1.73) 1.70(1.64,1.74) 1.72(1.67,1.75) 5.01 0.082
体重(kg) 80(73,90) 76(71,85) 80(70,90) 83(75,90) 7.51 0.023
BMI(kg/cm2 28.1(25.7,30.3) 26.7(24.5,29.8) 28.2(25.3,30.5) 28.4(26.3,30.6) 4.85 0.088
颈围(cm) 42.0(40.0,45.0) 40.0(38.0,42.0) 42.0(39.0,45.0) 42.0(40.0,45.0) 12.43 0.002
腹围(cm) 100(96,105) 99(91,104) 100(95,104) 101(97,109) 4.01 0.135
颈腹比 0.42(0.40,0.45) 0.42(0.39,0.45) 0.42(0.40,0.45) 0.42(0.40,0.45) 0.12 0.943
合并高血压 4.05 0.132
120(53.3) 28(63.6) 32(58.2) 60(47.6)
105(46.7) 16(36.4) 23(41.8) 66(52.4)
合并糖尿病 2.16 0.339
49(21.8) 11(25.0) 15(27.3) 23(18.3)
176(78.2) 33(75.0) 40(72.7) 103(81.7)
术前AHI(次/h) 33(20,54) 11(8,13) 25(20,26) 52(40,67) 179.72 <0.001
术前最低血氧饱和度(%) 72(63,81) 82(76,87) 78(73,82) 68(59,73) 60.17 <0.001
术前平均血氧饱和度(%) 93.5(89.6,95.1) 95.2(93.4,96.0) 93.9(92.0,95.3) 92.2(88.8,94.2) 30.59 <0.001
术前Stop-Bang评分 4.00(3.00,6.00) 3.00(2.00,4.00) 4.00(3.00,5.00) 5.00(4.00,6.00) 51.14 <0.001
术前Epworth嗜睡量表 8.0(5.0,12.0) 5.0(4.0,6.3) 7.0(5.0,9.0) 11.0(7.0,14.0) 63.65 <0.001
表2 VEGF、IL-6 各组间差异表
图1 术后6 个月VEGF、IL-6 预测改善情况的ROC 曲线 注:VEGF 为血管内皮生长因子;IL-6 为白介素-6
图2 术后1 年VEGF、IL-6 预测改善情况的ROC 曲线 注:VEGF 为血管内皮生长因子;IL-6 为白介素-6
表3 VEGF、IL-6 单项检测联合检测和联合诊断模型判断OSAHS 的价值
表4 各组间术后并发症出现情况[例(%)]
1
Benjafield AV, Ayas NT, Eastwood PR, et al. Estimation of the global prevalence and burden of obstructive sleep apnoea: a literature-based analysis [J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2019, 7(8): 687-698.
2
黄乃磊, 张继华, 王娜. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者多普勒超声下颈动脉斑块特征与鼾声响度、低氧血症及咽腔结构的相关性研究 [J]. 中国医学装备, 2023, 20(5): 88-93.
3
Patel SR. Obstructive Sleep Apnea [J]. Ann Intern Med, 2019, 171(11):ITC81-ITC96.
4
Tondo P, Fanfulla F, Sabato R, et al. Obstructive sleep apnoeahypopnoea syndrome: state of the art [J]. Minerva Med, 2023, 114(1):74-89.
5
许乘铭, 杭文璐, 陈雷, 等. 全身炎症反应指数联合纤维蛋白原对OSAHS 合并高血压的预测价值 [J]. 国际呼吸杂志, 2024, 44(7):831-837.
6
中华医学会, 中华医学会杂志社, 中华医学会全科医学分会,等.成人阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停基层诊疗指南(2018 年) [J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2019, (1): 21-29.
7
Miskedaki A, Bacopoulou F, Vlachakis D, et al. Validation of the STOP-Bang questionnaire in Greek patients suffering from obstructive sleep apnea [J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2021, 1337: 77-82.
8
张克, 杨占奇, 闫维, 等. 持续气道正压通气对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者发生心脑血管事件的影响 [J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(5): 433-440.
9
Rundo JV. Obstructive sleep apnea basics [J]. Cleve Clin J Med, 2019,86(9 Suppl 1): 2-9.
10
陈婕, 郭裕, 关建. 痰瘀互结型OSA 患者舌体与多导睡眠图监测指标的相关性研究 [J]. 中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志, 2024,32(1): 42-45.
11
Parakh A, Dhingra D, Abel F. Sleep studies in children [J]. Indian Pediatr, 2021, 58(11): 1085-1090.
12
吕梦, 王宇清. 儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征筛查诊断的研究进展 [J] .国际儿科学杂志, 2022, 49(2): 104-108.
13
秦丽霞, 陆巧, 李哲. 首次CPAP 压力滴定对有和无日间嗜睡OSAHS 患者的治疗效果差异及分析 [J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2023,28(4): 584-589.
14
许镇斌, 杨小雄, 庄燕云, 等. OSAHS 患者应用改良悬雍垂腭咽成形术治疗的效果观察 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(12):1656-1660.
15
Li X, Fu Z, Xu H, et al. Influence of multiple apolipoprotein A-I and B genetic variations on insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome in obstructive sleep apnea [J]. Nutr Metab, 2020, 17: 83.
16
宋建波, 韩俊伟, 周敏, 等. 血管内皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂致蛋白尿风险的荟萃分析 [J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(12): 1297-1303.
17
Yi M, Zhao W, Fei Q, et al. Causal analysis between altered levels of interleukins and obstructive sleep apnea [J]. Front Immunol, 2022, 13:888644.
18
Rose-John S, Jenkins BJ, Garbers C, et al. Targeting IL-6 transsignalling: past, present and future prospects [J]. Nat Rev Immunol,2023, 23(10): 666-681.
19
Yoo SA, Kwok SK, Kim WU. Proinflammatory role of vascular endothelial growth factor in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis:prospects for therapeutic intervention [J]. Mediat Inflamm, 2008,2008: 129873.
20
尚静, 怀德, 殷敏, 等. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者血浆IL-10、VEGF 水平变化及临床意义 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2020,17(17): 129-132, 148.
[1] 聂全禹, 李明星, 刘莹, 王慧, 陈媛媛, 周鸿, 周洋. 基于超声的瘤内联合瘤周影像组学模型对乳腺癌HER2 表达状态的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(12): 1103-1110.
[2] 杨颖, 辛岗, 王丽君, 胡崇珠. 吡咯替尼新辅助治疗HER-2 阳性乳腺癌的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 58-60.
[3] 辛岗, 刘佳妮, 胡崇珠, 杨颖. HER-2 表达与HER-2 阳性乳腺癌临床病理特征及靶向治疗疗效的关系[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 45-48.
[4] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[5] 黄福, 王黔, 金相任, 唐云川. VEGFR2、miR-27a-5p在胃癌组织中的表达与临床病理参数及预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 558-561.
[6] 杜贵伟, 陆勇, 成博, 贺薏, 梁爽. 钬激光碎石术术后联合坦索罗辛治疗对输尿管结石患者的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 491-496.
[7] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[8] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[9] 刘先勇, 秦东梅, 张若梅, 李俊娇, 孟春芹, 邬明歆, 王玉红, 赵新鲜, 徐瑞联, 洪文文, 马玲, 仇玮, 周宇. Her2/Hes1在肠型胃癌Correa级联反应3个病理阶段中的表达及意义[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 321-327.
[10] 蒙柄成, 朱海, 任洪冰, 毛伟民, 韦德令, 徐邦浩, 王继龙, 金宗睿, 蓝祝晶, 黄柯豫, 卢婷婷, 张灵, 郭雅, 文张. IGF-1 介导FOXO 信号通路在大鼠ALPPS 术后肝再生中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 118-125.
[11] 张蔚林, 王哲学, 白峻阁, 黄忠诚, 肖志刚. 利用TCGA数据库构建基于miRNA的结直肠癌列线图预后模型[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 381-388.
[12] 王海晶, 米思蓉, 高晶. 胃癌患者血清IGFBP1表达水平与临床病理特征的相关性及其诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 11-15.
[13] 杜宝静, 李敏叶, 王云霞, 申永静, 谈威威. 轮状病毒感染相关腹泻患儿肠道菌群特征与血清锌、肌酸激酶同工酶及炎症因子的关系[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 78-82.
[14] 牟磊, 徐东成, 韩鑫, 徐长江, 韩坤锜, 薛叶潇, 牟媛, 秦文玲, 刘相静, 陈哲, 高楠. 五虫通络胶囊防治椎动脉开口支架术后再狭窄发生的效果[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 467-472.
[15] 欧春影, 李晓宾, 郭靖, 朱亮, 许可, 王梦, 安晓雷. 丁苯酞对血管性认知障碍大鼠炎症因子的影响及对认知障碍的改善作用[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 483-487.
阅读次数
全文


摘要