切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (12) : 1090 -1096. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2024.12.003

临床研究

多延迟动脉自旋标记成像与CT灌注成像在急性缺血性脑卒中的应用研究
侯志博1, 李秋璇1, 逯瑶1, 张苗1, 於帆, 卢洁()   
  1. 1. 100053 北京首都医科大学宣武医院放射与核医学科;北京磁共振成像脑信息学北京市重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-09 出版日期:2024-12-15
  • 通信作者: 卢洁
  • 基金资助:
    首都医科大学宣武医院:汇智人才工程-支持计划-领军人才(HZ2021ZCLJ005)

Application of multi-delay arterial spin labeling imaging and computed tomography perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke

Zhibo Hou1, Qiuxuan Li1, Yao Lu1, Miao Zhang1, Fan Yu1, Jie Lu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Brain, Beijing 100053, China
  • Received:2024-09-09 Published:2024-12-15
  • Corresponding author: Jie Lu
引用本文:

侯志博, 李秋璇, 逯瑶, 张苗, 於帆, 卢洁. 多延迟动脉自旋标记成像与CT灌注成像在急性缺血性脑卒中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(12): 1090-1096.

Zhibo Hou, Qiuxuan Li, Yao Lu, Miao Zhang, Fan Yu, Jie Lu. Application of multi-delay arterial spin labeling imaging and computed tomography perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(12): 1090-1096.

目的

急性缺血性脑卒中早期准确评估梗死核心及缺血半暗带的体积对治疗决策至关重要。本文旨在比较多延迟动脉自旋标记成像与CT灌注成像在评估这些病灶体积方面的准确性与一致性。

方法

回顾性收集2021年7月~ 2023年9月在首都医科大学宣武医院诊治的36例AIS患者的临床资料,所有患者均接受多延迟ASL与CTP检查(两项检查时间间隔<24 h)。分析患者的ASL与CTP图像,采用符号秩检验比较两种方法在测量梗死核心及缺血半暗带体积上的差异,利用组内相关系数评估两种方法在测量这些指标时的一致性。

结果

多延迟ASL与CTP测得的梗死核心体积分别为12.56[7.99,37.59]和10.50[6.00,37.00],差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多延迟ASL与CTP测得的缺血半暗带体积分别为124.94[94.67,150.16]和116.00[83.00,151.00],差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两种方法在测量梗死核心和缺血半暗带体积时的ICC分别为0.967和0.949,表明两者具有高度一致性。

结论

多延迟ASL与CTP在AIS患者中的诊断准确性较高且一致性良好,尤其是对于梗死核心和缺血半暗带的评估。多延迟ASL作为一种有效的影像学方法,具有推广应用的潜力,值得在临床实践中进一步探索。

Objective

Early and accurate assessment of infarct core and ischemic penumbra volume is crucial for treatment decisions in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study aimed to compare the accuracy and consistency of multi-delay arterial spin labeling (ASL) and computed tomography perfusion(CTP) in evaluating the volumes of these lesion.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 36 AIS patients who were admitted to Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University between July 2021 and September 2023. All patients underwent both multi-delay ASL and CTP scans (with an interval of<24 hours between the two examinations). The ASL and CTP images were analyzed, and the differences in infarct core and ischemic penumbra volumes measured by the two modalities were compared using the Wilcoxon signedrank test. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the consistency of the two methods in measuring these volumes.

Results

The infarct core volumes measured by multi-delay ASL (12.56 [7.99,37.59]) and CTP (10.50 [6.00, 37.00]) showed no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). Similarly,the ischemic penumbra volumes measured by multi-delay ASL (124.94 [94.67, 150.16]) and CTP (116.00[83.00, 151.00]) also showed no significant difference (P>0.05). The ICC for measuring infarct core and ischemic penumbra volumes by the two methods were 0.967 and 0.949, respectively, indicating a high level of consistency.

Conclusion

Both multi-delay ASL and CTP demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy and good consistency in evaluating infarct core and ischemic penumbra volumes in AIS patients. Multi-delay ASL is a promising imaging method with potential for clinical application and further exploration.

表1 AIS患者临床特征
表2 ATT校正前后梗死核心体积和缺血半暗带体积的差异对比[例(%)]
表3 多延迟ASL和CTP方法在核心梗死和缺血半暗带体积的差异性比较
表4 多延迟ASL和CTP测量梗死核心和缺血半暗带的一致性
表5 多延迟ASL和CTP方法与NIHSS评分的相关性
图1 右侧岛叶、颞叶急性期缺血性脑卒中图像。患者男性,63岁,左上肢无力2 h入院,先后行CTP、多延迟ASL,时间间隔为174 min。校正后多延迟ASL与CTP判定的梗死核心和缺血半暗带体积接近。图a为CTP彩图(rCBF<30%),紫色区域表示利用CTP判定的梗死核心体积为82 ml;图b为CTP彩图(Tmax>6 s),绿色区域表示利用CTP判定的低灌注区体积为210 ml,缺血半暗带体积为128 ml(Tmax>6 s-rCBF<30%);图c为磁共振弥散加权成像,显示右侧岛叶、颞叶新发脑梗死;图d为ASL彩图(CBF),经校正后的多延迟ASL显示右侧大脑中动脉供血区低灌注;图e为ASL梯度显示图(CBF),利用多延迟ASL所得梗死核心(蓝色区域:ADC<620×10-6 mm2/s)体积为78 ml,所得缺血半暗带(粉色区域:0≤rCBF<20%)体积为110 ml
1
Correction to: Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: A report from the American Heart Association [J]. Circulation, 2020, 141(2): e33.
2
Ma Q, Li R, Wang L, et al. Temporal trend and attributable risk factors of stroke burden in China, 1990-2019: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 [J]. Lancet Public Health, 2021, 6(12): e897-e906.
3
Tang L, Tang X, Yang Q. The application of tirofiban in the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis [J]. Cerebrovasc Dis,2021, 50(2): 121-131.
4
王陇德, 彭斌, 张鸿祺, 等. 《中国脑卒中防治报告2020》概要 [J].中国脑血管病杂志, 2022, 19(2): 136-144.
5
王拥军, 李子孝, 谷鸿秋, 等. 中国卒中报告2020(中文版) [J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(5): 433-447.
6
Kim S, Jeon KN, Jung JW, et al. Substitution with low-osmolar iodinated contrast agent to minimize recurrent immediate hypersensitivity reaction[J]. Radiology, 2023, 309(1): e222467.
7
Ren H, Guo YF, Zhang ZX, et al. Perception of recurrent risk versus objective measured risk of ischemic stroke in first-ever stroke patients from a rural area in China: A cross-sectional study [J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2023, 107: 107586.
8
陈蝶, 关莹, 韩笑, 等. 颈动脉彩色多普勒联合经颅彩色多普勒评估缺血性脑卒中疗效的临床价值 [J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2023, 17(3): 297-302.
9
Kohno N, Okada K, Yamagata S, et al. Distinctive patterns of threedimensional arterial spin-labeled perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in subtypes of acute ischemic stroke [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2016,25(7): 1807-1812.
10
Vilela P, Rowley HA. Brain ischemia: CT and MRI techniques in acute ischemic stroke [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2017, 96: 162-172.
11
Martín-Noguerol T, Kirsch CFE, Montesinos P, et al. Arterial spin labeling for head and neck lesion assessment: technical adjustments and clinical applications [J]. Neuroradiology, 2021, 63(12): 1969-1983.
12
Clement P, Petr J, Dijsselhof MBJ, et al. A beginner's guide to Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) image processing [J]. Front Radiol, 2022, 2: 929533.
13
Tortora D, Severino M, Rossi A. Arterial spin labeling perfusion in neonates [J]. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med, 2020, 25(5): 101130.
14
Uetani H, Kitajima M, Sugahara T, et al. Perfusion abnormality on threedimensional arterial spin labeling in patients with acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures and late reduced diffusion [J]. J Neurol Sci, 2020,408: 116558.
15
Shi Z, Li J, Zhao M, et al. Baseline cerebral ischemic core quantified by different automatic software and its predictive value for clinical outcome[J]. Front Neurosci, 2021, 15: 608799.
16
Andrew B ,Venkatesh K ,Peter S, et al.Arterial spin labeling versus bolustracking perfusion in hyperacute stroke [J]. Stroke, 2014, 45(1): 127-33.
17
Alsop DC, Detre JA, Golay X, et al. Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia [J]. Magn Reson Med, 2015, 73(1): 102-116.
18
Lyu J, Duan Q, Xiao S, et al. Arterial spin labeling-based MRI estimation of penumbral tissue in acute ischemic stroke [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2023, 57(4): 1241-1247.
19
Nam KW, Kim CK, Yoon BW, et al. Multiphase arterial spin labeling imaging to predict early recurrent ischemic lesion in acute ischemic stroke[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 1456.
20
卓丽华, 唐春耕, 周明, 等 . 1H-磁共振波普成像联合弥散加权成像、3D-动脉内源性标记对急性脑梗死缺血半暗带的评估价值 [J/OL].中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(8): 596-602.
21
Bivard A, Krishnamurthy V, Stanwell P, et al. Arterial spin labeling versus bolus-tracking perfusion in hyperacute stroke [J]. Stroke, 2014, 45(1):127-133.
22
Alsop DC, Detre JA, Golay X, et al. Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia [J]. Magn Reson Med, 2015, 73(1): 102-116.
23
Ferré JC, Bannier E, Raoult H, et al. Arterial spin labeling (ASL)perfusion: techniques and clinical use [J]. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2013,94(12): 1211-1223.
24
Sijtsema Nienke D, Petit Steven F, Verduijn Gerda M, et al. Multi-delay pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling to measure blood flow in the head and neck [J]. NMR in biomedicine, 2023, 36(7): e4898-e4898.
25
Haller S, Zaharchuk G, Thomas DL, et al. Arterial spin labeling perfusion of the brain: emerging clinical applications [J]. Radiology, 2016, 281(2):337-356.
26
Jezzard P, Chappell MA, Okell TW. Arterial spin labeling for the measurement of cerebral perfusion and angiography [J]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2018, 38(4): 603-626.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 李刚, 潘晓帆, 田雪, 刘路路. CT灌注成像参数及血栓弹力图对急性前循环脑梗死早期神经功能恶化的预测价值分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 226-232.
[3] 尚慧娟, 袁晓冬. 机械取栓术后应用依达拉奉右崁醇对急性缺血性脑卒中预后的改善[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 295-301.
[4] 吉莉, 苏云楠, 王斌, 沈滔, 刘团结, 毛蕾, 徐玉萍, 张婷, 王博. 急性缺血性脑卒中患者脑白质微结构改变对长期认知功能损伤的预测价值研究[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 193-200.
[5] 马丽. CT灌注联合血管成像预测急性脑梗死患者近期神经功能预后的价值分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 229-234.
[6] 隆昱洲, 柳华, 张云茜, 李兴统, 范云虎, 尚正良, 宋镇妤, 罗丽华. 依达拉奉预适应延长急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓时间窗的研究及ROS/TXNIP/NLRP3通路参与机制的探讨[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 65-74.
[7] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
[8] 尹晓晴, 赵子萱, 杨帆, 敖峰, 林勇. D型人格与前循环急性缺血性脑卒中患者预后的相关性[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 206-211.
[9] 王增龙, 顾梅, 杭宇, 刘圣, 施海彬, 包建英. 急性大血管闭塞性脑卒中患者血管内治疗后吞咽障碍发生的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 10-14.
[10] 季鹏, 郭言言, 王超. CT灌注成像联合CT血管造影对TIA患者进展为急性脑梗死的预测[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 128-132.
[11] 徐志嘉, 贾振宇, 赵林波, 刘圣, 施海彬, 曹月洲. 高敏肌钙蛋白T动态变化在晚时间窗内进行血管内治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 42-47.
[12] 李小勇, 郭海志, 赵洋. QSM 联合SWI 预测急性缺血性脑卒中患者EVT 后神经功能的价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 549-555.
[13] 李昕, 李永凯, 江树青, 夏来百提姑·赛买提, 杨建中. 急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓后出血转化相关危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 331-336.
[14] 李昕, 杨建中. 急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓后出血转化危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 9-15.
[15] 吴嶛, 孙颖, 倪小宇, 倪贵华. 依达拉奉右莰醇注射用浓溶液治疗急性前循环缺血性脑卒中的短期临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 253-257.
阅读次数
全文


摘要