Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (04): 285-291. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2026.04.005

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles    

Impact of the IDEAS model on rehabilitation outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical surgery for colorectal cancer

Yanan Xi1, Guodong Yao2,(), Xiuzhen Guo2,(), Binli Gao2, Yuan Zhao1, Ting Li1, Liyan Zhong1, Mengqian Li1   

  1. 1 Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010059, China
    2 Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010050, China
  • Received:2025-11-18 Online:2026-04-30 Published:2026-06-09
  • Contact: Guodong Yao, Xiuzhen Guo

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the effect of the IDEAS model in improving perioperative rehabilitation outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical resection for colorectal cancer.

Methods

One hundred patients who underwent robot-assisted radical surgery for colorectal cancer at the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University between July 2024 and October 2025 were selected as subjects and randomly divided into either an experimental group or a control group, with 50 patients in each group. In both groups, routine visits were conducted, and in the experimental group, the IDEAS model was additionally implemented. Physiological stress indicators (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure), coping styles [Simple Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ)], quality of life (SF-36), complication incidence, and treatment adherence were compared between the two groups.

Results

After the intervention, the experimental group showed significantly lower scores on the negative coping dimension compared to pre-intervention levels, and these scores remained lower than those of the control group (P<0.001). Conversely, the experimental group demonstrated a significant increase in scores on the positive coping dimension compared to the control group (P<0.001). The experimental group also achieved higher quality of life scores and better treatment compliance (level 4) than the control group (P<0.05). Furthermore, physiological stress indicators were more stable in the experimental group than in the control group after the intervention (P<0.001). Although the experimental group had a lower complication rate than the control group, the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.242).

Conclusion

The IDEAS model not only reduces negative coping levels and stabilizes preoperative physiological stress indicators in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical surgery for colorectal cancer, but also improves their positive coping levels, quality of life, and therapeutic compliance.

Key words: IDEAS model, Robot-assisted surgery, Cancer, Treatment compliance

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-57830845 E-mail: zhlcyszz@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd