切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (07) : 400 -404. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2018.07.006

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

胰胆管定量分析对壶腹周围癌的鉴别诊断价值
王姚1,(), 张川2   
  1. 1. 637300 四川南充,南部县中医医院放射科
    2. 637000 四川南充,川北医学院附属医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-21 出版日期:2018-04-01
  • 通信作者: 王姚

Value of quantitative MRI analysis of pancreaticobiliary duct changes in differential diagnosis of periampullary carcinomas

Yao Wang1,(), Chuan Zhang2   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Nanbu County Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanchong 637300, China
    2. Department of Radiology, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, China
  • Received:2018-02-21 Published:2018-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yao Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Yao, Email:
引用本文:

王姚, 张川. 胰胆管定量分析对壶腹周围癌的鉴别诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(07): 400-404.

Yao Wang, Chuan Zhang. Value of quantitative MRI analysis of pancreaticobiliary duct changes in differential diagnosis of periampullary carcinomas[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(07): 400-404.

目的

探讨胰胆管定量分析对胰头癌和其他壶腹周围癌的鉴别诊断价值。

方法

回顾性分析南部县中医医院及川北医学院附属医院2013年9月至2018年3月81例壶腹周围癌患者的磁共振影像资料,包括41例胰头癌,20例胆总管下段癌及20例壶腹癌。将胆总管直径、主胰管直径、胰胆管末端间距、十二指肠乳头至胆胰管末端间距相加得到"胰胆管径线和"并在磁共振胰胆管成像上测量胰胆管汇合角,采用受试者工作特性曲线分析2名医师及采用贯序实验后胰胆管汇合角和胰胆管径线和用于鉴别胰头癌和其他壶腹周围癌的鉴别诊断效能。

结果

胰头癌的胰胆管汇合角及胰胆管径线和大于其他壶腹周围癌[(86.2°±13.8°vs (61.6°±10.7°),(9.3±1.7)cm vs (7.8±1.2)cm],差异具有统计学意义(F=5.896、19.568,P=0.017、0.001)。贯序实验得出胰胆管汇合角及胰胆管径线和临界点分别为70°和9 cm,敏感度和特异度为(67%,96%),AUC为0.93。

结论

胰胆管定量分析可鉴别胰头癌及其他壶腹周围癌(胆总管下段癌及壶腹癌),联合胰胆管汇合角及胰胆管径线和可进一步提高鉴别诊断价值。

Objective

To quantitatively analyze pancreaticobiliary duct changes by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and assess its value in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic duct adenocacinoma (PDAC) and other periampullary carcinomas.

Methods

Eighty-one patients who had histopathologically confirmed periampullary carcinomas and underwent MRI were enrolled, including 41 with PDACs, 20 with intrapancreatic common bile duct (CBD) carcinomas, and 20 with ampullary carcinomas. The sum of the maximum diameters of the CBD and main pancreatic duct (MPD), the distance between the ends of the dilated pancreaticobiliary duct, and the distance between the major papilla and the end of the dilated pancreaticobiliary duct were calculated as summation of the distances. The pancreaticobiliary duct angle was measured by MRI. SPSS18.0 software was used for statistical analyses. The cut-off values for pancreaticobiliary duct angles and summation of the distance were confirmed using receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

The pancreaticobiliary duct angle in PDAC (86.2°±13.8°) was greater than that in other malignancies (61.6°±10.7°). The summation of the distances in PDAC (9.3±1.7 cm) was greater than that in others (7.8±1.2 cm). A sequential test for the average pancreaticobiliary duct angle and summation of the distances suggested 70° and 9 cm as cut-off values, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were 67% and 96%, respectively. The AUC of the sequential test was 0.93.

Conclusion

PDAC can be differentiated from other types of periampullary carcinoma by the quantitative analysis of pancreaticobiliary ductal changes with a high sensitivity and specificity. The combination of pancreaticobiliary duct angle and the summation of the distances increases the diagnostic accuracy.

图1 胰头癌患者胰胆管定量分析的测值 图1a为胰胆管汇合角测值;图1b为胰胆管末端间距测值;图1c为十二指肠乳头至胰胆管末端间距
表1 胰胆管汇合角对胰头癌及其他壶腹周围癌的鉴别诊断的敏感度及特异度[%(95%CI)]
表2 胰胆管径线和对胰头癌及其他壶腹周围癌的鉴别诊断的敏感度、特异度[%(95%CI)]
表3 胰胆管汇合角和胰胆管径线和的ROC曲线下面积
图2 2名医师分别及贯序实验的ROC曲线 图2a为胰胆管径线和;图2b为胰胆管汇合角;图2c为贯序实验。
1
唐琳,夏黎明,汪晶莹, 等. 胰胆管十二指肠连接区癌的MR诊断 [J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2011, 9(1):51-53.
2
Sunil BJ, Seshadri RA, Gouthaman S, et al. Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in periampullary carcinoma [J]. J Gastrointest Cancer, 2017, 48(1):13-19.
3
Cha DI, Kim YK, Choi SY, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: prevalence and diagnostic value of dark choledochal ring sign on T2-weighted MRI [J]. Clin Radiol, 2014, 69(4):416-423.
4
Wu DS, Chen WX, Wang XD, et al. Pancreaticobiliary duct changes of periampullary carcinomas: quantitative analysis at MR imaging [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(9):2112-2117.
5
Chen JF, Chen WX, Wang XP, et al. Differential diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary ductal and duodenal union carcinomas with MRI 3D-VIBE sequence combined with MRCP [J]. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, 2009, 40(6):1110-1114, 1138.
6
Das SK, Yang DJ, Wang JL, et al. Non-Gaussian diffusion imaging for malignant and benign pulmonary nodule differentiation: a preliminary study [J]. Acta Radiol, 2017, 58(1):19-26.
7
Gonzalez RS, Bagci P, Basturk O, et al. Intrapancreatic distal common bile duct carcinoma: Analysis, staging considerations, and comparison with pancreatic ductal and ampullary adenocarcinomas [J]. Mod Pathol, 2016, 29(11):1358-1369.
8
Katabathina VS, Flaherty EM, Dasyam AK, et al. "Biliary Diseases with Pancreatic Counterparts" : Cross-sectional Imaging Findings [J]. Radiographics, 2016, 36(2):374-392.
9
He J, Ahuja N, Makary MA, et al. 2564 resected periampullary adenocarcinomas at a single institution: trends over three decades [J]. HPB (Oxford), 2014, 16(1):83-90.
10
Gonzalez RS, Bagci P, Basturk O, et al. Intrapancreatic distal common bile duct carcinoma: Analysis, staging considerations,and comparison with pancreatic ductal and ampullary adenocarcinomas [J]. Mod Pathol, 2016, 29(11):1358-1369.
11
韦德华,但家立. 胰腺癌的B超诊断及与CT的对比分析 [J]. 遵义医学院学报, 2002, 25(6):530, 532.
12
Zheng ZZ, Shan H, Li X. Fat-suppressed 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging of the cartilage with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 194(5):W414-419.
13
Cao W, Li F, Gong J, et al. Liver acquisition with acceleration volume acquisition gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance combined with T2 sequences in the diagnosis of local recurrence of rectal cancer [J]. J Xray Sci Technol, 2016, 24(6):855-863.
14
张国明,刘衡,肖辉, 等. 二维及三维磁共振胰胆管成像研究 [J]. 遵义医学院学报, 2007, 30(3):271-273.
15
Cloyd JM, George E, Visser BC. Duodenal adenocarcinoma: Advances in diagnosis and surgical management [J]. World J Gastrointest Surg, 2016, 8(3):212-221.
[1] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[2] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[3] 庄若语, 杭明辉, 李文华, 张霆, 侯炜. 膝骨关节炎半定量磁共振评分研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 545-552.
[4] 吴少敏, 张世豪, 刘炳光, 李婵, 尹嘉敏, 郑昌业, 黄素然. 胎儿巨大蛛网膜囊肿并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 390-397.
[5] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[6] 陈燕. LCBDE和ERCP+EST治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 385-388.
[7] 刘明辉, 葛方明. MRI 对腹股沟疝修补术后患者早期并发症的评估价值研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 579-583.
[8] 方开萱, 翟亚奇, 张贯军, 陈升鑫, 陈德鑫, 刘文静, 梁雅文, 李明阳. 内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗胰腺分裂症的安全性与远期疗效[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 284-289.
[9] 韩青雷, 丛赟, 李佳隆, 邵英梅. 术前减黄方式对壶腹周围癌胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 665-669.
[10] 黄金鑫, 陈佳骏, 王旋, 曲岩, 张晞文, 李甫. ERCP在胆胰合流异常患者诊治中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 699-704.
[11] 臧书芹, 陈巧玲, 江思源, 朱晓明, 沈浮, 王颢, 张卫, 邵成伟. 基于直肠高分辨MRI的直肠侧系膜分析及其临床价值的研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 312-320.
[12] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
[13] 商倩, 罗静, 卓振山, 苗园园, 吴静, 廖振林. 通腑泻浊法联合生长抑素对内镜逆行胰胆管造影治疗的急性胆源性胰腺炎患者预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 437-441.
[14] 陈慧, 邹祖鹏, 周田田, 张艺丹, 张海萍. 皮肤镜对头皮红斑性皮肤病辅助鉴别诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 692-698.
[15] 金安松, 邹玉松, 刘玖涛, 薛凤麟, 庞爱兰. 孤立性颅内浆细胞瘤一例及相关文献复习[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 495-500.
阅读次数
全文


摘要