切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (09) : 488 -491. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2018.09.002

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

单操作孔与全胸腔镜在小儿纵膈肿瘤手术中的应用比较
陈义初1, 皮名安1,()   
  1. 1. 430016 武汉,华中科技大学同济医学院附属武汉儿童医院心胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-13 出版日期:2018-05-01
  • 通信作者: 皮名安

Single port versus total thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of pediatric mediastinal tumors

Yichu Chen1, Ming′an Pi1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Wuhan Children′s Hospital, Wuhan 430016, China
  • Received:2018-04-13 Published:2018-05-01
  • Corresponding author: Ming′an Pi
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Pi Ming′an, Email:
引用本文:

陈义初, 皮名安. 单操作孔与全胸腔镜在小儿纵膈肿瘤手术中的应用比较[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(09): 488-491.

Yichu Chen, Ming′an Pi. Single port versus total thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of pediatric mediastinal tumors[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(09): 488-491.

目的

探讨单操作孔手术与全胸腔镜手术在小儿纵膈肿瘤治疗中的效果。

方法

回顾性分析2014年1月至2017年6月武汉市儿童医院心胸外科收治的46例纵膈肿瘤患儿临床资料。根据手术方式不同将患儿分为2组,A组为全胸腔镜手术组,共29例患儿;B组为单操作孔手术组,共17例患儿,2组患儿年龄、体质量、肿瘤大小、类型等差异无统计学意义。分析比较2组患儿手术时间、术中出血量、胸腔引流时间、手术后住院时间和手术后并发症等。

结果

46例患儿均顺利完成手术,A组中转开胸2例,B组无中转开胸,术后5例带气管插管回ICU。A组平均手术时间(69.35±8.24)min,较B组平均手术时间[(72.80±6.28)min]短,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),术中出血量2组间比较[(21.47±6.85)ml vs(27.52±4.15)ml]差异无统计学意义;A组患儿平均胸腔引流时间、手术后住院时间较B组略长,分别为(5.46±1.72)d vs (4.68±1.39)d,(6.93±1.34)d vs(5.92±1.67)d。2组患儿术后均无严重并发症,恢复顺利。

结论

与全胸腔镜手术相比,单操作孔手术治疗小儿纵隔肿瘤,具有创伤小、恢复快等优点,但手术耗时较长。

Objective

To compare the therapeutic efficacy of single port versus total thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of pediatric mediastinal tumors.

Methods

From January 2014 to June 2017, 46 children with mediastinal tumors who underwent surgical treatment were divided into two groups according to the operative approach used: A and B. Age, body weight, and tumor size were compared between the two groups. Group A (n=29) underwent single port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, while group B (n=17) underwent total thoracoscopic surgery. Operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage time, hospitalization time, and postoperative complications of the two groups were recorded and compared.

Results

The average operative duration was significantly shorter in group A than in group B [(69.35±8.24) min vs (72.80±6.28) min] (P<0.05) . The volume of intraoperative blood loss was similar between the two groups [(21.47±6.85) mL vs (27.52±4.15) mL]. Mean postoperative drainage time and hospitalization time of group A were slightly longer than those of group B [(5.46±1.72) days vs (4.68±1.39) days, (6.93±1.34) days vs (5.92±1.67) days]. All operations were successfully completed. There was two cases of conversion to thoracotomy in group A. No severe complications occurred in either group.

Conclusion

Compared with total thoracoscopic surgery, single port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery offers the advantages of smaller incision and faster recovery for mediastinal tumors under 5 cm; however, the latter is more time-consuming.

表1 全胸腔镜手术组与单操作孔手术组手术情况比较(±s
1
蒋连勇,谢晓,胡丰庆, 等. 单操作孔全胸腔镜手术在小儿后纵隔肿瘤中的应用[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2015, 15(10):876-877.
2
Hosaka T, Hata Y, M akino T, et al. Mediastinal myeloli-poma showing gradual enlargement over 9 years: a case report[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2016, 11(1):91-95.
3
王巍炜,李高峰,张勇, 等. 胸腔镜单操作孔切除纵隔肿瘤28例[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2015, 15(1):59-61.
4
陈浩,杨合英,刘秋亮, 等. 小儿纵隔肿瘤手术切除与并发症处理体会[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志, 2013, 34(4):313-314.
5
Kent M, Wang T, Whyte R, et al. Open video-assisted thoracic surgery and robotic lobectomy:review of a national database[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014, 97(1):236-244.
6
Jeon HW, Kim YD, et al. Does 11.5mm guided single port surgery has clinical advantage than multi-port thoracoscopic surgery in spontaneous pneumothorax[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2016, 8(10):2924-2930.
7
王巍炜,李高峰,张勇, 等. 胸腔镜单操作孔切除纵隔肿瘤28例[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2015, 15(1):59-61.
8
唐汉. 单操作孔全胸腔镜手术方式治疗纵隔肿瘤的临床病例分析[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2015.
9
Kim HK, Sung HK, Lee HJ, et a1. The feasibility of a Two-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2013, 8:88.
10
王志超,张合林,刘俊峰, 等. 单操作孔全胸腔镜手术治疗纵隔肿瘤43例临床分析[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2014, 52(5):393-394.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[7] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[8] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[9] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[10] 陈旭渊, 罗仕云, 李文忠, 李毅. 腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 82-85.
[11] 纪凯伦, 郝少龙, 孙海涛, 韩威. 减重术后胆囊结石形成机制的新进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 100-103.
[12] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[13] 程相阵. 腹茧症9例诊治分析并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 968-971.
[14] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[15] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要