切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (09) : 488 -491. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2018.09.002

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

单操作孔与全胸腔镜在小儿纵膈肿瘤手术中的应用比较
陈义初1, 皮名安1,()   
  1. 1. 430016 武汉,华中科技大学同济医学院附属武汉儿童医院心胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-13 出版日期:2018-05-01
  • 通信作者: 皮名安

Single port versus total thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of pediatric mediastinal tumors

Yichu Chen1, Ming′an Pi1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Wuhan Children′s Hospital, Wuhan 430016, China
  • Received:2018-04-13 Published:2018-05-01
  • Corresponding author: Ming′an Pi
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Pi Ming′an, Email:
引用本文:

陈义初, 皮名安. 单操作孔与全胸腔镜在小儿纵膈肿瘤手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(09): 488-491.

Yichu Chen, Ming′an Pi. Single port versus total thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of pediatric mediastinal tumors[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(09): 488-491.

目的

探讨单操作孔手术与全胸腔镜手术在小儿纵膈肿瘤治疗中的效果。

方法

回顾性分析2014年1月至2017年6月武汉市儿童医院心胸外科收治的46例纵膈肿瘤患儿临床资料。根据手术方式不同将患儿分为2组,A组为全胸腔镜手术组,共29例患儿;B组为单操作孔手术组,共17例患儿,2组患儿年龄、体质量、肿瘤大小、类型等差异无统计学意义。分析比较2组患儿手术时间、术中出血量、胸腔引流时间、手术后住院时间和手术后并发症等。

结果

46例患儿均顺利完成手术,A组中转开胸2例,B组无中转开胸,术后5例带气管插管回ICU。A组平均手术时间(69.35±8.24)min,较B组平均手术时间[(72.80±6.28)min]短,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),术中出血量2组间比较[(21.47±6.85)ml vs(27.52±4.15)ml]差异无统计学意义;A组患儿平均胸腔引流时间、手术后住院时间较B组略长,分别为(5.46±1.72)d vs (4.68±1.39)d,(6.93±1.34)d vs(5.92±1.67)d。2组患儿术后均无严重并发症,恢复顺利。

结论

与全胸腔镜手术相比,单操作孔手术治疗小儿纵隔肿瘤,具有创伤小、恢复快等优点,但手术耗时较长。

Objective

To compare the therapeutic efficacy of single port versus total thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of pediatric mediastinal tumors.

Methods

From January 2014 to June 2017, 46 children with mediastinal tumors who underwent surgical treatment were divided into two groups according to the operative approach used: A and B. Age, body weight, and tumor size were compared between the two groups. Group A (n=29) underwent single port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, while group B (n=17) underwent total thoracoscopic surgery. Operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage time, hospitalization time, and postoperative complications of the two groups were recorded and compared.

Results

The average operative duration was significantly shorter in group A than in group B [(69.35±8.24) min vs (72.80±6.28) min] (P<0.05) . The volume of intraoperative blood loss was similar between the two groups [(21.47±6.85) mL vs (27.52±4.15) mL]. Mean postoperative drainage time and hospitalization time of group A were slightly longer than those of group B [(5.46±1.72) days vs (4.68±1.39) days, (6.93±1.34) days vs (5.92±1.67) days]. All operations were successfully completed. There was two cases of conversion to thoracotomy in group A. No severe complications occurred in either group.

Conclusion

Compared with total thoracoscopic surgery, single port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery offers the advantages of smaller incision and faster recovery for mediastinal tumors under 5 cm; however, the latter is more time-consuming.

表1 全胸腔镜手术组与单操作孔手术组手术情况比较(±s
1
蒋连勇,谢晓,胡丰庆, 等. 单操作孔全胸腔镜手术在小儿后纵隔肿瘤中的应用[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2015, 15(10):876-877.
2
Hosaka T, Hata Y, M akino T, et al. Mediastinal myeloli-poma showing gradual enlargement over 9 years: a case report[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2016, 11(1):91-95.
3
王巍炜,李高峰,张勇, 等. 胸腔镜单操作孔切除纵隔肿瘤28例[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2015, 15(1):59-61.
4
陈浩,杨合英,刘秋亮, 等. 小儿纵隔肿瘤手术切除与并发症处理体会[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志, 2013, 34(4):313-314.
5
Kent M, Wang T, Whyte R, et al. Open video-assisted thoracic surgery and robotic lobectomy:review of a national database[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014, 97(1):236-244.
6
Jeon HW, Kim YD, et al. Does 11.5mm guided single port surgery has clinical advantage than multi-port thoracoscopic surgery in spontaneous pneumothorax[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2016, 8(10):2924-2930.
7
王巍炜,李高峰,张勇, 等. 胸腔镜单操作孔切除纵隔肿瘤28例[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2015, 15(1):59-61.
8
唐汉. 单操作孔全胸腔镜手术方式治疗纵隔肿瘤的临床病例分析[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2015.
9
Kim HK, Sung HK, Lee HJ, et a1. The feasibility of a Two-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2013, 8:88.
10
王志超,张合林,刘俊峰, 等. 单操作孔全胸腔镜手术治疗纵隔肿瘤43例临床分析[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2014, 52(5):393-394.
[1] 陶宏宇, 叶菁菁, 俞劲, 杨秀珍, 钱晶晶, 徐彬, 徐玮泽, 舒强. 右心声学造影在儿童右向左分流相关疾病中的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 959-965.
[2] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[3] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[4] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[5] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[6] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[7] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[8] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[9] 孙一娇, 包润发, 董平, 束翌俊. PBL结合手术视频剪辑教学在普通外科专科医师规范化培训中的应用与思考[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 96-99.
[10] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[11] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[12] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[13] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[14] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[15] 张耕毓, 唐冲, 张昆, 张辉, 张清华, 刘家帮. 股骨头坏死髓芯减压术的文献计量学分析及单中心病例报道[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 771-780.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?