切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (11) : 614 -618. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2018.11.005

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

不同肝病模型诊断肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张的对比研究
陈健1, 钱建清1,(), 徐晓丹1, 孙楹1, 孙曦1, 王甘红2   
  1. 1. 215500,苏州大学附属常熟医院(常熟市第一人民医院)消化内科
    2. 215500,常熟市中医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-02 出版日期:2018-06-01
  • 通信作者: 钱建清
  • 基金资助:
    常熟市青年科技计划项目(cswsq201608)

Comparative study of different liver disease models in diagnosis of cirrhotic esophagogastric varices

Jian Chen1, Jianqing Qian1,(), Xiaodan Xu1, Ying Sun1, Xi Sun1, Ganhong Wang2   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, First People’s Hospital of Changshu city, Changshu 215500, China
    2. Department of Gastroenterology, Changshu Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Changshu 215500, China
  • Received:2018-04-02 Published:2018-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Jianqing Qian
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Qian Jianqing, Email:
引用本文:

陈健, 钱建清, 徐晓丹, 孙楹, 孙曦, 王甘红. 不同肝病模型诊断肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张的对比研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(11): 614-618.

Jian Chen, Jianqing Qian, Xiaodan Xu, Ying Sun, Xi Sun, Ganhong Wang. Comparative study of different liver disease models in diagnosis of cirrhotic esophagogastric varices[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(11): 614-618.

目的

对比天冬氨酸氨基转移酶-血小板比率指数(APRI)、血小板计数与脾脏直径比值(PC/SD)、血清腹水白蛋白梯度(SAAG)3种不同肝病模型诊断肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张(GOV)的准确性,并与增强CT比较,以期为临床筛选出诊断肝硬化GOV的最佳肝病模型。

方法

选取2014年5月至2018年3月因肝硬化失代偿腹水收入常熟市第一人民医院住院的126例患者纳入研究。对患者行胃镜检查确诊是否存在GOV,并依据结果分为GOV组(51例)和非GOV组(75例)。收集患者相关检查数据并通过公式计算3种肝病模型APRI、PC/SD、SAAG的值,采用单因素分析(独立样本t检验)比较GOV组和非GOV组患者APRI、PC/SD、SAAG。将单因素分析差异有统计学意义的肝病模型进行多因素分析,通过基于偏最大似然估计的前进法二分类逐步logistic回归分析,筛选诊断GOV的有效肝病模型,并与增强CT比较受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线的曲线下面积(AUC),使用Youden指数确定最佳判定点。

结果

GOV组患者与非GOV组患者比较,APRI、SAAG值明显升高[(0.72±0.31)vs(0.54±0.18),t=4.15,P<0.01;(21.62±3.14)g/L vs(15.87±1.78)g/L,t=13.08,P<0.01],PC/SD值明显降低[(847.26±260.92)vs(1298.20±213.51),t=-10.23,P<0.01],差异具有统计学意义。经多因素回归分析,PC/SD、SAAG是诊断GOV的独立危险因素,建立回归方程:logistic(P)=-5.266+0.707 SAAG–0.007 PC/SD。通过ROC曲线对比,PC/SD(0.86,95%CI=0.79~0.92)、SAAG(0.89,95%CI=0.83~0.94)比增强CT(0.73,95%CI=0.65~0.81)有着更大的AUC,即更高的诊断准确性,差异具有统计学意义(P均<0.01);但PC/SD和SAAG之间AUC对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。使用Youden指数确定最佳判定点发现,PC/SD<1123.4具有对肝硬化GOV最高的诊断准确性(敏感度92.2%、特异度66.7%),SAAG>18.2g/L具有对肝硬化GOV最高的诊断准确性(敏感度86.3%、特异度85.3%)。

结论

多种肝病模型中PC/SD、SAAG诊断肝硬化GOV准确性较高,且均优于增强CT,可在临床上作为胃镜发现肝硬化GOV的有效补充手段。

Objective

To compare the accuracy of three different liver disease models of aspartate aminotransferase-platelet ratio index (APRI), platelet count and spleen diameter ratio (PC/SD), and serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) in the diagnosis of cirrhosis with GOV and to compare the results with those of enhanced CT, in order to find the best liver disease model for diagnosing cirrhotic GOV.

Methods

A total of 126 patients with decompensated ascites due to cirrhosis were enrolled. The patients were diagnosed with or without GOV by electronic gastroscopy. The relevant data were collected and APRI, PC/SD, and SAAG were calculated using formulae. Single-factor and multi-factor analyses were used to screen the effective liver disease model for GOV. These models were compared with enhanced CT with regard to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and the Youden index was used to determine the best cut-off point.

Results

Single-factor and multivariate regression analyses showed that PC/SD and SAAG were independent risk factors for the diagnosis of GOV. The regression equation was established as Logistic (P)=-5.266+ 0.707 SAAG -0.007 PC/SD. PC/SD and SAAG had larger AUC and higher diagnostic accuracy than enhanced CT [SAAG: 0.89 (95%CI: 0.83-0.94); PC/SD: 0.86 (95%CI: 0.79-0.92); enhanced CT: 0.73 (95%CI: 0.65-0.81), P<0.01] , but there was no significant difference in AUC between PC/SD and SAAG (Z=0.849, P=0.936). Using the Youden index to determine the best cut-off point, PC/SD<1123.4 had the highest diagnostic accuracy for cirrhotic GOV (sensitivity, 92.2%; specificity, 66.7%), and SAAG>18.2 g/L had the highest diagnostic accuracy for cirrhotic GOV (sensitivity, 86.3%; specificity, 85.3%).

Conclusion

PC/SD and SAAG for diagnosis of cirrhosis with GOV are more accurate, and they perform better than enhanced CT. PC/SD and SAAG can be used as an effective supplement to gastroscopy for the diagnosis of GOV.

表1 126例肝硬化患者APRI、PC/SD、SAAG比较(±s
表2 肝硬化GOV患者肝病模型多因素logistic回归分析
图1 SAAG、PC/SD、增强CT的受试者工作特征曲线
1
中华医学会肝病学分会,中华医学会消化病学分会,中华医学会内镜学分会. 肝硬化门静脉高压食管胃静脉曲张出血的防治指南[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2016, 32(2):203-219.
2
Ozdil K, Ozturk O, Calik ES, et al. Relationship between size of varices and platelet count/spleen size ratio in cirrhotic patients [J]. North Clin Istanb, 2016, 3(1):46-52.
3
Voutilainen S, Kivisaari R, Lohi J, et al. A prospective comparison of noninvasive methods in the assessment of liver fibrosis and esophageal varices in pediatric chronic liver diseases [J]. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2016, 50(8):658-663.
4
Rahman A, Sumon SM, Sutradhar SR, et al. Prediction of oesophageal varices in cirrhosis of liver patients by serum ascitic albumin gradient [J]. Mymensingh Med J, 2013, 22(4):669-675.
5
Garbuzenko DV. Current approaches to the management of patients with liver cirrhosis who have acute esophageal variceal bleeding [J]. Curr Med Res Opin, 2016, 32(3):467-475.
6
Hwang JH, Shergill AK, Acosta RD, et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of variceal hemorrhage [J]. Gastrointes Endos, 2014, 80(2):221-227.
7
Xiao G, Zhu F, Wang M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of APRI and FIB-4 for predicting hepatitis B virus-related liver fibrosis accompanied with hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2016, 48(10):1220-1226.
8
王帅,张威,张帆, 等. FibroScan、APRI及二者联合对肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张出血的预测[J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2017, 25(14):1287-1291.
9
Giannini E, Botta F, Borro P, et al. Platelet count/spleen diameter ratio: proposal and validation of a non-invasive parameter to predict the presence of oesophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis [J]. Gut, 2003, 52(8):1200-1205.
10
Ying L, Lin X, Xie ZL, et al. Performance of platelet count/spleen diameter ratio for diagnosis of esophageal varices in cirrhosis: a meta-analysis [J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2012, 57(6):1672-1681.
11
Hoefs JC. Serum protein concentration and portal pressure determine the ascitic fluid protein concentration in patients with chronic liver disease [J]. J Lab Clin Med, 1983, 102(2):260-273.
12
黄雪,刘传苗,赵守松, 等. 失代偿期肝硬化患者SAAG、PA、PTA水平与肝功能分期及预后的关系[J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2016, 24(5):790-795.
13
Deng H, Qi X, Zhang Y, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis: a retrospective observational study [J]. J Evid Based Med, 2017, 10(1):46-52.
14
徐晓丹. 非侵入性诊断肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张及预测破裂出血的临床研究[D].苏州: 苏州大学, 2016.
[1] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[2] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[3] 莫闲, 杨闯. 肝硬化患者并发门静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 678-683.
[4] 雷雪雪, 于颖, 李虹彦. 乙型肝炎肝硬化患者肝移植等待期应用多模式预康复优化项目的临床研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 158-163.
[5] 李芳, 孙海云. 风险因素护理干预对合并失代偿性肝硬化的腹股沟疝患者Lichtenstein术围手术期应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 477-480.
[6] 韩宇, 张武, 李安琪, 陈文颖, 谢斯栋. MRI肝脏影像报告和数据系统对非肝硬化乙肝患者肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 669-673.
[7] 许语阳, 吕云福, 王葆春. 乙肝后肝硬化门静脉高压症脾肿大外科治疗进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 469-473.
[8] 李勇, 兰川, 吴斌, 张光年, 李敬东. 术前血小板-白蛋白评分对肝硬化肝癌术后预后的预测价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 412-416.
[9] 杨林青, 任松, 纪泛扑, 张健, 蒋安, 张丽, 安鹏, 王林, 李宗芳. 揿针疗法对门静脉高压症脾切除断流术后胃肠功能的调节作用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 322-326.
[10] 秦维, 王丹, 孙玉, 霍玉玲, 祝素平, 郑艳丽, 薛瑞. 血清层粘连蛋白、Ⅳ型胶原蛋白对代偿期肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张出血的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 447-451.
[11] 张雯, 宋牡丹, 邓雪婷, 张云. 强化营养支持辅助奥曲肽治疗肝硬化合并食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的疗效及再出血危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 456-460.
[12] 朱翔宇, 王建美, 张辉, 叶红英. 无创左心室压力-应变循环技术在左心室功能参数与肝硬化的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 494-498.
[13] 郭亮亮, 邱珊珊, 钟萍, 赵心恺. 血小板-白蛋白-胆红素评分对肝硬化上消化道出血的诊断价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 216-219.
[14] 朱风尚, 舍玲, 丁永年, 杨长青. 五步疑问法在肝硬化门静脉高压症临床教学中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 116-118.
[15] 孔凡彪, 杨建荣. 肝脏基础疾病与结直肠癌肝转移之间关系的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 818-822.
阅读次数
全文


摘要