切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 105 -110. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2019.02.005

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

血清胱抑素C联合尿NGAL在肝硬化患者并发急性肾损伤中的诊断价值
裴峰1,()   
  1. 1. 431700 湖北天门,湖北省天门市第一人民医院检验科
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-22 出版日期:2019-01-15
  • 通信作者: 裴峰

Value of serum CysC combined with urinary NGAL in diagnosis of acute kidney injury in patients with liver cirrhosis

Feng Pei1,()   

  1. 1. Clinical Laboratory, the First People's Hospital of Tianmen in Hubei Province, Tianmen 431700, China
  • Received:2017-12-22 Published:2019-01-15
  • Corresponding author: Feng Pei
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Pei Feng, Email:
引用本文:

裴峰. 血清胱抑素C联合尿NGAL在肝硬化患者并发急性肾损伤中的诊断价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(02): 105-110.

Feng Pei. Value of serum CysC combined with urinary NGAL in diagnosis of acute kidney injury in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(02): 105-110.

目的

分析血清胱抑素C(CysC)联合尿中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白(NGAL)在肝硬化患者并发症急性肾功能损伤(AKI)中的诊断价值。

方法

对湖北省天门市第一人民医院2014年4月至2017年4月期间收治的120例肝硬化并发AKI患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,根据患者AKI分期标准将患者分成AKI 1期组、AKI 2期组以及AKI 3期组,每组40例,同时另选取同时段进行健康体检的健康者40名作为对照组。根据血清CysC与尿NGAL水平表达情况,以表达水平高于基础值50%为基线,设为高CysC组、高NGAL组以及高CysC+NGAL组。采用单因素方差检验分析比较AKI 1期组、AKI 2期组、AKI 3期组与对照组之间血清CysC、尿NGAL、血清肌酐(SCr)、APACHE Ⅱ评分的差异,比较高CysC组、高NGAL组以及高CysC+NGAL组APACHE Ⅱ评分的差异,组间差异的两两比较采用SNK-q检验;采用两独立样本t检验比较存活组与死亡组血清CysC、尿NGAL及APACHE Ⅱ评分;采用χ2检验比较各组的存活情况,组间的两两比较采用χ2分割检验;血清CysC、尿NGAL水平与APACHEⅡ评分的相关性采用Pearson积差相关分析。

结果

对照组、AKI 1期组、AKI 2期组与AKI 3期组中血清CysC、尿NGAL与SCr表达水平随着AKI病情分期的增加而升高,APACHE Ⅱ评分亦随着病情的加重而增加;血清CysC方面,AKI 1期组、AKI 2期组、AKI 3期组与对照组比较,差异具有统计学意义(q=4.807,P=0.036;q=15.449,P<0.001;q=23.942,P<0.001);AKI 2期组、AKI 3期组与AKI 1期组比较差异具有统计学意义(q=10.641,P<0.001;q=19.136,P<0.001);AKI 3期组与AKI 2期组比较,差异具有统计学意义(q=8.495,P=0.01);尿NGAL方面,AKI 1期组、AKI 2期组、AKI 3期组与对照组比较,差异具有统计学意义(q=6.109,P=0.012;q=10.997,P<0.001;q=19.375,P<0.001);AKI 2期组、AKI 3期组与AKI 1期组比较差异具有统计学意义(q=4.887,P=0.031;q=13.266,P<0.001);AKI 3期组与AKI 2期组比较,差异具有统计学意义(q=8.378,P=0.004);SCr方面,AKI 1期组、AKI 2期组、AKI 3期组与对照组比较,差异具有统计学意义(q=8.461,P=0.003;q=21.198,P<0.001;q=42.995,P<0.001);AKI 2期组、AKI 3期组与AKI 1期组比较差异具有统计学意义(q=12.737,P<0.001;q=34.534,P<0.001);AKI 3期组与AKI 2期组比较,差异具有统计学意义(q=21.797,P<0.001);APACHE Ⅱ评分方面,AKI 2期组、AKI 3期与AKI 1期组比较差异具有统计学意义(q=10.907,P<0.001;q=21.643,P<0.001);AKI 3期组与AKI 2期组比较,差异具有统计学意义(q=10.737,P<0.001);病死率方面,AKI 2期组、AKI 3期组与AKI 1期组比较,差异具有统计学意义(χ2=4.766,P=0.029;χ2=13.272,P<0.001);AKI 3期组与AKI 2期组比较,差异具有统计学意义(χ2=5.208,P=0.022)。高CysC组、高NGAL组与高NGAL+CysC组APACHE Ⅱ评分以及死亡率逐渐升高,APACHE Ⅱ评分方面,高CysC组、高NGAL组与高NGAL+CysC组比较,差异具有统计学意义(q=17.440,P<0.001;q=16.206,P<0.001);高CysC组与高NGAL组比较,差异无统计学意义(q=1.234,P=0.452);病死率方面,高CysC组、高NGAL组与高NGAL+CysC组比较,差异具有统计学意义(χ2=8.010,P=0.005;χ2=5.148,P=0.023),高CysC组与高NGAL组比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.173,P=0.279)。死亡组患者血清CysC与尿NGAL表达水平高于存活组,差异具有统计学意义(t=13.687,12.246,P均<0.001)。APACHE Ⅱ评分结果死亡组高于存活组,差异具有统计学意义(t=18.872,P<0.001);血清CysC及尿NGAL水平与APACHE Ⅱ评分成线性相关性(r=0.868,P=0.003;r=0.721,P=0.008)。

结论

尿NGAL与血清CysC是预测AKI发病的早期指标,两者联合检测能进一步提高对AKI的早期诊断,可作为临床上诊断AKI患者病情与预后的指标。

Objective

To assess the value of serum CysC combined with urinary NGAL in the diagnosis of acute kidney injury in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Methods

The clinical data of 120 cases of liver cirrhosis complicated with acute renal injury treated at the First People's Hospital of Tianmen, Hubei, China from April 2014 to April 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the AKI criteria, the patients were divided into an AKI 1 group, AKI 2 group, and AKI 3 group, with 40 cases in each group. Forty cases who received normal health examination at the same hospital during the same period were selected as a control group. Urine NGAL was detected by solid phase sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), serum CysC was detected by ELISA, and creatinine (SCr) was detected by serum oxidase method. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the difference of urine NGAL and serum CysC expression among the four groups, and the correlation between serum CysC, the level of urine NGAL, and the APACHE Ⅱ score was assessed by Pearson correlation analysis.

Results

Serum CysC, urinary NGAL and Scr levels, and APACHEⅡ score increased with disease severity. Serum CysC levels in the three AKI groups were significantly different from that in the control group (q=4.807, P=0.036; q=15.449, P<0.001; q=23.942, P<0.001); a significant difference was also observed between the AKI 2/3 groups and AKI 1 group (q=10.641, P<0.001; q=19.136, P<0.001), as well as between the AKI 3 and AKI 2 groups (q=8.495, P=0.01). Urinary NGAL levels in the three AKI groups were significantly different from that in the control group (q=6.109, P=0.012; q=10.997, P<0.001; q=19.375, P<0.001); a significant difference was also observed between the AKI 2/3 groups and AKI 1 group (q=4.887, P=0.031; q=13.266, P<0.001), as well as between the AKI 3 and AKI 2 groups (q=8.378, P=0.004). Scr levels in the three AKI groups were significantly different from that in the control group (q=8.461, P=0.003; q=21.198, P<0.001; q=42.995, P<0.001); a significant difference was also observed between the AKI 2/3 groups and AKI 1 group (q=12.737, P<0.001; q=34.534, P<0.001), as well as between the AKI 3 group and AKI 2 group (q=21.797, P<0.001). APACHE Ⅱ score differed significantly between the AKI 2/3 groups and AKI 1 group (q=10.907, P<0.001; q=21.643, P<0.001), as well as between the AKI 3 group and AKI 2 group (q=10.737, P<0.001). The mortality rates differed significantly between the AKI 2/3 groups and the AKI 1 group (χ2=4.766, P=0.029, χ2=13.272, P<0.001), as well as between the AKI 2 and AKI 3 groups (χ2=5.208, P=0.022). APACHEⅡ score increased with the aggravation of the disease. APACHE Ⅱ score in the high CysC + high NGAL group was significantly higher than that in the high CysC alone group or high NGAL alone group (q=17.440, P<0.001; q=16.206, P<0.001). APACHE Ⅱ score was not significantly different between the high CysC alone group and high NGAL alone group (q=1.234, P=0.452). The mortality rate of patients with high CysC and high NGAL was significantly higher than that of patients with high CysC alone (χ2=8.010, P=0.005) or high NGAL alone (χ2=5.148, P=0.023). The mortality rate was statistically higher in the high CysC alone group than in the high NGAL alone group (χ2=1.173, P=0.279). Serum CysC and urinary NGAL in the death group were significantly higher than those in the survival group. APACHE score in the death group was signficantly higher than that of the survival group (t=18.872, P<0.001). Serum CysC and urinary NGAL levels were linearly correlated with APACHE score (r=0.868, P=0.003; r=0.721, P=0.008).

Conclusion

Urinary NGAL and serum CysC are the early indicators for predicting the onset of AKI, and combined detection of them can further improve the early diagnosis of AKI. Urinary NGAL and serum CysC can be used as indicators for evaluating the clinical condition and prognosis of liver cirrhosis patients with AKI.

表1 4组被检者血清CysC与尿NGAL等指标表达水平比较(±s
表2 血清CysC与尿NGAL联合检测对AKI病情严重程度的临床价值评价
表3 存活组与死亡组患者血清CysC、尿NGAL表达水平以及APACHE Ⅱ评分比较(±s
1
南月敏. 肝硬化并发症诊治现状及展望 [J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2017, 25(4): 614-615.
2
臧红, 万志红, 辛绍杰. 肝硬化急性肾损伤的早期临床诊断 [J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2015, 32(9): 566-568.
3
刘新龙, 岳锦熙, 苏美仙. 血NGAL、CysC检测对外科重症急性肾损伤患者的早期诊断价值 [J]. 重庆医学, 2015, 44(18): 2506-2508.
4
池锐彬, 邓宇珺, 袁婕, 等. 尿NAG联合血清CysC预测重症患者急性肾损伤诊断和预后的临床价值 [J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2016, 25(2): 194-199.
5
王莉. CysC检测对急性肾损伤早期诊断的临床意义 [J]. 西南国防医药, 2016, 26(9): 1028-1030.
6
谷翠芝, 李清初, 曾凝,等. 急性肾损伤患者NGAL、KIM-1与血肌酐的相关性 [J]. 广东医学, 2015, 53(20): 3179-3181.
7
王海燕. KDIGO急性肾损伤临床实践指南 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 521-523.
8
中华医学会传染病与, 寄生虫病学分会, 肝病学分会. 病毒性肝炎防治方案 [J]. 中华内科杂志, 2001, 40(1): 324-329.
9
Singal AK, Jackson B, Pereira GB, et al. Biomarkers of renal injury in patients with cirrhosis: association with acute kidney injury and recovery after liver transplantation [J]. Gastroenterology, 2017, 152(5): 1132.
10
汪力, 王少清, 毛楠, 等. 结肠透析联合尿毒清保留灌肠治疗老年慢性肾脏病的疗效观察[J]. 保健医学研究与实践, 2016, 13(4): 34-36.
11
王雪, 崔燕, 赵永利, 等. 胱抑素C在肾脏疾病的研究进展 [J]. 中国中西医结合肾病杂志, 2017, 18(1): 83-85.
12
朱军, 朱兴旺. 血清NGAL检测在新生儿窒息后急性肾损伤早期诊断中的应用 [J]. 中国新生儿科杂志, 2016, 31(3): 195-197.
13
Assadi F, Sharbaf FG. Urine KIM-1 as a Potential Biomarker of Acute Renal Injury After Circulatory Collapse in Children [J]. Pediatr Emerg Care, 2016, 23(12): 1-2.
14
杨美平. 血清Cys-C、KIM-1及NGAL在急性肾损伤早期诊断中作用 [J]. 现代仪器与医疗, 2016, 22(4): 67-68.
15
董自杰, 李彦青, 李雪, 等. 尿液NGAL、血清CysC联合诊断在儿童急性肾损伤中应用价值 [J]. 中国临床研究, 2017, 32(8): 754-755.
16
李平华, 宋倩, 黄连铭. 血清肌酐、胱抑素C、NGAL检测对妊娠相关急性肾损伤诊断及预后评估的价值 [J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2017, 25(5): 308-313.
17
阮红刚, 付潮泓, 许腊梅. Cys C联合NGAL在急性肾损伤中的评估价值 [J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2016, 17(12): 960-962.
18
王群仙, 陈友好, 何俊英, 等. 尿中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白联合血清胱抑素C早期诊断新生儿急性肾损伤的价值 [J]. 中国全科医学, 2015, 18(36): 4450-4454.
[1] 韩圣瑾, 周正武, 翁云龙, 黄鑫. 碳酸氢钠林格液联合连续性肾脏替代疗法对创伤合并急性肾损伤患者炎症水平及肾功能的影响[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 376-381.
[2] 张秋彬, 张楠, 林清婷, 徐军, 朱华栋, 姜辉. 急性胰腺炎合并急性肾损伤患者的预后评估[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 382-389.
[3] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[4] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[5] 莫闲, 杨闯. 肝硬化患者并发门静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 678-683.
[6] 韩宇, 张武, 李安琪, 陈文颖, 谢斯栋. MRI肝脏影像报告和数据系统对非肝硬化乙肝患者肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 669-673.
[7] 李青霖, 宋仁杰, 周飞虎. 一种重型劳力性热射病相关急性肾损伤小鼠模型的建立与探讨[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 265-270.
[8] 任加发, 邬步云, 邢昌赢, 毛慧娟. 2022年急性肾损伤领域基础与临床研究进展[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 276-281.
[9] 李金璞, 饶向荣. 抗病毒药物和急性肾损伤[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 287-290.
[10] 宋艳琪, 任雪景, 王文娟, 韩秋霞, 续玥, 庄凯婷, 肖拓, 蔡广研. 间充质干细胞对顺铂诱导的小鼠急性肾损伤中细胞铁死亡的作用[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 187-193.
[11] 秦维, 王丹, 孙玉, 霍玉玲, 祝素平, 郑艳丽, 薛瑞. 血清层粘连蛋白、Ⅳ型胶原蛋白对代偿期肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张出血的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 447-451.
[12] 张雯, 宋牡丹, 邓雪婷, 张云. 强化营养支持辅助奥曲肽治疗肝硬化合并食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的疗效及再出血危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 456-460.
[13] 朱翔宇, 王建美, 张辉, 叶红英. 无创左心室压力-应变循环技术在左心室功能参数与肝硬化的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 494-498.
[14] 易成, 韦伟, 赵宇亮. 急性肾脏病的概念沿革[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 906-910.
[15] 孔凡彪, 杨建荣. 肝脏基础疾病与结直肠癌肝转移之间关系的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 818-822.
阅读次数
全文


摘要