切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (11) : 801 -805. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2019.11.001

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

全脊柱内镜下可视化环锯单侧入路双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症
夏梦娇1, 王振飞1, 陈涛2, 赵猛1, 周建1, 马超1, 高娟1, 刘珅3, 曲新华3, 戴尅戎3, 刘光旺1,()   
  1. 1. 221000 徐州市中心医院骨脊柱外科
    2. 233000 蚌埠医学院
    3. 200000 上海交通大学医学院骨与关节研究所
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-15 出版日期:2019-06-01
  • 通信作者: 刘光旺
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省卫生计生委科研课题(H201673、QNRC2016392); 江苏省科技厅重点研发计划(BE2016640);徐州市卫生计生委科研课题(XWCX201601、2014006)

Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by full-endoscopic trephination-based bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach

Mengjiao Xia1, Zhenfei Wang1, Tao Chen2, Meng Zhao1, Jian Zhou1, Chao Ma1, Juan Gao1, Kun Liu3, Xinhua Qu3, Kerong Dai3, Guangwang Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Spine Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou 221000, China
    2. Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233000, China
    3. Bone and Joint Institute, Shanghai Jiao tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200000, China
  • Received:2018-12-15 Published:2019-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Guangwang Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Guangwang, Email:
引用本文:

夏梦娇, 王振飞, 陈涛, 赵猛, 周建, 马超, 高娟, 刘珅, 曲新华, 戴尅戎, 刘光旺. 全脊柱内镜下可视化环锯单侧入路双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(11): 801-805.

Mengjiao Xia, Zhenfei Wang, Tao Chen, Meng Zhao, Jian Zhou, Chao Ma, Juan Gao, Kun Liu, Xinhua Qu, Kerong Dai, Guangwang Liu. Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by full-endoscopic trephination-based bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(11): 801-805.

目的

探讨经皮脊柱内镜下可视化环锯单侧入路双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的可行性及疗效。

方法

2015年9月至2017年9月采用经皮脊柱内镜下利用可视化环锯经单侧入路完成腰椎管狭窄的双侧减压31例。记录手术时间、术中出血量,术后并发症发生情况及CT复查的表现等,并对患者于末次随访时按Nakai标准评定疗效,并计算优良率。

结果

手术时间65~125 min,平均(48±13)min;术中出血25~180 ml,平均(37±9)ml;切口约7~8 mm,平均(7.0±0.6)mm。手术均顺利完成,无神经损伤、术后感染、腰椎不稳等手术并发症。术后CT显示椎管减压充分。随访6~18个月,平均(10.0±4.6)个月。疗效评定:优22例,良6例,可2例,差1例,优良率为90.3%(28/31)。

结论

经皮脊柱内镜下可视化环锯单侧入路双侧减压技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症减压充分,创伤小、恢复快、费用低,而且术中安全性高,术后并发症发生率低,可最大限度减少对腰椎稳定结构的破坏,是一种治疗腰椎管狭窄症的理想微创手术。

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of full-endoscopic trephination-based bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

Methods

From September 2015 to September 2017, 31 cases of LSS were treated by full-endoscopic trephination-based bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and CT reexamination findings were recorded, the efficacy was evaluated according to the Nakai standard at the last follow-up, and the excellent/good result rate was calculated.

Results

The operation time ranged from 65 to 125 min, with an average of (48±13) min. Intraoperative blood loss ranged from 25 to 180 ml, with an average of (37±9) ml. The incision length was about 7-8 mm, with an average of (7.0±0.6) mm. All the operations were successfully completed without complications such as nerve injury, postoperative infection, and lumbar instability. Postoperative CT showed adequate decompression of the spinal canal. The patients were followed for 6 to 18 months, with an average period of (10.0±4.6) months. With regard to curative effects, excellent, good, fair, and poor results were achieved in 22, 6, 2, and 1 case, respectively, with an excellent/good result rate of 90.3% (28/31).

Conclusion

Full-endoscopic trephination-based bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach in the treatment of LSS is associated with adequate decompression, small trauma, quick recovery, low cost, high safety, and low incidence of postoperative complications, and can minimize damage to the lumbar spinal structure, representing an ideal minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of LSS.

图7 术后复查腰椎CT,提示减压充分
1
Kreiner DS, Shaffer WO, Baisden JL, et al. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update) [J]. Spine J, 2013, 13(7): 734-743.
2
Försth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis [J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 374(15): 1413-1123.
3
Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, et al. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults [J]. Jama, 2010, 303(13): 1259-1265.
4
Kondo M, Oshima Y, Inoue H, et al. Significance and pitfalls of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for large central lumbar disc herniation [J]. J Spine Surg, 2018, 4(1): 79-85.
5
Lee CH, Choi M, Choi I, et al. Efficacy and safety of full-endoscopic decompression via interlaminar approach for central or lateral recess spinal stenosis of the lumbar spine: A meta-analysis [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2018, 43(24): 1756-1764.
6
Komp M, Hahn P, Merk H, et al. Bilateral operation of lumbar degenerative central spinal stenosis in full-endoscopic interlaminar technique with unilateral approach: prospective 2-year results of 74 patients [J]. Clinical Spine Surgery, 2011, 24(5): 281-287.
7
Park CH,Lee SH,et al. Endoscope-assisted minimally invasive interlaminar lumbar decompression for spinal stenosis [J]. Pain Physician, 2019, 22(6): E573-E578.
8
Lee CW, Yoon KJ, Jun JH. Percutaneous endoscopic laminotomy with flavectomy by uniportal, unilateral approach for the lumbar canal or lateral recess stenosis [J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 126: 686.
[1] 谭海宁, 于凌佳, 谢学虎, 刘宁, 张国强, 李想, 杨雍, 祝斌. 单通道全脊柱内镜治疗腰椎管狭窄症的隐性失血及危险因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 233-238.
[2] 邵睿, 祝斌, 刘立立, 刘晓光. 脊柱内镜腰椎间盘突出髓核摘除术后早期非计划二次手术原因分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(01): 46-49.
[3] 辛志军, 郑国权, 廖文波, 张西峰, 黄鹏. 两种经皮脊柱内镜术式治疗腰椎管狭窄症的并发症分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(02): 107-112.
[4] 黄良诚, 郭燕梅, 李宁, 陈锦旭, 曾祥超, 车路阳, 郭清华, 薛大鹏, 张西峰, 黄鹏. 经皮内镜腰神经根减压术后疼痛症状改善进展的研究[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 09(05): 257-261.
[5] 曾祥超, 黄鹏, 张西峰, 陈锦旭, 李宁, 黄良诚, 车路阳, 王岩. 经皮内镜治疗老年腰椎间盘突出与椎管狭窄的比较[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 09(01): 25-28.
[6] 李松风, 李锡勇, 白晓辉, 王云鹭, 韩鹏飞, 李红倬. 单侧双通道内镜与通道显微内镜治疗腰椎管狭窄症的meta分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 172-181.
[7] 赵俊华, 杨政伟, 刘阳, 郑银福, 刘建. 规范的术后康复训练对PELD术预后的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 157-165.
[8] 王海宾, 刘恩, 吕飞, 韩清清, 张俊芬. 斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄的疗效分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(04): 224-230.
[9] 邢海清, 苏寅, 叶少奇, 缪晓晖. 交叉MIS-TLIF联合经皮椎弓根螺钉治疗双节段腰椎管狭窄伴节段失稳症[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2020, 06(01): 48-53.
[10] 张志强, 杨建东, 范新宇, 黄吉军, 蔡俊, 冯新民, 闫明. Endo-LOVE技术治疗重度脱垂型腰椎间盘突出症的效果分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 62-65.
[11] 朱李梅, 张经纬, 陈佳楠, 安林. 老年腰椎管狭窄症患者围术期应用人促红细胞生成素联合蔗糖铁的疗效分析[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 24-27.
[12] 彭如辉, 周德春, 吴庆鸣, 杨忠. 经皮经椎间孔脊柱内镜技术治疗老年退变性腰椎管狭窄症疗效分析[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2021, 08(04): 14-17.
阅读次数
全文


摘要