切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (11) : 822 -827. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2019.11.005

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

18F-FDG PET/CT在结直肠癌术后血清癌胚抗原阳性患者中的临床应用
林新峰1, 李囡1, 王菲1, 赵伟1, 杨志1,()   
  1. 1. 100142 北京大学肿瘤医院核医学科
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-24 出版日期:2019-06-01
  • 通信作者: 杨志

Clinical value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in postoperative colorectal cancer patients with elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen

Xinfeng Lin1, Nan Li1, Fei Wang1, Wei Zhao1, Zhi Yang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100142, China
  • Received:2019-04-24 Published:2019-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhi Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Zhi, E-mail:
引用本文:

林新峰, 李囡, 王菲, 赵伟, 杨志. 18F-FDG PET/CT在结直肠癌术后血清癌胚抗原阳性患者中的临床应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(11): 822-827.

Xinfeng Lin, Nan Li, Fei Wang, Wei Zhao, Zhi Yang. Clinical value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in postoperative colorectal cancer patients with elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(11): 822-827.

目的

探讨18F-FDG PET/CT检测结直肠癌术后血清癌胚抗原(CEA)阳性患者中复发和转移灶的价值。

方法

回顾性分析60例结直肠癌术后CEA阳性且接受PET/CT检查的患者,将PET/CT检出结果与病理及随访结果进行比较。

结果

18F-FDG PET/CT诊断阳性50例,假阳性1例;阴性10例,假阴性3例。PET/CT诊断结直肠癌术后CEA阳性患者复发和转移灶的灵敏度为94.2%(49/52),特异度为87.5%(7/8),阳性预测值为98.0%(49/50),阴性预测值为70.0%(7/10),准确率为93.3%(56/60)。

结论

18F-FDG PET/CT在结直肠癌术后血清CEA阳性患者中有较高的临床应用价值,其对复发及转移灶的检测具有较高的灵敏度、特异度及准确率。

Objective

To explore the value of 18-fluorine flurodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in detecting recurrence and metastasis in postoperative colorectal cancer patients with elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA).

Methods

Clinical data of 60 cases of colorectal cancer, including PET/CT, pathological, and follow-up results, were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

There were 50 18F-FDG PET/CT positive and 10 18F-FDG PET/CT negative cases, including 1 false positive and 3 false negative cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting recurrence and metastasis in postoperative colorectal cancer patients with elevated serum CEA were 94.2%(49/52), 87.5% (7/8), 98.0% (49/50), 70.0% (7/10), and 93.3% (56/60), respectively.

Conclusion

18F-FDG PET/CT has high clinical value in postoperative colorectal cancer patients with elevated serum CEA, and it has a high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the detection of recurrence and metastasis.

表1 60例结直肠癌术后CEA升高患者的临床特征
图1 患者男,40岁,18F-FDG PET/CT图像 图a示患者右腹部造瘘口软组织灶轻度放射性摄取增高,判定为炎性改变;图b随访过程中,造瘘口软组织增大,考虑肿瘤转移
图2 患者女,51岁,18F-FDG PET/CT图像 图a示盆腔腹膜轻度放射性摄取增高(箭),判定为炎性改变;图b随访过程中腹膜较前增厚,放射性摄取较前增高(箭),考虑肿瘤转移
图3 患者男,77岁,18F-FDG PET/CT图像 图a示肠系膜根部小淋巴结(箭);图b示随访过程中发现淋巴结较前增大,放射性摄取较前增高(箭)
表2 18F-FDG PET/CT检查对结直肠癌术后CEA阳性患者复发及转移的诊断结果(例)
表3 18F-FDG PET/CT检出结直肠癌术后CEA阳性患者复发和转移病灶情况
1
Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2013, 63 (1): 11-30.
2
Hammond K, Margolin DA. The role of postoperative surveillance in colorectal cancer [J]. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 2007, 20(3): 249-254.
3
Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, et al. Perioperative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC 40983): long-term results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2013, 14(12): 1208-1215.
4
Hirai I, Kimura W, Fuse A, et al. Surgical management for metastatic liver tumors [J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2006, 53(71): 757-763.
5
Schaefer O, Langer M. Detection of recurrent rectal cancer with CT, MRI and PET/CT [J]. Eur Radiol, 2007, 17(8): 2044-2054.
6
Maas M, Rutten IJ, Nelemans PJ, et al. What is the most accurate whole-body imaging modality for assessment of local and distant recurrent disease in colorectal cancer? A meta-analysis: imaging for recurrent colorectal cancer [J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2011, 38(8): 1560-1571.
7
Lin JK, Lin CC, Yang SH, et al. Early postoperative CEA level is a better prognostic indicator than is preoperative CEA level in predicting prognosis of patients with curable colorectal cancer [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2011, 26(9): 1135-1141.
8
Yakabe T, Nakafusa Y, Sumi K, et al. Clinical significance of CEA and CA19-9 in postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2010, 17(9): 2349-2356.
9
Dirisamer A, Halpern BS, Flöry D, et al. Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the staging and restaging of colorectal cancer: comparison with PET and enhanced CT [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2010, 73(2): 324-328.
10
Wiering B, Vogel WV, Ruers TJ, et al. Controversies in the management of colorectal liver metastases: role of PET and PET/CT [J]. Dig Surg, 2008, 25(6): 413-420.
11
Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, et al. ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer: a personalized approach to clinical decision making [J]. Ann Oncol, 2012, 23(10): 2479-2516.
12
Meyerhardt JA, Mangu PB, Flynn PJ, et al. Follow-up care, surveillance protocol, and secondary prevention measures for survivors of colorectal cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline endorsement [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2013, 31(35): 4465-4470.
13
Zhang C, Chen Y, Xue H, et al. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET in recurrent colorectal carcinoma: a meta-analysis [J]. Int J Cancer, 2009, 124(1): 167-173.
14
Zhang Y, Feng B, Zhang GL, et al. Value of 18F-FDG PET-CT in surveillance of postoperative colorectal cancer patients with various carcinoembryonic antigen concentrations [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(21): 6608-6614.
15
Panagiotidis E, Datseris IE, Rondogianni P, et al. Does CEA and CA 19-9 combined increase the likelihood of 18F-FDG in detecting recurrence in colorectal patients with negative CeCT? [J]. Nucl Med Commun, 2014, 35(6): 598-605.
16
Makis W, Kurzencwyg D, Hickeson M. 18F-FDG PET/CT superior to serum CEA in detection of colorectal cancer and its recurrence [J]. Clin Imaging, 2013, 37(6): 1094-1097.
17
Manfredi S, Lepage C, Hatem C, et al. Epidemiology and management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer [J]. Ann Surg, 2006, 244(2): 254-259.
18
Shamim SA, Kumar R, Halanaik D, et al. Role of FDG-PET/CT in detection of recurrent disease in colorectal cancer [J]. Nucl Med Commun, 2010, 31(6): 590-596.
19
Kyoto Y, Momose M, Kondo C, et al. Ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT to diagnose recurrent colorectal cancer in patients with elevated CEA concentrations [J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2010, 24(5): 395-401.
20
Chiewvit S, Jiranantanakorn T, Apisarnthanarak P, et al. Detection of recurrent colorectal cancer by 18F-FDG PET/CT comparison with contrast enhanced CT scan [J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2013, 96(6): 703-708.
21
Patel S, McCall M, Ohinmaa A, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomographic scans compared to computed tomographic scans for detecting colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review [J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 253(4): 666-671.
22
Niekel MC, Bipat S, Stoker J, et al. Diagnostic imaging of colorectal liver metastases with CT, MR imaging, FDG PET, and/or FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis of prospective studies includ- ing patients who have not previously undergone treatment [J]. Radiology, 2010, 257(3): 674-684.
23
Nomori H, Watanabe K, Ohtsuka T, et al. Evaluation of F-18 flurodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scanning for pulmonary nodule less than 3cm in diameter, with special reference to the CT images. Lung Cancer, 2004, 45(1): 19-27.
24
Borasio P, Gisabella M, Billé A, et al. Role of surgical resection in colorectal lung metastases: analysis of 137 patients [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2011, 26(2): 183-190.
25
Goldstein MJ, Mitchell EP. Carcinoembryonic antigen in the staging and follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer [J]. Cancer Investig, 2005, 23(4): 338-351.
26
Michael G, Magdalena K, Rune V. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT as first choice in the detection of recurrent colorectal cancer due to rising CEA [J]. Cancer Imaging, 2015, 13; 15: 11.
27
Sanli Y, Kuyumcu S, Ozkan ZG, et al. The utility of FDG-PET/CT as an effective tool for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer egardless of serum CEA levels [J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2012, 26(7): 551-558.
28
Chen LB, Tong JL, Song HZ, et al. (18)FDG PET/CT in detection of recurrence and metastasis of colorectal cancer [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2007, 13(37): 5025-5029.
29
Ozkan E, Soydal C, Araz M, et al. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence in patients with elevated CEA levels [J]. Nucl Med Commun, 2012, 33(4): 395-402.
30
Han A, Xue J, Zhu D, et al. Clinical value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in postoperative monitoring for patients with colorectal carcinoma [J]. Cancer Epidemiol, 2011, 35(5): 497-500.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[6] 崔占斌, 乔军利, 张丽丽, 韩明强. 尿碘水平与甲状腺乳头状癌患者术后复发危险度分层的相关性[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 615-618.
[7] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[8] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[9] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[10] 阿冲罗布, 陈颖, 谢德坤. 腹腔镜外囊完整剥离术治疗肝包虫病效果及对患者肝功能、预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
[11] 邢晓伟, 刘雨辰, 赵冰, 王明刚. 基于术前腹部CT的卷积神经网络对腹壁切口疝术后复发预测价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 677-681.
[12] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[13] 张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.
[14] 张政赢, 鞠阳, 刘晓宁. 二甲双胍对2型糖尿病患者大肠腺瘤术后复发的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 485-488.
[15] 符梅沙, 周玉华, 李慧, 薛春颜. 淋巴细胞免疫治疗对复发性流产患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群分布与PD1/PD-L1表达的影响及意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 726-730.
阅读次数
全文


摘要