切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (12) : 930 -937. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2019.12.012

所属专题: 文献

基础研究

增味小承气汤对梗阻性黄疸大鼠腹部切口愈合的影响
魏强1, 陈强谱1,(), 管清海1, 孙宝房1, 朱文涛1   
  1. 1. 256600 滨州医学院附属医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-11 出版日期:2019-06-15
  • 通信作者: 陈强谱

Effect of modified Xiaochengqi decoction on incision healing in rats with obstructive jaundice

Qiang Wei1, Qiangpu Chen1,(), Qinghai Guan1, Baofang Sun1, Wentao Zhu1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou 256600, China
  • Received:2019-04-11 Published:2019-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Qiangpu Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Qiangpu, Email:
引用本文:

魏强, 陈强谱, 管清海, 孙宝房, 朱文涛. 增味小承气汤对梗阻性黄疸大鼠腹部切口愈合的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(12): 930-937.

Qiang Wei, Qiangpu Chen, Qinghai Guan, Baofang Sun, Wentao Zhu. Effect of modified Xiaochengqi decoction on incision healing in rats with obstructive jaundice[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(12): 930-937.

目的

研究增味小承气汤对梗阻性黄疸大鼠腹部切口愈合程度的影响。

方法

将SD大鼠随机分为对照组、假手术组、梗阻性黄疸+中药组和梗阻性黄疸组,每组10只,梗阻性黄疸+中药组和梗阻性黄疸组大鼠建立梗阻性黄疸模型,建模前1 d至建模后第7天,梗阻性黄疸+中药组大鼠每日以增味小承气汤灌胃2次,同时给予其他各组大鼠等量蒸馏水灌胃。模型建立后第3、5、7天自大鼠尾静脉取血,测定直接胆红素水平;术后第8天处死大鼠,留取标本,行皮肤切口抗张力实验、腹壁切口抗张力实验,皮肤切口行HE染色、Masson染色,免疫组化法检测α-平滑肌激动蛋白(SMA)。

结果

与梗阻性黄疸组相比,梗阻性黄疸+中药组大鼠精神状态好转,活动量有所增加;建立模型后第3、5、7天留取的血清检查发现,梗阻性黄疸+中药组和梗阻性黄疸组血清直接胆红素水平较对照组、假手术组均程度明显升高,说明模型建立成功。与梗阻性黄疸组相比,梗阻性黄疸+中药组大鼠皮肤切口所抗张力程度明显提高(F=127.4,P<0.05),腹壁切口抗张力程度明显提高(F=101.9,P<0.05);皮肤切口组织HE染色可见,与梗阻性黄疸组比较,梗阻性黄疸+中药组大鼠切口愈合较好,Masson染色可见梗阻性黄疸+中药组胶原纤维分布均匀紧密;各组皮下α-SMA表达量有差异,差异具有统计学意义(F=16.59,P<0.05),与梗阻性黄疸组相比,梗阻性黄疸+中药组皮下α-SMA表达量增加,差异具有统计学意义(t=5.245,P<0.05)。

结论

增味小承气汤明显加快了梗阻性黄疸大鼠腹部切口纤维化的形成,增加了切口的抗张力程度,促进了腹部切口的愈合。

Objective

To observe the effect of modified Xiaochengqi decoction on skin incision healing in rats with obstructive jaundice (OJ).

Methods

Healthy male rats were randomly divided into a control group, sham group, OJ+ traditional Chinese medicine (OJ+ M) group, and OJ alone group, each of which contained ten animals. The control group was not treated surgically; the sham group underwent separation of the common bile duct using laparotomy instruments, followed by abdominal closure; both the OJ+ M and OJ groups received laparotomy and separation of the common bile duct, which was ligated near the porta hepatis, followed by abdominal closure. From the day before modeling to the 7 th day after modeling, intragastric administration of modified Xiaochengqi decoction was performed in the OJ+ M group twice a day (in the morning and evening, respectively), while equal amount of distilled water was intragastrically administered in all other groups. All rats were killed on the 8 th day after modeling with specimens collected. The rats were observed in terms of general conditions, serum direct bilirubin, and incision healing. The general conditions of each group, such as activity level, mental state, and defecation, were recorded. Blood was collected via the caudal vein on the 3 rd, 5 th, and 7 th days after modeling, followed by centrifugation to obtain the serum, which was then stored at -20 ℃ for subsequent detection. Rat skin incision and abdominal incision were reserved for skin incision anti-tension test, abdominal incision anti-tension test, HE staining, Masson staining, and immunohistochemical detection of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression to observe the effect of modified Xiaochengqi decoction on abdominal incision healing in OJ rats.

Results

Compared with the OJ group, the rats of the OJ+ M group exhibited improved mental state and increased activity level. On the 3 rd, 5 th, and 7 th days after modeling, the levels of serum direct bilirubin in the OJ+ M and OJ groups were significantly higher than those in the control group and sham group, suggesting successful establishment of an OJ model. Compared with the OJ group, the OJ+ M group was featured by significantly increased tension resistance on the skin incision (F=127.4, P<0.05) and abdominal incision (F=101.9, P<0.05). HE staining demonstrated that the incision was better healed in the OJ+ M group, and Masson staining showed evenly and closely distributed collagen fibers at a higher content in the latter group (t=5.241, P<0.05). Immunohistochemical detection of α-SMA expression in the OJ+ M group indicated that the subcutaneous distribution of α-SMA was wider and significantly increased around the incision (t=5.245, P<0.05).

Conclusion

Modified Xiaochengqi decoction increases the formation of fibrosis significantly, improves the degree of tension resistance on the skin incision and abdominal incision, and promotes the healing of abdominal incision.

图1 大鼠模型建立情况 图a示正常大鼠肝门部情况;图b示梗阻性黄疸模型大鼠肝门部情况
表1 4组大鼠直接胆红素的变化(μmol/L,±s
图2 切口抗张力实验图 a图皮肤切口抗张力程度比较,两两比较,aP<0.05,bP<0.05,cP<0.05;b图腹壁切口抗张力程度比较,两两比较,aP<0.05,bP<0.05,cP<0.05
表2 大鼠切口抗张力情况(N,±s
图3 各组大鼠皮肤切口处HE染色(×400) 图a为对照组,图b为假手术组,图c为梗阻性黄疸+中药组,图d为梗阻性黄疸组
图4 各组大鼠皮肤切口处Masson染色病理图(×400) 图a为对照组,图b为假手术组,图c为梗阻性黄疸+中药组,图d为梗阻性黄疸组
表3 不同组别大鼠切口胶原纤维及α-SMA的表达量(±s
图5 各组大鼠α-平滑肌激动蛋白的表达量(×200) 图a为对照组,图b为假手术组,图c为梗阻性黄疸+中药组,图d为梗阻性黄疸组
图6 各组大鼠α-平滑肌激动蛋白的表达量(×400) 图a为对照组,图b为假手术组,图c为梗阻性黄疸+中药组,图d为梗阻性黄疸组
1
Wang L, Yu W. Obstructive jaundice and perioperative management [J]. Acta Anaesthesiologica Taiwanica, 2014, 52(1): 22-29.
2
Modha K. Clinical approach to patients with obstructive jaundice [J]. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol, 2015, 18(4): 197-200.
3
Fang Y, Gurusamy KS, Wang Q, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on safety and efficacy of biliary drainage before surgery for obstructive jaundice [J]. British Journal of Surgery, 2013, 100(12): 1589-1596.
4
Kurniawan J, Hasan I, Gani RA, et al. Mortality-related factors in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice [J]. Acta Med Indones, 2016, 48(4): 282-288.
5
王洪军, 刘洪波, 张保华, 等. 小承气汤对胰十二指肠切除术后患者血清炎性因子水平的影响 [J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2015, (22): 76-77.
6
Gao X, Xu X, Pan R, et al. Saponin fraction from Astragalus membranaceus roots protects mice against polymicrobial sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture by inhibiting inflammation and upregulating protein C pathway [J]. J Nat Med-Tokyo, 2009, 63(4): 421-429.
7
王庭欣, 王庭祥, 吴广臣, 等. 黄芪多糖增强小鼠免疫功能的实验研究 [J]. 时珍国医国药, 2009, 20(7): 1763-1764.
8
李钦, 胡继宏, 高博, 等. 黄芪多糖在免疫调节方面的最新研究进展 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2017, 23(2): 199-206.
9
张辉, 刘岩. 生肌散促进阑尾切除术后切口感染愈合临床观察 [J]. 中医药临床杂志, 2016, 28(2): 229-231.
10
Steenhagen E. Enhanced recovery after surgery: it′s time to change practice [J]. Nutr Clin Pract, 2016, 31(1): 18-29.
11
Khalil H, Cullen M, Chambers H, et al. Elements affecting wound healing time: An evidence based analysis [J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2015, 23(4): 550-556.
12
Schmidt BA, Horsley V. Intradermal adipocytes mediate fibroblast recruitment during skin wound healing [J]. Development, 2013, 140(7): 1517-1527.
13
Bainbridge P. Wound healing and the role of fibroblasts [J]. J Wound Care, 2013, 22(8): 407.
14
Woodley DT. Distinct fibroblasts in the papillary and reticular dermis [J]. Dermatol Clin, 2017, 35(1): 95-100.
15
Janda J, Nfonsam V, Calienes F, et al. Modulation of ROS levels in fibroblasts by altering mitochondria regulates the process of wound healing [J]. Arch Dermatol Res, 2016, 308(4): 239-248.
16
Masci VL, Taddei AR, Gambellini G, et al. Ultrastructural investigation on fibroblast interaction with collagen scaffold [J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2016, 104(1): 272-282.
17
Kasuya A, Tokura Y. Attempts to accelerate wound healing [J]. J Dermatol Sci, 2014, 76(3): 169-172.
18
陈念平, 戴维, 缪辉来, 等. 大黄素对阻塞性黄疸大鼠肝损害的保护作用 [J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2006, 13(6): 681-682.
19
Chen Y, Xu Y, Zhang H, et al. Emodin alleviates jejunum injury in rats with sepsis by inhibiting inflammation response [J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2016, 84: 1001-1007.
20
Groneberg D, Voussen B, Friebe A. Integrative control of gastrointestinal motility by nitric oxide [J]. Curr Med Chem, 2016, 23(24): 2715-2735.
21
王满才, 侯晓翔, 马天龙, 等. 厚朴排气合剂治疗外科手术后胃肠动力障碍疗效的Meta分析 [J]. 中医杂志, 2016, 76(9): 747-752.
22
张蔷,高文远,满淑丽. 黄芪中有效成分药理活性的研究进展 [J]. 中国中药杂志, 2012, 37(21): 3203-3207.
23
Yao C, Gao F, Chen Y, et al. Experimental research of astragalus polysaccharides collagen sponge in enhancing angiogenesis and collagen synthesis [J]. Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi, 2011, 25(12): 1481.
24
Zhang Q, Fong CC, Yu WK, et al. Herbal formula Astragali Radix and Rehmanniae Radix exerted wound healing effect on human skin fibroblast cell line Hs27 via the activation of transformation growth factor (TGF-β) pathway and promoting extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition [J]. Phytomedicine, 2012, 20(1): 9-16.
25
陈蔚, 李益明, 俞茂华, 等. 黄芪多糖对糖尿病鼠T细胞亚群的免疫调节作用 [J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2007, 17(1): 28-31.
26
颜爱, 李波, 李润成, 等. 香菇多糖和黄芪多糖对免疫抑制小鼠免疫功能调节的研究[J]. 中国免疫学杂志, 2012, 28(11): 999-1001.
27
Banno N, Akihisa T, Yasukawa K, et al. Anti-inflammatory activities of the triterpene acids from the resin of Boswellia carteri [J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2006, 107(2): 249-253.
28
朱小芳, 管咏梅, 刘莉, 等. 乳香、没药药对的研究进展 [J]. 江西中医药, 2016, 47(12): 72-75.
29
Zhang Y, Ji S, Fang H, et al. Use of amniotic microparticles coated with fibroblasts overexpressing sdf-1α to create an environment conducive to neovascularization for repair of full-thickness skin defects [J]. Cell Transplant, 2016, 25(2): 365-376.
30
Jiang QY. Moist exposed burn ointment promotes cutaneous excisional wound healing in rats involving VEGF and bFGF [J]. Mol Med Rep, 2014, 9(4): 1277-1282.
31
Mirza RE, Koh TJ. Contributions of cell subsets to cytokine production during normal and impaired wound healing [J]. Cytokine, 2015, 71(2): 409-412.
[1] 周子慧, 李恭驰, 李炳辉, 王知, 刘慧真, 王卉, 邹利军. 细胞自噬在创面愈合中作用的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 542-546.
[2] 陈继秋, 朱世辉. 皮肤牵张装置的临床应用现状[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 451-453.
[3] 中国老年医学学会烧创伤分会, 中国生物材料学会烧创伤创面修复材料分会. 中国糖尿病足截肢(趾)治疗专家共识(2022年版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(01): 1-9.
[4] 刘甜甜, 李明, 朱含汀, 倪涛, 彭银波, 方勇. 创缘铁过载的临床样本验证与铁过载对小鼠创面愈合的影响[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(06): 475-481.
[5] 黄晓罡, 牛东升, 闫香果, 张克松, 何军民, 王晓军, 刘媛媛. 局部应用重组人Ⅲ型胶原蛋白水凝胶对糖尿病患者创面愈合的影响[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(05): 430-434.
[6] 张苗苗, 付倩倩, 赵雅玫, 余小平, 周军利. 慢性创面伴自身免疫性疾病的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(05): 445-449.
[7] 王春立, 刘泽云, 闫冰, Emilio Galea. 脂质水胶体技术促进伤口愈合的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(05): 454-456.
[8] 蔡红升, 李炳辉, 沈谦, 杨文波, 陈妍雯, 李恭驰. 湖北省某创面修复中心慢性难愈合创面住院患者的流行病学调查分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(04): 283-291.
[9] 刘慧真, 李恭驰, 杜烨, 王卉, 李炳辉. 糖尿病足的诊断及治疗进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(04): 349-353.
[10] 彭毛东智, 李毅, 王洪瑾, 杨文静. 现代敷料促进创面愈合的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(04): 354-358.
[11] 盖晨阳, 张庆富. 负压封闭引流技术在创面治疗中的应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(03): 265-268.
[12] 韩焱福, 陶然, 杜雪梅. 手术切除+局部推进皮瓣修复术后慢性难愈性切口的临床观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(03): 237-241.
[13] 何平, 张琦, 薛江涛, 张建超. 糜蛋白酶结合亲水纤维敷料换药促进慢性创面愈合的回顾性研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(03): 233-236.
[14] 韩飞, 张万福, 胡晓龙, 佟琳, 官浩. 脱细胞异体真皮联合自体刃厚皮修复大面积烧伤后关节部位瘢痕挛缩[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(03): 221-226.
[15] 魏强, 张明祥, 陈强谱, 孙宝房. 增味小承气汤对梗阻性黄疸大鼠胃肠道动力的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 267-270.
阅读次数
全文


摘要