切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 280 -283. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2020.04.008

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

QuillTM缝线在腹腔镜肾部分切除术中的应用
唐露1, 张中元2, 王峰3,()   
  1. 1. 850000 拉萨,西藏藏医药大学
    2. 100034 北京大学第一医院泌尿外科,北京大学泌尿外科研究所
    3. 850000 拉萨,西藏自治区人民医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-13 出版日期:2020-04-15
  • 通信作者: 王峰

Clinical application of QuillTM self-retaining system comprised of polydioxanone synthetic absorbable surgical suture material in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Lu Tang1, Zhongyuan Zhang2, Feng Wang3,()   

  1. 1. University of Tibetan Medicine, Lhasa 850000, China
    2. Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China
    3. Department of Urology, People’s Hospital of Tibet Autonomous Region, Lhasa 850000, China
  • Received:2020-03-13 Published:2020-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Feng Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Feng, Email:
引用本文:

唐露, 张中元, 王峰. QuillTM缝线在腹腔镜肾部分切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 280-283.

Lu Tang, Zhongyuan Zhang, Feng Wang. Clinical application of QuillTM self-retaining system comprised of polydioxanone synthetic absorbable surgical suture material in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 280-283.

目的

探讨QuillTM缝线在腹腔镜肾部分切除术应用中的安全性及有效性。

方法

回顾性分析2015年6月至2020年1月西藏自治区人民医院泌尿外科完成的腹腔镜肾部分切除术38例,根据应用缝合线的不同分为普通缝线组和QuillTM缝线组。普通缝线组20例,均采用2-0单乔线缝合内层,线尾固定Hem-o-lok夹,1-0可吸收线缝合肾缺损,出肾被膜每针均固定1个Hem-o-lok夹;QuillTM缝线组18例,均采用2-0倒刺线缝合内层,1-0倒刺线缝合肾缺损处,采用连续缝合,最后肾被膜出针处固定1个Hem-o-lok夹。比较2组的手术时间、热缺血时间、术中出血量、术后并发症情况。

结果

38例患者手术均顺利完成,无中转开放或肾切除病例,2组的手术时间、术中出血量比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。普通缝线组平均热缺血时间[(25±5)min]大于QuillTM缝线组[(15±4)min],差异具有统计学意义(t=3.32,P=0.002)。2组均无术中并发症,普通缝线组1例因术后出血行选择性肾动脉栓塞,1例因漏尿留置D-J管。QuillTM缝线组术后无出血、漏尿等并发症。

结论

倒刺缝合在腹腔镜肾部分切除术中应用安全、有效,可减少平均热缺血时间及术后并发症的发生率。

Objective

To investigate the clinical application of QuillTM self-retaining system in patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 38 patients with renal neoplasms undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, who were admitted to the People's Hospital of Tibet Autonomous Region from June 2015 to January 2020. According to the suture used for renorrhaphy, the patients were divided into two groups. Vicryl suture was used for renorrhaphy in 20 patients (group 1), and QuillTM was used in 18 patients (group 2). Renorrhaphy was performed in two layers for both groups. In group 2, 2-0 QuillTM was used to suture the deep wound bed, and the second outer layer renorrhaphy was performed with I-0 QuillTM in the same way. In group 1, the inner layer was sutured using 2-0 Monocryl suture by the same method mentioned above. A second outer layer was sutured with 1-0 absorbable suture across the wound. The operation time, warm ischemia time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

Renorrhaphy was successfully performed in all the 38 cases without conversion to open procedure or nephretomy. The estimated blood loss and average operation time did not differ significantly between the two groups (P>0.05), although warm ischemic time was significantly shorter in the QuillTM group than in the Vicryl group [15±4) min vs (25±5) min, t=3.32, P=0.002]. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. One patient in the Vicryl suture group underwent selective renal artery embolization due to postoperative hemorrhage, and one patient was left with a D-J tube for leaking urine. There was no postoperative complication in the QuillTM suture group.

Conclusion

QuillTM is safe and effective for renorrhaphy in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The suture time, warm ischemic time, and the incidence of postoperative complications can be reduced by using the QuillTM suture in operation.

表1 2组术前一般资料比较
1
McDougall EM, Clayman RV, Chandhoke PS, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the pig model[J]. J Urol, 1993, 149(6): 1633-1636.
2
Lucas SM, MeHon MJ, Erntsberger L, et al. A comparison of roboric,laparoscopic and open partial nephreetomy[J]. JSLS, 2012, 16: 581-587.
3
邵鹏飞, 殷长军, 孟小鑫, 等. 后腹膜后镜下肾部分切除术治疗肾肿瘤的疗效评价[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2010, 31(10): 658-661.
4
Porpiglia F, Volpe A, Billia M, et al. Laparoscopie versus open partial nephrectomy: analysis of the current literature[J]. Eur Urol, 2008, 53(4): 732-743.
5
Lane BR, Campbell SC, Gill IS. 10-year oncologic outcomes after laparuscopic and open partial nephrectorny[J]. J Urol, 2013, 190(1): 44-49.
6
罗照, 王德林, 盛夏, 等. 腹腔镜与开放肾部分切除术临床疗效比较的Meta分析[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2013, 34(6): 444-447.
7
Alyami FA, Rendon RA. Laparoscopic partial nephrcctomy for>4 cm renal masses[J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2013, 7(5-6): E281-E286.
8
Agarwal D, O'Malley P, Clarke D, et al. Modified technique of renal defect closure following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy[J]. BJU Int, 2007, 100(4): 967-970.
9
Benway BM, Cabella Ji, Figenshau RS, et al. Sliding-clip renorrhaphy provides superior closing tension during robot·assisted partial nephrectomy[J]. J Endourol, 2010, 24(4): 605-608.
10
周利群, 张凯, 何志嵩, 等. 后腹膜后镜下IUPU法建立腹膜后腔的简单性、安全性及实用性—1114例应用经验[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2010, 31(5): 311-314.
11
CampbeU SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass[J]. J Urol, 2009, 182(4): 1271-1279.
12
Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update[J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58(3): 398-406.
13
Weld KJ, Ames CD, Hruby G, et al. Evaluation of a novel knotless serf-anchoring suture material for urinary tract reconstruction[J]. Urology, 2006, 67(6): 1133-1137.
14
Moran ME, Marsh C, Perrotti M. Bidirectional-barbed sutured knofless running anastomosis v classic Van Velthoven suturing in a model system[J]. J Endourel, 2007, 21(10): 1175-1178.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要