切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 280 -283. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2020.04.008

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

QuillTM缝线在腹腔镜肾部分切除术中的应用
唐露1, 张中元2, 王峰3,()   
  1. 1. 850000 拉萨,西藏藏医药大学
    2. 100034 北京大学第一医院泌尿外科,北京大学泌尿外科研究所
    3. 850000 拉萨,西藏自治区人民医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-13 出版日期:2020-04-15
  • 通信作者: 王峰

Clinical application of QuillTM self-retaining system comprised of polydioxanone synthetic absorbable surgical suture material in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Lu Tang1, Zhongyuan Zhang2, Feng Wang3,()   

  1. 1. University of Tibetan Medicine, Lhasa 850000, China
    2. Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China
    3. Department of Urology, People’s Hospital of Tibet Autonomous Region, Lhasa 850000, China
  • Received:2020-03-13 Published:2020-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Feng Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Feng, Email:
引用本文:

唐露, 张中元, 王峰. QuillTM缝线在腹腔镜肾部分切除术中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 280-283.

Lu Tang, Zhongyuan Zhang, Feng Wang. Clinical application of QuillTM self-retaining system comprised of polydioxanone synthetic absorbable surgical suture material in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 280-283.

目的

探讨QuillTM缝线在腹腔镜肾部分切除术应用中的安全性及有效性。

方法

回顾性分析2015年6月至2020年1月西藏自治区人民医院泌尿外科完成的腹腔镜肾部分切除术38例,根据应用缝合线的不同分为普通缝线组和QuillTM缝线组。普通缝线组20例,均采用2-0单乔线缝合内层,线尾固定Hem-o-lok夹,1-0可吸收线缝合肾缺损,出肾被膜每针均固定1个Hem-o-lok夹;QuillTM缝线组18例,均采用2-0倒刺线缝合内层,1-0倒刺线缝合肾缺损处,采用连续缝合,最后肾被膜出针处固定1个Hem-o-lok夹。比较2组的手术时间、热缺血时间、术中出血量、术后并发症情况。

结果

38例患者手术均顺利完成,无中转开放或肾切除病例,2组的手术时间、术中出血量比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。普通缝线组平均热缺血时间[(25±5)min]大于QuillTM缝线组[(15±4)min],差异具有统计学意义(t=3.32,P=0.002)。2组均无术中并发症,普通缝线组1例因术后出血行选择性肾动脉栓塞,1例因漏尿留置D-J管。QuillTM缝线组术后无出血、漏尿等并发症。

结论

倒刺缝合在腹腔镜肾部分切除术中应用安全、有效,可减少平均热缺血时间及术后并发症的发生率。

Objective

To investigate the clinical application of QuillTM self-retaining system in patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 38 patients with renal neoplasms undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, who were admitted to the People's Hospital of Tibet Autonomous Region from June 2015 to January 2020. According to the suture used for renorrhaphy, the patients were divided into two groups. Vicryl suture was used for renorrhaphy in 20 patients (group 1), and QuillTM was used in 18 patients (group 2). Renorrhaphy was performed in two layers for both groups. In group 2, 2-0 QuillTM was used to suture the deep wound bed, and the second outer layer renorrhaphy was performed with I-0 QuillTM in the same way. In group 1, the inner layer was sutured using 2-0 Monocryl suture by the same method mentioned above. A second outer layer was sutured with 1-0 absorbable suture across the wound. The operation time, warm ischemia time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

Renorrhaphy was successfully performed in all the 38 cases without conversion to open procedure or nephretomy. The estimated blood loss and average operation time did not differ significantly between the two groups (P>0.05), although warm ischemic time was significantly shorter in the QuillTM group than in the Vicryl group [15±4) min vs (25±5) min, t=3.32, P=0.002]. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. One patient in the Vicryl suture group underwent selective renal artery embolization due to postoperative hemorrhage, and one patient was left with a D-J tube for leaking urine. There was no postoperative complication in the QuillTM suture group.

Conclusion

QuillTM is safe and effective for renorrhaphy in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The suture time, warm ischemic time, and the incidence of postoperative complications can be reduced by using the QuillTM suture in operation.

表1 2组术前一般资料比较
1
McDougall EM, Clayman RV, Chandhoke PS, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the pig model[J]. J Urol, 1993, 149(6): 1633-1636.
2
Lucas SM, MeHon MJ, Erntsberger L, et al. A comparison of roboric,laparoscopic and open partial nephreetomy[J]. JSLS, 2012, 16: 581-587.
3
邵鹏飞, 殷长军, 孟小鑫, 等. 后腹膜后镜下肾部分切除术治疗肾肿瘤的疗效评价[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2010, 31(10): 658-661.
4
Porpiglia F, Volpe A, Billia M, et al. Laparoscopie versus open partial nephrectomy: analysis of the current literature[J]. Eur Urol, 2008, 53(4): 732-743.
5
Lane BR, Campbell SC, Gill IS. 10-year oncologic outcomes after laparuscopic and open partial nephrectorny[J]. J Urol, 2013, 190(1): 44-49.
6
罗照, 王德林, 盛夏, 等. 腹腔镜与开放肾部分切除术临床疗效比较的Meta分析[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2013, 34(6): 444-447.
7
Alyami FA, Rendon RA. Laparoscopic partial nephrcctomy for>4 cm renal masses[J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2013, 7(5-6): E281-E286.
8
Agarwal D, O'Malley P, Clarke D, et al. Modified technique of renal defect closure following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy[J]. BJU Int, 2007, 100(4): 967-970.
9
Benway BM, Cabella Ji, Figenshau RS, et al. Sliding-clip renorrhaphy provides superior closing tension during robot·assisted partial nephrectomy[J]. J Endourol, 2010, 24(4): 605-608.
10
周利群, 张凯, 何志嵩, 等. 后腹膜后镜下IUPU法建立腹膜后腔的简单性、安全性及实用性—1114例应用经验[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2010, 31(5): 311-314.
11
CampbeU SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass[J]. J Urol, 2009, 182(4): 1271-1279.
12
Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update[J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58(3): 398-406.
13
Weld KJ, Ames CD, Hruby G, et al. Evaluation of a novel knotless serf-anchoring suture material for urinary tract reconstruction[J]. Urology, 2006, 67(6): 1133-1137.
14
Moran ME, Marsh C, Perrotti M. Bidirectional-barbed sutured knofless running anastomosis v classic Van Velthoven suturing in a model system[J]. J Endourel, 2007, 21(10): 1175-1178.
[1] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[2] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[3] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[4] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[5] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[6] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[7] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[8] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[9] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[10] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[11] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[12] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[13] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[14] 马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[15] 刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.
阅读次数
全文


摘要