切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 272 -279. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2020.04.007

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

口腔颌面部锥形束CT结合微创拔牙技术在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除中的临床应用
代天国1, 邱银秀2, 刘应凯1, 冉红兵1,()   
  1. 1. 617067 四川攀枝花,攀枝花市中心医院口腔科
    2. 617067 四川攀枝花,攀枝花市中心医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-07 出版日期:2020-04-15
  • 通信作者: 冉红兵

Clinical application of cone beam computed tomography combined with minimally invasive extraction in extraction of impacted mandibular third molars

Tianguo Dai1, Yinxiu Qiu2, Yingkai Liu1, Hongbing Ran1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Stomatology, Head and Neck Surgery, Panzhihua Central Hospital, Panzhihua 617067, China
    2. Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Panzhihua Central Hospital, Panzhihua 617067, China
  • Received:2019-12-07 Published:2020-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Hongbing Ran
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ran Hongbing, Email:
引用本文:

代天国, 邱银秀, 刘应凯, 冉红兵. 口腔颌面部锥形束CT结合微创拔牙技术在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 272-279.

Tianguo Dai, Yinxiu Qiu, Yingkai Liu, Hongbing Ran. Clinical application of cone beam computed tomography combined with minimally invasive extraction in extraction of impacted mandibular third molars[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 272-279.

目的

研究口腔颌面部锥形束CT(CBCT)检查结合牙体分割微创拔牙技术在下颌阻生第三磨牙(IMTM)拔除中的临床应用。

方法

选取2018年1月至2019年5月四川省攀枝花市中心医院诊断为IMTM的97例(155颗)拔牙患者为研究对象。术前CBCT明确IMTM与周围重要组织的关系,术中采用转角高速涡轮机夹持长臂裂钻分割牙体,以微创的方式分块拔除IMTM。记录拔牙时间、患者满意度、术中及术后并发症等指标。采用t检验比较男、女间拔牙时间的差异,采用方差分析比较不同阻生牙类型及不同年龄段组间拔牙时间的差异。

结果

CBCT结果显示67.7%(105/155)的下颌管位于IMTM根尖的颊侧、22.6%根尖下方、9.7%舌侧,其中24.5%<1 mm;24颗(15.5%,24/155)IMTM根尖区舌侧骨板缺如,56颗牙(36.1%,56/155)<1 mm。IMTM以近中、垂直及水平向阻生最为常见,平均拔牙时间分别是(24.3±1.1)min,(15.6±1.2)min,(29.7±1.8)min,差异有统计学意义(F=23.85,P<0.001);术中8颗牙(5.2%,8/155)下颌管暴露,无1例舌侧骨板损伤致牙根移位。术后3例少量出血,1例发生干槽症,无1例发生下唇麻木,患者满意度在95.5%以上。

结论

CBCT应作为IMTM拔除前常规的影像学检查手段。高速涡轮机牙体分割微创拔牙技术适用于各类IMTM拔除,具有创伤小、临床效率高、并发症少、患者满意度高等优点。

Objective

To study the clinical application of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) combined with minimally invasive extraction technology in the extraction of impacted mandible third molars (IMTM).

Methods

Ninety-seven patients (155 teeth) diagnosed with IMTM at Panzhihua Central Hospital from January 2018 to May 2019 were selected as study subjects. Before operation, CBCT was taken to clarify the relationship between IMTM and surrounding important tissues. During the operation, the teeth were segmented with a long arm split drill with high-speed turbine and IMTM was extracted in a minimally invasive way. The extraction time, patient satisfaction, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. The difference of extraction time between males and females was compared by the t-test, and the difference of extraction time between different age groups was compared by ANOVA.

Results

CBCT showed that 67.7% (105/155) of mandibular canals were located in the buccal side, 22.6% under the root tip, and 9.7% in the lingual side of IMTM, of which 24.5% was less than 1 mm. There were 24 (15.5%, 24/155) IMTM apical regions with lingual bone plate missing and 56 teeth (36.1%, 56/155) less than 1 mm. Angular, vertical, and horizontal impactions were the most common types of IMTM. The average extraction time was (24.3±1.1) min, (15.6±1.2) min, (29.7±1.8) min, respectively (F=23.85, P<0.001). Eight teeth (5.2%, 8/155) were exposed to mandibular canal during the operation, and there was no root displacement caused by lingual bone plate injury. There were three cases of bleeding and one case of dry socket. There was no case of numbness of the lower lip. The rate of patient satisfaction was more than 95.5%.

Conclusion

CBCT should be used as a routine imaging examination before IMTM extraction. High speed turbine assisted minimally invasive extraction technology is suitable for all kinds of IMTM extraction. It has the advantages of small trauma, high clinical efficiency, few complications, and high patient satisfaction.

图1 按Winter分类法分类下颌阻生第三磨牙 图a为近中阻生;图b为垂直阻生:图c为水平阻生;图d为远中阻生;图e为倒置阻生;图f为颊向阻生;图g为舌向阻生;图h为各类阻生牙例数
图2 下颌管与下颌阻生第三磨牙根尖关系 图a,a1:下颌管位于下颌阻生第三磨牙根尖颊侧<1 mm;图b,b1:下颌管位于下颌阻生第三磨牙根尖舌侧<1 mm;图c,c1:下颌管位于下颌阻生第三磨牙根尖下方<1 mm
图3 下颌阻生第三磨牙与舌侧骨板关系 图a为全景片无法显示舌侧骨板情况;图b为下颌阻生第三磨牙釉牙骨质界距舌侧骨板距离<1 mm;图c为下颌阻生第三磨牙根中份舌侧骨板开始缺如;图d为下颌阻生第三磨牙根尖区舌侧骨板完全缺如
图4 年龄对拔牙时间的影响 图a为不同年龄段平均拔牙时间比较;图b为垂直组不同年龄段平均拔牙时间比较;图c为近中组不同年龄段平均拔牙时间比较;图d为水平组不同年龄段平均拔牙时间比较
图5 下颌管暴露及颊侧骨板损伤情况 图a为下颌阻生第三磨牙呈水平阻生,下颌管与下颌阻生第三磨牙根尖关系密切;图b为下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除后下颌管暴露,但无损伤;图c、d为下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除前后颊侧骨板对比,术后骨板保留较完整
表1 拔牙并发症及患者满意度调查
1
Candotto V, Oberti L, Gabrione F, et al. Complication in third molar extractions[J]. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents, 2019, 33(3 Suppl 1): 169-172.
2
Demiriz L, Hazar Bodrumlu E, İçen M, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography on measuring impacted supernumerary teeth[J]. Scanning, 2016, 38(6): 579-584.
3
Song J, Bi X. The preliminary study on nursing the extraction of mandibular mesioangular impacted third molar using reversal high-speed air turbine[J]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2012, 30(4): 396-398.
4
Mozzati M, Gallesio G, Russo A, et al. Third-molar extraction with ultrasound bone surgery: a case-control study[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2014, 25(3): 856-859.
5
Ma ZG, Xie QY, Yang C, et al. An orthodontic technique for minimally invasive extraction of impacted lower third molar[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2013, 71(8): 1309-1317.
6
Passi D, Pal US, Mohammad S, et al. Laser vs bur for bone cutting in impacted mandibular third molar surgery: A randomized controlled trial[J]. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, 2013, 3(2): 57-62.
7
邱蔚六. 口腔颌面外科学 [M]. 6版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2008: 78-79.
8
Wang TF, Wu YT, Tseng CF, et al. Associations between dental anxiety and postoperative pain following extraction of horizontally impacted wisdom teeth[J]. Medicine, 2017, 96(47): e8665.
9
Peker I, Sarikir C, Alkurt M, et al. Panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography findings in preoperative examination of impacted mandibular third molars[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2014, 14(1): 71.
10
Maglione M, Costantinides F, Bazzocchi G. Classification of impacted mandibular third molars on cone-beam CT images[J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2015, 7(2): e224-e231.
11
陈全, 张晓, 张刚, 等. 锥形束CT在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术前诊断应用的初步研究[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2011, 46(7): 398-402.
12
Menziletoglu D, Tassoker M, Kubilay-Isik B, et al.The assesment of relationship between the angulation of impacted mandibular third molar teeth and the thickness of lingual bone: A prospective clinical study[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2019, 24(1): e130-e135.
13
杨擎天, 胡开进, 薛洋, 等. 阻生下颌第三磨牙2种拔除方法的比较[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2010, 26(1): 73-76.
14
许竞, 肖翼初, 高文峰, 等. 以高速涡轮手机拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的微创术式设计探讨[J]. 广东医学, 2012, 33(20): 57-61.
15
Xie L, Yang RT, Lv K, et al. Comparison of Low Pre-Emptive Oral Doses of Celecoxib Versus Acetaminophen for Postoperative Pain Management After Third Molar Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019. pii: S0278-2391(19)31148-6.
16
Saito K, Kaneko A, Machii K, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Additional 200-mg Dose of Celecoxib in Adult Patients With Postoperative Pain Following Extraction of Impacted Third Mandibular Molar: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study in Japan[J]. Clinical Therapeutics, 2012, 34(2): 314-328.
17
Viswanath A, Oreadi D, Finkelman M, et al. Does Pre-Emptive Administration of Intravenous Ibuprofen (Caldolor) or Intravenous Acetaminophen (Ofirmev) Reduce Postoperative Pain and Subsequent Narcotic Consumption After Third Molar Surgery?[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019, 77(2): 262-270.
[1] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[2] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会. 中国活体肝移植供者微创手术技术指南(2024版)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 241-252.
[3] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[4] 向辉, 贾晓斌, 全卫涛. 真空辅助乳腺微创旋切术治疗乳腺纤维瘤的效果及并发症观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-530.
[5] 吴登爽, 李墨农, 张欣红, 侯四川, 邱志磊. 解剖性显微镜下精索静脉结扎术的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-596.
[6] 赵毅, 李昶田, 唐文博, 白雪婷, 刘荣. 腹腔镜术中超声主胰管自动识别模型的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 290-294.
[7] 王双兴, 吴永杰, 孟兵, 张宏涛, 刁美, 张辉. 微创切口联合腹腔镜同期治疗先天性心脏病合并心外畸形[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 244-249.
[8] 潘立超, 王兆海, 刘荣. 日间肝切除术2例报道[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 253-256.
[9] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[10] 张宗明, 董家鸿, 何小东, 王秋生, 徐智, 刘立民, 张翀. 老年胆道外科热点问题的争议与思考[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 754-762.
[11] 卓文锋, 曾桂芳, 杨思加, 赵家立, 邹宝嘉, 白子锐, 林恩, 李坚. 腹腔镜巨脾切除术:逐步打破的手术壁垒[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 783-788.
[12] 曹文钰, 郭鹏, 李锦平. 微创手术及非手术方式治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 304-309.
[13] 谭明明, 战世强, 侯宏涛, 曾翔硕. 经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定术对骨质疏松脊柱压缩性骨折患者临床研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 349-354.
[14] 李新宇, 梁建锋. 3D打印导板辅助颅内血肿穿刺引流手术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 382-384.
[15] 代剑华, 覃语思, 陈磊, 彭志红, 陈瑶, 刘俐, 吴宏博, 许森林, 李川, 钱锋, 彭贵勇. 术前评估超内镜治疗适应证胃癌的超级微创新选择:内镜、腔镜序贯治疗[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 217-224.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?