切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (10) : 813 -816. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2020.10.012

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

免气腹与CO2气腹腹腔镜双侧精索静脉高位结扎术的临床疗效比较
刘永亮1,(), 王臣2, 宋晓明2, 鲁可权2   
  1. 1. 330006 南昌,江西省人民医院泌尿外科
    2. 221006 江苏徐州,解放军陆军第七十一集团军医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-10 出版日期:2020-10-15
  • 通信作者: 刘永亮

Comparison of gasless laparoscopy with gas laparoscopy for surgical treatment of bilateral varicocele

Yongliang Liu1,(), Chen Wang2, Xiaoming Song2, Kequan Lu2   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, Nanchang 330006, China
    2. Department of Urology, the 71st Army Hospital of PLA, Xuzhou 221006, China
  • Received:2020-03-10 Published:2020-10-15
  • Corresponding author: Yongliang Liu
引用本文:

刘永亮, 王臣, 宋晓明, 鲁可权. 免气腹与CO2气腹腹腔镜双侧精索静脉高位结扎术的临床疗效比较[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(10): 813-816.

Yongliang Liu, Chen Wang, Xiaoming Song, Kequan Lu. Comparison of gasless laparoscopy with gas laparoscopy for surgical treatment of bilateral varicocele[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(10): 813-816.

目的

探讨免气腹与CO2气腹腹腔镜精索静脉高位结扎术的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2010年5月至2016年4月解放军71军医院68例双侧精索静脉曲张患者行腰硬联合麻醉或全麻下双侧精索静脉高位结扎术的临床资料,其中34例行腹壁悬吊式免气腹腹腔镜手术(免气腹组),34例行经腹CO2气腹腹腔镜手术(气腹组)。观察症状和体征改变及并发症情况,比较2组手术时间、术后住院时间、肠道功能恢复时间;分别比较气腹组、免气腹组术前和术后9个月的精子密度、精子活动度。

结果

2组患者手术均顺利完成,症状、体征均改善,无严重手术并发症。2组手术时间、术后住院时间、肠道功能恢复时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05);2组患者术后9个月精子密度与术前比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05),术后9个月精子活动率均较术前增高[气腹组:(78.59±6.50)% vs(74.41±6.95)%,免气腹组:(75.88±7.47)% vs(68.71±7.43)%],差异具有统计学意义(t=6.549,P=0.013;t=15.770,P<0.001)。

结论

2种微创术式均可准确结扎精索内静脉,疗效确切,切口美观,术后恢复较快。免气腹手术避免了CO2气腹对呼吸、循环系统的影响,无气腹并发症,可采用椎管内麻醉,作为更经济的术式选择。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and application value of gasless and gas laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of bilateral varicocele.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 68 patients with bilateral varicocele at the 71st Army Hospital of PLA from May 2010 to April 2016. Laparoscopic varicocele high ligation were performed on 68 patients, including 34 case who underwent gasless laparoscopic surgery accompanied by abdominal wall lifting (AWL) under combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA), and 34 cases who underwent gas laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia (GA). Changes in symptoms and signs and complications were recorded. Operative time, postoperative hospitalization time, and time to intestinal function recovery between the two groups were compared. Preoperative sperm concentration and sperm motility were compared with those at 9 months after surgery in the two groups.

Results

All operations were performed successfully. The symptoms and signs were eased or disappeared after the operations. No serious complications occurred. Operative time, postoperative hospitalization time, and time to intestinal function recovery did not differ significantly between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference between preoperative sperm concentration and sperm concentration at 9 months after surgery in the two groups (P>0.05). The percentage of motile sperm at 9 months after surgery was significantly higher than that before operation [gas laparoscopy group: (78.59±6.50)% vs (74.41±6.95)%, t=6.549, P=0.013; gasless laparoscopy group: (75.88±7.47)% vs (68.71±7.43)%, t=15.770, P<0.001].

Conclusion

Both gasless and gas laparoscopic surgery have the advantages of minimal invasiveness, and both are effective treatments for varicocele. Gasless laparoscopic surgery could avoid the adverse effects of pneumoperitoneum and complications related to pneumoperitoneum. CSEA as an alternative anesthesia method could have contributed to the reduction of patients' financial burden.

表1 2组双侧精索静脉曲张患者手术情况比较(
xˉ
±s
表2 2组双侧精索静脉曲张患者手术前后精液常规主要指标比较(
xˉ
±s
1
Zavattaro M, Ceruti C, Motta G, et al. Treating varicocele in 2018: current knowledge and treatment options [J]. J Endocrinol Invest, 2018, 41(12): 1365-1375.
2
Yu W, Rao T, Ruan Y, et al. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy in adolescents: artery ligation and artery preservation [J]. Urology, 2016, 89(3): 150-154.
3
Ren H, Tong Y, Ding XB, et al. Abdominal wall-lifting versus CO2 pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopy: a review and meta-analysis [J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2014, 7(6): 1558-1568.
4
Lomboy JR, Coward RM. The varicocele: clinical presentation, evaluation, and surgical management [J]. Semin Intervent Radiol, 2016, 33(3): 163-169.
5
Fast AM, Deibert CM, Van Batavia JP, et al. Adolescent varicocelectomy: does artery sparing influence recurrence rate and/or catch-up growth? [J]. J Andrology, 2014, 2(2): 159-164.
6
Chan PT, Wright EJ, Goldstein M. Incidence and postoperative outcomes of accidental ligation of the testicular artery during microsurgical varicocelectomy [J]. J Urol, 2005, 173(2): 482-484.
7
Kim KS, Lee C, Song SH, et al. Impact of internal spermatic artery preservation during laparoscopic varicocelectomy on recurrence and the catch-up growth rate in adolescents [J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2014, 10(3): 435-440.
8
Esposito C, Escolino M, Castagnetti M, et al. Two decades of experience with laparoscopic varicocele repair in children: Standardizing the technique [J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2018, 14(1): 10.e1-10.e7.
9
张勇建, 吴意光, 高雪松, 等. 腹腔镜和开放手术行双侧精索静脉曲张高位结扎术的比较研究[J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(4): 1784-1785.
10
刘晓梅, 傅强, 米卫东. 人工气腹下三种血流动力学参数评估容量状况的价值及相关性 [J]. 解放军医学杂志, 2014, 39(7): 553-556.
11
Mayhew PD, Pascoe PJ, Kass PH, et al. Effects of pneumoperitoneum induced at various pressures on cardiorespiratory function and working space during laparoscopy in cats [J]. Am J Vet Res, 2013, 74(10): 1340-1346.
[1] 郭鹏, 陈金芳, 苏刚, 张小华. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片修补术联合精索静脉高位结扎治疗腹股沟疝合并精索静脉曲张的疗效优势[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 235-238.
[2] 叶鉴锋, 王润邦, 张墨. 3D高清腹腔镜保留睾丸动脉的精索静脉高位结扎术的疗效分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 265-269.
[3] 王晓利, 李琦, 李春风, 王璟琦, 管晓东. 保留睾丸动脉的腹腔镜精索内静脉高位结扎术对精索静脉曲张致不育的疗效分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 261-264.
[4] 高志翔, 姚裘, 刘晓龙. 显微镜下三种手术入路治疗精索静脉曲张的探索[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 43-46.
[5] 张立元, 张小康, 剡锐, 景锁世, 常鹏程, 冷光现, 杨捷. 经腹腔入路腹腔镜高选择性精索静脉结扎术的疗效观察[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 452-455.
[6] 刘立民, 那万里, 曲立成. 腹壁下静脉-精索静脉分流术治疗男性胡桃夹综合征不育患者的疗效观察[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(06): 382-386.
[7] 廖国龙, 唐嘉妮, 李亚妹, 马赫, 严彬元, 李璐婧, 庞俊. 显微镜下小切口行精索静脉-腹壁下静脉转流术治疗胡桃夹综合征的临床疗效观察[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(06): 378-382.
[8] 谢起根, 苏诚, 徐哲, 钟志海, 高鹏飞, 周李, 李作青. 三种精索静脉高位结扎术治疗儿童精索静脉曲张的疗效分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(02): 128-131.
[9] 潘爱民, 王效强, 丁占一, 袁荫田, 董建平, 刘鹏. 亚甲蓝染色在腹腔镜精索静脉高位结扎术中保留淋巴管的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(06): 418-421.
[10] 王晓利, 王璟琦, 王东文. 腹腔镜手术治疗精索静脉曲张的进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 139-141.
[11] 苏剑锋, 张炎, 杨晓健, 张浩. 显微镜下两种入路治疗精索静脉曲张引起的阴囊疼痛疗效对比[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(01): 62-65.
[12] 张帅, 付海波, 魏亚元, 陈巧, 朱佳, 张志, 张晓平, 吴相柏. 腹股沟疝Lichtenstein术联合精索静脉结扎术的应用研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 205-208.
[13] 丁伟, 王敏, 曾志, 闫效宇. 悬吊免气腹经脐单孔腹腔镜在妇产科疾病应用进展[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(03): 189-192.
阅读次数
全文


摘要