切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (10) : 817 -822. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2020.10.013

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

64排螺旋CT对肺孤立性结节的征象分析及诊断价值
陈瑶1, 孙毅1, 石国富1, 茆占湖1, 朱志韬1, 杨波1,()   
  1. 1. 222000 江苏连云港,连云港市第二人民医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-29 出版日期:2020-10-15
  • 通信作者: 杨波

64-slice spiral CT characteristics of solitary pulmonary nodules

Yao Chen1, Yi Sun1, Guofu Shi1, Zhanhu Mao1, Zhitao Zhu1, Bo Yang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, the Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang 222000, China
  • Received:2020-03-29 Published:2020-10-15
  • Corresponding author: Bo Yang
引用本文:

陈瑶, 孙毅, 石国富, 茆占湖, 朱志韬, 杨波. 64排螺旋CT对肺孤立性结节的征象分析及诊断价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(10): 817-822.

Yao Chen, Yi Sun, Guofu Shi, Zhanhu Mao, Zhitao Zhu, Bo Yang. 64-slice spiral CT characteristics of solitary pulmonary nodules[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(10): 817-822.

目的

研究64排螺旋CT孤立性肺结节(SPN)影像学特征,提高良恶性结节的诊断准确性。

方法

收集连云港市第二人民医院2015年8月至2018年12月病理确诊的170例SPN,恶性结节(116例)作为肺腺癌组,良性结节(54例)作为良性结节组,采用χ2检验比较组间结节的CT表现(位置、病灶形态、内部成分、瘤-肺界面、瘤周毛刺征、胸膜牵拉征、支气管截断征等)及强化方式的差异,采用t检验比较组间病灶直径和距胸膜距离的差异。

结果

肺腺癌组与良性结节组比较,实性、亚实性结节(42.2% vs 22.2%、44.8% vs 29.6%)、不规则形(88.7% vs 35.2%)、瘤-肺界面不光滑(77.6% vs 22.2%)、分叶(62.9% vs 14.8%)、瘤周毛刺征(56.9% vs 3.7%)、胸膜牵拉征(45.7% vs 3.7%)等征象表现所占比例均大,且差异均具有统计学意义(χ2=25.17、52.24、47.03、23.54、43.43、29.66,P均<0.05);2组间病灶直径和距胸膜距离比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。增强动脉期肺腺癌组结节轻-中度度强化比例高于良性结节组(57.4% vs 28.6%),结节明显强化比例低于良性结节组(35.2% vs 53.5%),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=4.68,P<0.05);静脉期肺腺癌组结节延迟强化比例高于良性结节组(83.3% vs 53.5%),结节强化减退比例低于良性结节组(9.2% vs 46.5%),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=64.23,P<0.05)。

结论

CT是检出肺结节的主要方法,通过特征性表现结合增强特点可以提高影像诊断准确性,尽早对肺癌结节进行正确的临床干预。

Objective

To investigate the 64-slice spiral CT imaging characteristics of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) and improve the diagnostic accuracy for benign and malignant SPN.

Methods

A total of 170 patients who were pathologically diagnosed with SPNs were eligible for the enrollment between August 2015 and December 2018 at the Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, including 116 with lung adenocarcinomas (LACs) and 54 with benign nodules (BNs). The χ2 test was used to compare the differences of CT findings (such as nodule position, morphology, and composition, tumor-lung interface, burr sign at the edge of the tumor, pleural violation, and bronchial amputation) and the patterns of enhancement, while the t test was applied for comparing the differences of the size of the lesions and the distance to pleura.

Results

There were significant differences in the solid and sub-solid nodules (42.2% vs 22.2%, 44.8% vs 29.6%), irregular pattern (88.7% vs 35.2%), rough tumor-lung interface (77.6% vs 22.2%), lobulated morphology (62.9% vs 14.8%) , burrs at the edge of the tumor (56.9% vs 3.7%), and pleural invasion (45.7% vs 3.7%) between LACs and BNs (χ2=25.17, 52.24, 47.03, 23.54, 43.43 and 29.66, respectively; P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the size of the lesions or the distance to pleura between the two groups (P>0.05). In the arterial period, the proportion of lesions with mild to moderate uneven enhancement was significantly higher in LACs than in BNs (57.4% vs 28.6%), whereas the proportion of lesions with pronounced enhancement was significantly lower in the BNs group (35.2% vs 53.5%; χ2=4.68, P<0.05). In the venous period, the proportion of lesions with delayed enhancement was significantly higher in LACs than in BNs (83.3% vs 53.5%), while the proportion of lesions with hypoenhancement was significantly lower in the BNs group (9.2% vs 46.5%; χ2=64.23, P<0.05).

Conclusion

CT is the main method for detection of pulmonary nodules, and the combination of CT characteristics and enhancement features can improve the diagnostic accuracy, thus improving the clinical management of malignant nodules.

图1 62岁男性腺癌患者CT图像示右下肺实性结节,瘤肺界面不光滑,边缘毛刺征(图a箭头) 图a为肺窗,图b为纵隔窗
图2 77岁女性腺癌患者CT图像示左下肺不规则亚实性结节,瘤肺界面模糊,邻近胸膜牵拉(图b箭头) 图a为肺窗,图b为纵隔窗
图3 54岁女性腺癌患者CT图像示右下肺不规则亚实性结节,瘤肺界面不光滑(图b箭头) 图a为轴位,图b为冠状位
图4 67岁女性腺癌-高分化患者CT图示右下肺混合磨玻璃结节,纵隔窗少许实性成分(图b箭头) 图a为肺窗,图b为纵隔窗
表1 2组孤立性肺结节患者170个肺结节分布及CT征象比较
图5 腺癌患者(与图1为同一患者)CT图 图a示动脉期轻中度强化,图b示静脉期延迟强化
图6 腺癌患者(与图3为同一患者)CT图示动脉期明显强化
表2 2组行CT增强检查的孤立性肺结节患者结节强化方式比较[个(%)]
1
周清华, 范亚光, 王颖, 等. 中国肺部结节分类、诊断与治疗指南(2016年版) [J].中国肺癌杂志, 2016, 19(12): 793-798.
2
张晓菊. «肺结节诊治中国专家共识(2018版)»解读 [J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2019, 33(1): 1-3.
3
明星, 吴非. 肺磨玻璃结节CT征象对早期肺腺癌的诊断价值 [J]. 国际医学放射学杂志, 2017, 40(1): 37-40.
4
Revel MP, Mannes I, Benzakoun J, et al. 亚实性肺结节分类:提高观察者诊断一致性的CT标准 [J]. 国际医学放射学杂志, 2018, 41(2): 222.
5
方振剑, 吴正琮, 郑宏宗, 等. CT增强对不同大小密度孤立性肺结节的诊断价值 [J]. 实用肿瘤学杂志, 2018, 32(4): 333-336.
6
林伟添, 侍丽, 梁知遇, 等. 用Logistic回归分析法对直径<2 cm孤立肺癌结节CT征象的回顾性分析 [J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2019, 35(5): 726-729.
7
么娜, 刘巍. 肺内恶性孤立性小结节的CT征像特征分析与诊断 [J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2016, 21(8): 1493-1495.
8
Rajesh B, Kaur A, Giridhar A, et al. "vacuole" sign adjacent to retinal pigment epithelial defects on spectral domain optical coherence thmography in central serous chorioretinopathy associathed with subretinal fibrin [J]. Retina, 2017, 37(2): 316-324.
9
杨舒一, 杨亮, 滕琳, 等. 周围型肺腺癌胸膜CT表现分析 [J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2018, 37(9): 1471-1475.
10
Chen T, Luo J, Wang R, et al. Visceral pleural invasion predict a poor survival among lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor size ≤3 cm [J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(39): 66576-66583.
11
巩翠珂, 齐蕾, 王志华, 等. 最大直径≤2 cm原发性周围型肺腺癌临床病理特征及预后 [J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2019, 39(7): 1600-1603.
12
陈劼, 袁梅, 仲艳, 等. 亚实性结节CT定量分析对浸润性肺腺癌亚型的鉴别价值 [J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2019, 35(6): 887-891.
13
Yee TS, Yong Geng G, Mary Frances D, et al. PET-CT evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules: correlation with maximum standardized uptake value and pathology [J]. Lung, 2013, 191(6): 625-632.
14
王总飞, 杨慧远, 刘先本, 等. 螺旋CT平扫及三期增强扫描在诊断肺癌中的价值研究 [J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2019, 17(1): 84-86.
[1] 桂爱元, 曾苗雨, 林杰果. 胸部X线与CT联合诊断早期肺部感染的临床价值[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(06): 599-602.
[2] 袁育韬, 邢金琳, 谢克飞, 殷凯. CT征象及BRAFV600E基因突变与甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结转移的相关性[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 611-614.
[3] 孟颖, 刘欢, 蔡久媺. 肺磨玻璃结节与组织学及CT特征分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(03): 400-402.
[4] 张文弢, 任长娟, 张瑞侠, 王瑞凯. 不同路径CT引导下经皮肺穿刺活检对孤立性肺结节诊断意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(02): 227-229.
[5] 王城, 王春梅, 王雪梅, 邬心爱. 99mTc-3PRGD2 SPECT/CT显像联合3D打印模板引导下经皮肺穿刺对孤立性肺结节诊断意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(05): 569-572.
[6] 马进林, 马晓艳, 王海强. 肺癌孤立性肺结节患者64排螺旋CT扫描影像特点分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(01): 48-52.
[7] 宋亚男, 齐宇, 张春敭, 盛银良, 吴凯, 朱森林, 刘帅帅, 赵松. 低剂量螺旋CT联合循环肿瘤细胞检测术对孤立性肺结节良恶性诊断的价值分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(02): 278-282.
[8] 曹芹, 李雪冰, 张丽, 刘珂崎. 孤立性肺结节危险因素及良恶性预测模型[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(04): 463-468.
[9] 王玉成, 徐敏, 宋健, 单叔媒, 奚克敏, 李洪义. 64排螺旋CT与超声检查对网膜肿瘤的诊断价值比较[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(03): 105-108.
[10] 田彤彤, 王猛, 王守安, 陈明祥, 吕燕, 夏巍, 叶靖. 低剂量能谱CT对良恶性孤立性肺结节的诊断价值研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(01): 5-7.
[11] 梁艳, 尹丹萍. 孤立性肺结节影像诊断现状及进展[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2018, 08(05): 232-235.
[12] 傅宇飞, 黄亚勇, 王涛, 曹伟. 孤立性肺结节胸腔镜切除术前CT引导下肺结节定位针与微弹簧圈定位的应用比较[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 272-277.
[13] 张超鑫, 钱伟军, 李立, 赵文, 房玉英, 郭蔚. 心率对64排螺旋CT冠状动脉成像质量的影响[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2018, 06(04): 234-236.
[14] 孙乔, 孙善见, 孙凤香. 64-MSCT联合DCG对冠心病的诊断价值[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2018, 06(01): 31-33.
阅读次数
全文


摘要