切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (12) : 989 -994. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2021.12.014

临床研究

微型钢板内固定术治疗Lisfranc关节损伤的疗效及术后关节功能恢复观察
商科1, 汪义奎1, 刘备1, 刘伟1,()   
  1. 1. 550002 贵阳,贵阳市第四人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-31 出版日期:2021-12-15
  • 通信作者: 刘伟

Mini-plate internal fixation for treatment of Lisfranc joint injury: Efficacy and postoperative joint function recovery

Ke Shang1, Yikui Wang1, Bei Liu1, Wei Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Guiyang Fourth People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China
  • Received:2021-07-31 Published:2021-12-15
  • Corresponding author: Wei Liu
引用本文:

商科, 汪义奎, 刘备, 刘伟. 微型钢板内固定术治疗Lisfranc关节损伤的疗效及术后关节功能恢复观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(12): 989-994.

Ke Shang, Yikui Wang, Bei Liu, Wei Liu. Mini-plate internal fixation for treatment of Lisfranc joint injury: Efficacy and postoperative joint function recovery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(12): 989-994.

目的

研究微型钢板内固定术治疗Lisfranc关节损伤的疗效及术后关节功能恢复观察。

方法

选取2019年1月至2020年12月在贵阳市第四人民医院治疗的106例Lisfranc关节损伤患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组各53例。对照组患者进行螺钉内固定术,观察组患者进行微型钢板内固定术。根据美国足踝关节协会(AOFAS)的踝-后足评分系统观察2组术后关节功能恢复情况,评价2组患者手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、切口愈合时间和骨折愈合时间,检测2组患者手术前后白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)、白细胞介素-8(IL-8)及肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平和疼痛应激指标[P物质(SP)、前列腺素E2(PGE2)及神经肽Y(NPY)]水平,统计2组术后并发症发生情况。

结果

观察组术后3个月关节功能恢复优良率显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。2组患者手术时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组的住院时间、术中出血量、切口愈合时间和骨折愈合时间显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组手术后IL-1β、IL-8、TNF-α、SP、PGE2及NPY水平显著高于治疗前(P<0.05),观察组手术后IL-1β、IL-8、TNF-α、SP、PGE2及NPY水平显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组并发症总发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论

微型钢板固定手术治疗Lisfranc关节损伤安全性较高,并发症较少,且与螺钉固定手术疗效相当,值得临床推广。

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of mini-plate internal fixation in the treatment of Lisfranc joint injury and the recovery of joint function after operation.

Methods

One hundred and six patients with Lisfranc joint injury treated at Guiyang Fourth People's Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 were selected as the research subjects. Using the random number table method, the patients were divided into an observation group and a control group, with 53 cases in each group. The control group was treated by screw internal fixation, and the observation group was treated by mini-plate internal fixation. According to the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hind foot scoring system, the recovery of joint function was assessed in the two groups. The operative time, length of hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, incision healing time, and fracture healing time were evaluated. The levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and pain stress indices [substance P (SP), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and neuropeptide Y (NPY)] were detected before and after surgery. The incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups was statistically compared.

Results

The excellent and good rate of joint function recovery in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group at 3 months after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). The hospitalization time, intraoperative bleeding, incision healing time, and fracture healing time in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). The levels of IL-1β, IL-8, TNF-α, SP, PGE2, and NPY after operation were significantly higher than those before treatment in both groups (P<0.05), and these indexes in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The total incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Mini-plate fixation for the treatment of Lisfranc joint injury has higher safety and fewer complications, and has the same curative effect as screw fixation, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

图1 微型钢板实物图
图2 对照组螺钉固定
图3 观察组微型钢板固定
表1 2组Lisfranc关节损伤患者的术后3个月关节功能恢复优良率比较[例(%)]
表2 2组Lisfranc关节损伤患者围术期指标比较(
xˉ
±s
表3 2组Lisfranc关节损伤患者手术前后血清炎症因子水平比较(
xˉ
±s
表4 2组Lisfranc关节损伤患者手术前后疼痛应激指标比较(
xˉ
±s
表5 2组Lisfranc关节损伤患者并发症比较[例(%)]
1
陈玉宏, 高翔, 张殿英. 经皮闭合复位内固定治疗隐匿性Lisfranc损伤 [J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 678-681.
2
于斌, 李卫兵, 孙金川, 等. 空心钉与Tight Rope内固定Lisfranc损伤的比较 [J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2020, 28(12): 1072-1076.
3
夏欣, 毛兆光. Herbert螺钉治疗跖跗关节损伤的疗效 [J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2019, 22(3): 369-371.
4
李中万, 洪劲松, 杨勤梦, 等. Lisfranc损伤切开复位螺钉内固定术后跖跗关节症状性骨关节炎的观察 [J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2018, 20(1): 45-49.
5
沈雷, 蒋雷生, 戴力扬. Lisfranc损伤的诊断和治疗 [J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2006, 9(2): 121-123.
6
Kim YS, Park EH, Koh YG, et al. Supramalleolar osteotomy with bone marrow stimulation for varus ankle osteoarthritis: clinical results and second-look arthroscopic evaluation [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2014, 42(7): 1558-1566.
7
孙兵, 车晓明. 视觉模拟评分法 (VAS) [J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2012, 28(6): 645.
8
陈宇, 张晖, 刘熹, 等. 切开复位联合万向锁定钢板治疗急性Lisfranc骨折脱位 [J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2019, 21(4): 314-320.
9
董玉金, 张铁慧, 钟声, 等. 一体化钢板系统结合克氏针内固定治疗Lisfranc损伤 [J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2021, 41(10): 618-624.
10
张明华, 李密, 胡斌. 切开复位内固定手术治疗跖跗关节损伤的效果评价 [J]. 中国民康医学, 2019, 31(18): 74-76.
11
Han PF, Zhang ZL, Chen CL, et al. Comparison of primary arthrodesis versus open reduction with internal fixation for Lisfranc injuries: systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Postgrad Med, 2019, 65(2): 93-100.
12
Mangi IK, Abro AA, Memon MN, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation for radial head fractures: a prospective observational study [J]. Journal of Acute Diseases, 2020, 9(4): 166-169.
13
Sivaloganathan S, Horriat S, Trompeter A. Lisfranc injuries: assessment, diagnosis and management [J]. Br J Hosp Med (Lond): 2018, 79(4): C50-C53.
14
陆小洋, 席武. 踝关节骨折切开复位内固定术后手术部位感染的发生率及危险因素分析 [J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2020, 22(11): 851-855.
15
Meyerkort DJ, Gurel R, Maor D, et al. Deep peroneal nerve injury following hardware removal for Lisfranc joint injury [J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2020, 41(3): 320-323.
16
张亚军, 陈金洪, 王勇, 等. 手术切开复位内固定联合桃红四物汤治疗肱骨髁间骨折及对炎性因子的影响 [J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2019, 37(2): 479-483.
17
Walker JB, Mitchell SM, Karr SD, et al. Percutaneous transiliac-transsacral screw fixation of sacral fragility fractures improve pain, ambulation, and rate of disposition to home [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2018, 32(9): 452-456.
18
黄健华, 包朝鲁, 李业, 等. 克氏针、螺钉及微型钢板内固定治疗Lisfranc损伤的风险及疗效观察 [J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2020, 20(9): 1773-1777.
19
王海东. 应用微型钢板和空心螺钉治疗Lisfranc损伤 [J]. 实用手外科杂志, 2018, 32(1): 108-109.
[1] 杜贵伟, 陆勇, 成博, 贺薏, 梁爽. 钬激光碎石术术后联合坦索罗辛治疗对输尿管结石患者的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 491-496.
[2] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[3] 邢嘉翌, 龚佳晟, 祝佳佳, 陆群. 肺癌化疗患者继发肺部感染的病原菌耐药性及炎症因子变化分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 714-718.
[4] 陈向军, 王在强, 王博荣, 王莉, 方芳, 金发光, 王光辉. PM2.5通过激活颗粒酶B/IL-18信号通路促进炎症因子表达[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 207-211.
[5] 张婵, 吕瑶, 张小燕, 张鸣青. 不同时机局部神经阻滞在开腹肝切除中的镇痛效果比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 189-194.
[6] 王曦, 关鹏飞. 双钢板内固定治疗肱骨远1/3骨折的有限元分析及基于肘关节功能和肘关节活动度评估疗效[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 230-237.
[7] 赵静磊, 陈晓婷, 夏莹, 黄维佳, 周菊, 刘芳. 锁骨骨折切开复位内固定术后患者肩关节功能恢复的风险因素研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 216-222.
[8] 冷昆鹏, 孟钰童, 单磊, 刘洋, 周君琳. 不同手术入路治疗肱骨远端冠状面骨折的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 127-134.
[9] 戴伟川, 郭协力, 方仲宁, 蔡文华, 洪天生, 田夏阳. 显微镜下周围神经松解术治疗腰椎间盘突出症术后残余神经症状的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 84-90.
[10] 鲁宁, 魏立友, 李亮, 张玉龙. 老年桡骨远端骨折小夹板治疗后早期腕关节功能恢复的相关因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 222-228.
[11] 李欣, 雷孝勇, 康大为. 手术与功能支具对闭合性移位肱骨干骨折患者功能结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 215-221.
[12] 李秀玲, 连少锋, 荣刘涛, 李登峰, 饶蕴玉. 利巴韦林联合复方嗜酸乳杆菌治疗轮状病毒肠炎患儿的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 369-372.
[13] 买买提·依斯热依力, 尹强, 尹海龙, 李治建, 董雨微, 王永康, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 阿吉艾克拜尔·艾萨. 罗乐胃蜜膏抑制酸刺激诱导食管上皮细胞炎症发生的机制研究[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 137-142.
[14] 欧春影, 李晓宾, 郭靖, 朱亮, 许可, 王梦, 安晓雷. 丁苯酞对血管性认知障碍大鼠炎症因子的影响及对认知障碍的改善作用[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 483-487.
[15] 牟磊, 徐东成, 韩鑫, 徐长江, 韩坤锜, 薛叶潇, 牟媛, 秦文玲, 刘相静, 陈哲, 高楠. 五虫通络胶囊防治椎动脉开口支架术后再狭窄发生的效果[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 467-472.
阅读次数
全文


摘要