切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 308 -311. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2022.04.004

临床研究

体外冲击波碎石对高密度输尿管结石治疗效果的影响因素分析
杨冰1, 潘东亮1, 晋连超1, 周哲1, 高鹏飞1, 周赜1, 张志宏1, 李宁忱1,()   
  1. 1. 100144 北京,北京大学首钢医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-01 出版日期:2022-04-15
  • 通信作者: 李宁忱

Prediction of stone-free rates after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of high-density ureteral stones

Bing Yang1, Dongliang Pan1, Lianchao Jin1, Zhe Zhou1, Pengfei Gao1, Ze Zhou1, Zhihong Zhang1, Ningchen Li1,()   

  1. 1. Urology Center, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing 100144, China
  • Received:2021-07-01 Published:2022-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Ningchen Li
引用本文:

杨冰, 潘东亮, 晋连超, 周哲, 高鹏飞, 周赜, 张志宏, 李宁忱. 体外冲击波碎石对高密度输尿管结石治疗效果的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 308-311.

Bing Yang, Dongliang Pan, Lianchao Jin, Zhe Zhou, Pengfei Gao, Ze Zhou, Zhihong Zhang, Ningchen Li. Prediction of stone-free rates after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of high-density ureteral stones[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 308-311.

目的

探讨影响体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)治疗高密度输尿管结石疗效(CT值>1000 HU)的影响因素。

方法

回顾性收集2015年6月至2020年6月在北京大学首钢医院诊断CT值>1000 HU的单发输尿管结石,同时行ESWL治疗患者的临床资料,分析第一次体外碎石后的疗效和影响因素。

结果

65例患者纳入研究,平均结石大小为(10.63±3.24)mm,平均结石密度(CT值)1202±126 HU,碎石成功率为63.1%,结石大小是影响ESWL治疗效果的独立影响因素(OR=1.586,95%CI=1.162~2.166,P=0.004)。ROC曲线分析显示,预测ESWL疗效的结石大小临界值是1 cm。

结论

对于CT值>1000 HU的输尿管结石,结石大小是影响ESWL疗效的独立预测因素,其中≤1 cm结石的碎石成功率达84.8%。

Objective

To identify the influencing factors of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of high-density ureteral calculi (CT value > 1000 HU).

Methods

Clinical data of single ureteral calculi with a CT value > 1000 HU diagnosed at Peking University Shougang Hospital from June 2015 to June 2020 were retrospectively collected, and the efficacy and influencing factors of the first external lithotriptomy were analyzed.

Results

Sixty-five patients were included in the study. The average stone size was (10.63±3.24) mm, the average stone density (CT value) was 1202±126 HU, and the success rate of lithotripsis was 63.1%. Stone size was an independent factor affecting the therapeutic effect of ESWL (odds ratio=1.586, 95% confidence interval: 1.162~2.166, P=0.004). ROC analysis showed that the critical value of stone size for predicting ESWL efficacy was 1 cm.

Conclusion

For ureteral calculi with a CT value>1000 HU, stone size is an independent predictor of ESWL efficacy, and the success rate of ESWL for calculi ≤ 1 cm was 84.8%.

表1 行体外冲击波碎石患者一般资料
表2 结石破碎和碎石成功率情况[例(%)]
表3 影响ESWL结石碎裂和疗效因素的Logistic回归分析
图1 结石大小评价ESWL疗效ROC曲线 注:ESWL为体外冲击波碎石术
1
孙西钊. 医用冲击波 [M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2006: 189.
2
White W, Klein F. Five-year clinical experience with the dornier delta lithotripter [J]. Urology, 2006, 68(1): 28-32.
3
Perks AE, ScHUler TD, Lee J, et al. Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy [J]. Urology, 2008, 72(4): 765-769.
4
Nakasato T, Morita J, Ogawa Y. Evaluation of hounsfield units as a predictive factor for the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and stone composition [J]. Urolithiasis, 2015, 43(1): 69-75.
5
Abdelhamid M, Mosharafa AA, Ibrahim H, et al. A prospective evaluation of high-resolution CT parameters in predicting extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy success for upper urinary tract calculi [J]. J Endourol, 2016, 30(11): 1227-1232.
6
Elkoushy MA, Hassan JA, Morehouse DD, et al. Factors determining stone-free rate in shock wave lithotripsy using standard focus of storz modulith SLX-F2 lithotripter [J]. Urology, 2011, 78(4): 759-763.
7
窦科, 马志伟, 冷冰, 等. 输尿管镜气压弹道与体外震波碎石术治疗输尿管结石疗效比较 [J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2006, 3(2): 38-39.
8
Pareek G, Hedican SP, Lee FTJr, et al. Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography [J]. Urology, 2005, 66(5): 941-944.
9
Tran TY, McGillen K, Cone EB, et al. Triple D score is a reportable predictor of shockwave lithotripsy stone-free rates [J]. J Endourol, 2015, 29(2): 226-230.
[1] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[2] 张超, 张珍, 马梁, 穆欢欢, 刘彩玲. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术术后C级胰瘘患者临床特征及影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-678.
[3] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[4] 陈宗杰, 胡添松. 肝外伤破裂患者治疗后胆漏发生影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 836-840.
[5] 邓万玉, 陈富, 许磊波. 肝硬化与非肝硬化乙肝相关性肝癌患者术后无复发生存比较及其影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 670-674.
[6] 何慧玲, 鲁祖斌, 冯嘉莉, 梁声强. 术前外周血NLR和PLR对结肠癌术后肝转移的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 682-687.
[7] 梁艳娉, 列诗韵, 王艺穗, 吴晓瑛, 林颖. 基于内镜操作细节记录系统构建胃底静脉曲张内镜下组织胶注射术的标准化管理方案[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 705-709.
[8] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[9] 史彬, 司远. 益气和络方联合缬沙坦治疗气阴两虚兼血瘀证IgA 肾病的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 306-312.
[10] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[11] 房桂彬, 肖进, 傅光涛, 郑秋坚. 老年髋部骨折患者术后1年行走能力的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 273-280.
[12] 韩俊岭, 王刚, 马厉英, 连颖, 徐慧. 维生素D 联合匹维溴铵治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征患者疗效及对肠道屏障功能指标的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 560-564.
[13] 倪颖, 张铁龙, 王岗, 高玉龙, 陈韶鹏, 倪家璇. 未预置支架逆行输尿管镜治疗近端输尿管结石手术中的困难与应对[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 795-801.
[14] 阳跃, 庹晓晔, 崔子豪, 欧阳四民, 林海阳, 胡景宇, 胡银, 李涛, 赵景峰, 郝岱峰, 冯光. 改良“阅读者”皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的疗效[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 751-755.
[15] 胡云鹤, 周玉焯, 付瑞瑛, 于凡, 李爱东. CHS-DRG付费制度下GB1分组住院费用影响因素分析与管理策略探讨[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 568-574.
阅读次数
全文


摘要