切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (09) : 851 -856. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2022.09.007

所属专题: 急危重症

院前急救·临床研究

多发性创伤患者院前急救镇痛对预后的效果评估:一项单中心前瞻性随机对照研究
杨阳1, 田小溪1, 杨彦龙1, 付国强1, 李立宏1,()   
  1. 1. 710038 陕西西安,空军军医大学唐都医院急诊科
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-30 出版日期:2022-09-15
  • 通信作者: 李立宏
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省重点研发计划-重点项目-社会发展领域(2017ZDXM-SF-042)

Effect of prehospital analgesia on prognosis in patients with multiple trauma: a single center, prospective randomized controlled study

Yang Yang1, Xiaoxi Tian1, Yanlong Yang1, Guoqiang Fu1, Lihong Li1,()   

  1. 1. Air Force Medical University Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an 710038, China
  • Received:2022-03-30 Published:2022-09-15
  • Corresponding author: Lihong Li
引用本文:

杨阳, 田小溪, 杨彦龙, 付国强, 李立宏. 多发性创伤患者院前急救镇痛对预后的效果评估:一项单中心前瞻性随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(09): 851-856.

Yang Yang, Xiaoxi Tian, Yanlong Yang, Guoqiang Fu, Lihong Li. Effect of prehospital analgesia on prognosis in patients with multiple trauma: a single center, prospective randomized controlled study[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(09): 851-856.

目的

探讨对接受院前急救的多发性创伤患者进行早期镇痛治疗的效果。

方法

将近期空军军医大学唐都医院急诊科收治的168例多发性创伤患者随机分为镇痛组和非镇痛组,2组均给予高级创伤生命支持治疗。此外,前者给予院前瑞芬太尼镇痛,后者给予同方式等剂量生理盐水。对比2组患者院前、院内首次生命体征、院内首次实验室检查指标以及临床资源消耗和院内死亡情况。

结果

镇痛组患者入院首次的呼吸频率显著低于非镇痛组,动脉血二氧化碳分压值显著高于非镇痛组,红细胞分布宽度值显著低于非镇痛组(P<0.01)。与非镇痛组相比,镇痛组患者ICU住院时长和住院总时长显著缩短,机械通气使用率显著减少(P<0.01)。亚组分析中,在严重多发性创伤(ISS评分>25)亚组中可观察到上述组间差异(P<0.01),而在轻度(ISS≤16)和中度(16<ISS≤5)多发性创伤亚组均未观察到上述差异。此外,严重多发性创伤亚组中,给予镇痛可使患者院内死亡率降低(P=0.03),但由于样本量少,仍需大样本研究进一步证实。

结论

对接受院前急救的严重多发性创伤患者使用瑞芬太尼进行早期镇痛治疗的效果较好、安全性高,可显著缩短其在ICU住院的时间及住院总时间,并且有可能改善患者的院内生存情况,具有临床应用潜力。

Objective

To explore the effect of early analgesia on the prognosis of patients with multiple trauma receiving prehospital care.

Methods

A total of 168 patients with multiple trauma recently admitted to the department of emergency of our hospital were randomly divided into either an analgesia group or a non-analgesia group. Both groups were given Advanced Trauma Life Support. In addition, patients in the analgesic group were given analgesic therapy with remifentanil during the stage of prehospital emergency, and those in the non-analgesic group were given an equal volume of saline using the same method. Then, the first vital signs, the first laboratory examination indexes, the consumption of clinical resources, and hospital mortality were compared between the two groups.

Results

Since hospital admission, the first result of respiratory rate was significantly lower and that of PCO2 was significantly higher in the analgesia group than in the non-analgesia group. Red blood cell distribution width was significantly lower in the analgesia group than in the non-analgesia group (P<0.01). Compared with the non-analgesic group, the ICU and hospital stay time were both significantly shortened and the rate of mechanical ventilation was significantly reduced in the analgesic group (P<0.01). In subgroup analysis, all of the differences observed above existed in the subgroup of severe multiple trauma (ISS score>25) (P<0.01), but not in the subgroups characterized by mild (ISS≤16) and moderate (16<ISS<25) multiple trauma. Moreover, in the subgroup of severe multiple trauma, analgesic therapy can reduce the in-hospital mortality (P=0.03).

Conclusion

Remifentanil can be used for analgesic treatment of patients with severe multiple trauma during the stage of prehospital rescue with high safety. It can significantly shorten ICU and hospital stay time and may improve the hospital survival rate of patients. All of these benefits make prehospital analgesia be a potential clinical treatment under the background of emergency medicine.

表1 基线数据特征
表2 院前及入院相关指标测定值
变量 所有患者(n=168) 镇痛组(n=84) 非镇痛组(n=84) P
院前生命体征
平均动脉压(mmHg) 74.37(72.29,76.02) 73.86(70.88,74.93) 74.78(72.06,77.15) 0.58
呼吸(min-1 19.67±5.58 19.83±6.15 19.04±5.83 0.59
脉搏(min-1 87.51±15.16 88.42±13.95 87.10±17.04 0.38
体温(℃) 36.68(36.21,37.04) 36.70(36.19,37.21) 36.67(36.02,37.28) 0.16
SpO2(%) 96.8(95.1,98.3) 96.4(94.9,98.0) 97.2(95.2,98.5) 0.24
院内生命体征
平均动脉压(mmHg) 74.49(70.49,76.02) 74.63(71.24,76.55) 74.21(72.11,76.83) 0.65
呼吸(min-1 18.72±7.43 17.92±9.20 19.12±4.89 <0.01
脉搏(min-1 86.62±16.37 86.47±15.15 87.01±16.66 0.15
体温(℃) 36.67(36.22,37.12) 36.69(36.20,37.18) 36.66(36.03,37.24) 0.37
SpO2(%) 97.2(95.6,98.8) 97.4(95.1,98.2) 97.1(95.5,98.4) 0.54
入院首次实验室指标
血乳酸(mmol/L) 1.6(0.9,2.3) 1.6(1.0,2.4) 1.6(0.8,2.1) 0.29
PCO2(mmHg) 42(36.5,47.3) 44.1(38.9,51.1) 39.6(32.9,45.0) <0.01
PO2(mmHg) 107(84,157.5) 108(85.3,151.2) 107(82.6,159.4) 0.45
谷丙转氨酶a 1.1(0.9,1.6) 1.1(0.9,1.6) 1.1(0.9,1.7) 0.22
谷草转氨酶b 1.5(1.2,1.7) 1.5(1.2,1.8) 1.5(1.2,1.7) 0.21
肌酐(μmol/L) 74.2(61.9,86.2) 74.1(59.7,84.6) 74.3(60.4,86.0) 0.33
尿素氮(mmol/L) 5.1(4.4,6.2) 5.0(4.5,6.5) 5.1(4.3,6.1) 0.45
红细胞分布宽度(%) 14.6(13.5,16.2) 13.7(12.9,15.8) 15.2(14.1,17.4) <0.01
白细胞计数(×109 7.8(7.2,8.3) 7.9(7.3,8.3) 7.8(7.2,8.4) 0.82
淋巴细胞百分比(%) 29.4(23.2,35.6) 29.3(23.0,35.7) 29.4(23.3,35.6) 0.15
中性粒细胞计数(%) 62.5(59.4,66.7) 62.3(59.1,66.5) 62.6(59.5,66.8) 0.06
表3 医疗资源消耗相关数据
表4 ISS≤16分患者的亚组分析
表5 16<ISS≤25分患者的亚组分析
表6 ISS>25分患者的亚组分析
1
陆金志, 王晋安. 早期镇痛在创伤性休克院前急救中的临床研究 [J]. 双足与保健, 2017, 26(21): 139-140.
2
Hards M, Brewer A, Bessant G, et al. Efficacy of prehospital analgesia with fascia lliaca compartment block for femoral bone fractures: a systematic review [J]. Prehosp Disaster Med, 2018, 33(3): 299-307.
3
DeVellis P, Thomas SH, Wedel SK. Prehospital and emergency department analgesia for air-transported patients with fractures [J]. Prehosp Emerg Care, 1998, 2(4): 293-296.
4
Vassiliadis J, Hitos K, Hill CT. Factors influencing prehospital and emergency department analgesia administration to patients with femoral neck fractures [J]. Emerg Med (Fremantle), 2002, 14(3): 261-266.
5
Abbuhl FB, Reed DB. Time to analgesia for patients with painful extremity injuries transported to the emergency department by ambulance [J]. Prehosp Emerg Care, 2003, 7(4): 445-447.
6
White L, Cooper J, Chambers R, et al. Prehospital use of analgesia for suspected extremity fractures[J]. Prehosp Emerg Care, 2000, 4: 205-208.
7
罗学宏. 多发伤 [J]. 急诊医学, 北京, 高等教育出版社, 2008: 226-232.
8
秦明峰. 瑞芬太尼与吗啡及芬太尼用于老年患者术后自控镇痛的效果比效 [J]. 新乡医学院学报, 2007(4): 380-382.
9
Turcato G, Serafini V, Dilda A, et al. Red blood cell distribution width independently predicts medium-term mortality and major adverse cardiac events after an acute coronary syndrome [J]. Ann Transl Med, 2016, 4(13): 254.
10
Ani C, Ovbiagele B. Elevated red blood cell distribution width predicts mortality in persons with known stroke [J]. J Neurol Sci, 2009, 277(1-2): 103-108.
11
Hu Z, Sun Y, Wang Q, et al. Red blood cell distribution width is a potential prognostic index for liver disease [J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2013, 51(7): 1403-1408.
12
Salciccioli JD, Marshall DC, Pimentel MA, et al. The association between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and mortality in critical illness: an observational cohort study [J]. Crit Care, 2015, 19(1): 13.
13
Yang Y, Liang S, Geng J, et al. Development of a nomogram to predict 30-day mortality of patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a retrospective cohort study [J]. J Intensive Care, 2020, 8: 45.
[1] 许亚龙, 巩栋, 陈晓涛. 超前镇痛在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 517-523.
[2] 李浩纶, 杨佳麒, 李羽. 盐酸氢吗啡酮在小儿术后镇痛作用中的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 166-171.
[3] 代莉, 郭华静, 邓恢伟. 镇痛-伤害性刺激指数指导下无阿片类药物麻醉对腔镜下甲状腺手术患者术后恢复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 282-286.
[4] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[5] 郭建丽, 珠娜, 宋飞, 柴国东. 七氟烷吸入复合瑞芬太尼麻醉在小儿腹腔镜疝修补术中的效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 223-227.
[6] 马自达, 孟岩, 郭宏坤, 孙少川, 孙中伟. 腹腔镜辅助腹横肌平面阻滞在腹股沟疝修补术后镇痛中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 102-105.
[7] 张婵, 吕瑶, 张小燕, 张鸣青. 不同时机局部神经阻滞在开腹肝切除中的镇痛效果比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 189-194.
[8] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[9] 陶栎, 张月辉, 王相明. 急性缺血性卒中院前急救体系的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 56-60.
[10] 唐成鑫, 亢文超, 孙玉芳, 项涛, 马林. 成都市院前急救中心院外心脏骤停的调度流程及改进措施分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 745-750.
[11] 王晓艳, 朱利平, 侯顺玉, 岳永飞. 椎管内分娩镇痛对B族溶血性链球菌阳性孕妇阴道分娩结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 112-116.
[12] 王文珠, 刘建, 袁常秀, 石亚飞, 尤培军. 竖脊肌平面阻滞对非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中阿片类药物用量的影响[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 155-159.
[13] 黄晓云, 姚雅极. 院前急救医师职业寿命影响因素与对策思考[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 281-285.
[14] 陆振华, 陶秀萍. 昆山市急救志愿者培训成果转化现状分析及管理方法研究[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 160-164.
[15] 葛书萌, 高丁, 王勇, 韩鹏达. "9·22"北京市通州区公交车起火事件医学救援及探讨[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 354-359.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?