切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (09) : 851 -856. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2022.09.007

院前急救·临床研究

多发性创伤患者院前急救镇痛对预后的效果评估:一项单中心前瞻性随机对照研究
杨阳1, 田小溪1, 杨彦龙1, 付国强1, 李立宏1,()   
  1. 1. 710038 陕西西安,空军军医大学唐都医院急诊科
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-30 出版日期:2022-09-15
  • 通信作者: 李立宏
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省重点研发计划-重点项目-社会发展领域(2017ZDXM-SF-042)

Effect of prehospital analgesia on prognosis in patients with multiple trauma: a single center, prospective randomized controlled study

Yang Yang1, Xiaoxi Tian1, Yanlong Yang1, Guoqiang Fu1, Lihong Li1,()   

  1. 1. Air Force Medical University Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an 710038, China
  • Received:2022-03-30 Published:2022-09-15
  • Corresponding author: Lihong Li
引用本文:

杨阳, 田小溪, 杨彦龙, 付国强, 李立宏. 多发性创伤患者院前急救镇痛对预后的效果评估:一项单中心前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(09): 851-856.

Yang Yang, Xiaoxi Tian, Yanlong Yang, Guoqiang Fu, Lihong Li. Effect of prehospital analgesia on prognosis in patients with multiple trauma: a single center, prospective randomized controlled study[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(09): 851-856.

目的

探讨对接受院前急救的多发性创伤患者进行早期镇痛治疗的效果。

方法

将近期空军军医大学唐都医院急诊科收治的168例多发性创伤患者随机分为镇痛组和非镇痛组,2组均给予高级创伤生命支持治疗。此外,前者给予院前瑞芬太尼镇痛,后者给予同方式等剂量生理盐水。对比2组患者院前、院内首次生命体征、院内首次实验室检查指标以及临床资源消耗和院内死亡情况。

结果

镇痛组患者入院首次的呼吸频率显著低于非镇痛组,动脉血二氧化碳分压值显著高于非镇痛组,红细胞分布宽度值显著低于非镇痛组(P<0.01)。与非镇痛组相比,镇痛组患者ICU住院时长和住院总时长显著缩短,机械通气使用率显著减少(P<0.01)。亚组分析中,在严重多发性创伤(ISS评分>25)亚组中可观察到上述组间差异(P<0.01),而在轻度(ISS≤16)和中度(16<ISS≤5)多发性创伤亚组均未观察到上述差异。此外,严重多发性创伤亚组中,给予镇痛可使患者院内死亡率降低(P=0.03),但由于样本量少,仍需大样本研究进一步证实。

结论

对接受院前急救的严重多发性创伤患者使用瑞芬太尼进行早期镇痛治疗的效果较好、安全性高,可显著缩短其在ICU住院的时间及住院总时间,并且有可能改善患者的院内生存情况,具有临床应用潜力。

Objective

To explore the effect of early analgesia on the prognosis of patients with multiple trauma receiving prehospital care.

Methods

A total of 168 patients with multiple trauma recently admitted to the department of emergency of our hospital were randomly divided into either an analgesia group or a non-analgesia group. Both groups were given Advanced Trauma Life Support. In addition, patients in the analgesic group were given analgesic therapy with remifentanil during the stage of prehospital emergency, and those in the non-analgesic group were given an equal volume of saline using the same method. Then, the first vital signs, the first laboratory examination indexes, the consumption of clinical resources, and hospital mortality were compared between the two groups.

Results

Since hospital admission, the first result of respiratory rate was significantly lower and that of PCO2 was significantly higher in the analgesia group than in the non-analgesia group. Red blood cell distribution width was significantly lower in the analgesia group than in the non-analgesia group (P<0.01). Compared with the non-analgesic group, the ICU and hospital stay time were both significantly shortened and the rate of mechanical ventilation was significantly reduced in the analgesic group (P<0.01). In subgroup analysis, all of the differences observed above existed in the subgroup of severe multiple trauma (ISS score>25) (P<0.01), but not in the subgroups characterized by mild (ISS≤16) and moderate (16<ISS<25) multiple trauma. Moreover, in the subgroup of severe multiple trauma, analgesic therapy can reduce the in-hospital mortality (P=0.03).

Conclusion

Remifentanil can be used for analgesic treatment of patients with severe multiple trauma during the stage of prehospital rescue with high safety. It can significantly shorten ICU and hospital stay time and may improve the hospital survival rate of patients. All of these benefits make prehospital analgesia be a potential clinical treatment under the background of emergency medicine.

表1 基线数据特征
表2 院前及入院相关指标测定值
变量 所有患者(n=168) 镇痛组(n=84) 非镇痛组(n=84) P
院前生命体征
平均动脉压(mmHg) 74.37(72.29,76.02) 73.86(70.88,74.93) 74.78(72.06,77.15) 0.58
呼吸(min-1 19.67±5.58 19.83±6.15 19.04±5.83 0.59
脉搏(min-1 87.51±15.16 88.42±13.95 87.10±17.04 0.38
体温(℃) 36.68(36.21,37.04) 36.70(36.19,37.21) 36.67(36.02,37.28) 0.16
SpO2(%) 96.8(95.1,98.3) 96.4(94.9,98.0) 97.2(95.2,98.5) 0.24
院内生命体征
平均动脉压(mmHg) 74.49(70.49,76.02) 74.63(71.24,76.55) 74.21(72.11,76.83) 0.65
呼吸(min-1 18.72±7.43 17.92±9.20 19.12±4.89 <0.01
脉搏(min-1 86.62±16.37 86.47±15.15 87.01±16.66 0.15
体温(℃) 36.67(36.22,37.12) 36.69(36.20,37.18) 36.66(36.03,37.24) 0.37
SpO2(%) 97.2(95.6,98.8) 97.4(95.1,98.2) 97.1(95.5,98.4) 0.54
入院首次实验室指标
血乳酸(mmol/L) 1.6(0.9,2.3) 1.6(1.0,2.4) 1.6(0.8,2.1) 0.29
PCO2(mmHg) 42(36.5,47.3) 44.1(38.9,51.1) 39.6(32.9,45.0) <0.01
PO2(mmHg) 107(84,157.5) 108(85.3,151.2) 107(82.6,159.4) 0.45
谷丙转氨酶a 1.1(0.9,1.6) 1.1(0.9,1.6) 1.1(0.9,1.7) 0.22
谷草转氨酶b 1.5(1.2,1.7) 1.5(1.2,1.8) 1.5(1.2,1.7) 0.21
肌酐(μmol/L) 74.2(61.9,86.2) 74.1(59.7,84.6) 74.3(60.4,86.0) 0.33
尿素氮(mmol/L) 5.1(4.4,6.2) 5.0(4.5,6.5) 5.1(4.3,6.1) 0.45
红细胞分布宽度(%) 14.6(13.5,16.2) 13.7(12.9,15.8) 15.2(14.1,17.4) <0.01
白细胞计数(×109 7.8(7.2,8.3) 7.9(7.3,8.3) 7.8(7.2,8.4) 0.82
淋巴细胞百分比(%) 29.4(23.2,35.6) 29.3(23.0,35.7) 29.4(23.3,35.6) 0.15
中性粒细胞计数(%) 62.5(59.4,66.7) 62.3(59.1,66.5) 62.6(59.5,66.8) 0.06
表3 医疗资源消耗相关数据
表4 ISS≤16分患者的亚组分析
表5 16<ISS≤25分患者的亚组分析
表6 ISS>25分患者的亚组分析
1
陆金志, 王晋安. 早期镇痛在创伤性休克院前急救中的临床研究 [J]. 双足与保健, 2017, 26(21): 139-140.
2
Hards M, Brewer A, Bessant G, et al. Efficacy of prehospital analgesia with fascia lliaca compartment block for femoral bone fractures: a systematic review [J]. Prehosp Disaster Med, 2018, 33(3): 299-307.
3
DeVellis P, Thomas SH, Wedel SK. Prehospital and emergency department analgesia for air-transported patients with fractures [J]. Prehosp Emerg Care, 1998, 2(4): 293-296.
4
Vassiliadis J, Hitos K, Hill CT. Factors influencing prehospital and emergency department analgesia administration to patients with femoral neck fractures [J]. Emerg Med (Fremantle), 2002, 14(3): 261-266.
5
Abbuhl FB, Reed DB. Time to analgesia for patients with painful extremity injuries transported to the emergency department by ambulance [J]. Prehosp Emerg Care, 2003, 7(4): 445-447.
6
White L, Cooper J, Chambers R, et al. Prehospital use of analgesia for suspected extremity fractures[J]. Prehosp Emerg Care, 2000, 4: 205-208.
7
罗学宏. 多发伤 [J]. 急诊医学, 北京, 高等教育出版社, 2008: 226-232.
8
秦明峰. 瑞芬太尼与吗啡及芬太尼用于老年患者术后自控镇痛的效果比效 [J]. 新乡医学院学报, 2007(4): 380-382.
9
Turcato G, Serafini V, Dilda A, et al. Red blood cell distribution width independently predicts medium-term mortality and major adverse cardiac events after an acute coronary syndrome [J]. Ann Transl Med, 2016, 4(13): 254.
10
Ani C, Ovbiagele B. Elevated red blood cell distribution width predicts mortality in persons with known stroke [J]. J Neurol Sci, 2009, 277(1-2): 103-108.
11
Hu Z, Sun Y, Wang Q, et al. Red blood cell distribution width is a potential prognostic index for liver disease [J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2013, 51(7): 1403-1408.
12
Salciccioli JD, Marshall DC, Pimentel MA, et al. The association between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and mortality in critical illness: an observational cohort study [J]. Crit Care, 2015, 19(1): 13.
13
Yang Y, Liang S, Geng J, et al. Development of a nomogram to predict 30-day mortality of patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a retrospective cohort study [J]. J Intensive Care, 2020, 8: 45.
[1] 蒋庆梅, 巫韧, 杨岸, 陈晓艳, 钟庆. 对囊周神经阻滞在股骨粗隆间骨折患者全麻术中的镇痛效果及认知功能影响的分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 204-209.
[2] 高晋鸿, 郝少龙, 刘勇, 翁以炳, 韩威, 王冠, 张腾, 刘鹏, 张磊, 赵鑫宇. 腹腔镜阑尾切除术前应用吲哚美辛栓和氯诺昔康疗效的比较[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 293-297.
[3] 张翼飞, 郭强, 赖华健, 钟文文, 叶雷, 马波, 瞿虎, 尧冰, 邱剑光, 王德娟. 加速康复外科在儿童尿道下裂围术期的应用效果分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 367-371.
[4] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[5] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[6] 黄铁刚, 肖凤霞. 地塞米松联合罗哌卡因在腹股沟疝修补术后镇痛效果及对血清指标的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 574-578.
[7] 谢文龙, 周建军. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞联合腹横肌平面阻滞在老年腹股沟疝中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 588-592.
[8] 于广东, 纪月珑, 李向南, 邓龙生. 纳布啡联合瑞芬太尼在腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝手术术后应用效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 463-467.
[9] 赵超, 张乾. SAPB和TPVB在腔镜下肺癌根治术中的应用及镇痛效果分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 535-537.
[10] 陈静, 张春明, 周斌, 吴明明. 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑联合瑞芬太尼全身麻醉对胸腔镜肺叶切除患者术后应激反应及血清PAF、γ干扰素的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 554-556.
[11] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[12] 徐洪宇, 何亚爽. 羟考酮与氢吗啡酮用于胃癌根治术后镇痛的疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 312-316.
[13] 陈焕军, 颜时姣, 宋兴月, 陈瑜, 吕传柱. 我国大学生应急救护培训现状调查[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 367-374.
[14] 潘鑫, 王忻, 王超, 顾慧, 吴敏, 唐加波, 崔恒熙, 李政. 亚低温治疗在脑卒中院前急救中的应用[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 155-158.
[15] 梅冬兰, 凌受毅, 梅冰, 邵光亮, 孙志辉. 院外自动心肺复苏机序贯骨髓腔输液在抢救呼吸心跳骤停患者中的应用价值[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 159-162.
阅读次数
全文


摘要