切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 105 -111. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2023.02.001

临床研究

内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌的疗效及预后分析
王俐, 樊帆, 陈国栋, 刘玉兰, 张黎明()   
  1. 100044 北京大学人民医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-21 出版日期:2023-02-15
  • 通信作者: 张黎明

Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer and characteristics of early cardiac gastric cancer

Li Wang, Fan Fan, Guodong Chen, Yulan Liu, Liming Zhang()   

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University People's Hospital, 100044 Beijing, China
  • Received:2022-06-21 Published:2023-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Liming Zhang
引用本文:

王俐, 樊帆, 陈国栋, 刘玉兰, 张黎明. 内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌的疗效及预后分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 105-111.

Li Wang, Fan Fan, Guodong Chen, Yulan Liu, Liming Zhang. Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer and characteristics of early cardiac gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(02): 105-111.

目的

分析经内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗的早期胃癌患者的近期疗效、远期预后及贲门部与非贲门部早期胃癌相关临床特征的差别。

方法

回顾性分析2012年8月至2021年7月于北京大学人民医院内镜中心行ESD的98例早期胃癌患者的临床病理资料及随访数据。分析相关临床病理及内镜特征,ESD治疗后病变完整、完全切除率,术后并发症以及复发率、同时性癌、异时性癌发生率等,采用Kaplan-Meier法分析比较了非治愈切除患者与治愈性切除患者的远期预后;并比较贲门与非贲门部位病变相关特征及预后差异。

结果

共有98例患者(105处病灶)纳入分析,其中贲门部早期胃癌患者20例(20.4%,20/98)。ESD治疗后病灶整块切除率为98.1%,完全切除率90.5%,无垂直切缘阳性,1.9%脉管阳性。按照eCura标准,治愈性切除组病灶共占88.6%,非治愈性切除组为11.4%。有2.9%病灶发生术后出血,无术后穿孔发生。多因素分析显示病灶大于2 cm、病理类型为未分化型是影响病灶完全切除的独立危险因素。在59个月的中位随访期内,局部复发和残留发生率为2.1%,同时性癌和异时性癌发生率分别为2.1%和5.3%。总体5年生存率为98.8%,5年疾病特异生存率100%,5年无肿瘤生存率为88.4%,治愈性切除组与非治愈性切除组的5年无肿瘤生存率无显著差异(86.2% vs 81.8%)(P=0.310)。贲门部位组与非贲门部位组比较,贲门部位组存在更高的局部复发和残留风险(10.5% vs 0%,P<0.05),贲门组5年无肿瘤生存率要低于非贲门组,但差异无统计学意义(77.5% vs 88.3%,P=0.071)。

结论

ESD对于符合适应症的早期胃癌患者有很好的疗效及安全性。非治愈性切除患者经合理选择术后策略,也有较好的远期预后。相较于非贲门部早期胃癌,贲门部早期胃癌患者可能有着不同的临床特征及预后。

Objective

To analyze the short-term and long-term outcomes of patients with early gastric cancer treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and the characteristics of early cardiac gastric cancer.

Methods

The clinicopathological and follow-up data of 98 patients with early gastric cancer who underwent ESD at the Endoscopy Center of Peking University People's Hospital from August 2012 to July 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical features of patients and endoscopic futures of lesions, en bloc resection and complete resection rates, complications after procedure, residual and recurrence rate, and incidence of synchronous and metachronous cancer were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the survival of patients in the curative group and non-curative group. The differences between cardiac and non-cardiac lesions were also analyzed.

Results

A total of 98 patients (105 lesions) were included in the study. The lesions were located in the cardia in 20 cases (20.4%, 20/98). The en bloc resection rate was 98.1%, and the complete resection rate was 90.5%. No positive vertical margin was found, and vessels were positive in 1.9% of the lesions. According to the eCura system, 88.6% of the lesions were in the curative resection group and 11.4% in the non-curative resection group. Postoperative bleeding occurred in 2.9% of the cases, and no postoperative perforation occurred. Multivariate analysis showed that lesions larger than 2 cm and pathological undifferentiation type were independent risk factors for incomplete resection. The incidence of residual and local recurrence was 2.1%, and the rates of synchronous and metachronous cancer were 2.1% and 5.3%, respectively. The overall 5-year survival rate was 98.8%, the 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 100%, and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 88.4%. There was no significant difference between the curative resection group and the non-curative resection group (86.2% vs 81.8%, P=0.310) for 5-year disease free survival rate. Compared with the non-cardiac group, the cardiac group had a higher residual and recurrence rate (10.5% vs 0%, P<0.05). The 5-year disease-free survival rate of the cardiac group was lower than that of the non-cardiac group, but the difference was not statistically significant (77.5% vs 88.3%, P=0.071).

Conclusion

ESD has good efficacy and safety for early gastric cancer lesions meeting the surgical indications. The long-term prognosis is excellent, even for patients with non-curative resection after appropriate postoperative treatment. Patients with early cardiac gastric cancer may have different characteristics and prognosis compared with those with early non-cardiac gastric cancer.

表1 早期胃癌病灶的内镜病理特征及ESD术治疗的近期疗效[例(%)]
表2 影响早期胃癌病灶非完全切除的单因素及多因素分析
图1 早期胃癌患者ESD治疗后无肿瘤生存曲线。图a为治愈性切除组和非治愈性切除组比较;图b为贲门部位组和非贲门部位组比较注:DFS为无肿瘤生存率;ESD为内镜黏膜下剥离术
表3 不同部位早期胃癌患者ESD术后远期疗效[例(%)]
1
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.
2
Thrift AP, El-Serag HB. Burden of gastric cancer [J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 18(3): 534-542.
3
Gotoda T. Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer: the Japanese perspective [J]. Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 2006, 22(5): 561-569.
4
Huang Q, Read M, Gold JS, et al. Unraveling the identity of gastric cardiac cancer [J]. J Dig Dis, 2020, 21(12): 674-686.
5
Endoscopic Classification Review Group. Update on the paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract [J]. Endoscopy, 2005, 37(6): 570-578.
6
北京市科委重大项目«早期胃癌治疗规范研究»专家组. 早期胃癌内镜下规范化切除的专家共识意见(2018, 北京) [J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2018, 36(6): 381-392.
7
Ahmed Y, Othman M. EMR/ESD: Techniques, complications, and evidence [J]. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2020, 22(8): 39.
8
Ono H, Yao K, Fujishiro M, et al. Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer (second edition) [J]. Dig Endosc, 2021, 33(1): 4-20.
9
陈光勇, 黄受方, 石晓燕, 等. 内镜下胃黏膜切除标本病理学规范化检查的建议 [J]. 中华病理学杂志, 2014, 43(5): 344-377.
10
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition [J]. Gastric Cancer, 2011, 14(2): 101-112.
11
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3) [J]. Gastric Cancer, 2011, 14(2): 113-123.
12
Ono H, Yao K, Fujishiro M, et al. Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer [J]. Dig Endosc, 2016, 28(1) :3-15.
13
Kosaka T, Endo M, Toya Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a single-center retrospective study [J]. Dig Endosc, 2014, 26(2): 183-191.
14
Nishizawa T, Yahagi N. Long-term outcomes of using endoscopic submucosal dissection to treat early gastric cancer [J]. Gut Liver, 2018, 12(2): 119-124.
15
Lee SH, Kim MC, Jeon SW, et al. Risk factors and clinical outcomes of non-curative resection in patients with early gastric cancer treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection: A retrospective multicenter study in Korea [J]. Clin Endosc, 2020, 53(2): 196-205.
16
郭若寒, 吴晰, 邹龙, 等. 早期胃癌内镜下特征对内镜下切除术非治愈性切除的预测意义 [J] . 中华消化内镜杂志, 2021, 38(10): 806-810.
17
Kim JH. Important considerations when contemplating endoscopic resection of undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2016, 22(3): 1172-1178.
18
Gupta S, Tao L, Murphy JD, et al. Race/ethnicity-, socioeconomic status-, and anatomic subsite-specific risks for gastric cancer [J]. Gastroenterology, 2019, 156(1): 59-62..
19
Zhang Y, Zhang PS, Rong ZY, et al. One stomach, two subtypes of carcinoma-the differences between distal and proximal gastric cancer [J]. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf), 2021, 9(6): 489-504.
[1] 张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[2] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[3] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[4] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[5] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[6] 邰清亮, 施波, 侍新宇, 陈国梁, 陈俊杰, 武冠廷, 王索, 孙金兵, 顾闻, 叶建新, 何宋兵. 腹腔镜次全结肠切除术治疗顽固性慢传输型便秘的疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 478-483.
[7] 徐红莉, 杨钰琳, 薛清, 张茜, 马丽虹, 邱振刚. 体外冲击波治疗非特异性腰痛疗效的系统评价和Meta分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 307-314.
[8] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[9] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[10] 高显奎, 赵太云, 陆兴俊, 张洪领, 房修罗, 闫碧春, 王胤, 王永翠, 刘苗苗, 冉若男. 内镜电凝止血与组织胶注射治疗上消化道溃疡伴出血的疗效观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 452-455.
[11] 张景旭, 李德舫, 由上可, 张玉田. 贝伐珠单抗与安罗替尼联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期直肠癌的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 289-293.
[12] 杨镠, 秦岚群, 耿茜, 李栋庆, 戚春建, 蒋华. 可溶性免疫检查点对胃癌患者免疫治疗疗效和预后的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 305-311.
[13] 盛静, 梅勇, 夏佩, 王晓林. 乌苯美司联合伊立替康二线治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 317-321.
[14] 董青, 丁飞, 郭浩, 李峰. Nesfatin-1/NUCB2在幽门螺杆菌感染相关早期胃癌患者中的表达及临床意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 783-789.
[15] 李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要