切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 105 -111. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2023.02.001

临床研究

内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌的疗效及预后分析
王俐, 樊帆, 陈国栋, 刘玉兰, 张黎明()   
  1. 100044 北京大学人民医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-21 出版日期:2023-02-15
  • 通信作者: 张黎明

Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer and characteristics of early cardiac gastric cancer

Li Wang, Fan Fan, Guodong Chen, Yulan Liu, Liming Zhang()   

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University People's Hospital, 100044 Beijing, China
  • Received:2022-06-21 Published:2023-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Liming Zhang
引用本文:

王俐, 樊帆, 陈国栋, 刘玉兰, 张黎明. 内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 105-111.

Li Wang, Fan Fan, Guodong Chen, Yulan Liu, Liming Zhang. Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer and characteristics of early cardiac gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(02): 105-111.

目的

分析经内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗的早期胃癌患者的近期疗效、远期预后及贲门部与非贲门部早期胃癌相关临床特征的差别。

方法

回顾性分析2012年8月至2021年7月于北京大学人民医院内镜中心行ESD的98例早期胃癌患者的临床病理资料及随访数据。分析相关临床病理及内镜特征,ESD治疗后病变完整、完全切除率,术后并发症以及复发率、同时性癌、异时性癌发生率等,采用Kaplan-Meier法分析比较了非治愈切除患者与治愈性切除患者的远期预后;并比较贲门与非贲门部位病变相关特征及预后差异。

结果

共有98例患者(105处病灶)纳入分析,其中贲门部早期胃癌患者20例(20.4%,20/98)。ESD治疗后病灶整块切除率为98.1%,完全切除率90.5%,无垂直切缘阳性,1.9%脉管阳性。按照eCura标准,治愈性切除组病灶共占88.6%,非治愈性切除组为11.4%。有2.9%病灶发生术后出血,无术后穿孔发生。多因素分析显示病灶大于2 cm、病理类型为未分化型是影响病灶完全切除的独立危险因素。在59个月的中位随访期内,局部复发和残留发生率为2.1%,同时性癌和异时性癌发生率分别为2.1%和5.3%。总体5年生存率为98.8%,5年疾病特异生存率100%,5年无肿瘤生存率为88.4%,治愈性切除组与非治愈性切除组的5年无肿瘤生存率无显著差异(86.2% vs 81.8%)(P=0.310)。贲门部位组与非贲门部位组比较,贲门部位组存在更高的局部复发和残留风险(10.5% vs 0%,P<0.05),贲门组5年无肿瘤生存率要低于非贲门组,但差异无统计学意义(77.5% vs 88.3%,P=0.071)。

结论

ESD对于符合适应症的早期胃癌患者有很好的疗效及安全性。非治愈性切除患者经合理选择术后策略,也有较好的远期预后。相较于非贲门部早期胃癌,贲门部早期胃癌患者可能有着不同的临床特征及预后。

Objective

To analyze the short-term and long-term outcomes of patients with early gastric cancer treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and the characteristics of early cardiac gastric cancer.

Methods

The clinicopathological and follow-up data of 98 patients with early gastric cancer who underwent ESD at the Endoscopy Center of Peking University People's Hospital from August 2012 to July 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical features of patients and endoscopic futures of lesions, en bloc resection and complete resection rates, complications after procedure, residual and recurrence rate, and incidence of synchronous and metachronous cancer were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the survival of patients in the curative group and non-curative group. The differences between cardiac and non-cardiac lesions were also analyzed.

Results

A total of 98 patients (105 lesions) were included in the study. The lesions were located in the cardia in 20 cases (20.4%, 20/98). The en bloc resection rate was 98.1%, and the complete resection rate was 90.5%. No positive vertical margin was found, and vessels were positive in 1.9% of the lesions. According to the eCura system, 88.6% of the lesions were in the curative resection group and 11.4% in the non-curative resection group. Postoperative bleeding occurred in 2.9% of the cases, and no postoperative perforation occurred. Multivariate analysis showed that lesions larger than 2 cm and pathological undifferentiation type were independent risk factors for incomplete resection. The incidence of residual and local recurrence was 2.1%, and the rates of synchronous and metachronous cancer were 2.1% and 5.3%, respectively. The overall 5-year survival rate was 98.8%, the 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 100%, and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 88.4%. There was no significant difference between the curative resection group and the non-curative resection group (86.2% vs 81.8%, P=0.310) for 5-year disease free survival rate. Compared with the non-cardiac group, the cardiac group had a higher residual and recurrence rate (10.5% vs 0%, P<0.05). The 5-year disease-free survival rate of the cardiac group was lower than that of the non-cardiac group, but the difference was not statistically significant (77.5% vs 88.3%, P=0.071).

Conclusion

ESD has good efficacy and safety for early gastric cancer lesions meeting the surgical indications. The long-term prognosis is excellent, even for patients with non-curative resection after appropriate postoperative treatment. Patients with early cardiac gastric cancer may have different characteristics and prognosis compared with those with early non-cardiac gastric cancer.

表1 早期胃癌病灶的内镜病理特征及ESD术治疗的近期疗效[例(%)]
表2 影响早期胃癌病灶非完全切除的单因素及多因素分析
图1 早期胃癌患者ESD治疗后无肿瘤生存曲线。图a为治愈性切除组和非治愈性切除组比较;图b为贲门部位组和非贲门部位组比较注:DFS为无肿瘤生存率;ESD为内镜黏膜下剥离术
表3 不同部位早期胃癌患者ESD术后远期疗效[例(%)]
1
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.
2
Thrift AP, El-Serag HB. Burden of gastric cancer [J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 18(3): 534-542.
3
Gotoda T. Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer: the Japanese perspective [J]. Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 2006, 22(5): 561-569.
4
Huang Q, Read M, Gold JS, et al. Unraveling the identity of gastric cardiac cancer [J]. J Dig Dis, 2020, 21(12): 674-686.
5
Endoscopic Classification Review Group. Update on the paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract [J]. Endoscopy, 2005, 37(6): 570-578.
6
北京市科委重大项目«早期胃癌治疗规范研究»专家组. 早期胃癌内镜下规范化切除的专家共识意见(2018, 北京) [J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2018, 36(6): 381-392.
7
Ahmed Y, Othman M. EMR/ESD: Techniques, complications, and evidence [J]. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2020, 22(8): 39.
8
Ono H, Yao K, Fujishiro M, et al. Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer (second edition) [J]. Dig Endosc, 2021, 33(1): 4-20.
9
陈光勇, 黄受方, 石晓燕, 等. 内镜下胃黏膜切除标本病理学规范化检查的建议 [J]. 中华病理学杂志, 2014, 43(5): 344-377.
10
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition [J]. Gastric Cancer, 2011, 14(2): 101-112.
11
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3) [J]. Gastric Cancer, 2011, 14(2): 113-123.
12
Ono H, Yao K, Fujishiro M, et al. Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer [J]. Dig Endosc, 2016, 28(1) :3-15.
13
Kosaka T, Endo M, Toya Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a single-center retrospective study [J]. Dig Endosc, 2014, 26(2): 183-191.
14
Nishizawa T, Yahagi N. Long-term outcomes of using endoscopic submucosal dissection to treat early gastric cancer [J]. Gut Liver, 2018, 12(2): 119-124.
15
Lee SH, Kim MC, Jeon SW, et al. Risk factors and clinical outcomes of non-curative resection in patients with early gastric cancer treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection: A retrospective multicenter study in Korea [J]. Clin Endosc, 2020, 53(2): 196-205.
16
郭若寒, 吴晰, 邹龙, 等. 早期胃癌内镜下特征对内镜下切除术非治愈性切除的预测意义 [J] . 中华消化内镜杂志, 2021, 38(10): 806-810.
17
Kim JH. Important considerations when contemplating endoscopic resection of undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2016, 22(3): 1172-1178.
18
Gupta S, Tao L, Murphy JD, et al. Race/ethnicity-, socioeconomic status-, and anatomic subsite-specific risks for gastric cancer [J]. Gastroenterology, 2019, 156(1): 59-62..
19
Zhang Y, Zhang PS, Rong ZY, et al. One stomach, two subtypes of carcinoma-the differences between distal and proximal gastric cancer [J]. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf), 2021, 9(6): 489-504.
[1] 张启龙, 柳亿, 卢会丽, 罗慧, 李成林, 王菁, 王辉. 奥妥珠单抗治疗磷脂酶A2受体相关膜性肾病的疗效与安全性:单中心回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 379-384.
[2] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[3] 聂生军, 王钰, 王毅, 鲜小庆, 马生成. 复方倍他米松局部注射联合光动力疗法治疗小型瘢痕疙瘩的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 404-410.
[4] 王卫东. 贲门周围血管离断与左膈下静脉的保留[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 464-464.
[5] 莫淇舟, 苏劲, 黄健, 李健维, 李思宁, 柳建军. 智能控压输尿管软镜碎石吸引取石术在直径10~25 mm上尿路结石中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 497-502.
[6] 王亚岚, 倪婧, 余世庆, 陶银花, 张荣. 尼达尼布抗纤维化治疗特发性肺纤维化的耐受性和疗效预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 750-755.
[7] 詹济玮, 蔡柳春, 温琼娜, 郭石生, 温春妹, 温鹤明. 布地格福联合噻托溴铵治疗AECOPD 的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 823-826.
[8] 王飞, 陈政, 余德才, 曹亚娟. 原发性肝癌合并门静脉高压症的微创手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 306-310.
[9] 魏孔源, 仵正, 王铮, 黎韡. 机器人胰腺中段切除后远端胰腺消化道不同重建方式初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 295-300.
[10] 梁艳娉, 列诗韵, 王艺穗, 吴晓瑛, 林颖. 基于内镜操作细节记录系统构建胃底静脉曲张内镜下组织胶注射术的标准化管理方案[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 705-709.
[11] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[12] 史彬, 司远. 益气和络方联合缬沙坦治疗气阴两虚兼血瘀证IgA 肾病的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 306-312.
[13] 韩俊岭, 王刚, 马厉英, 连颖, 徐慧. 维生素D 联合匹维溴铵治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征患者疗效及对肠道屏障功能指标的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 560-564.
[14] 阳跃, 庹晓晔, 崔子豪, 欧阳四民, 林海阳, 胡景宇, 胡银, 李涛, 赵景峰, 郝岱峰, 冯光. 改良“阅读者”皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的疗效[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 751-755.
[15] 克地尔牙·马合木提, 胡波, 杨琼, 闫素, 胡岚卿, 高沛沛, 姚恩生. 依达拉奉右莰醇对急性脑梗死后认知功能障碍的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 459-466.
阅读次数
全文


摘要