切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (02) : 159 -165. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2024.02.008

临床研究

糖皮质激素序贯疗法预防环周食管浅表肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术后狭窄的研究
陈磊1, 高苏俊1, 王璐1, 倪修凡1, 史茜菁1, 朱振1,()   
  1. 1. 225001 江苏 扬州,扬州大学临床医学院苏北人民医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-08 出版日期:2024-02-15
  • 通信作者: 朱振

Efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with glucocorticoids in preventing esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for circumferential superficial esophageal neoplasms

Lei Chen1, Sujun Gao1, Lu Wang1, Xiufan Ni1, xijing Shi1, Zhen Zhu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, China
  • Received:2023-10-08 Published:2024-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Zhen Zhu
引用本文:

陈磊, 高苏俊, 王璐, 倪修凡, 史茜菁, 朱振. 糖皮质激素序贯疗法预防环周食管浅表肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术后狭窄的研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 159-165.

Lei Chen, Sujun Gao, Lu Wang, Xiufan Ni, xijing Shi, Zhen Zhu. Efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with glucocorticoids in preventing esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for circumferential superficial esophageal neoplasms[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(02): 159-165.

目的

评估糖皮质激素序贯疗法预防环周食管浅表肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后食管狭窄的有效性和安全性,并探讨糖皮质激素的适宜剂量及疗程。

方法

回顾分析2017年1月至2022年12月38例在苏北人民医院因全周食管浅表肿瘤行ESD的患者病例资料,其中口服强的松组(n=10)仅术后第三天口服强的松30 mg/d,每三周减量5 mg;序贯长疗程组(n=11)术后立即予黏膜缺损处注射曲安奈德,第三天起口服强的松30 mg/d并每三周减量5 mg,而序贯短疗程组(n=17)注射曲安奈德48 h后口服强的松的起始剂量30 mg/d并逐渐减量,疗程共8周。主要观察指标:术后食管狭窄率、难治性狭窄率、内镜下球囊扩张(EBD)次数、食管狭窄的总治疗时间、术后1月、3月的创面愈合率、ESD和EBD手术并发症及使用糖皮质激素相关不良时间。

结果

口服强的松组、序贯长疗程组、序贯短疗程组ESD后食管狭窄率及难治性狭窄率分别为80%(8/10)、27.3%(3/11)、29.4%(5/17)和60%(6/10)、18.2%(2/11)、17.6%(3/17),差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.007,P=0.018、χ2=6.364,P=0.042),口服强的松组明显高于序贯治疗组(P<0.05),而序贯长疗程组和序贯短疗程组间无差异(P>0.05)。序贯长疗程组及序贯短疗程组术后EBD次数分别为0(0,8)、0(0,8),明显少于口服强的松组7.5(0,12)(H=9.882,P=0.007),而序贯长疗程组和序贯短疗程组间无差异(P>0.05)。口服强的松组术后食管狭窄患者的总治疗时间为(133.75±38.61)d,明显长于序贯长疗程组(85.33±20.74)d和序贯短疗程组(84.8±27.23)d(F=4.38,P=0.035),而两序贯组间比较无差异(P>0.05)。术后一月3组创面愈合率分别为50%、72.7%和76.5%,术后三月的创面愈合率分别为80%,90.9%和94.1%,两时间点各组间比较均无差异(χ2=3.225,P=0.199;χ2=3.429,P=0.180)。口服强的松组出现糖皮质激素相关不良反应6人次,序贯长疗程组有7人次,而序贯短疗程组仅2人次。

结论

糖皮质激素序贯疗法能安全有效地预防环周食管ESD后狭窄,为减少糖皮质激素相关不良时间,可适当减少序贯疗法中强的松的总剂量。

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with glucocorticoids in preventing esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for circumferential superficial esophageal neoplasms, and to investigate the appropriate dosage and course of glucocorticoids.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on data of 38 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for circumferential superficial esophageal neoplasms from January 2017 to December 2022 in Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital. The patients were divided into an oral prednisone group (n=10), a sequential long-course group (n=11), and a sequential short-course group (n=17). Prednisone 30 mg was administered orally for 3 weeks and then the dose was reduced in 5 mg decrements every 3 weeks since the third day after ESD in the oral prednisone group. Patients in the sequential long-course group received intralesional triamcinolone injection combined with oral prednisone 30 mg/day, and the dosage was reduced in 5 mg decrements every 3 weeks. Patients in the sequential short-course group received prednisone at 30 mg/day, and the dosage was tapered over 8 weeks after intralesional triamcinolone injection. The frequency of esophageal stenosis and refractory stenosis, the number of endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) treatments, treatment time for esophageal stenosis, the rate of wound healing at 1 and 3 months after ESD, and adverse events potentially associated with glucocorticoid administration were compared among the three groups.

Results

The frequency of esophageal stenosis and refractory stenosis in the oral prednisone group, sequential long-course group, and sequential short-course group were 80% (8/10), 27.3% (3/11), and 29.4% ( 5/17), and 60% (6/10), 18.2% (2/11), and 17.6% (3/17), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant among the three groups (χ2=8.007, P=0.018 and χ2=6.364, P=0.042, respectively). In pairwise comparisons, the above indicators in the sequential long-course group and sequential short-course group were significantly lower than those of the oral prednisone group (P<0.05), but there were no statistical difference between the sequential long-course group and sequential short-course group (P>0.05). The number of EBD treatments and treatment time for esophageal stenosis of the three groups were 7.5 (range, 0 to 12), 0 (range, 0 to 8) , and 0 (range, 0 to 8), and (133.75±38.61) d, (85.33±20.74 ) d, and (84.8±27.23) d, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant among the three groups (H=9.882, P=0.007 and F=4.38, P=0.035). In pairwise comparisons, the above indicators in the sequential long-course group and sequential short-course group were significantly less than those of the oral prednisone group (P<0.05), but there were no statistical difference between the sequential long-course group and sequential short-course group (P>0.05). The rate of wound healing in the oral prednisone group, sequential long-course group, and sequential short-course group at 1 and 3 months after ESD were 50%, 72.7%, and 76.5%, and 80%, 90.9%, and 94.1%, respectively, with no significant difference among the three groups (χ2=3.225, P=0.199 and χ2=3.429, P=0.180, respectively). Oral herpes virus infection, mycotic esophagitis, and pneumonia were observed in 6 patients in the oral prednisone group and in 7 in the sequential long-course group. Two patients had mycotic esophagitis in the sequential short-course group.

Conclusion

Sequential therapy with glucocorticoids can effectively prevent esophageal stricture after ESD for circumferential superficial esophageal neoplasms. To reduce glucocorticoid-associated adverse events, the total dose of prednisone in sequential therapy can be appropriately reduced.

图1 序贯治疗组手术过程及术后随访。图a为卢戈氏液染色见食管环周病变并标记;图b为病灶口侧沿标记点外0.5 cm环周切开黏膜;图c为从口侧建立黏膜下隧道至肛侧;图d为术后创面;图e为使用内镜注射针外鞘管接触创面,脉冲式注射曲安奈德;图f为术后标本;图g为术后标本展开固定;图h为术后3月胃镜检查见术后疤痕,镜身能通过
表1 各组患者一般情况及术后病理
1
Plum PS, Holscher AH, Pacheco Godoy K, et al. Prognosis of patients with superficial T1 esophageal cancer who underwent endoscopic resection before esophagectomy-a propensity scorematched comparison[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 2: 3972-3980.
2
Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society: part 1[J]. Esophagus, 2019, 16(1):1-24.
3
Chen MC, Dang YN, Ding C, et al. Lesion size and circumferential range identifiedas independent risk factors for esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(9): 4065-4071.
4
Kishida Y, Kakushima N, Kawata N, et al. Complications of endoscopic dilation for esophageal stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal cancer[J]. SurgEndosc, 2015, 29(10): 2953-2959.
5
Kadota T, Yoda Y, Hori K, et al. Prophylactic steroid administration against strictures is not enough for mucosal defects involving the entire circumference of the esophageal lumen after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)[J]. Esophagus, 2020, 17(4): 440-447.
6
Iizuka T, Kikuchi D, Hoteya S, et al. Effectiveness of modified oral steroid administration for preventing esophageal stricture after entire circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2018, 31(7): 1-6.
7
王玉欣, 朱季军, 刘云云, 等. 内镜黏膜下隧道法剥离术治疗食管黏膜内癌及黏膜下癌的疗效及手术时间影响因素[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(12): 962-966.
8
Qiu Y, Shi R. Roles of steroids in preventing esophageal stricture after endoscopic resection[J] Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2019, 1, 2019: 5380815.
9
Pih GY, Kim DH, Gong EJ, et al. Preventing esophageal strictures with steroids after endoscopic submucosal dissection in superficial esophageal neoplasm[J]. J Dig Dis, 2019, 20(11):609-616.
10
Zhou G, Yuan F, Cai J, et al. Efficacy of prednisone for prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J].Thorac Cancer, 2017, (5): 489-494.
11
Chu Y, Chen T, Li H, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of intralesional steroid injection plus oral steroid administration in preventing stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal epithelial neoplasms[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(4): 1244-1251.
12
Sato H, Inoue H, Kobayashi Y,et al. Control of severe strictures after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal carcinoma: oral steroid therapy with balloon dilation or balloon dilation alone[J].Gastrointest Endosc, 2013, 78(2): 250-257.
13
Iizuka T, Kikuchi D, Hoteya S, et al. Effectiveness of modified oral steroid administration for preventing esophageal stricture after entire circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2018, 31(7).
14
Yamashina T, Uedo N, Fujii M, et al. Delayed perforation after intralesional triamcinolone injection for esophageal stricture following endoscopic submucosal dissection[J]. Endoscopy, 2013, 45: E92.
15
Fardet L, Fève B. Systemic glucocorticoid therapy: a review of its metabolic and cardiovascular adverse events[J]. Drug, 2014, 74(15): 1731-1745.
16
Oliveira JF, Moura EG, Bernardo WM, et al. Prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(7): 2779-2791.
17
Ishida T, Morita Y, Hoshi N, et al. Disseminated nocardiosis during systemic steroid therapy for the prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection[J]. Dig Endosc, 2015, 27(3): 388-391.
18
Yano T, Yoda Y, Nomura S, et al. Prospective trial of biodegradable stents for refractory benign esophageal strictures after curative treatment of esophageal cancer[J]. GastrointestEndosc, 2017, 86, 492-499.
19
Yamaguchi N, Isomoto H, Kobayashi S, et al. Oral epithelial cell sheets engraftment for esophageal strictures after endoscopic submucosal dissection of squamous cell carcinoma and airplane transportation[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 12, 7(1): 17460.
20
Zhang BZ, Zhang Y, Wang YD, et al. Stent placement to prevent strictures after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2021, 34(9): doab015.
21
Iizuka T, Kikuchi D, Hoteya S, et al. Polyglycolic acid sheet and fibrin glue for preventing esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a historical control study[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2017, 30(11): 1-8.
[1] 岳伟岗, 蒋由飞, 尹瑞元, 吴雨晨, 曾丽, 田金徽. 经鼻高流量氧疗对急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者住院病死率的累积Meta分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 39-44.
[2] 徐娟, 孙汝贤, 赵东亚, 张清艳, 金兆辰, 蔡燕. 右美托咪定序贯镇静模式对中深度镇静的机械通气患者预后和谵妄的影响[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 363-369.
[3] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[4] 周川鹏, 杨浩, 魏微阳, 王奇, 黄亚强. 微创与标准通道经皮肾镜治疗肾结石合并肾功能不全的对比研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 470-475.
[5] 姜东, 冉龙艳, 雷传江, 徐静. 脓毒症的前世今生及序贯器官衰竭认知及理念[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 605-610.
[6] 刘玉强, 吴秀秀, 李晓辉, 王瑜, 韩国霖, 张伟, 王俊芝, 侯春霞. 瑞舒伐他汀钙联合激素气道雾化对AECOPD并发肺动脉高压的疗效分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 670-672.
[7] 成军霞, 梅馨方, 青刚, 许郭华. NLR与qSOFA评分对老年重症肺炎预后的临床意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 703-705.
[8] 胡欣芫, 杨智義, 赵成俊, 张秋雨, 张挽乾, 潘佰猛, 张灵强. 急性胰腺炎评分系统预测病情严重程度的研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 239-243.
[9] 闫伟, 张建民. 创伤性视神经损伤诊治进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 1-5.
[10] 张川, 姚宝群. 外伤性视神经病变的治疗进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 369-372.
[11] 侯超, 潘美辰, 吴文明, 黄兴广, 李翔, 程凌雪, 朱玉轩, 李文波. 早期食管癌及上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 383-387.
[12] 陶海燕, 金晓维, 郁海静, 欧阳皓, 张娟, 张海芳. 行内镜黏膜下的剥离术治疗老年大肠侧向发育型肿瘤的临床观察[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(11): 1137-1141.
[13] 王欣, 刘琳, 闻哲嘉, 刘春玲, 张弘, 吕芳. 妊娠前应激暴露对小鼠后续妊娠的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[14] 杜健, 王盈盈, 刘晓冰, 吴慧银, 王俊雅, 邱晓珏. 食管大面积病变内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术后使用体外自助式扩张球囊预防食管狭窄的围手术期护理1例并文献复习[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 59-61.
[15] 齐凤祥, 齐向娟. 内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗老年人早期胃癌疗效分析[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 18-22.
阅读次数
全文


摘要