切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (06) : 446 -453. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2025.06.008

临床研究

SGLT2抑制剂与肾结石风险:一项荟萃分析
再米拉·依力哈木, 蒋升, 艾比拜·玉素甫()   
  1. 830017 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学第一附属医院内分泌科
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-05 出版日期:2025-06-30
  • 通信作者: 艾比拜·玉素甫
  • 基金资助:
    省部共建中亚高发病成因与防治国家重点实验室开放课题项目(SKL-HIDCA-2024-RWS1)

SGLT2 inhibitors and risk of kidney stones: A meta-analysis

Sheng Jiang   

  1. Department of Endocrinology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830017, China
  • Received:2025-06-05 Published:2025-06-30
引用本文:

再米拉·依力哈木, 蒋升, 艾比拜·玉素甫. SGLT2抑制剂与肾结石风险:一项荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 446-453.

Sheng Jiang. SGLT2 inhibitors and risk of kidney stones: A meta-analysis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(06): 446-453.

目的

SGLT2抑制剂治疗的心血管保护、肾脏保护、脑血管保护和代谢益处已经得到了充分证实。然而,SGLT2抑制剂治疗与肾结石风险之间的潜在关联仍然是一个正在研究和讨论的领域。

方法

本研究通过系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、中国知网等中英文数据库(截至2025年2月),本文纳入10篇符合标准的文献,纳入患者13,430,554例,采用荟萃分析比较SGLT-2抑制剂组与对照组的肾结石风险差异。

结果

研究显示,SGLT-2抑制剂组的肾结石发生率显著低于对照组(OR=0.68,95% CI:0.57~0.82,P<0.01)。亚组分析进一步表明,与空白/安慰剂组(OR=0.71,95% CI:0.56~0.90,P<0.01)、GLP-1RA组(OR=0.74,95% CI:0.57~0.97,P=0.03)及DPP-4i组(OR=0.61,95% CI:0.40~0.95,P=0.03)相比,SGLT-2抑制剂均表现出更低的肾结石风险,且敏感性分析和发表偏倚检验支持结果的稳健性。

结论

本研究结果提示,SGLT-2抑制剂能降低肾结石发生风险,这对于合并高尿酸血症或既往结石病史的糖尿病患者临床实践具有重要指导意义。

Objective

The cardiovascular, renal, and cerebrovascular protective properties as well as metabolic benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors have been well established. However, the potential association between SGLT2 inhibitor treatment and the risk of kidney stones remains an area under investigation and discussion.

Methods

This study conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and other Chinese and English databases (up to February 2025) and included 10 eligible studies involving 13,430,554 patients. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the risk of kidney stones between the SGLT-2 inhibitor group and the control group.

Results

The results showed that the incidence of kidney stones in the SGLT-2 inhibitor group was significantly lower than that of the control group (odds ratio [OR]=0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57~0.82, P<0.01). Subgroup analysis further indicated that compared with the placebo group (OR=0.71, 95%CI: 0.56~0.90, P<0.01), the GLP-1RA group (OR=0.74, 95%CI: 0.57~0.97, P=0.03), and the DPP-4i group (OR=0.61, 95%CI: 0.40~0.95, P=0.03), SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of kidney stones. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias tests supported the robustness of the results.

Conclusion

This study suggests that SGLT-2 inhibitors may reduce the risk of kidney stones, which has important implications for clinical practice in diabetic patients with hyperuricemia or a history of kidney stones. Future prospective studies are needed to verify the results, and the safety of their clinical application deserves further attention.

图1 文献筛选流程图
表1 纳入文献的基本信息
图2 随机对照试验偏倚风险评估
图3 非随机对照试验偏倚风险评估
图4 SGLT-2i组与对照组肾结石率的Meta分析
图5 SGLT-2i组与空白或安慰剂组肾结石率的Meta分析
图6 SGLT-2i组与GLP-1RA组肾结石率的Meta分析
图7 SGLT-2i组与DPP-4i组肾结石率的Meta分析
图8 敏感性分析
图9 发表偏倚漏斗图
1
孙秀芹, 高美娟, 张琼阁, 等.京西地区无心血管病史2型糖尿病中老年人群患心血管疾病的危险因素分析 [J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(3): 245-252.
2
赵晨阳, 杨文明, 李水琴. 钠–葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂的心血管和肾脏获益 [J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(10): 221-226.
3
赵梦男, 王棋, 陈晨, 等. 钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂对2型糖尿病患者肾脏结局的系统评价和Meta分析 [J]. 中国医院药学杂志, 2024, 44(2): 200-208.
4
钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白抑制剂联合胰岛素治疗型糖尿病中国专家共识编写委员会. 钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂联合胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病中国专家共识(2023版) [J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2024, 16(1): 9-19.
5
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (version 6.5) [EB/OL]. Cochrane, 2024, [updated August 2024; accessed 1 March 2025].
6
Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, et al. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument [J]. ANZ J Surg, 2003, 73(9): 712-716.
7
Mcmurray JJV, Demets DL, Inzucchi SE, et al. A trial to evaluate the effect of the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin on morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (DAPA-HF) [J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2019, 21(5): 665-675.
8
马志颖, 韩江莉, 李明子.卡格列净应用于糖尿病合并急性心肌梗死、左心室射血分数减低患者一例 [J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(5): 391-392.
9
McCormick N, Yokose C, Lu N, et al. Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors for recurrent nephrolithiasis among patients with pre-existing nephrolithiasis or gout: target trial emulation studies [J]. BMJ, 2024, 387: e080035.
10
Davies MJ, Trujillo A, Vijapurkar U, et al. Effect of canagliflozin on serum uric acid in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [J]. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2015, 17(4): 426-429.
11
Balasubramanian P, Wanner C, Ferreira JP, et al. Empagliflozin and decreased risk of nephrolithiasis: a potential new role for SGLT2 inhibition? [J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2022, 107(7): e3003-e3007.
12
Anan G, Hirose T, Kikuchi D, et al. Inhibition of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 suppresses renal stone formation [J]. Pharmacol Res, 2022, 186: 106524.
13
Shin A, Shin JY, Kang EH. Risk of nephrolithiasis associated with SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP4 inhibitors among patients with type 2 diabetes: a target trial emulation study [J]. Diabetes Care, 2025, 48(2): 193-201.
14
Paik JM, Tesfaye H, Curhan GC, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and nephrolithiasis risk in patients with type 2 diabetes [J]. JAMA Intern Med, 2024, 184(3): 265-274.
15
Kristensen KB, Henriksen DP, Hallas J, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and risk of nephrolithiasis [J]. Diabetologia, 2021, 64(7): 1563-1571.
16
Anan G, Kikuchi D, Hirose T, et al. Impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on urolithiasis [J]. Kidney Int Rep, 2023, 8(4): 925-928.
17
Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, et al. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes [J]. N Engl J Med, 2019, 380(4): 347-357.
18
Kanbay M, Brinza C, Copur S, et al. SGLT2 inhibitors and nephrolithiasis risk: a meta-analysis [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2025, 40(4): 671-678.
19
Harmacek D, Pruijm M, Burnier M, et al. Empagliflozin changes urine supersaturation by decreasing pH and increasing citrate [J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2022, 33(6): 1073-1075.
20
Schietzel S, Bally L, Cereghetti G, et al. Impact of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin on urinary supersaturations in kidney stone formers (Sweetstone trial): protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial [J]. BMJ Open, 2022, 12(3): e059073.
[1] 虞兵兵, 王婷婷, 方俊霖, 罗莹莹, 阳鹏, 郭云, 袁丁, 沈忠园, 黄英如. 氨甲环酸改善股骨粗隆间骨折内固定围术期失血的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 427-444.
[2] 谭飞, 王静, 曾健康, 李嘉欢, 李培杰, 汪昕, 乔永杰, 叶铄, 周胜虎. 顺行髓内钉与不同逆行技术治疗第5掌骨颈骨折[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 742-750.
[3] 李继承, 刘仕祺, 杜娟, 杨子馨, 朱杏, 黑明燕. 肠造瘘术后新生儿肠液回输安全性的系统评价和Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(02): 219-229.
[4] 李萌, 李雄雄, 徐婷, 尚进. 局部应用皮质类固醇治疗特发性肉芽肿性乳腺炎疗效与安全性的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 135-141.
[5] 丁文珠, 汪谦. 直肠癌经肛全直肠系膜切除术的肿瘤学结局:一项系统评价和Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 66-72.
[6] 陶然, 尹聪, 叶少波, 杨新平, 田洁, 熊丽红, 吴瑾滨, 梅红兵. 应用多学科管理预防日间经皮肾镜碎石取石术后尿源性脓毒症的发生[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 615-621.
[7] 施冬亮, 王滢鹏, 万彬, 丁海霞. 基于决策树模型评价两种碎石方式的成本-效果[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 346-352.
[8] 石兵, 张智, 陈金海, 唐文. 基于电磁跟踪和手术导航系统的实时超声引导下两种经皮肾盏穿刺方法的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 572-578.
[9] 王铭池, 梁乐琦, 刘永达. 基于NHANES数据库分析血脂与肾结石之间的关系[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 485-490.
[10] 方道成, 唐春华, 胡媛媛. 肠道菌群对草酸钙肾结石形成的影响[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 509-513.
[11] 林凯, 罗凡, 杨春. 腹腔镜与开放式补片修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 317-324.
[12] 赵江桥, 杨硕. 腹腔镜与传统开放组织结构分离技术治疗成人腹壁疝疗效的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 232-240.
[13] 马振威, 宋润夫, 王兵. ERCP胆道内支架与骑跨十二指肠乳头支架置入治疗不可切除肝门部胆管癌疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 807-812.
[14] 王芳, 刘达, 左智炜, 盛金平, 陈庭进, 蒋锐. 定量CT与双能X线骨密度仪对骨质疏松诊断效能比较的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 363-371.
[15] 边识博, 张翊乔, 张萌, 刘洋. 替尔泊肽对比司美格鲁肽治疗超重或肥胖人群有效性与安全性的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(02): 121-128.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?