切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (13) : 1965 -1969. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2017.13.001

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

原发性高血压患者不同体位血浆醛固酮浓度与脉压的相关性
姚晓光1, 洪静1, 李梅1, 李秀芳1, 胡君丽1, 张德莲1, 常桂娟1, 周克明1, 李南方1,()   
  1. 1. 830000 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院高血压中心 新疆维吾尔自治区高血压研究所
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-16 出版日期:2017-07-01
  • 通信作者: 李南方
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(81460078)

Correlation between plasma aldosterone concentration and pulse pressure in patients with essential hypertension in different positions

Xiaoguang Yao1, Jing Hong1, Mei Li1, Xiufang Li1, Junli Hu1, Delian Zhang1, Guijuan Chang1, Keming Zhou1, Nanfang Li1,()   

  1. 1. Hypertension Center of People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Hypertension Institute of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830000, China
  • Received:2017-03-16 Published:2017-07-01
  • Corresponding author: Nanfang Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Nanfang, Email:
引用本文:

姚晓光, 洪静, 李梅, 李秀芳, 胡君丽, 张德莲, 常桂娟, 周克明, 李南方. 原发性高血压患者不同体位血浆醛固酮浓度与脉压的相关性[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(13): 1965-1969.

Xiaoguang Yao, Jing Hong, Mei Li, Xiufang Li, Junli Hu, Delian Zhang, Guijuan Chang, Keming Zhou, Nanfang Li. Correlation between plasma aldosterone concentration and pulse pressure in patients with essential hypertension in different positions[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(13): 1965-1969.

目的

探讨原发性高血压患者不同体位血浆醛固酮浓度(PAC)和脉压(PP)之间的相关性。

方法

连续选取2008年10月至2010年10月就诊于新疆维吾尔自治区高血压诊疗研究中心的高血压患者195例,所有受试者均成功完成立、卧、坐三体位刺激试验,分别测量三体位的血压和PAC。按照平均PP划分为正常PP组(PP<40 mmHg)和PP增大组(PP≥40 mmHg),比较2组间临床指标的差异,分析PP与醛固酮水平的相关性。

结果

(1)不同PP水平的2组间比较,PP≥40 mmHg患者平均血钾水平明显高于PP<40 mmHg患者(P = 0.01)。相关分析提示,矫正了血清钾、年龄、性别后,PP和直立位PAC(r = 0.235,P = 0.001)、坐位PAC(r = 0.220,P = 0.002)及仰卧位PAC(r = 0.166,P = 0.021)均存在正相关。(3)2组间比较显示,不管任何体位,PP≥40 mmHg患者PAC明显高于PP<40 mmHg患者。直立位和坐位PAC>12 ng/dl患者比PAC≤12 ng/dl患者平均PP更大。(4)以PP是否≥40 mmHg作为因变量,年龄、血钾、体重指数及三体位的PAC为自变量分别建立Logistics回归模型,分析发现血清K+[OR = 0.043,95% CI:1.09(1.00~1.12)]以及PAC[OR = 0.025,95% CI:0.35(0.13~0.88)]均为PP增大的风险因素。

结论

无论是立位、坐位还是卧位,血清PAC水平增高和PP增大有一定的相关性,提示较高水平的PAC是高血压患者动脉弹性下降的危险因素。

Objective

To investigate the correlation between plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and pulse pressure (PP) in patients with essential hypertension in different positions.

Methods

A total of 195 patients with hypertension were selected at the Hypertension Center of People′s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from October 2008 to October 2010. All subjects successfully completed stimulation tests in the sitting, supine, and upright positions, and the blood pressure and PAC were measured in the three positions. According to the average pulse pressure, the patients were divided into either a normal PP group (PP < 40 mmHg) or a high PP group (PP ≥ 40 mmHg). Clinical indicators were compared between the two groups. The correlation between PP and aldosterone levels was analyzed.

Results

Serum potassium was significantly higher in the high PP group than in the normal PP group (P = 0.01). Correlation analysis showed that after adjustment of serum potassium, age, and sex, PP was positively correlated with PAC in all the three positions (upright: r = 0.235, P = 0.001; sitting: r = 0.220, P = 0.002; supine: r = 0.166, P = 0.021). Regardless of any position, the level of aldosterone was significantly higher in the high PP group than in the normal PP group. Average PP was significantly higher in patients with PAC > 12 ng/dl in the upright and sitting positions than in those with PAC ≤ 12 ng/dl. A logistics regression model was established by using PP ≥ 40 mmHg as the dependent variable, and age, blood potassium, body mass index, and aldosterone levels in the three position as independent variables. Regression analysis showed that serum K+ [OR = 0.043, 95% CI: 1.09 (1.00-1.12)] and PAC [OR = 0.025, 95% CI: 0.35 (0.13-0.88)] were risk factors for increased PP.

Conclusion

There is a positive correlation between serum PAC level and PP, regardless of body position. High level of PAC is a risk factor for arterial elasticity in patients with hypertension.

表1 不同PP水平下患者一般资料的比较(±s
表2 不同PP水平患者三体位状态下血醛固酮水平的比较(ng/dl,±s
表3 三体位状态下不同PAC分组间24 h-PP水平的比较(mmHg,±s
表4 不同体位PP和PAC间Logistic回归分析模型
[1]
Harbaoui B, Courand PY, Milon H, et al. Association of various blood pressure variables and vascular phenotypes with coronary, stroke and renal deaths: Potential implications for prevention [J]. Atherosclerosis, 2015, 243(1): 161-168.
[2]
Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, et al. Expert consensus on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications [J]. Eur Heart J, 2006, 27(21): 2588-2605.
[3]
Kubozono T, Ohishi M. Prognostic Significance of Regional Arterial Stiffness for Stroke in Hypertension [J]. Pulse(Basel), 2015, 3(2): 98-105.
[4]
Kingue S, Walinjom J, Menanga A, et al. Arterial compliance in a group of normotensive and untreated hypertensive Cameroonian subjects in Yaounde [J]. Pan Afr Med J, 2016, 24: 162.
[5]
Lyon RT, Runyon-Hass A, Davis HR, et al. Protection from atherosclerotic lesion formation by reduction of artery wall motion [J]. J Vasc Surg, 1987, 5(1): 59-67.
[6]
Baumbach GL, Siems JE, Heistad DD. Effects of local reduction inpressure on distensibility and composition of cerebral arterioles [J]. Circ Res, 2015, 68(2): 338-351.
[7]
Rehwald R, Petersen J, Gratl A, et al. Retrospective angiographic study to determine the effect of atherosclerotic stenoses of upstream arteries on the degree of atherosclerosis in distal vascular territories [J]. BMJ Open, 2016, 6(6): e010704.
[8]
James MA, Watt PAC, Potter JF, et al. Pulse pressure and resistance artery structure in the elderly [J]. Hypertension, 1995, 26(2): 301-306.
[9]
Chaszczewska-Markowska M, Sagan M, Bogunia-Kubik K. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system(RAAS)-physiology and molecular mechanisms of functioning [J]. Postepy Hig Med Dosw(Online), 2016, 70(10): 917-927.
[10]
邢卫红,张菊红,蒋文, 等. 高血压患者不同体位血浆醛固酮浓度与颈动脉粥样硬化的关系 [J]. 中华高血压杂志, 2012, 20(4): 358-362.
[11]
Matsumura K, Fujii K, Oniki H, et al. Role of aldosterone in left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension [J]. Am J Hypertens, 2006, 19(1): 13-18.
[12]
Li NF, Li HJ, Zhang DL, et al. Genetic variations in the KCNJ5 gene in primary aldosteronism patients from Xinjiang, China [J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(1): e54051.
[13]
Sun Y, Zhang J, Lu L, et al. Aldosterone-induced inflammation in the rat heart: role of oxidative stress [J]. Am J Pathol, 2002, 161(5): 1773-1781.
[14]
Blasi ER, Rocha R, Rudolph AE, et al. Aldosterone/salt induce srenal inflammation and fibrosis in hypertensive rats [J]. Kidney Int, 2003, 63(5): 1791-1800.
[15]
Keidar S, Kaplan M, Pavlotzky E, et al. Aldosterone administrationto mice stimulates macrophage NADPH oxidase and increasesatherosclerosis development: a possible role for angiotensin-converting enzyme and the receptors for angiotensin II and aldosterone [J]. Circulation, 2004, 109(18): 2213-2220.
[16]
Oberleithner H. Aldosterone makes human endothelium stiff and vulnerable [J]. Kidney Int, 2005, 67(5): 1680-1682.
[17]
Toda N, Nakanishi S, Tanabe S. Aldosterone affects blood flow and vascular tone regulated by endothelium-derived NO: therapeutic implications [J]. Br J Pharmacol, 2013, 168(3): 519-533.
[18]
Taku I, Mitsuteru M, Kazufumi N, et al. Cardio-vascular risk factors associated with pulse pressure in a screened cohort in Okinawa, Japan [J]. Hypertens Res, 2003, 26(18): 153-158.
[19]
Jiang Z, Sang H, Fu X, et al. The relations of abnormal pulse pressure to the cardiovascular risk factors and the cardiac function in adults from Hebei, Zhejiang, and Guangxi province of China [J]. Cell Biochem Biophys, 2014, 70(3): 1507-1511.
[1] 崔红丽, 吴雅峰, 李雁平. 超声心动图对妊娠中晚期下腔静脉压迫综合征的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(09): 880-884.
[2] 龚利缘, 应利君, 吕铁, 李川吉. 平均动脉压对不同乳酸清除率脓毒性休克患者预后的影响[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 37-42.
[3] 中国医师协会血管外科医师分会静脉学组. 常见静脉疾病诊治规范(2022年版)[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 255-272.
[4] 顾竹劼, 胡双双, 师小伟, 马钰, 陆敏敏, 汪建胜. 老年肝癌合并肝硬化患者围手术期不同液体管理在腹腔镜肝切除术中的对比研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 199-204.
[5] 赵新宇, 陈世远. 髂静脉压迫综合征诊疗进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 229-233.
[6] 康鹏东, 张锴, 张尧, 马超, 韩风. 术中超声辅助下控制性低中心静脉压在大肝癌腔镜切除术中的价值[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 627-630.
[7] 康焕菊, 曹苏, 王敬春, 王雷, 刘学. 半肝入肝血流阻断联合CLCVP对腹腔镜肝切除术患者组织灌注及肝肾功能影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 427-430.
[8] 吕瑶, 张婵, 陈建华, 张鸣青. 压力控制容量保证通气模式在腹腔镜肝细胞癌切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 528-533.
[9] 李文轩, 潘扬勋, 侯嘉杰, 侯靖禹, 陆霄云, 赖仁纯, 王小辉, 王骏成, 徐立, 张耀军, 陈敏山, 周仲国. 腹腔镜肝癌切除术中CVP与出血量关系及其影响因素[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2020, 09(06): 538-542.
[10] 郇宇, 胡世颉, 吴霜, 武秀权, 何鑫, 陈燕伟, 杜伟, 费舟, 李兵. 非火器开放性颅脑损伤临床特征分析及死亡相关因素探讨[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 146-150.
[11] 高志伟, 谢剑锋, 刘玲, 陈辉, 李聪, 杨毅. 舒张压对脓毒性休克进展预测价值及治疗指导的研究进展[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2021, 07(02): 159-163.
[12] 邢学忠, 高勇, 王海军, 曲世宁, 黄初林, 张昊. 脉搏指示连续心输出量测定指导脓毒症休克治疗的Meta分析[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2021, 07(01): 43-47.
[13] 乔育, 李加龙, 孙帅, 于蓬勃, 马胜利, 张陇平, 王晓峰. 显微血管减压神经移位技术治疗三叉神经痛术中静脉压迫4例报道[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 61-62.
[14] 曾书燚, 梁祥文, 林智海, 黎艺毅, 凌政, 王正东. 24小时尿蛋白、血压变异性与原发性高血压患者发生睡眠障碍的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 48-53.
[15] 宗斌, 韩冰, 宗雪峰. 原发性高血压患者脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2与动态动脉硬化指数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(09): 680-684.
阅读次数
全文


摘要