切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (19) : 2268 -2272. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2017.19.004

所属专题: 急危重症 文献

临床论著

右美托咪定与咪达唑仑用于机械通气患者早期目标导向镇静的前瞻性随机对照临床研究
吴莹莹1, 郑瑞强1,(), 林华1   
  1. 1. 225001 扬州,江苏省苏北人民医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-20 出版日期:2017-10-01
  • 通信作者: 郑瑞强
  • 基金资助:
    苏北人民医院院级课题(yzucms201531)

Prospective randomized controlled study of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for early goal-directed sedation in patients with mechanical ventilation

Yingying Wu1, Ruiqiang Zheng1,(), Hua Lin1   

  1. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Northern Jiangsu People′s Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, China
  • Received:2017-03-20 Published:2017-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Ruiqiang Zheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zheng Ruiqiang, Email:
引用本文:

吴莹莹, 郑瑞强, 林华. 右美托咪定与咪达唑仑用于机械通气患者早期目标导向镇静的前瞻性随机对照临床研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(19): 2268-2272.

Yingying Wu, Ruiqiang Zheng, Hua Lin. Prospective randomized controlled study of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for early goal-directed sedation in patients with mechanical ventilation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(19): 2268-2272.

目的

研究右美托咪定和咪达唑仑用于重症监护病房(ICU)机械通气(MV)患者的早期目标导向镇静的可行性及安全性。

方法

选择2015年5月至2016年10月预计机械通气超过24 h且需要镇静的ICU患者80例,按随机数字表法分为2组,分别给予咪达唑仑(41例)和右美托咪定(39例)镇静治疗,根据镇静程度评估量表(RASS)评分调整镇静药剂量,使镇静深度评分控制在-2~+1分;观察记录2组药物用量、48 h内浅镇静的时间、3 d内拔管率、两周内MV时间、ICU住院时间、ICU病死率以及心动过缓、谵妄、呼吸机相关性肺炎、物理约束、非计划拔管等的发生率。

结果

右美托咪定与咪达唑仑均能使患者达到镇静目标评分,右美托咪定组更易达到浅镇静目标。与咪达唑仑组比较,右美托咪定组MV时间明显缩短[(102.47±81.84)h vs (172.71±83.09)h,P<0.05],48 h内浅镇静的时间明显延长[(37.79±5.85)h vs (25.14±9.89)h,P<0.01],3 d内拔管率明显增加(56.4% vs 24.4%,P<0.01),ICU住院时间明显缩短[(9.05±5.97)d vs (14.76±9.15)d,P<0.05],谵妄发生率明显降低(30.8% vs 53.7%,P<0.05),但心动过缓发生率明显增加(33.3% vs 4.9%,P<0.01)。

结论

与咪达唑仑治疗相比,以右美托咪定为基础的目标导向镇静方案具有良好的可行性及安全性,缩短了MV时间,提高了早期拔管率,缩短ICU住院时间,降低了谵妄发生率,但同时要加强心率的监测,防治心动过缓。

Objective

To assess the feasibility and safety of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for early goal-directed sedation (EGDS) in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV).

Methods

Eighty critically ill patients who were predicted to ventilate for > 24 hours were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups to receive either midazolam (41 cases) or dexmedetomidine (39 cases). In both groups, the dose of sedation was regulated according to the Richmond agitation sedation scale (RASS) to maintain the sedative score between -2 and 1. The amount of drug, duration of light sedation within 48 hours, extubation rate within three days, duration of MV within two weeks, length of ICU stay, ICU mortality, and the incidence of bradycardia, delirium, ventilator associated pneumonia, physical constraints, and unplanned extubation were recorded in the two groups.

Results

In all the patients of the two groups taking dexmedetomidine or midazolam, expected sedative scores were achieved. Compared with the midazolam group, the patients in the dexmedetomidine group were easier to achieve light sedation and had significantly shorter duration of MV [(102.47±81.84) hours vs (172.71±83.09) hours, P<0.05], shorter length of ICU stay [(9.05±5.97) days vs (14.76±9.15) days, P<0.05], longer duration of light sedation within 48 hours [(37.79±5.85) hours vs (25.14±9.89) hours, P<0.01], higher rate of extubation within three days (56.4% vs 24.4%, P<0.01), lower rate of delirium (30.8% vs 53.7%, P<0.05), and higher rate of bradycardia (33.3% vs 4.9%, P<0.01).

Conclusion

Compared with midazolam, EGDS with dexmedetomidine is feasible and effective and can shorten the duration of MV and ICU stay, increase the rate of early extubation, and lower the rate of delirium. However, it is important to prevent and control bradycardia when dexmedetomidine is used.

表1 2组基本资料的比较(±s)
表2 2组临床计量数据指标的比较(±s)
表3 2组3 d拔管率及负面事件发生率的比较[例(%)]
[1]
Shehabi Y, Bellomo R, Reade M, et al. Sedation Practice in Intensive Care Evaluation(SPICE) Study Group and the ANZICS CTG: Early intensive care sedation predicts long-term mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients [J]. Am J Resp Crit Care Med, 2012, 186(8): 724-731.
[2]
Kemp KM, Henderhght L, Neville M. Precedex: is it the future of cooperative sedation [J]. Nursing, 2008, 38(4 Suppl): 7-8.
[3]
Shehabi Y, Riker RR, Bokesch PM, et al. Delirium duration and mortality in lightly sedated, mechanically ventilated intensive care patients [J]. Crit Care Med, 2010, 38(12): 2311-2318.
[4]
Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, et al. Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) [J]. JAMA, 2001, 286(21): 2703-2710.
[5]
Safdar N, Dezfulian C, Collard HR, et al. Clinical and economic consequences of ventilator associated pneumonia: a systematic review [J]. Crit Care Med, 2005, 33(10): 2184-2193.
[6]
Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B, et al. Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit [J]. JAMA, 2004, 291(14): 1753-1762.
[7]
Nelson JE, Tandon N, Mercado AF, et al. Brain dysfunction: another burden for the chronically critically ill [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2006, 166(18): 1993-1999.
[8]
Treggiari MM, Romand JA, Yanez ND, et al: Randomized trial of light versus deep sedation on mental health after critical illness [J]. Crit Care Med, 2009, 37(9): 2527-2534.
[9]
Pandharipande PP, Pun BT, Herr DL, et al. Effect of sedation with dexmedetomidine vs lorazepam on acute brain dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients: the MENDS randomized controlled trial [J]. JAMA, 2007, 298(22): 2644-2653.
[10]
Maldonado J, Wysong A, van der Starre P, et al. Dexmedetomidine and the reduction of postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery [J]. Psychosomatics, 2009, 50(30): 206-217.
[11]
Volkov PA, Churadze BT, Sevalkin SA, et al. Dexmedetomidine as a part of analgesic component of general anesthesia for laparoscopic operations [J]. Anesteziol Reanimatol, 2015, 60(1): 4-8.
[12]
Nishina K, Akamatsu H, Mikawa K, et al. The effects of clonidine and dexmedetomidine on human neutrophil functions [J]. Anesth Analg, 1999, 88(2): 452-458.
[13]
Huupponen E, Maksimow A, Lapinlampi P, et al. Electroencephalogram spindle activity during dexmedetomidine sedation and physiological sleep [J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2008, 52(2): 289-294.
[14]
Riker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch PM, et al. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: A randomized trial [J]. JAMA, 2009, 301(5): 489-499.
[15]
Jakob SM, Ruokonen E, Grounds RM, et al. Dexmedetomidine for Long-Term Sedation Investigators: Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: Two randomized controlled trials [J]. JAMA, 2012, 307(11): 1151-1160.
[16]
Kawazoe Y, Miyamoto K, Morimoto T, et al. Effect of Dexmedetomidine on mortality and ventilator-free days in patients requiringmechanical ventilation with sepsis: a randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA, 2017, 317(13): 1321-1328.
[17]
Shehabi Y, Bellomo R, Reade MC, et al. Early goal-directed sedation versus standard sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a pilot study [J]. Crit Care Med, 2013, 41(8): 1983-1991.
[18]
Shehabi Y, Chan L, Kadiman S, et al. Sedation depth and long-term mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill adults: a prospective longitudinal multicentre cohort study [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2013, 39(5): 910-918.
[19]
Becker SE. A pilot study implementing a protocol using Dexmedetomidine as a safe alternative to traditional sedation to decrease ventilator days for patients difficult to extubate [J]. Dimens Crit Care Nurs, 2016, 35(5): 291-297.
[20]
Klimscha W, Tong C, Eisenach JC. Intrathecal alpha 2-adrenergic agonists stimulate acetylcholine and norepinephrine release from the spinal cord dorsal horn in sheep. An in vivo microdialysis study [J]. Anesthesiology, 1997, 87(1): 110-116.
[21]
Kamibayashi T, Maze M. Clinical uses of alpha2-adrenergic agonists [J]. Anesthesiology, 2000, 93(5): 1345-1349.
[22]
Ingersoll-Weng E, Manecke GR Jr, Thistlethwaite PA. Dexmedetomidine and cardiac arrest [J]. Anesthesiology, 2004, 100(3): 738-739.
[1] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[2] 张锋, 孙孟奇, 方秀春. 静注右美托咪定、利多卡因对腹腔镜疝修补术患者围手术期心率、麻醉苏醒质量的比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 562-565.
[3] 李先锋, 何懿, 程贞永, 邓国魁, 胡波, 谢红, 王莉, 王小燕, 李晓明. 右美托咪定对腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术患者血流动力学及麻醉复苏效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 437-441.
[4] 韦雅丽, 范利杰. 术前右美托咪定滴鼻在腹股沟斜疝患儿腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 446-450.
[5] 张璇, 高杨, 房雅君, 姚艳玲. 保护性机械通气在肺癌胸腔镜肺段切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 563-567.
[6] 张骞, 唐伟, 刘丽丽. 右美托咪定复合羟考酮对老年经皮椎间孔镜腰椎间盘切除术患者术后认知功能、镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 209-214.
[7] 潘清, 葛慧青. 基于机械通气波形大数据的人机不同步自动监测方法[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 399-403.
[8] 唐韵, 杨小博, 余愿, 舒化青, 尚游. 苯磺酸瑞马唑仑的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 389-393.
[9] 苗明月, 周建新. 肺保护性镇静:应重视呼吸驱动和吸气努力的床旁评估[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 325-328.
[10] 韦小霞, 陈管洁, 李雪珠, 李晓青, 钱淑媛. 机械通气患者抗菌药物雾化吸入的临床实施[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 334-337.
[11] 倪韫晖, 杨毅, 袁雪燕, 邱海波. 胸壁加压在急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用和临床进展[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 243-247.
[12] 刘春峰, 徐朝晖, 施红伟, 陈瑢, 马腾飞, 李鹏飞, 袁蓉, 陈建荣, 徐爱明. 机械通气患者肌肉减少症的诊断及其对预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 820-825.
[13] 张平骥, 徐钰, 李天水, 庞文翼, 符师宁, 张梦圆. 重症患者镇静治疗现状及期望的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 562-567.
[14] 刘晓鹏, 柳聪艳, 杨宁, 蔡琛, 李晓兵, 王红宇, 张思森. 三穴五针联合腹部提压法在机械通气患者肺康复中的疗效[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 193-198.
[15] 刘晴雯, 韩勇, 陈丽丹, 邓哲. 早期机械通气对成人院内心脏骤停病死率的影响:一项回顾性队列研究[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 203-206.
阅读次数
全文


摘要