切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (23) : 2445 -2449. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2017.23.004

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

前外侧联合后内侧入路三柱重建治疗胫骨平台三柱骨折
蔡史健1,(), 钟志刚1, 赵资坚1, 张荣臻1   
  1. 1. 515000 广东汕头,汕头市第二人民医院骨外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-18 出版日期:2017-12-01
  • 通信作者: 蔡史健

Three-column reconstruction via the anterolateral plus posteromedial approach for treating three-column tibial plateau fractures

Shijian Cai1,(), Zhigang Zhong1, Zijian Zhao1, Rongzhen Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second People′ Hospital of Shantou, Shantou 515000, China
  • Received:2017-09-18 Published:2017-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Shijian Cai
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cai Shijian, Email:
引用本文:

蔡史健, 钟志刚, 赵资坚, 张荣臻. 前外侧联合后内侧入路三柱重建治疗胫骨平台三柱骨折[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(23): 2445-2449.

Shijian Cai, Zhigang Zhong, Zijian Zhao, Rongzhen Zhang. Three-column reconstruction via the anterolateral plus posteromedial approach for treating three-column tibial plateau fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(23): 2445-2449.

目的

探讨前外侧联合后内侧入路三柱重建胫骨平台三柱骨折的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2013年2月至2016年10月期间汕头市第二人民医院骨外科收治的胫骨平台骨折病例,对其中采用联合入路三柱固定的闭合性胫骨平台三柱骨折,并获完整随访的32例患者进行分析。采用配对t检验比较术后即刻和末次随访患肢胫骨平台内翻角(TPA)及后倾角(PA),评估内固定稳定性。记录末次随访美国特种外科医院(HSS)膝关节功能评分、骨折愈合情况及不良反应发生情况。

结果

32例患者随访时间6~33个月,平均18.5个月。骨折愈合时间13~21周,平均16周,完全负重时间平均18周。术后即刻和末次随访患肢TPA[(86.2°±4.4°vs (84.5°±4.4°)]及PA[(8.3°±1.5°vs(9.2°±1.6°)]比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=1.58,P>0.05;t=-1.91,P>0.05)。末次随访患者膝关节活动度平均为2°~121°,HSS评分87~96分,平均93.5分。术后1例患者小腿后下部麻木,为腓肠内侧皮神经损伤所致,术后半年复查已恢复。患者切口均愈合良好,未出现重要血管损伤,无内固定松动、断裂等并发症发生。

结论

复杂胫骨平台三柱骨折,采用前外侧联合后内侧入路行三柱固定,手术显露满意,固定可靠,可早期功能锻炼,术后疗效满意。

Objective

To assess the clinical effects of three-column reconstruction via the ranterolateral plus medial posterior approach in the treatment of three-column tibial plateau fractures.

Methods

The cases with tibial plateau fractures treated at our hospital from February 2013 to October 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-two cases with closed three-column tibial plateau fractures who were treated by three-column fixation via the combined approach were included. These cases had complete clinical data, and there were 23 males and 9 females with an average age of 43.6 years. Tibial plateau-tibial shaft angle (TPA) and posterior angle (PA) were measured immediately after surgery and at the last follow-up for the affected limb. Stability of internal fixation was assessed. Hospital for special surgery knee score (HSS) was recorded at the last follow-up and functional recovery of the knee joint was assessed.

Results

The 32 cases were followed for 6-33 months (average, 18.5 months). The time to bone fracture healing was 13-21 weeks with an average of 16 weeks, and the time to complete weight bearing was 18 weeks on average. There was no significant difference in TPA or PA immediately after surgery and at the last follow-up [(86.2°±4.4°) vs(84.5°±4.4°), t=1.58, P>0.05; (8.3°±1.5°) vs (9.2°±1.6°), t=-1.91, P>0.05]. The average knee joint range of motion was 2°-121° in the last follow-up, and HSS score was 87-96 (average, 93.5). One case had numbness in the posteroinferior part of the calf due to injury to the medial sural cutaneous nerve. This case recovered upon reexamination 6 months later. Incision healed well in all cases without injury to important vessels, loosening or fracture of internal fixation.

Conclusion

Three-column fixation via the anterolateral plus posteromedial approach for three-column tibial plateau fractures can achieve a good effect and stable fixation. The patients can start early functional training after surgery and the outcome is satisfactory.

图1 骨折患者术前CT三维重建示左胫骨平台内、外、后柱骨折 图1a为前方三维重建,图1b为后方重建
图2 左膝三柱骨折患者术后即刻复查左膝X线片 图示胫骨平台骨折复位良好,三柱钢板内固定图2a为正位X线片,图2b为侧位X线片
图3 左膝三柱骨折患者术后6个月复查示骨折基本愈合,胫骨平台高度恢复良好 图3a为正位X线片,图3b为侧位X线片
图4 左膝三柱骨折患者术后16个月取出内固定术后复查示胫骨平台骨折愈合良好 图4a为正位X线片,图4b为侧位X线片
[1]
罗从风, 胡承方, 高洪, 等. 基于CT的胫骨平台骨折的三柱分型[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2009, 11(3): 201-205.
[2]
Gardner MJ,Yacoubian S,Geller D, et al. Prediction of soft-tissue injuries in Schatzker II tibial plateau fractures based on measurements of plain radio graphs[J]. J Trauma, 2006, 60(2): 319-324.
[3]
Yang G,zhai Q,Zhu Y, et al. The incidence of posterior tibial plateau fracture: an Investigation of 525 fractures by using a CT-based classification system[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2013, 133(7): 929-934.
[4]
毛玉江. 胫骨平台骨折的诊治进展[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2013, 15 (4): 345-348.
[5]
毛玉江, 张伯松, 公茂琪, 等. 200例胫骨平台骨折的骨折形态及损伤机制分析[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2016, 18(1): 47-51.
[6]
汤旭日, 王秋根, 张秋林, 等. 胫骨平台骨折术后高度丢失的原因及对策[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2004, 6(3): 260-263.
[7]
Solomon LB,Stevenson AW,Baird RP, et a1. Postemlateral transfibular approach to tibial plateau fractures: technique, results, andrationale[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2010, 24(8): 505-514.
[8]
Morris BJ,Unger RZ,Archer KR, et al. Risk factors of infection after ORIF of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures[J]. J Orthop trauma, 2013, 27(9): 196-200.
[9]
孙辉, 罗从风, 曾炳芳. 胫骨平台后侧骨折新型手术径路解剖学研究[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2011, 10(8): 765-769.
[10]
胡勇, 尹宗生, 张辉, 等. 累及后柱的胫骨平台骨折的手术治疗[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2012, 32(12): 1138-1144.
[11]
Chang SM,Zheng HP,Li HF, et al. Treatment of isolated posterior coronal fracture of the lateral tibial plateau through posterolateral approach for direct exposure and buttress plate fixation[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2009, 129(7): 955-962.
[12]
李国文, 刘志彬, 李毅, 等. 前后联合切口入路治疗累及后柱的复杂胫骨平台骨折疗效分析[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2017, 19(6): 439-442.
[13]
Rüsdi TP,Buckly RE,Moran CG. 骨折治疗的AO原则 [M]. 危杰, 刘璠, 吴新宝, 等译. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2010: 153-154.
[1] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[2] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[3] 刘瀚忠, 黄生辉, 万俊明, 李家春, 舒涛. 髌上入路和髌旁外侧入路髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 795-801.
[4] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[5] 刘丹丹, 宋鸣, 李霞, 徐夏君. 老年髋部骨折术后便秘的影响因素及其列线图预测模型[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 607-612.
[6] 夏效泳, 王立超, 朱治国, 丛云海, 史宗新. 深度塌陷性胫骨平台骨折的形态特点和治疗策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-632.
[7] 陈志超, 张志伟, 蒋勰, 顾祖超, 蒋菁芸, 许婷婷. 带线锚钉结合缝线捆扎固定髌骨下极粉碎性骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 732-735.
[8] 周春林, 韩元龙, 丁飞, 吴玮杰. 踝关节骨折内固定术后形态变化及功能影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 736-740.
[9] 浦路桥, 徐永清, 齐保闯, 施洪鑫, 林玮, 卜鹏飞, 白艳, 唐志方, 李川. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)计划书[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 747-750.
[10] 伊喆, 王志新, 陈伟, 齐伟亚, 方杰, 石海飞, 赵夏, 赵喆, 竺枫, 盛伟, 陈焱, 张宇昊, 朱瑾, 殷耀斌, 杨勇, 陈山林, 刘波. 机器人辅助无移位急性舟骨骨折经皮内固定的诊疗与手术操作规范[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 464-468.
[11] 丁晨梦, 胡雪慧, 闫沛, 程乔. 髋部骨折术后患者居家康复体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 365-372.
[12] 金浪, 石洁, 黄正, 贾永伟, 张建坡, 魏礼成, 金昊雷. 3D打印数字技术辅助改良交叉PVP对重度骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折脊柱-骨盆矢状面平衡状态的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 263-268.
[13] 傅佰圣, 李庆虎, 王大伟, 陶扶林, 王永会. 扩髓清创联合单边外固定架治疗长骨骨折髓内钉术后慢性感染的研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 289-294.
[14] 杨鹏, 刘冲. PFNA治疗老年股骨转子间骨折后隐匿性失血及其危险因素的横断面研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 301-306.
[15] 马洪庆, 于淼, 张建锋, 武雪亮, 胡旭华, 王光林, 孟泽松, 于滨, 王贵英. 混合入路与传统中央入路在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中的疗效分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 545-550.
阅读次数
全文


摘要