切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (23) : 2445 -2449. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2017.23.004

所属专题: 骨科学 文献

临床论著

前外侧联合后内侧入路三柱重建治疗胫骨平台三柱骨折
蔡史健1,(), 钟志刚1, 赵资坚1, 张荣臻1   
  1. 1. 515000 广东汕头,汕头市第二人民医院骨外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-18 出版日期:2017-12-01
  • 通信作者: 蔡史健

Three-column reconstruction via the anterolateral plus posteromedial approach for treating three-column tibial plateau fractures

Shijian Cai1,(), Zhigang Zhong1, Zijian Zhao1, Rongzhen Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second People′ Hospital of Shantou, Shantou 515000, China
  • Received:2017-09-18 Published:2017-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Shijian Cai
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cai Shijian, Email:
引用本文:

蔡史健, 钟志刚, 赵资坚, 张荣臻. 前外侧联合后内侧入路三柱重建治疗胫骨平台三柱骨折[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(23): 2445-2449.

Shijian Cai, Zhigang Zhong, Zijian Zhao, Rongzhen Zhang. Three-column reconstruction via the anterolateral plus posteromedial approach for treating three-column tibial plateau fractures[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(23): 2445-2449.

目的

探讨前外侧联合后内侧入路三柱重建胫骨平台三柱骨折的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2013年2月至2016年10月期间汕头市第二人民医院骨外科收治的胫骨平台骨折病例,对其中采用联合入路三柱固定的闭合性胫骨平台三柱骨折,并获完整随访的32例患者进行分析。采用配对t检验比较术后即刻和末次随访患肢胫骨平台内翻角(TPA)及后倾角(PA),评估内固定稳定性。记录末次随访美国特种外科医院(HSS)膝关节功能评分、骨折愈合情况及不良反应发生情况。

结果

32例患者随访时间6~33个月,平均18.5个月。骨折愈合时间13~21周,平均16周,完全负重时间平均18周。术后即刻和末次随访患肢TPA[(86.2°±4.4°vs (84.5°±4.4°)]及PA[(8.3°±1.5°vs(9.2°±1.6°)]比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=1.58,P>0.05;t=-1.91,P>0.05)。末次随访患者膝关节活动度平均为2°~121°,HSS评分87~96分,平均93.5分。术后1例患者小腿后下部麻木,为腓肠内侧皮神经损伤所致,术后半年复查已恢复。患者切口均愈合良好,未出现重要血管损伤,无内固定松动、断裂等并发症发生。

结论

复杂胫骨平台三柱骨折,采用前外侧联合后内侧入路行三柱固定,手术显露满意,固定可靠,可早期功能锻炼,术后疗效满意。

Objective

To assess the clinical effects of three-column reconstruction via the ranterolateral plus medial posterior approach in the treatment of three-column tibial plateau fractures.

Methods

The cases with tibial plateau fractures treated at our hospital from February 2013 to October 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-two cases with closed three-column tibial plateau fractures who were treated by three-column fixation via the combined approach were included. These cases had complete clinical data, and there were 23 males and 9 females with an average age of 43.6 years. Tibial plateau-tibial shaft angle (TPA) and posterior angle (PA) were measured immediately after surgery and at the last follow-up for the affected limb. Stability of internal fixation was assessed. Hospital for special surgery knee score (HSS) was recorded at the last follow-up and functional recovery of the knee joint was assessed.

Results

The 32 cases were followed for 6-33 months (average, 18.5 months). The time to bone fracture healing was 13-21 weeks with an average of 16 weeks, and the time to complete weight bearing was 18 weeks on average. There was no significant difference in TPA or PA immediately after surgery and at the last follow-up [(86.2°±4.4°) vs(84.5°±4.4°), t=1.58, P>0.05; (8.3°±1.5°) vs (9.2°±1.6°), t=-1.91, P>0.05]. The average knee joint range of motion was 2°-121° in the last follow-up, and HSS score was 87-96 (average, 93.5). One case had numbness in the posteroinferior part of the calf due to injury to the medial sural cutaneous nerve. This case recovered upon reexamination 6 months later. Incision healed well in all cases without injury to important vessels, loosening or fracture of internal fixation.

Conclusion

Three-column fixation via the anterolateral plus posteromedial approach for three-column tibial plateau fractures can achieve a good effect and stable fixation. The patients can start early functional training after surgery and the outcome is satisfactory.

图1 骨折患者术前CT三维重建示左胫骨平台内、外、后柱骨折 图1a为前方三维重建,图1b为后方重建
图2 左膝三柱骨折患者术后即刻复查左膝X线片 图示胫骨平台骨折复位良好,三柱钢板内固定图2a为正位X线片,图2b为侧位X线片
图3 左膝三柱骨折患者术后6个月复查示骨折基本愈合,胫骨平台高度恢复良好 图3a为正位X线片,图3b为侧位X线片
图4 左膝三柱骨折患者术后16个月取出内固定术后复查示胫骨平台骨折愈合良好 图4a为正位X线片,图4b为侧位X线片
[1]
罗从风, 胡承方, 高洪, 等. 基于CT的胫骨平台骨折的三柱分型[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2009, 11(3): 201-205.
[2]
Gardner MJ,Yacoubian S,Geller D, et al. Prediction of soft-tissue injuries in Schatzker II tibial plateau fractures based on measurements of plain radio graphs[J]. J Trauma, 2006, 60(2): 319-324.
[3]
Yang G,zhai Q,Zhu Y, et al. The incidence of posterior tibial plateau fracture: an Investigation of 525 fractures by using a CT-based classification system[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2013, 133(7): 929-934.
[4]
毛玉江. 胫骨平台骨折的诊治进展[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2013, 15 (4): 345-348.
[5]
毛玉江, 张伯松, 公茂琪, 等. 200例胫骨平台骨折的骨折形态及损伤机制分析[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2016, 18(1): 47-51.
[6]
汤旭日, 王秋根, 张秋林, 等. 胫骨平台骨折术后高度丢失的原因及对策[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2004, 6(3): 260-263.
[7]
Solomon LB,Stevenson AW,Baird RP, et a1. Postemlateral transfibular approach to tibial plateau fractures: technique, results, andrationale[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2010, 24(8): 505-514.
[8]
Morris BJ,Unger RZ,Archer KR, et al. Risk factors of infection after ORIF of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures[J]. J Orthop trauma, 2013, 27(9): 196-200.
[9]
孙辉, 罗从风, 曾炳芳. 胫骨平台后侧骨折新型手术径路解剖学研究[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2011, 10(8): 765-769.
[10]
胡勇, 尹宗生, 张辉, 等. 累及后柱的胫骨平台骨折的手术治疗[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2012, 32(12): 1138-1144.
[11]
Chang SM,Zheng HP,Li HF, et al. Treatment of isolated posterior coronal fracture of the lateral tibial plateau through posterolateral approach for direct exposure and buttress plate fixation[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2009, 129(7): 955-962.
[12]
李国文, 刘志彬, 李毅, 等. 前后联合切口入路治疗累及后柱的复杂胫骨平台骨折疗效分析[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2017, 19(6): 439-442.
[13]
Rüsdi TP,Buckly RE,Moran CG. 骨折治疗的AO原则 [M]. 危杰, 刘璠, 吴新宝, 等译. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2010: 153-154.
[1] 李焕玺, 何淳诺, 田志敏, 周胜虎, 吴昊越, 张浩强. 全膝关节置换术后股骨远端假体周围骨折治疗现状[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 630-637.
[2] 郭杰坤, 王楹, 杨轩, 晏欢欣, 钟豪. Ilizarov 骨搬移技术在急诊一期修复GustiloⅢB 型胫骨长段开放粉碎性骨折的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 507-510.
[3] 周迪, 全志伟. 规范化胆囊良性疾病诊治流程减少胆囊癌误诊误治[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 749-753.
[4] 朱前拯, 付中国, 陈瀛. 反向肩关节置换治疗老年肱骨近端四部分骨折[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 190-190.
[5] 于同, 矫健航, 姜炜博, 王中汉, 王洋, 伍旭辉, 吴敏飞. 体位复位与椎板切除减压内固定术治疗胸腰段爆裂性骨折的对比性研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 331-339.
[6] 黄韬, 杨晓华, 薛天森, 肖睿. 改良“蛋壳”技术治疗老年OVCF及对脊柱矢状面平衡参数、预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 340-348.
[7] 谭明明, 战世强, 侯宏涛, 曾翔硕. 经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定术对骨质疏松脊柱压缩性骨折患者临床研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 349-354.
[8] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[9] 张峻, 赵建民, 姚晓克, 吉浩宇, 越瑞祥. 增加CT对桡骨远端骨折分型的可靠性及可重复性评价[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 264-272.
[10] 房桂彬, 肖进, 傅光涛, 郑秋坚. 老年髋部骨折患者术后1年行走能力的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 273-280.
[11] 张于, 程亮亮, 王峰, 赵德伟. 2枚与3枚空心钉治疗无移位股骨颈骨折的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 281-286.
[12] 茹江英, 廖启宇, 温国洪, 潘思华, 刘栋, 张皓琛, 牛云飞. 直接前方入路和后外侧入路半髋关节置换治疗老年痴呆股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 287-293.
[13] 单良, 刘怡, 于涛, 徐丽. 老年股骨颈骨折术后患者心理弹性现状及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 294-300.
[14] 周锐, 罗飞. 骨质疏松椎体骨折的分型进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 315-320.
[15] 喻蓉, 周伟力, 雷青, 陈松, 陈立, 刘峰, 丁州, 阳宏奇, 王康, 王大鹏. 改良的内外侧环抱锁定钢板在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 764-770.
阅读次数
全文


摘要