切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (07) : 527 -531. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2019.07.009

所属专题: 骨科学 文献

临床研究

沪滇对口帮扶医院骨折治疗模式的转变
瞿中勇1, 陶星光2,(), 罗毕心1, 熊志华1, 瞿源福1, 李继龙1, 杨庆2, 潘福根2   
  1. 1. 678100 云南保山,云南省昌宁县人民医院骨科
    2. 201700 上海,复旦大学附属中山医院青浦分院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-08 出版日期:2019-04-01
  • 通信作者: 陶星光

Transition of treatments for fractures in Shanghai-Yunnan counterpart assisting hospitals

Zhongyong Qu1, Xingguang Tao2,(), Bixin Luo1, Zhihua Xiong1, Yuanfu Qu1, Jilong Li1, Qing Yang2, Fugen Pan2   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Changning People′s Hospital, Baoshan 678100, China
    2. Department of Orthopaedics, Qingpu Branch of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 201700, China
  • Received:2019-03-08 Published:2019-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Xingguang Tao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tao Xingguang, Email:
引用本文:

瞿中勇, 陶星光, 罗毕心, 熊志华, 瞿源福, 李继龙, 杨庆, 潘福根. 沪滇对口帮扶医院骨折治疗模式的转变[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(07): 527-531.

Zhongyong Qu, Xingguang Tao, Bixin Luo, Zhihua Xiong, Yuanfu Qu, Jilong Li, Qing Yang, Fugen Pan. Transition of treatments for fractures in Shanghai-Yunnan counterpart assisting hospitals[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(07): 527-531.

目的

以沪滇医疗对口帮扶前后云南省昌宁县人民医院治疗股骨粗隆间骨折模式的转变,分析帮扶项目提高对口医院医疗服务能力的方案。

方法

回顾性分析云南省昌宁县人民医院2012年10月至2017年10月在帮扶下技术改进前后2种手术方式治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的效果,按帮扶前后2种手术方式分为帮扶前股骨近端锁定钢板固定组(钢板组)17例和帮扶后股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)内固定组(PFNA组)25例,使用t检验比较2组患者手术时间、术中出血量、开始负重时间、完全负重时间、术后1年髋关节Harris评分及住院费用等情况的差异,采用χ2检验比较2组患者术后并发症的差异。

结果

42例患者术后随访12~18个月,平均14.3个月。PFNA组平均手术时间、术中出血量、开始负重时间、完全负重时间及住院费用低于钢板组[(86.80±28.97)min vs (156.76±31.70)min、(116.40±52.59)ml vs(273.53±113.85)ml、(12.50±3.72)d vs(20.19±5.98)d、(13.71±2.26)周vs(17.75±2.02)周、(14.40±1.94)千元vs(17.53±1.59)千元],Harris评分总分高于钢板组[(91.05±4.89)分vs(80.14±8.82)分],差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后并发症发生率PFNA组(4/25)低于钢板组(7/17),且差异具有统计学意义(χ2=42.000,P<0.01)。

结论

医疗帮扶能改善对口医院骨折的治疗模式,提高股骨粗隆间骨折治疗效果,减少因病致残、因病致贫的发生。

Objective

To analyze the changes in the treatments for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in Changning People's Hospital of Yunnan Province before and after Shanghai-Yunnan medical counterpart assistance to improve the medical service capacity of assisting hospitals.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the effects of two surgical methods for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures that were implemented before and after technical improvement, respectively, from October 2012 to October 2017 at Changning People′s Hospital of Yunnan Province. According to the surgical method used, the patients were divided into either an anterior locking plate fixation group (plate group, n=17) or a proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) group (n=25). The t-test and χ2 test were used to compare the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, time to initial weight-bearing, time to total weight-bearing, postoperative complications, hip Harris score at 1 year postoperatively, and hospital costs of the two groups. The operation time of the same doctor for PFNA was analyzed.

Results

The 42 patients were followed for 12 to 18 months with an average of 14.3 months. The average operation time, intraoperative blood loss, time to initial weight-bearing, time to total weight-bearing, hospitalization cost, and Harris score in the PFNA group were significantly less than those in the plate group [(86.80±28.97) min vs (156.76±31.70) min, (116.40±52.59) ml vs (273.53±113.85) ml, (12.50±3.72) d vs (20.19±5.98) d, (13.71±2.26) weeks vs (17.75±2.02) weeks, (14.40±1.94)×103 yuan vs (17.53±1.59)×103 yuan, (80.14±8.82) scores vs (91.05±4.89) scores; P<0.05]. The incidence of postoperative complications was lower in the PFNA group (4/25) than in the plate group (7/17), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=42.000, P<0.01).

Conclusion

Medical assistance can improve the therapeutic effects on intertrochanteric fractures and reduce the incidence of disability and poverty due to illness.

表1 2组股骨粗隆间骨折患者术前基线资料比较
表2 2组股骨粗隆间骨折患者术中术后观察指标结果(±s
表3 2组股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后1年髋关节Harris评分结果(分,±s
表4 2组股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后并发症情况对比(例)
[1]
Panula J, Pihlajamäki H, Mattila VM, et al. Mortality and cause of death in hip fracture patients aged 65 or older: a population-based study [J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2011, 12: 105.
[2]
Sheehan KJ, Sobolev B, Chudyk A, et al. Patients and system factors of mortality after hip fractures. A scoping review [J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2016, 17: 166.
[3]
安智全, 王烨明, 曾炳芳. 经皮穿针导入股骨近端髓内钉内固定治疗股骨转子间骨折的前瞻性研究 [J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2006, 8(9): 816-819.
[4]
唐佩福, 姚琦, 黄鹏, 等. 股骨近端髓内钉-螺旋刀片治疗高龄骨质疏松性股骨转子间骨折 [J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2007, 9(7): 622-624.
[5]
Matre K, Vinje T, Havelin LI, et al. Trigen intertan intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw: a prospective, randomized multicenter study on pain, function, and complications in 684 patients with an intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture and one year of follow-up [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013, 95(3): 200-208.
[6]
Huang SG, Chen B, Zhang Y, et al. Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of PFNA, PFLCP, and DHS in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture [J]. Am J Ther, 2017, 24(6): e659-e666.
[7]
Karapinar L, Kumbaraci M, Kaya A, et al. Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) to treat peritrochanteric fractures in elderly 13 patients [J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2012, 22(3): 237-243.
[8]
Baldwin PC 3rd, Lavender RC, Sanders R, et al. Controversies in intramedullary fixation for intertrochanteric hip fractures [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2016, 30(12): 635-641.
[9]
Choy WS, Ahn JH, Ko JH, et al. Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients [J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2010, 2(4): 221-226.
[10]
Kim JT, Kim HH, Kim JH, et al. Mid-term survivals after cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(3): 777-782.
[11]
Rai SK, Varma R, Wani SS. Does time of surgery and complication have any correlation in the management of hip fracture in elderly and can early surgery affect the outcome? [J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2017, 28(2): 277-282.
[12]
Haq RU, Manhas V, Pankaj A. Proximal femoral nails compared with reverse distal femoral locking plates in intertrochanteric fractures with a compromised lateral wall: a randomised controlled trial [J]. Int Orthop, 2014, 38(7): 1443-1449.
[13]
Huang TW, Chuang PY, Lin SJ, et al. Teriparatide improves fracture healing and early functional recovery in treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures [J]. Medicine, 2016, 95(19): e3626.
[14]
蔡保塔, 徐成毅, 曹军, 等. 三种内固定方式治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较 [J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2016, 18(7): 564-568.
[15]
Reindl R, Harvey EJ, Berry GK, et al. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for unstable intertrochanteric fractures: A prospective randomized controlled trial [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2015, 97(23): 1905-1912.
[16]
邵明哲, 赵珺, 梅家才, 等. 下腔静脉滤器预防骨创伤合并下肢深静脉血栓形成患者围手术期肺栓塞 [J]. 中华外科杂志, 2012, 50(5): 418-421.
[1] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[2] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[3] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[4] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[5] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[6] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗的项目介绍[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 125-125.
[7] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[8] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[9] 陈伟杰, 何小东. 胆囊癌免疫靶向治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 763-768.
[10] 王秋生. 胆道良性疾病诊疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 779-782.
[11] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[12] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[13] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[14] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
[15] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
阅读次数
全文


摘要