切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (08) : 608 -611. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2019.08.009

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

两种超前口服药物对不可复性牙髓炎神经阻滞麻醉的影响
葛蓓蓓1, 于航2, 宋勇1,()   
  1. 1. 223800 江苏宿迁,徐州医科大学附属宿迁医院口腔科
    2. 223800 江苏宿迁,泗阳县众兴镇大众医院口腔科
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-10 出版日期:2019-04-15
  • 通信作者: 宋勇

Effects of two oral drugs administered before root canal treatment on nerve block anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis

Beibei Ge1, Hang Yu2, Yong Song1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Stomatology, Suqian Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian 223800, China
    2. Department of Stomatology, Popular Hospital of Zhongxing Town, Siyang County, Suqian 223800, China
  • Received:2018-12-10 Published:2019-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Yong Song
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Song Yong, Email:
引用本文:

葛蓓蓓, 于航, 宋勇. 两种超前口服药物对不可复性牙髓炎神经阻滞麻醉的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(08): 608-611.

Beibei Ge, Hang Yu, Yong Song. Effects of two oral drugs administered before root canal treatment on nerve block anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(08): 608-611.

目的

探讨两种超前口服药物对不可复性牙髓炎下牙槽神经阻滞效果的影响。

方法

收集2016年2月至2018年6月在徐州医科大学附属宿迁医院口腔科或泗阳大众医院口腔科门诊接受治疗的34例不可复性牙髓炎患者为研究对象。随机分为布洛芬组16例和强的松龙组18例,分别于一次性根管治疗前60 min口服布洛芬和强的松龙,记录下牙槽神经阻滞情况,对患者进行疼痛和焦虑评分,评判不同口服药物对神经阻滞的效果。采用χ2检验比较布洛芬组与强的松龙组间性别、6 h内饮食情况、磨牙位置以及阻滞情况的差异。采用成组t检验比较2组患者年龄和疼痛、焦虑评分的差异。

结果

布洛芬组与强的松龙组患者性别、年龄、初始疼痛评分、6 h内饮食情况、磨牙位置、Corah牙焦虑评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。2组使用利多卡因下牙槽神经阻滞成功率相当(62.5% vs 61.1%),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.409,P=0.523),对麻醉不成功者,阿替卡因补充麻醉成功率分别为33.3%和57.1%,差异具有统计学意义(P=0.045)。术后24 h随访疼痛评分,布洛芬组高于强的松龙组[(4.01±1.45)分vs(2.83±1.07)分],差异具有统计学意义(t=7.078,P=0.008)。

结论

超前口服强的松龙操作简单,患者易于接受,对下牙槽神经麻醉效果有增强作用,且术后疼痛缓解维持时间长,降低患者的疼痛敏感性,值得在临床中进一步推广应用。

Objective

To investigate the effects of two advanced oral drugs on the alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis.

Methods

From February 2016 to June 2018, 34 patients with irreducible pulpitis who received treatment at the Department of Stomatology of Suqian Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University or the Department of Stomatology of Siyang Dazhong Hospital were collected as research subjects. The patients were randomly divided into either an ibuprofen group (n=16) or a prednisone group (n=18). The two groups of patients were given oral ibuprofen and prednisone 60 min before one-time root canal treatment, respectively. The conditions of alveolar nerve block were recorded. The gender, diet, molar position, and nerve block were compared between the two groups by chi-square test. The t-test was used to compare age and pain and anxiety scores between the two groups.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of gender, age, initial pain score, diet within 6 h, molar position, and Corah anxiety score (P>0.05).The success rate of lower alveolar nerve block using lidocaine was similar between the two groups (62.5% vs 61.1%, χ2=0.409, P=0.523). For unsuccessful anesthesia, the success rates of supplemental anesthesia with articaine were 33.3% and 57.1%, respectively, in the ibuprofen group and prednisone group, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.045).The pain score at the postoperative 24 h follow-up was significantly higher in the ibuprofen group than in the prednisone group [(4.01±1.45) vs (2.83±1.07), t=7.078, P=0.008].

Conclusion

Oral prednisone before root canal treatment is simple and easy to accept, which can enhance the effect of lower alveolar nerve anesthesia, result in longer postoperative pain relief, and reduce the patient's pain sensitivity, so it is worthy of further promotion and application in clinical practice.

表1 两组不可复性牙髓炎患者治疗前基线资料比较
1
Robertson WD. Clinical evaluation of mandibular conduction anesthesia[J]. Gen Dent, 1979, 27(5): 49-51.
2
Bhuyan AC, Latha SS, Jain S, et al. Anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental X-tip intraosseous injection using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline in patients with irreversible pulpitis: An in vivo study[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2014, 17(6): 522-525.
3
Verma PK, Srivastava R, Ramesh KM. Anesthetic efficacy of X-tip intraosseous injection using 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in patients with irreversible pulpitis after inferior alveolar nerve block: A clinical study[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2013, 16(2): 162-166.
4
Abt E. Analgesic Premedication may Increase the Success Rate of Local Anesthetics for Teeth with Irreversible Pulpitis[J]. J Evid Based Dent Pract, 2011, 11(3): 141-142.
5
Lapidus D, Goldberg J, Hobbs EH, et al. Effect of premedication to provide analgesia as a supplement to inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2016, 147(6): 427-437.
6
Lindemann M, Reader A, Nusstein J, et al. Effect of sublingual triazolam on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis[J]. J Endod, 2008, 34(10): 1167-1170.
7
Tominaga M, Caterina MJ. Thermosensation and pain[J]. J Neurobiol, 2004, 61(1): 3-12.
8
Arslan H, Topcuoglu HS, Aladag H. Effectiveness of tenoxicam and ibuprofen for pain prevention following endodontic therapy in comparison to placebo: a randomized double-blind clinical trial[J]. J Oral Sci, 2011, 53(2): 157-161.
9
Wells JE, Bingham V, Rowland KC, et al. Expression of Nav1.9 channels in human dental pulp and trigeminal ganglion[J]. J Endod, 2007, 33(10): 1172-1176.
10
张丽,陈启红,丁小珍. 加巴喷丁联合泼尼松治疗带状疱疹性疼痛疗效观察[J]. 海南医学, 2016, 27(16): 2651-2653.
11
Elkhadem A, Ezzat K, Ramadan M, et al. The effect of preoperative oral administration of prednisolone on postoperative pain in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a single-centre randomized controlled trial[J]. Int Endod J, 2018, 51 Suppl 3: e189-e196.
12
胡文庆,宋红转,顾娟仙, 等. 危重病相关皮质类固醇激素不足诊断争议和进展[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2017, 26(10): 1200-1204.
13
Nordgaard-Lassen I, Dahlerup JF, Belard E, et al. Guidelines for screening, prophylaxis and critical information prior to initiating anti-TNF-alpha treatment[J]. Dan Med J, 2012, 59(7): C4480.
14
Bane K, Charpentier E, Bronnec F, et al. Randomized Clinical Trial of Intraosseous Methylprednisolone Injection for Acute Pulpitis Pain[J]. J Endod, 2016, 42(1): 2-7.
15
Pochapski MT, Santos FA, de Andrade ED, et al. Effect of pretreatment dexamethasone on postendodontic pain[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2009, 108(5): 790-795.
16
Jalalzadeh SM, Mamavi A, Shahriari S, et al. Effect of pretreatment prednisolone on postendodontic pain: a double-blind parallel-randomized clinical trial[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(6): 978-981.
17
Holte K, Kehlet H. Perioperative single-dose glucocorticoid administration: pathophysiologic effects and clinical implications[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2002, 195(5): 694-712.
18
Klossek JM, Desmonts-Gohler C, Deslandes B, et al. Treatment of functional signs of acute maxillary rhinosinusitis in adults. Efficacy and tolerance of administration of oral prednisone for 3 days[J]. Presse Med, 2004, 33(5): 303-309.
[1] 吴宏伟, 杨小林, 夏飞, 顾本进, 任映梅. 超声引导下腰脊神经后内侧支优化阻滞复合全身麻醉在腰椎内固定术中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(12): 1208-1211.
[2] 宋志强, 张颖, 张清彬. 手法复位联合Twin-Block咬合板治疗急性颞下颌关节盘不可复性前移位的临床效果评价[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 144-149.
[3] 李莉玫, 朱耀旻, 姚微, 梁潇, 王昱萌. 颏成形术联合颞下颌关节盘复位锚固术对颞下颌关节内紊乱伴下颌偏缩畸形的治疗作用分析[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 228-233.
[4] 王浩然, 管俊杰, 王映, 李娜, 王静秋, 葛良玉, 孟箭. 经皮穴位电刺激对不可逆性牙髓炎患者下牙槽神经阻滞的影响[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 85-91.
[5] 古丽莎, 龚启梅, 周玉竹, 韦曦. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间对急性牙痛临床诊疗工作的防控建议[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 9-13.
[6] 李锐, 张睿, 付坤, 高宁, 乔永明. 手术治疗单侧不可复性关节盘前移位的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2015, 09(01): 57-62.
[7] 林丽, 潘在礼, 黄良诚, 甘昌材. 局部神经阻滞麻醉对腹股沟无张力疝修补镇痛效果及应激反应影响的前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 61-64.
[8] 李声华, 李冬, 陈璟莉, 严虹. LPSB及CSEA麻醉方案用于老年髋部骨折术中的麻醉效果及患者血流动力学观察研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(12): 978-983.
[9] 刘凯, 叶远舟, 吴雨宸, 苏俭生. 非编码RNA在牙髓炎中的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 232-236.
阅读次数
全文


摘要