切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 267 -271. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2020.04.006

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

补救性放化疗对宫颈癌术后盆腔复发和未控患者的治疗价值
刘萍1, 潘九林1,()   
  1. 1. 225001 江苏扬州,苏北人民医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-27 出版日期:2020-04-15
  • 通信作者: 潘九林

Therapeutic value of salvage radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for pelvic recurrence and uncontrolled disease after radical hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma

Ping Liu1, Jiulin Pan1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecolog , Subei People’s Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225001, China
  • Received:2019-09-27 Published:2020-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Jiulin Pan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Pan Jiulin, Email:
引用本文:

刘萍, 潘九林. 补救性放化疗对宫颈癌术后盆腔复发和未控患者的治疗价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 267-271.

Ping Liu, Jiulin Pan. Therapeutic value of salvage radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for pelvic recurrence and uncontrolled disease after radical hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 267-271.

目的

探讨宫颈癌术后盆腔局部复发或未控的患者行同步放化疗的治疗效果。

方法

选取江苏省苏北人民医院2008年1月至2016年12月宫颈癌术后复发或未控进行补救性放化疗患者32例。从宫颈癌术后到复发的平均间隔时间是27个月。全盆腔体外放疗的剂量临床靶区剂量(CTV)50.0~50.4 Gy,肿瘤靶区(GTV)在CTV基础上局部推量10.0~15.0 Gy。在体外放疗结束后,针对残端复发患者进行阴道模后装放疗,总量15.0~30.0 Gy。32例患者均接受顺铂同步化疗,10例患者在同步放化疗后接受了顺铂联合紫杉醇的巩固化疗。采用Logistic回归模型确定治疗反应的预测因素,采用时序检验方法分析最初的国际妇产科协会(FIGO)分期、盆壁浸润、复发肿瘤大小和缓解状态与生存状态的关系。

结果

所有患者完成了剂量≥50.0 Gy的放疗。26例(81.2%,26/32)患者得到完全缓解。单因素Logistic回归分析表明,FIGO分期、复发肿瘤的大小及盆壁的浸润是达完全缓解的重要预测因素。5年无进展生存期、局部控制率,无远处转移生存率和总生存率分别是68.7%,78.1%,81.3%,75.0%。单变量时序检验表明,FIGO分期、盆壁浸润和完全缓解状态是影响无进展生存期和总生存率的重要因素。同步放化疗轻中度急性和晚期毒性发生率为4例(12.5%)和1例(3.1%)。维持性化疗的急性毒性发生率为40%(4/10)。

结论

对于局限于盆腔的复发或未控宫颈癌,积极补救行同步放化疗是可行的,具有良好的治疗效果和可接受的毒性。

Objective

To investigate the treatment outcomes of patients with pelvic recurrence or uncontrolled disease after radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical cancer who received salvage radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent chemotherapy.

Methods

Thirty-two patients with pelvic recurrence or uncontrolled disease after hysterectomy for uterine cervical cancer who received salvage chemoradiotherapy at Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province between January 2008 and December 2016 were enrolled retrospectively. The median interval between initial operation and recurrence was 27 months. Whole-pelvic irradiation was delivered at a median dose of 50.0-50.4 Gy, followed by a boost at a median dose of 10.0-15.0 Gy to the gross tumor volume. Cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy was administered to all patients, and 10 patients accepted paclitaxel-cisplatin consolidation chemotherapy after chemoradiotherapy. The Logistic regression model was used to determine the predictors of treatment response, and the timing test was used to analyze the relationship between the initial International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, pelvic wall infiltration, recurrent tumor size and remission status and survival status.

Results

All patients completed ≥50.0 Gy RT. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 26 (81.2%, 26/32) patients. Initial International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, tumor size at recurrence, and pelvic sidewall involvement were identified to be important predictors in univariate Logistic regression analysis. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 68.7%, 78.1%, 81.3%, and 75.0%, respectively. FIGO stage, pelvic wall involvement and CR status were significant factors affecting PFS and OS rate in univariate log-rank test. The incidence of mild to moderate acute and late toxicities was 12.5% (4/32) and 3.1% (1/32), respectively. The incidence of severe acute toxicities was 40.0% (4/10).

Conclusion

Aggressive salvage RT with concurrent chemotherapy for recurrent cervical cancer confined to the pelvis is feasible, with promising treatment outcomes and acceptable toxicities.

表1 各因素对补救性放化疗后完全缓解的影响
表2 不同因素对复发性宫颈癌补救性放疗后临床结果的影响
1
Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, et al. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer[J]. Lancet, 1997, 350(9077): 535-540.
2
Friedlander M, Grogan M. Guidelines for the treatment of recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer[J]. Oncologist, 2002, 7(4): 342-347.
3
Ryu SY, Kim MH, Nam BH, et al. Intermediate-risk grouping of cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study[J]. Br J Cancer, 2014, 110(2): 278-285.
4
Krebs HB, Helmkamp BF, Sevin BU, et al. Recurrent cancer of the cervix following radical hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1982, 59(4): 422-427.
5
Larson DM, Copeland LJ, Stringer CA, et al. Recurrent cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1988, 30(3): 381-387.
6
Network NCC. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (Verson 5)[J/OL]. Cervical Cancer (2019-09)[2019-10].

URL    
7
Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(2): 228-247.
8
Haasbeek CJ, Uitterhoeve AL, van der Velden J, et al. Longterm results of salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of recurrent cervical carcinoma after prior surgery[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2008, 89(2): 197-204.
9
Ijaz T, Eifel PJ, Burke T, et al. Radiation therapy of pelvic recurrence after radical hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1998, 70(2): 241-246.
10
Jain P, Hunter RD, Livsey JE, et al. Salvaging locoregional recurrence with radiotherapy after surgery in early cervical cancer[J]. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), 2007, 19(10): 763-768.
11
Maneo A, Landoni F, Cormio G, et al. Concurrent carboplatin/5-flfluorouracil and radiotherapy for recurrent cervical carcinoma[J]. Ann Oncol, 1999, 10(7): 803-807.
12
Kim SW, Chun M, Ryu HS. et al. Salvage radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy for pelvic recurrence after hysterectomy alone for early-stage uterine cervical cancer[J]. Strahlenther Onkol, 2017, 193(7): 534-542.
13
Qiu JT, Abdullah NA, Chou HH, et al. Outcomes and prognosis of patients with recurrent cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2012, 127(3): 472-477.
14
Windschall A, Ott OJ, Sauer R, et al. Radiation therapy and simultaneous chemotherapy for recurrent cervical carcinoma[J]. Strahlenther Onkol, 2005, 181(8): 545-550.
15
Lee YS, Kim YS, Kim JH, et al. Feasibility and outcome of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for recurrent cervical carcinoma after initial surgery[J]. Tumori, 2010, 96(4): 553-559.
[1] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[2] 燕速. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌盆腔侧方淋巴结清扫指征与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 480-484.
[3] 陈滔, 罗洪, 周进军. 老年食管癌单纯放疗及同期放化疗患者急性不良反应影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 405-407.
[4] 张明, 谭钦元, 杨为杰, 王晓庆. 膀胱鳞状细胞癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 90-92.
[5] 李哲, 高敬华, 李永生, 赵瑾. 阿帕替尼联合放化疗不能切除小细胞肺癌的临床疗效[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 352-354.
[6] 李道学, 李丹. 非小细胞肺癌患者放化疗后肺功能低下的相关性分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(05): 706-708.
[7] 邹贵军, 袁新普, 马冰, 宋舟, 黄晓天, 曹震, 王麦换, 张朝军. 机器人经肛切除临床完全缓解的直肠癌一例[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(05): 311-314.
[8] 侍新宇, 孙金兵, 何宋兵. 血液生物标志物在直肠癌新辅助治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 228-233.
[9] 李绍堂. 直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的关键问题探讨[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 190-195.
[10] 刘恩瑞, 关旭, 魏然, 姜争, 刘正, 陈瑛罡, 王锡山. 新辅助治疗反应对局部进展期直肠癌患者预后的影响[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(01): 44-53.
[11] 黄栋, 杜金林. 直肠癌新辅助放化疗反应的预测性分子标志物研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(06): 638-642.
[12] 牛文博, 吴凤鹏, 刘月平, 周超熙, 张娟, 胡旭华, 李保坤, 王贵英. 新辅助放化疗对局部进展期直肠癌疗效及肿瘤免疫微环境变化的研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 519-523.
[13] 苏兰芳, 李韩建, 万江花, 刘旭东. 不同弥散加权成像感兴趣区ADC值对直肠癌疗效的评估价值分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 182-188.
[14] 张建锋, 胡旭华, 王贵英. 直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫相关热点问题再探讨[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(11): 801-804.
[15] 刘超, 丁鹏绪, 周朋利, 韩新巍. 上腔静脉综合征的诊疗进展[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(01): 70-74,87.
阅读次数
全文


摘要