切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 332 -336. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2020.05.003

所属专题: 乳腺疾病 总编推荐 经典病例 文献

乳腺癌·临床研究

炎性乳腺癌临床病理分析25例
王伟1, 辛灵1, 张虹2, 张爽2, 徐玲1, 刘倩1, 叶京明1, 刘荫华1,()   
  1. 1. 100034 北京大学第一医院乳腺疾病中心
    2. 100034 北京大学第一医院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-24 出版日期:2020-05-15
  • 通信作者: 刘荫华
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0901302); 应用液体活检技术检测乳腺癌临床疗效的研究(2017-2019)

Clinicopathologic characteristics of inflammatory breast cancer cases: analysis of 25 cases

Wei Wang1, Ling Xin1, Hong Zhang2, Shuang Zhang2, Ling Xu1, Qian Liu1, Jingming Ye1, Yinhua Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Breast Cancer Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
    2. Department of Pathology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2020-02-24 Published:2020-05-15
  • Corresponding author: Yinhua Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Yinhua, Email:
引用本文:

王伟, 辛灵, 张虹, 张爽, 徐玲, 刘倩, 叶京明, 刘荫华. 炎性乳腺癌临床病理分析25例[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 332-336.

Wei Wang, Ling Xin, Hong Zhang, Shuang Zhang, Ling Xu, Qian Liu, Jingming Ye, Yinhua Liu. Clinicopathologic characteristics of inflammatory breast cancer cases: analysis of 25 cases[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(05): 332-336.

目的

研究炎性乳腺癌的临床病理特征及影响预后的相关因素。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月至2018年12月北京大学第一医院乳腺疾病中心收治炎性乳腺癌患者的临床病理资料,探讨影响预后的相关因素。

结果

25例临床病理资料完整的炎性乳腺癌患者纳入分析,占同期收治新发乳腺癌患者的0.89%(25/2811)。临床分期Ⅲ期17例(68%),Ⅳ期8例(32%),预后分期Ⅲ期17例(68%),Ⅳ期8例(32%)。Luminal B型(HER-2阴性)9例(36%),HER-2阳性型5例(20%)及三阴型11例(44%)。19例患者接受手术治疗,R0切除率94.7%(18/19)。中位生存时间18.2个月,预后分期ⅢB期、ⅢC期和Ⅳ期患者2年总生存率分别为72.9%,66.7%和15.6%(χ2=13.247,P<0.001),差异具有统计学意义。

结论

炎性乳腺癌临床发病率不高,但是病期晚,预后差。在接受新辅助治疗后90%以上的患者可以获得局部R0切除。

Objective

To investigate the clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of patients with IBC diagnosed at Peking University First Hospital from January 2012 to December 2018.

Results

A total of 25 patients with IBC were included, accounting for 0.89% (25/2811) of newly diagnosed breast cancer cases at our center. All patients had complete clinicopathologic data and follow-up results. Seventeen (68%) patients had stage Ⅲ IBC, and eight (32%) had stage Ⅳ disease. The numbers of patients with luminal B (HER-2 negative), HER-2 positive, and triple-negative breast cancer were 9 (36%), 5 (20%), and 11 (44%), respectively. Nineteen patients underwent surgery, 94.7% of whom achieved local R0 resection. The median survival time was 18.2 months. The 2-year overall survival rates of patients with prognostic stage ⅢB, stage ⅢC, and stage Ⅳ disease were 72.9%, 66.7%, and 15.6%, respectively; there was a significant difference among them (χ2=13.247, P<0.001).

Conclusion

IBC is a rare, aggressive disease with advanced stage and poor disease outcome. Local R0 resection can be achieved in more than 90% of patients after neoadjuvant therapy.

表1 25例炎性乳腺癌患者的临床病理资料
图1 不同预后分期炎性乳腺癌患者总生存期
1
Wingo PA, Jamison PM, Young JL, et al. Population-based statistics for women diagnosed with inflammatory breast cancer (United States) [J]. Cancer Causes Control, 2004, 15(3): 321-328.
2
Walshe JM, Swain SM. Clinical aspects of inflammatory breast cancer [J]. Breast Dis, 2005, 22: 35-44.
3
Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL, et al., editors. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) [M]. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer, 2017.
4
Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Wolff AC, et al., American society of clinical oncology/college of american pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer [J]. J Oncol Pract, 2010, 6(4): 195-197.
5
Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, et al., Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2013, 31(31): 3997-4013.
6
Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up [J]. Histopathology, 1991, 19(5): 403-410.
7
Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, et al., Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011 [J]. Ann Oncol, 2011, 22(8): 1736-1747.
8
Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000, 92(3): 205-216.
9
Ogston KN, Miller ID, Payne S, et al., A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival [J]. Breast, 2003, 12(5): 320-327.
10
高国璇,张虹,张爽, 等. 首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌66例临床病理分析 [J]. 中华外科杂志, 2015, 53(12): 935-940.
11
Hance KW, Anderson WF, Devesa SS, et al., Trends in inflammatory breast carcinoma incidence and survival: the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program at the National Cancer Institute [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2005. 97(13): 966-975.
12
Fan L, Strasser-Weippl K, Li JJ, et al. Breast cancer in China [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15(7): e279-e289.
13
Rueth NM, Lin HY, Bedrosian I, et al. Underuse of trimodality treatment affects survival for patients with inflammatory breast cancer: an analysis of treatment and survival trends from the National Cancer Database [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2014, 32(19): 2018-2024.
14
Liu J, Chen K, Jiang W, et al. Chemotherapy response and survival of inflammatory breast cancer by hormone receptor- and HER2-defined molecular subtypes approximation: an analysis from the National Cancer Database [J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2017, 143(1): 161-168.
15
Sutherland S, Ashley S, Walsh G, et al. Inflammatory breast cancer-The Royal Marsden Hospital experience: a review of 155 patients treated from 1990 to 2007 [J]. Cancer, 2010, 116(11 Suppl): 2815-2820.
16
DeSnyder SM, Mittendorf EA, Le-Petross C, et al., Prospective Feasibility Trial of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Setting of Inflammatory Breast Cancer [J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2018, 18(1): e73-e77.
17
杨振林. 乳腺癌前哨淋巴结研究的现状与评价 [J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(6): 8-12.
18
Dawood S, Ueno NT, Valero V, et al. Identifying factors that impact survival among women with inflammatory breast cancer [J]. Ann Oncol, 2012, 23(4): 870-875.
19
Akay CL, Ueno NT, Chisholm GB, et al. Primary tumor resection as a component of multimodality treatment may improve local control and survival in patients with stage Ⅳ inflammatory breast cancer [J]. Cancer, 2014, 120(9): 1319-1328.
20
Dawood S, Ueno NT, Valero V, et al. Differences in survival among women with stage III inflammatory and noninflammatory locally advanced breast cancer appear early: a large population-based study [J]. Cancer, 2011, 117(9): 1819-1826.
21
Fouad TM, Kogawa T, Liu DD, et al. Overall survival differences between patients with inflammatory and noninflammatory breast cancer presenting with distant metastasis at diagnosis [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2015, 152(2): 407-416.
[1] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[2] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[3] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[4] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[5] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[6] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[7] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[8] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[9] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[10] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[11] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[12] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要