切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (09) : 690 -693. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2020.09.005

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术术中应用纱块钝性分离腹膜前间隙的效果分析
王翀1, 罗丹东1, 屈荣荣1, 黄冠群1,()   
  1. 1. 510700 广州医科大学附属第五医院普外三区
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-03 出版日期:2020-09-15
  • 通信作者: 黄冠群

Efficacy of using gauze for blunt dissection of the preperitoneal space during laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty

Chong Wang1, Dandong Luo1, Rongrong Qu1, Guanqun Huang1,()   

  1. 1. Third Department of General Surgery, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510700, China
  • Received:2020-03-03 Published:2020-09-15
  • Corresponding author: Guanqun Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Guanqun, Email:
引用本文:

王翀, 罗丹东, 屈荣荣, 黄冠群. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术术中应用纱块钝性分离腹膜前间隙的效果分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(09): 690-693.

Chong Wang, Dandong Luo, Rongrong Qu, Guanqun Huang. Efficacy of using gauze for blunt dissection of the preperitoneal space during laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(09): 690-693.

目的

探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)术中应用纱块钝性分离腹膜前间隙的效果。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至7月佛山市南海区人民医院行TAPP治疗的腹股沟疝136例。根据手术器械的不同将患者分为纱块游离组(36例)和直接游离组(100例)。采用t检验比较2组患者游离腹膜前间隙所花费的时间、出血量的差异,采用χ2检验比较2组患者术中腹膜破损发生率的差异。

结果

136例患者术后通过门诊复诊及电话随访1年均未复发。纱块游离组患者平均手术时间短于直接游离组[(18.97±2.86)min vs(24.84±4.25)min],出血量少于直接游离组[(6.29±2.82)ml vs(8.94±4.17)ml],腹膜破裂发生率低于直接游离组[3.03%(3/36)vs 25.00%(25/100)],2组比较差异均具有统计学意义(t=-9.181,P=0.027;t=-4.212,P=0.001;χ2=4.497,P=0.034)。

结论

TAPP术中应用钳夹纱块钝性分离腹膜前间隙,可以缩短手术时间,减少术中出血量,术中腹膜破损的发生率也较低。

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of using gauze for blunt dissection of the preperitoneal space during laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TAPP).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 136 patients with inguinal hernia who underwent TAPP at the Nanhai District People's Hospital from January to July 2017. The patients were divided into either a gauze dissection group (n=36) or a direct dissect group (n=100) according to the surgical instruments used. The time taken to dissect the preperitoneal space and the amount of blood loss were compared between the two groups by using t-test. The incidence of intraoperative peritoneal injury was compared between the two groups by chi-squared test.

Results

No recurrence was found in 136 patients after surgery during the 1-year outpatient or telephone follow-up. The average operation time was significantly shorter [(18.97±2.86) min vs (24.84±4.25) min, t=-9.181, P=0.027], the amount of blood loss was significantly less [(6.29±2.82) ml vs (8.94±4.17) ml, t=-4.212, P=0.001], and the incidence of peritoneal rupture was significantly lower [3.03% (3/36) vs 25.00% (25/100), χ2=4.497, P=0.034] in the gauze dissection group than in the direct dissection group.

Conclusion

In TAPP, the application of gauze can effectively shorten the operation time, decrease the intraoperative blood loss, and reduce the incidence of intraoperative peritoneal damage.

表1 2组腹股沟疝患者的一般临床资料比较
表2 2组腹股沟疝患者手术相关情况比较
1
中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组,中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,大中华腹腔镜疝外科学院. 腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术规范化操作指南 [J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2013, 33(7): 566-570.
2
梁瑜珊,黄铁,周用. 单极电刀电凝模式切除儿童扁桃体的临床研究 [J]. 中国耳鼻喉颅低外科杂志, 2012, 18(6): 434-437.
3
陈双,杨斌. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术技术要点 [J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2012, 32(6): 433-435.
4
Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treaLment of inguinal hemia in adult patients [J]. Hemia, 2009, 13(4): 343-403
5
Krishna A, Misra MC, Bansal VK, et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair:transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal(TEP) approach: a prospective randomized controlled trial [J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(3): 639-649

URL    
6
华伟,梁志宏,赵象文, 等. 耻骨肌孔的空间分离解剖在腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术中的应用及意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2014, 32(3): 351-356.

URL    
7
Mirilas P, Colborn GL, McClusky DA, et al. The history of anatomy and surgery of the preperitoneal space [J]. Arch Surg, 2005, 140(1): 90-94.
8
汤治平,赵象文,梁志宏, 等. 腹膜外间隙空间的建立与细分对耻骨肌孔后腹股沟疝修补术的意义 [J]. 解剖学研究, 2010, 32(5): 344-348.
9
陈双,李英儒. 谈腹股沟疝腔镜的腹膜外修补操技术 [J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2017, 26(10): 1227-1229.
10
Moldovanu R, Pavy G. Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) procedure-step-by-step tips and tricks [J]. Chirurgia (Bucur), 2014, 109(3): 407-415.
[1] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[2] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[3] 李芳, 王峻峰. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝的临床疗效及安全性[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 401-409.
[4] 余磊, 魏寇准, 刘志刚, 陈光彬, 王志. 不同手术入路对腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术临床疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 361-365.
[5] 万俊, 岳云林, 秦龙. 腹腔镜疝修补术与开放疝修补术对高原地区患者术后疼痛及创伤应激影响的对比研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 669-672.
[6] 阮华, 夏青萍, 李劲平. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术对患者术后应激反应及疼痛的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 629-632.
[7] 贾高磊, 刘岩, 田志龙, 高新宝, 袁福康, 奚海林. 成人腹股沟复发疝行腹腔镜经腹膜前间隙修补术疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 613-617.
[8] 曹新岭, 张管平, 李涛. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术对男性患者术后疼痛和生殖功能影响的前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 507-511.
[9] 司仙科, 次仁多吉, 姚子涵, 于昆, 郑侃, 华蕾, 张计训, 杨佳华. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与Lichtenstein术在成人腹股沟嵌顿疝的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 122-125.
[10] 冒卫华. 完全剥离疝囊与横断处理疝囊在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 456-460.
阅读次数
全文


摘要