切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (11) : 895 -898. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2020.11.009

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

快速进展型结核性心包炎的临床治疗
王伟1, 程力剑1,(), 罗勇1, 袁武1, 陈剑1, 曹安强1, 赵龙1, 陈杰1   
  1. 1. 610031 成都,成都市第三人民医院 西南交通大学附属医院心脏大血管外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-24 出版日期:2020-11-15
  • 通信作者: 程力剑

Clinical therapy of rapidly progressive tuberculous pericarditis

Wei Wang1, Lijian Cheng1,(), Yong Luo1, Wu Yuan1, Jian Chen1, Anqiang Cao1, Long Zhao1, Jie Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiac Surgery, the Third People's Hospital of Chengdu the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
  • Received:2020-05-24 Published:2020-11-15
  • Corresponding author: Lijian Cheng
引用本文:

王伟, 程力剑, 罗勇, 袁武, 陈剑, 曹安强, 赵龙, 陈杰. 快速进展型结核性心包炎的临床治疗[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(11): 895-898.

Wei Wang, Lijian Cheng, Yong Luo, Wu Yuan, Jian Chen, Anqiang Cao, Long Zhao, Jie Chen. Clinical therapy of rapidly progressive tuberculous pericarditis[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(11): 895-898.

目的

探讨不同治疗方案对于快速进展为缩窄性心包炎的结核性心包炎(快速进展型结核性心包炎)治疗效果、并发症、死亡率、患者预后的影响,以期对结核性心包炎的治疗获得更好的效果。

方法

回顾性分析2014年6月至2019年5月成都市第三人民医院心脏大血管外科对38例快速进展型结核性心包炎的治疗方式、外科手术干预时机、手术方式及疗效、并发症、死亡率和随访情况等,治疗方式包括药物治疗、心包穿刺引流术、心包开窗术、心包剥脱术等。同期观察对慢性缩窄性心包炎行外科手术治疗患者115例。

结果

对于快速进展型结核性心包炎采用不同的治疗方案,随访1~5年。所有患者均采用抗结核药物治疗,其中单纯药物治疗5例,全部进展为缩窄性心包炎;早期行心包穿刺引流术12例,治愈1例,其余11例进展为慢性缩窄性心包炎;早期行心包开窗术10例,进展为慢性缩窄性心包炎1例,治愈9例;早期行心包剥脱术11例,无进展为慢性缩窄性心包炎病例。全组无围术期死亡病例。与同期行慢性缩窄性心包炎外科手术治疗患者相比,快速进展型结核性心包炎外科手术治疗患者低心排综合征发生率较低(4.8% vs 24.3%,P<0.05),患者心功能改善情况较好(100.0% vs 80.7%,P<0.05),术后5年随访生存率较高(100% vs 78%,P<0.05)。

结论

快速进展型结核性心包炎单纯采用药物治疗和心包穿刺术治疗,有很高比例的患者会进展为缩窄性心包炎,从而严重影响患者的预后。早期外科干预能显著降低快速进展型结核性心包炎进展为缩窄性心包炎的概率,从而改善患者总体预后,改善患者生存质量,减轻社会负担。

Objective

To explore the clinical effects, complications, mortality, and prognosis associated with different treatment schemes for tuberculous pericarditis with rapid progression to constrictive pericarditis (rapidly progressive tuberculous pericarditis), in order to obtain better therapeutic effects for the treatment of tuberculous pericarditis.

Methods

From June 2014 to May 2019, 38 cases of rapidly progressive tuberculous pericarditis were treated by different treatments. The timing, method and effect of surgical intervention, complications, mortality, and follow-up data were analyzed retrospectively. Treatment methods included drug therapy, pericardiocentesis and drainage, pericardiotomy, and pericardiectomy. Meanwhile, 115 cases of chronic constrictive pericarditis treated surgically were also observed.

Results

Different treatment schemes were used for the treatment of rapidly progressive tuberculous pericarditis, with a follow-up of 1-5 years. All patients were treated with antituberculosis drugs. Among all cases involved, 5 were treated with drugs alone and all of them developed into constrictive pericarditis; 12 were treated by pericardiocentesis and drainage in early stage, of which 1 was cured, and the other 11 developed into chronic constrictive pericarditis; 10 were treated by pericardiotomy in early stage, of which 1 developed into chronic constrictive pericarditis and 9 were cured; 11 underwent early pericardiectomy and there was no progression to chronic constrictive pericarditis. No perioperative deaths occurred. Compared with the patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis who underwent surgical treatment in the same period, the incidence of low cardiac output syndrome was lower in patients with rapidly progressive tuberculous pericarditis who underwent surgical treatment (4.8% vs 24.3%, P<0.05), the improvement of cardiac function was better (100.0% vs 80.7%, P<0.05), and the 5-year follow-up survival rate was higher (100% vs 78%, P<0.05).

Conclusion

A high proportion of cases of rapidly progressive tuberculous pericarditis treated only with drugs or by pericardiocentesis will progress to constrictive pericarditis, which will seriously affect the prognosis of patients. Early surgical intervention can significantly reduce the rate of rapidly progression of tuberculous pericarditis to constrictive pericarditis, thus improving the overall prognosis of patients and their quality of life and reducing the social burden.

表1 快速进展型结核性心包炎外科手术治疗与同期慢性缩窄性心包炎手术治疗情况及预后比较(例)
1
吴小滢, 刘晓丽, 史冬梅, 等. 心包炎临床诊治分析 [J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2014, 24(10): 2488-2490.
2
王峻, 姜德谦, 文丹, 等. 缩窄性心包炎患者心包切除术后病因分析 [J]. 医学临床研究, 2006, 23(6): 941-942.
3
屠德华. 中国结核病控制60年 [J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2013, 36(12): 886-887.
4
尹海军. 慢性缩窄性心包炎的外科治疗体会 [J]. 中外医疗, 2010, 30(17): 7-9.
5
杨梅. 105例结核性心包炎的治疗分析 [J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2014, 19(9): 1649-1651.
6
魏宇森, 廖玉华, 王国荣, 等. 快速进展至心包缩窄的结核性心包炎临床分析 [J]. 临床内科杂志, 2006, 23(10): 686-688.
7
Shammas NW, Padaria RF, Coyne EP. Pericarditis,myocarditis, and other cardiomyopathies [J]. Prim Care, 2013, 40(1): 213-236.
8
马向东. 现代结核病学 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2000: 337-343.
9
赵自屹. 结核性心包炎的临床治疗研究 [J]. 心血管病防治知识:学术版, 2014(2): 116-118.
10
Mookadam F, Jiamsripong P, Raslan SF, et al. Constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy in the modern era [J]. Future Cardiol, 2011, 7(4): 471-483.
11
郭家龙, 张军, 林称意, 等. 结核所致缩窄性心包炎的外科治疗 [J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2016, 23(10): 69-71.
12
吴殷, 张培元. 结核性心包炎诊断及治疗进展 [J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2002, 24(1): 37-40.
13
Quale JM, Lipschik GY, Heurich AH. Management of tuberculous pericarditis [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 1987, 43(6): 653-655.
14
柴东升. 结核性心包积液心包腔内注射尿激酶减少缩窄性心包炎的临床观察 [J]. 中国实用医药, 2018, 13(3): 89-90.
15
Szabo G, Schmack B, Bulut C, et al. Constrictive pericarditis:risks, aetiologies and outcomes after total pericardiectomy: 24 years of experience [J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2013, 44(6): 1023-1028.
16
Cho YH, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, et al. Completion pericardiectomy for recurrent constrictive pericarditis: importance of timing of recurrence on late clinical outcome of operation [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2012, 93(4): 1236-1240.
[1] 宋江勤, 向健, 杨昊, 周锦. 荧光定量PCR技术检测肺外结核患者样本临床应用[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 251-255.
阅读次数
全文


摘要