切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (10) : 748 -753. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2021.10.006

乳腺癌·临床研究

首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌局部手术时机探讨
董洁1, 莫雪莉1,(), 韩冬1, 张鹏1, 赵期康1   
  1. 1. 100043 北京,北京大学首钢医院乳腺疾病科
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-03 出版日期:2021-10-15
  • 通信作者: 莫雪莉

Timing of local operation for newly diagnosed stage Ⅳ breast cancer

Jie Dong1, Xueli Mo1,(), Dong Han1, Peng Zhang1, Qikang Zhao1   

  1. 1. Department of Breast Disease, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing 100144, China
  • Received:2021-09-03 Published:2021-10-15
  • Corresponding author: Xueli Mo
引用本文:

董洁, 莫雪莉, 韩冬, 张鹏, 赵期康. 首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌局部手术时机探讨[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(10): 748-753.

Jie Dong, Xueli Mo, Dong Han, Peng Zhang, Qikang Zhao. Timing of local operation for newly diagnosed stage Ⅳ breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(10): 748-753.

目的

通过5例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌病例及文献复习,探讨手术治疗时机选择及疗效。

方法

回顾分析2012年6月至2018年11月于北京大学首钢医院经全身治疗联合局部手术治疗的首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌患者5例,观察其疗效及生存质量,并回顾分析相关文献。

结果

5例患者在全身治疗有效并维持8~15个月后行乳腺原发灶和/或转移灶手术,均达到R0切除,术后均接受了全身治疗,其中1例患者因肝转移死亡,其余患者均生存,无局部复发生存期6~72个月,无远处转移进展生存期6~48个月,总生存期25~72个月。生存质量调查结果显示,从功能领域来看,患者躯体角色情绪社会功能普遍较好;症状领域中,患者出现的轻微症状考虑与肿瘤不相关,部分为内分泌药物不良反应,1例老年患者出现认知功能下降。

结论

在有效全身治疗的情况下,充分评估疾病负荷、发展进程,结合患者体力状况和个人意愿,适时采取局部治疗措施,可提高生存质量,改善生存。

Objective

To analyze the clinical data of five cases of newly diagnosed stage Ⅳ breast cancer and perform a literature review, in order to analyze the timing and efficacy of surgical treatment.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on five patients with newly diagnosed stage Ⅳ breast cancer who received systemic treatment combined with locoregional operation from June 2012 to November 2018 at Peking University Shougang Hospital. The efficacy and quality of life were assessed, and the relevant literature was reviewed.

Results

After systemic treatment was effective and maintained for 8-15 months, the five patients underwent surgery for primary breast lesions and/or metastases, and all of them achieved R0 resection. All patients received systemic treatment after operation. One of the patients died of liver metastasis, while the others survived. The local-regional failure free survival was 6-72 months, the distance disease progression free survival was 6-48 months, and the overall survival was 25-72 months. The quality of life in function domain, including patients' physical role and emotional and social function, was generally better. In the domain of symptoms, the mild symptoms of the patients were not related to the tumor, some were adverse reactions of endocrine therapy, and one elderly patient had decreased cognitive function.

Conclusion

Under optimal systemic treatment, with consideration of the physical condition and individual needs of our patients, combined with timely local treatment measures and a thorough evaluation of the disease load and development process, patients' quality of life and survival rates can be improved.

表1 5例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌患者一般状况、治疗方式、疗效及生存情况汇总
表2 4例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌患者生活质量量表标准化得分(分)
1
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2020, 70(1): 7-30.
2
Lei SY, Zheng RS, Zhang SW, et al. Breast cancer incidence and mortality in women in China: temporal trends and projections to 2030 [J]. Cancer Biol Med, 2021, 18(3): 900-909.
3
Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2019, 69(5): 363-385.
4
Caswell-Jin JL, Plevritis SK, Tian L, et al. Change in survival in metastatic breast cancer with treatment advances: meta-analysis and systematic review [J]. JNCI Cancer Spectr, 2018, 2(4): pky062.
5
Nishino M, Jackman DM, Hatabu H, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) guidelines for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: comparison with original RECIST and impact on assessment of tumor response to targeted therapy [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 195(3): W221-8.
6
Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1993, 85(5): 365-376.
7
Fisher B, Gunduz N, Coyle J, et al. Presence of a growth-stimulating factor in serum following primary tumor removal in mice [J]. Cancer Res, 1989, 49(8): 1996-2001.
8
Chuthapisith S, Eremin J, El-Sheemey M, et al. Breast cancer chemoresistance: emerging importance of cancer stem cells [J]. Surg Oncol, 2010, 19(1): 27-32.
9
Abraham BK, Fritz P, McClellan M,et al. Prevalence of CD44+/CD24-/low cells in breast cancer may not be associated with clinical outcome but may favor distant metastasis [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2005, 11(3): 1154-1159.
10
Harris E, Barry M, Kell MR. Meta-analysis to determine if surgical resection of the primary tumour in the setting of stage Ⅳ breast cancer impacts on survival [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013, 20(9): 2828-2834.
11
Warschkow R, Güller U, Tarantino I, et al.Improved survival after primary tumor surgery in metastatic breast cancer: a propensity-adjusted, population-based SEER trend analysis [J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 263(6): 1188-1198.
12
Lane WO, Thomas SM, Blitzblauet RC, et al. Surgical resection of the primary tumor in women with de novo stage Ⅳ breast cancer: contemporary practice patterns and survival analysis [J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 269(3): 537-544.
13
Stahl K, Wong W, Dodge D, et al. Benefits of surgical treatment of stage Ⅳ breast cancer for patients with known hormone receptor and HER2 status [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021, 28(5): 2646-2658.
14
Badwe R, Hawaldar R, Nair N, et al. Locoregional treatment versus no treatment of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer: an open-label randomised controlled trial [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2015, 16(13): 1380-1388.
15
Fitzal F, Bjelic-Radisic V, Knauer M, et al. Impact of breast surgery in primary metastasized breast cancer: outcomes of the prospective randomized phase Ⅲ ABCSG-28 posytive trial [J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 269(6): 1163-1169.
16
Khan SA, Zhao F, Lawrence J, et al. A randomized phase Ⅲ trial of systemic therapy plus early local therapy versus systemic therapy alone in women with de novo stage Ⅳ breast cancer: a trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Research Group (E2108) [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2020, 38(18): LBA2.
17
Soran A, Ozmen V, Ozbas S, et al. Randomized trial comparing resection of primary tumor with no surgery in stage Ⅳ breast cancer at presentation: protocol MF07-01 [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2018, 25(11): 3141-3149.
18
Reinhorn D, Mutai R, Yerushalmi R, et al. Locoregional therapy in de novo metastatic breast cancer: Systemic review and meta-analysis [J]. Breast, 2021, 58: 173-181.
[1] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[2] 唐玮, 何融泉, 黄素宁. 深度学习在乳腺癌影像诊疗和预后预测中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 323-328.
[3] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[4] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[5] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[6] 伍秋苑, 陈佩贤, 邓裕华, 何添成, 周丹. 肠道微生物在乳腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 362-365.
[7] 谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[8] 周婉丽, 钱铮, 李喆. 槐耳在乳腺癌免疫治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 369-371.
[9] 熊倩, 罗凤. 乳腺癌患者术后康复现状与对策的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 372-374.
[10] 杨小菁, 姜瑞瑞, 石玉香, 王静静, 李长天. 乳腺孤立性纤维性肿瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 375-377.
[11] 冯雪园, 韩萌萌, 马宁. 乳腺原发上皮样血管内皮瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 378-380.
[12] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[13] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[14] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
[15] 孙晗, 武侠. 成人肠易激综合征患者肠道菌群特征与不同分型患者生活质量和精神症状的相关性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 461-465.
阅读次数
全文


摘要