切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (01) : 58 -61. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2022.01.010

临床研究

肢体导联反向法和室性心动过速积分法在鉴别预激性心动过速中的临床价值
李秦1,()   
  1. 1. 100050 北京,首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院心血管中心
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-18 出版日期:2022-01-15
  • 通信作者: 李秦

Clinical value of opposing QRS complex on limb leads criteria and ventricular tachycardia score in identifying pre-excited tachycardia

Qin Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
  • Received:2021-08-18 Published:2022-01-15
  • Corresponding author: Qin Li
引用本文:

李秦. 肢体导联反向法和室性心动过速积分法在鉴别预激性心动过速中的临床价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 58-61.

Qin Li. Clinical value of opposing QRS complex on limb leads criteria and ventricular tachycardia score in identifying pre-excited tachycardia[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(01): 58-61.

目的

探讨肢体导联反向法和室性心动过速(VT)积分法在鉴别预激性心动过速中的临床价值。

方法

回顾性分析2013年1月至2021年6月首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院经心内电生理确诊为预激性心动过速的住院患者18例,收集患者发作时的12导联心电图,分别采用肢体导联反向法和VT积分法进行评分。采用χ2检验比较二者诊断预激性心动过速的特异度差异,并分析2种流程诊断预激性心动过速不同类型和不同旁路位置中的特异度。

结果

18例患者中,肢体导联反向法诊断的真阳性11例,特异度为38.89%;VT积分法积分≥2分、≥3分诊断预激性心动过速的特异度分别为55.56%、100.00%。肢体导联反向法与VT积分法积分≥2分诊断预激性心动过速的特异度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);肢体导联反向法与VT积分法积分≥3分的特异度比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2种诊断流程对不同类型和旁路位置预激性心动过速诊断的特异度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

VT积分法积分≥3分可区分预激性心动过速和VT,肢体导联反向法和VT积分法≥2分则不能区分。

Objective

To compare the clinical value of opposing QRS complex on limb leads (OQL) criteria and ventricular tachycardia (VT) score in identifying pre-excited tachycardia.

Methods

Twelve-lead electrocardiograph results were obtained from 18 patients at pre-excited tachycardia attacking stage who were diagnosed by electrophysiology. Pre-excited tachycardia was scored based on the OQL criteria and the VT score. The specificities of OQL criteria and VT score (≥2 points and ≥3 points) in identifying pre-excited tachycardia were compared by chi-square test. The specificities of the two modalities in different pre-excitation types and different bypass positions were analyzed.

Results

The specificity of OQL criteria for patients with pre-excited tachycardia was 38.89%. The specificity of VT score (≥2 points and ≥3 points) for patients with pre-excited tachycardia were 55.56% and 100.00%, respectively. Comparing the results of the OQL criteria with the VT score ≥2 points, there was no statistical difference in the two groups (P>0.05). Comparing the results of the OQL criteria with the VT score ≥3 points, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the specificities of the two modalities in different pre-excitation types and different bypass positions (P>0.05).

Conclusion

VT score ≥3 points can completely identify pre-excited tachycardia and VT. The OQL criteria and VT score ≥2 points cannot completely distinguish pre-excited tachycardia from VT.

表1 肢体导联反向法和VT积分法对不同类型预激性心动过速的诊断特异度比较
表2 肢体导联反向法和VT积分法对不同类型旁路位置的预激性心动过速的诊断特异度比较[例(%)]
1
郭继鸿. 宽QRS波心动过速的鉴别诊断:室速积分法 [J]. 临床心电学杂志, 2018, 27(2): 55-64.
2
Jastrzębski M, Sasaki K, Kukla P, et al. The ventricular tachycardia score: a novel approach to electrocardiographic diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia [J] . Europace, 2016, 18 (4): 578-584.
3
Chen Q, Sanghamitra M, Domenico DR, et al. A new, simple ECG algorithm for the rapid identification of ventricular tcchycardia based on opposing QRS complexes on limb leads [J]. JACC, 2019, 73(9): 319.
4
李兴杰, 吴翠香. 极易误诊为室性心动过速的几种情况 [J]. 中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志, 2020, 34(4): 391-395.
5
刘少稳, 朱俊. 中华医学会.预激综合征基层诊疗指南 [J] . 中华全科医师杂志, 2020, 19(6): 482-485
6
Brugada P, Brugada J, Mont L, et al. A new approach to the differential diagnosis of a regular tachycardia with a wide QRS complex [J]. Circulation, 1991, 83(5): 1649-1659.
7
Wellens HJ, Bär FW, Lie KI. The value of the electrocardiogram in the differential diagnosis of a tachycardia with a widened QRS complex [J]. Am J Med, 1978, 64(1): 27-33.
8
Vereckei A, Duray G, Szenasi G, et al. Application of a new algorithm in the differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia [J]. Eur Heart J, 2007, 28(5): 589-600.
9
李予, 汪文娟, 郭惠玲, 等. 探讨室速积分法与其他流程鉴别预激性心动过速的临床价值 [J]. 中国心血管杂志, 2020, 25(2): 137-140.
10
Chen Q, Xu JY, Carola G, et al. Simple electrocardiographic criteria for rapid identification of wide QRS complex tachycardia: The new limb lead algorithm [J]. Heart Rhythm, 2020, 17(3): 431-438.
11
Suzuki T, Nakamura Y, Yoshida S, et al. Differentiating fasciculoventricular pathway from Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome by electrocardiography [J]. Heart Rhythm, 2014, 11(4): 686-690.
12
Jastrzebski M, Kukla P, Crarnecka D. Ventricular tachycardia score-A novel method for wide QRS complex tachycardia differentiation-explained [J]. J Electrocardiol, 2017, 50(5): 704-709.
13
何秉贤. 预激综合征心电学诊断的相关问题 [J]. 临床心电学杂志, 2008, 17(6): 452-455.
[1] 居维竹, 陈明龙. 左心室假腱索起源室性心动过速一例[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2022, 10(01): 52-53.
阅读次数
全文


摘要