切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (10) : 919 -924. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2022.10.001

述评

立足阶梯化手术治疗理念,助力膝骨关节炎外科管理
关振鹏1,()   
  1. 1. 100144 北京,北京大学首钢医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-18 出版日期:2022-10-15
  • 通信作者: 关振鹏

Establishing stepwise surgical treatment concept to promote knee osteoarthritis management

Zhenpeng Guan1,()   

  1. 1. Orthopedics Department, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing 100144, China
  • Received:2022-10-18 Published:2022-10-15
  • Corresponding author: Zhenpeng Guan
引用本文:

关振鹏. 立足阶梯化手术治疗理念,助力膝骨关节炎外科管理[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(10): 919-924.

Zhenpeng Guan. Establishing stepwise surgical treatment concept to promote knee osteoarthritis management[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(10): 919-924.

膝骨关节炎是中老年人常见的一种退行性疾病。2018年制定的膝骨关节炎阶梯治疗专家共识,为膝骨关节炎提供了分期和对应的治疗方案。我们认为相对于可贯穿治疗全程的非手术治疗,手术治疗更具有阶段性特点。就此,我们提出膝骨关节炎的阶梯化手术治疗理念,根据对膝关节的解剖结构的保留程度,分4个阶梯,依次为膝关节镜手术、膝关节周围截骨术、部分膝关节置换术,全膝关节置换术。旨在实现治疗的个性化、精准化、微创化、智能化,尽量做降阶梯的手术。

Knee osteoarthritis is a common degenerative disease among middle and old aged people. The expert consensus on stepwise treatment of knee osteoarthritis was established in 2018, in which a staging system and matched therapeutic regimens have been provided. In our opinion, surgical treatment is more characteristic of steps compared with non-surgical treatment which can be throughout the process of management of knee osteoarthritis. So we put forward the concept of stepwise surgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis, which contains four steps (arthroscopic knee surgery, osteotomy around the knee, partial knee arthroplasty, and total knee arthroplasty) based on the extent of anatomy preservation in the knee, aiming to achieve individualization, precision, minimal invasiveness, and intellectualization during the management of knee osteoarthritis and try to perform the step-down surgery.

1
Ren Y, Hu J, Tan J, et al. Incidence and risk factors of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis among the Chinese population: analysis from a nationwide longitudinal study [J]. BMC public health, 2020, 20(1): 1491.
2
中华医学会骨科分会关节外科学组,吴阶平医学基金会骨科学专家委员会. 膝骨关节炎阶梯治疗专家共识(2018年版) [J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(1):124-130.
3
黄野. 坚持膝关节骨关节炎的阶梯化治疗 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2020, 26(12): 2.
4
Moseley JB, O'Malley K, Petersen NJ, et al. A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee [J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347(2): 81-88.
5
Kirkley A, Birmingham TB, Litchfield RB, et al. A randomized trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee [J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 359(11): 1097-1107.
6
Liebs TR, Ziebarth K, Berger S. Randomized controlled trials for arthroscopy in degenerative knee disease: was conservative therapy appropriately tried prior to arthroscopy? [J]. Arthroscopy, 2018, 34(5): 1680-1687.e1686.
7
LaPrade RF, Spalding T, Murray IR, et al. Knee arthroscopy: evidence for a targeted approach [J]. Br J Sports Med, 2020, 55(13): 707-708.
8
Beaufils P, Becker R, Kopf S, et al. Surgical management of degenerative meniscus lesions: the 2016 ESSKA meniscus consensus [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumato Arthrosc, 2017, 25(2): 335-346.
9
Abram SGF, Judge A, Beard DJ, et al. Rates of knee arthroplasty within one-year of undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in England: temporal trends, regional and age-group variation in conversion rates [J]. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2019, 27(10): 1420-1429.
10
Aprato A, Sordo L, Costantino A, et al. Outcomes at 20 years after meniscectomy in young patients [J]. The Knee, 2021, 29: 49-54.
11
Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Briggs KK. Microfracture to treat full-thickness chondral defects: surgical technique, rehabilitation, and outcomes [J]. J Knee Surg, 2002, 15(3): 170-176.
12
Ulstein S, Årøen A, Røtterud JH, et al. Microfracture technique versus osteochondral autologous transplantation mosaicplasty in patients with articular chondral lesions of the knee: a prospective randomized trial with long-term follow-up [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2014, 22(6): 1207-1215.
13
Ibarra C, Villalobos E, Madrazo-Ibarra A, et al. Arthroscopic matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation versus microfracture: A 6-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2021, 49(8): 2165-2176.
14
Kanakamedala AC, Hurley ET, Manjunath AK, et al. High tibial osteotomies for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee [J]. JBJS reviews, 2022, 10(1).
15
Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM, et al. A 12-28-year followup study of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, 452(91-96).
16
Gstöttner M, Michaela G, Pedross F, et al. Long-term outcome after high tibial osteotomy [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2008, 128(1): 111-115.
17
Akizuki S, Shibakawa A, Takizawa T, et al. The long-term outcome of high tibial osteotomy: a ten- to 20-year follow-up [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2008, 90(5): 592-596.
18
Rudan JF, Simurda MA. High tibial osteotomy. A prospective clinical and roentgenographic review [J]. Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1990, 255: 251-256.
19
Amendola A, Bonasia DE. Results of high tibial osteotomy: review of the literature [J]. Int Orthop, 2010, 34(2): 155-160.
20
Billings A, Scott DF, Camargo MP, et al. High tibial osteotomy with a calibrated osteotomy guide, rigid internal fixation, and early motion. Long-term follow-up [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2000, 82(1): 70-79.
21
Flamme CH, Rühmann O, Schmolke S, et al. Long-term outcome following high tibial osteotomy with tension bend principle [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2003, 123(1): 12-16.
22
van Wulfften Palthe AFY, Clement ND, Temmerman OPP, et al. Survival and functional outcome of high tibial osteotomy for medial knee osteoarthritis: a 10-20-year cohort study [J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2018, 28(7): 1381-1389.
23
Coventry MB, Ilstrup DM, Wallrichs SL. Proximal tibial osteotomy. A critical long-term study of eighty-seven cases [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1993, 75(2): 196-201.
24
DeMeo PJ, Johnson EM, Chiang PP, et al. Midterm follow-up of opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2010, 38(10): 2077-2084.
25
Majima T, Yasuda K, Aoki Y, et al. Impact of patellofemoral osteoarthritis on long-term outcome of high tibial osteotomy and effects of ventralization of tibial tubercle [J]. J Orthop Sci, 2008, 13(3): 192-197.
26
Kwon SK, Moon HK, Choi CJ, et al. Accelerated degeneration of the discoid lateral meniscus after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2015, 23(1): 97-103.
27
Prakash J, Song EK, Lim HA, et al. High tibial osteotomy accelerates lateral compartment osteoarthritis in discoid meniscus patients [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018, 26(6): 1845-1850.
28
Badhe NP, Forster IW. High tibial osteotomy in knee instability: the rationale of treatment and early results [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2002, 10(1): 38-43.
29
Dean CS, Liechti DJ, Chahla J, et al. Clinical outcomes of high tibial osteotomy for knee instability: a systematic review [J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2016, 4(3): 2325967116633419.
30
Mehl J, Paul J, Feucht MJ, et al. ACL deficiency and varus osteoarthritis: high tibial osteotomy alone or combined with ACL reconstruction? [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2017, 137(2): 233-240.
31
Sun H, Zhou L, Li F, et al. Comparison between Closing-Wedge and Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in Patients with Medial Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J]. J Knee Surg, 2017, 30(2): 158-165.
32
Amzallag J, Pujol N, Maqdes A, et al. Patellar height modification after high tibial osteotomy by either medial opening-wedge or lateral closing-wedge osteotomies [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013, 21(1): 255-259.
33
Ducat A, Sariali E, Lebel B, et al. Posterior tibial slope changes after opening- and closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a comparative prospective multicenter study [J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2012, 98(1): 68-74.
34
Kim JI, Kim BH, Lee KW, et al. Lower limb length discrepancy after high tibial osteotomy: prospective randomized controlled trial of lateral closing versus medial opening wedge osteotomy [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2016, 44(12): 3095-3102.
35
Koshino T, Yoshida T, Ara Y, et al. Fifteen to twenty-eight years' follow-up results of high tibial valgus osteotomy for osteoarthritic knee [J]. Knee, 2004, 11(6): 439-444.
36
Papachristou G, Plessas S, Sourlas J, et al. Deterioration of long-term results following high tibial osteotomy in patients under 60 years of age [J]. Int Orthop, 2006, 30(5): 403-408.
37
Davies AP, Vince AS, Shepstone L, et al. The radiologic prevalence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2002, (402): 206-212.
38
Kobayashi S, Pappas E, Fransen M, et al. The prevalence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2016, 24(10): 1697-1707.
39
Leadbetter WB, Seyler TM, Ragland PS, et al. Indications, contraindications, and pitfalls of patellofemoral arthroplasty [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, 122-137.
40
van der List JP, Chawla H, Zuiderbaan HA, et al. Survivorship and functional outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty: a systematic review [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017, 25(8): 2622-2631.
41
Clement ND, Howard TA, Immelman RJ, et al. Patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty for patients with patellofemoral osteoarthritis: equal function and satisfaction but higher revision rate for partial arthroplasty at a minimum eight years' follow-up [J]. Bone Joint J, 2019, 1: 41-46.
42
Chawla H, Nwachukwu BU, van der List JP, et al. Cost effectiveness of patellofemoral total knee arthroplasty in younger patients [J]. Bone Joint J, 2017, 99-B(8): 1028-1036.
43
Kozinn SC, Scott R. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1989, 71(1): 145-150.
44
White SH, Ludkowski PF, Goodfellow JW. Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1991, 73(4): 582-586.
45
Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, et al. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2011, 93(2): 198-204.
46
Murray DW, Parkinson RW. Usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty [J]. Bone Joint J, 2018, 100-B(4): 432-435.
47
Evans JT, Walker RW, Evans JP, et al. How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up [J]. Lancet (London, England), 2019, 393(10172): 655-663.
48
Arshi A, Sekimura T, Kelley BV, et al. Navigated and robot-assisted technology in total knee arthroplasty: do outcome differences achieve minimal clinically important difference? [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2022, 37(8): 1562-1569.
49
Rivière C, Jackson W, Villet L, et al. Specific case consideration for implanting TKA with the Kinematic Alignment technique [J]. EFORT Open Rev, 2021, 6(10): 881-891.
50
Risitano S, Cacciola G, Sabatini L, et al. Restricted kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of radiographic and clinical data [J]. J Orthop, 2022, 33: 37-43.
51
Alessio-Mazzola M, Clemente A, Russo A, et al. Clinical radiographic outcomes and survivorship of medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2022, 142(11): 3437-3448.
52
List R, Schütz P, Angst M, et al. Videofluoroscopic evaluation of the influence of a gradually reducing femoral radius on joint kinematics during daily activities in total knee arthroplasty [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2020, 35(10): 3010-3030.
53
Morra EA, Rosca M, Greenwald JF, et al. The influence of contemporary knee design on high flexion: a kinematic comparison with the normal knee [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008, 195-201.
54
Uivaraseanu B, Vesa CM, Tit DM, et al. Highlighting the advantages and benefits of cementless total knee arthroplasty (Review) [J]. Exp Ther Med, 2022, 23(1): 58.
55
Santoso MB, Wu L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, is it superior to high tibial osteotomy in treating unicompartmental osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis and systemic review [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2017, 12(1): 50.
56
Mikkelsen M, Wilson HA, Gromov K, et al. Comparing surgical strategies for end-stage anteromedial osteoarthritis : total versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty [J]. Bone Jt Open, 2022, 3(5): 441-447.
57
Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H, et al. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales [J]. Lancet (London, England), 2014, 384(9952): 1437-1445.
[1] 欧阳剑锋, 李炳权, 叶永恒, 胡少宇, 向阳. 关节镜联合富血小板血浆治疗粘连性肩周炎的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 765-772.
[2] 罗旺林, 杨传军, 许国星, 俞建国, 孙伟东, 颜文娟, 冯志. 开放性楔形胫骨高位截骨术不同植入材料的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 818-826.
[3] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[4] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[5] 肖志满, 龚煜, 谢景凌, 刘斌伟. 上下肢关节镜手术后患者下肢深静脉血栓发生的对比研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 601-606.
[6] 杨国栋, 张辉, 郭珈, 曲迪, 张静, 戚超. 外侧半月板后角撕裂是否修复的术后疗效对比[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 619-624.
[7] 张中斌, 付琨朋, 朱凯, 张玉, 李华. 胫骨高位截骨术与富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 633-641.
[8] 马鹏程, 刘伟, 张思平. 股骨髋臼撞击综合征关节镜手术中闭合关节囊的疗效影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 653-662.
[9] 陈山林, 魏绮珮, 刘畅. 腕关节假体:路在何方?[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 469-475.
[10] 吴香敏, 吴鹏. 超声引导下收肌管阻滞联合腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙阻滞在老年患者全膝关节置换术中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 516-522.
[11] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[12] 周晓强, 孙超, 虞宵, 金宇杰, 李志强, 张向鑫, 陈广祥. 同一患者同期行全膝和单髁置换术的早期临床疗效[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 275-281.
[13] 马聪, 李雪靖, 郑晓佐, 张晓阳, 段坤峰, 刘国强, 郄素会. 关节腔内注射富血小板血浆与透明质酸钠治疗Ⅰ-Ⅲ期膝骨关节炎的对比研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 282-288.
[14] 付庆鹏, 邓晓强, 高伟, 姜福民, 范永峰, 吴海贺, 齐岩松, 包呼日查, 徐永胜. 新型股骨测量定位器在全膝关节置换术中的临床应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 980-987.
[15] 刘新光, 杨滨, 刘晨, 王晓华, 张克. 股骨前皮质切割在前、后参考系统全膝关节置换术中发生的对比研究及锯片摆动偏差分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 507-512.
阅读次数
全文


摘要