切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (10) : 989 -994. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2022.10.012

临床研究

结肠镜下结直肠息肉及腺瘤检出率的影响因素
丁一鸣1, 白鹏1, 张蕾1, 李欣1, 杨雪松1, 曾冉冉1, 范雪1, 王妍1, 王丽1, 林香春1,()   
  1. 1. 100000 北京:北京大学国际医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-03 出版日期:2022-10-15
  • 通信作者: 林香春

Factors influencing the detection rate of colorectal polyps and adenomas by colonoscopy

Yiming Ding1, Peng Bai1, Lei Zhang1, Xin Li1, Xuesong Yang1, Ranran Zeng1, Xue Fan1, Yan Wang1, Li Wang1, Xiangchun Lin1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 1000000, China
  • Received:2021-08-03 Published:2022-10-15
  • Corresponding author: Xiangchun Lin
引用本文:

丁一鸣, 白鹏, 张蕾, 李欣, 杨雪松, 曾冉冉, 范雪, 王妍, 王丽, 林香春. 结肠镜下结直肠息肉及腺瘤检出率的影响因素[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(10): 989-994.

Yiming Ding, Peng Bai, Lei Zhang, Xin Li, Xuesong Yang, Ranran Zeng, Xue Fan, Yan Wang, Li Wang, Xiangchun Lin. Factors influencing the detection rate of colorectal polyps and adenomas by colonoscopy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(10): 989-994.

目的

探讨结肠镜对于结直肠息肉/腺瘤的诊断及其影响因素。

方法

以自2017年1月1日至2019年12月31日北京大学国际医院行结肠镜检查的病人为对象,记录患者的性别、年龄、是否麻醉、肠道清洁度情况、进镜时间、检查医师、息肉/腺瘤诊断情况。应用单因素卡方检验,分析息肉/腺瘤检出率和上述因素的关系,再进行Logistic多因素分析得出息肉/腺瘤检出率的独立危险因素。

结果

共有6679例患者纳入研究,男性3297例,女性3382例,年龄55.98±9.79岁,结肠息肉检出率为47.25%,结肠腺瘤检出率为30.93%,单因素分析显示性别、年龄分层、麻醉状态、肠道清洁度、进镜时间以及检查医师经验影响结直肠腺瘤检出率,多因素分析显示患者性别、年龄、肠道清洁度、进镜时间及检查医师经验是结直肠腺瘤检出率的影响因素。

结论

患者性别、年龄与结肠息肉/腺瘤检出有关,需要做好肠道准备、提高医师检查经验,以提高结肠息肉/腺瘤检出率。

Objective

To explore the diagnosis of colorectal polyps/adenomas by colonoscopy and its influencing factors.

Methods

Patients who underwent colonoscopy at Peking University International Hospital from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019 were selected as study subjects. Gender, age, anesthesia, intestinal cleanliness, time of admission, examining physician, and diagnosis of polyps/adenomas were recorded. Univariate Chi-square test was used to analyze the relationship between the detection rate of polyps/adenomas and the above factors, and then the independent risk factors affecting the detection rate of polyps/adenomas were identified by Logistic multivariate analysis.

Results

A total of 6679 patients were included in the study, including 3297 males and 3382 females, aged 55.98±9.79 years. The detection rate for colon polyps was 47.25%, and the detection rate for colorectal adenomas was 30.93%. Univariate analysis showed that gender, age group, anesthesia, intestinal cleanliness, time of endoscopic examination, and experience of examining physician affected the detection rate for colorectal adenomas. Multivariate analysis showed that gender, age, intestinal cleanliness, time of endoscopic examination, and experience of examining physician were factors affecting the detection rate of colorectal adenomas.

Conclusion

The gender and age of patients are related to the detection of colon polyps/adenomas. It is necessary to make good bowel preparation and improve the experience of examining doctors, so as to improve the detection rate for colon polyps/adenomas.

表1 影响PDR及ADR的因素分析(卡方检验)
表2 影响PDR及ADR的多因素Logistic分析
1
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2020年版) [J]. 中华外科杂志, 2020, 58(8): 561-585.
2
Shaukat A, Kahi CJ, Burke CA, et al. ACG clinical guidelines: colorectal cancer screening 2021 [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2021, 116(3): 458-479.
3
Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2015, 81(1): 31-53.
4
Bjorkman DJ, Popp JWJr. Measuring the quality of endoscopy [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2006, 63(4 Suppl): S1-2.
5
中华人民共和国卫生和计划生育委员会医政医管局, 中华医学会肿瘤学分会. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2017年版) [J]. 中华外科杂志, 2018, 56(4): 241-258.
6
国家卫生计生委医政医管局, 中华医学会肿瘤学分会. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2015版) [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015(10): 961-973.
7
Aronchick CA, Lipshutz WH, Wright SH, et al. A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2000, 52(3): 346-52.
8
Kaminski MF, Wieszczy P, Rupinski M, et al. Increased rate of adenoma detection associates with reduced risk of colorectal cancer and death [J]. Gastroenterology, 2017, 153(1): 98-105.
9
Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death [J]. N Engl J Med, 2014, 370(14): 1298-306.
10
Krigel A, Patel A, Kaplan J, et al. Anesthesia assistance in screening colonoscopy and adenoma detection rate among trainees [J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2020, 65(4): 961-968.
11
郭蕊, 王拥军, 张灵烨, 等. 结肠镜检查质量评价的单中心回顾性横断面分析 [J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2019, 18(7): 747-752.
12
Sedation in screening colonoscopy: impact on quality indicators and complications [J]. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2012, 107(12): 1837-1848.
13
Zhao S, Yang X, Wang S, et al. Impact of 9-minute withdrawal time on the adenoma detection rate: a multicenter randomized controlled trial [J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2022, 20(2): e168-e181.
14
中国医师协会内镜医师分会消化内镜专业委员会, 中国抗癌协会肿瘤内镜学专业委员会, 李兆申, 等. 中国消化内镜诊疗相关肠道准备指南精简版(2019年, 上海) [J]. 中华消化杂志, 2019, 39(7): 438-443.
15
Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline - update 2019 [J]. Endoscopy. 2019 Aug; 51(8):775-794.
16
Niedermaier T, Amitay EL, Gies A, et al. Impact of inadequate bowel cleansing on colonoscopic findings in routine screening practice [J]. Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 2020, 11(4) e00169.
17
Choi JM, Seo JY, Lee J, et al. Longer withdrawal time is more important than excellent bowel preparation in colonoscopy of adequate bowel preparation [J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2021, 66(4): 1168-1174.
18
Adike A, Buras MR, Gurudu SR, et al. Is the level of cleanliness using segmental Boston bowel preparation scale associated with a higher adenoma detection rate? [J] Ann Gastroenterol, 2018, 31(2): 217-223.
19
姜元喜, 陈莹, 李信, 等. 结直肠癌筛查高危患者结肠镜下息肉与腺瘤检出率的影响因素 [J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2015, 32(10): 649-652.
20
Nakshabendi R, Berry AC, Munoz JC, et al. Choice of sedation and its impact on adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopies [J]. Ann Gastroenterol, 2016, 29(1): 50-55.
[1] 张国锋, 屈欣荣, 李艳, 张春, 刘蕾. 基于空芯针穿刺活组织检查的乳腺纤维上皮性肿瘤患者治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 264-268.
[2] 宋玟焱, 杜美君, 陈佳丽, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 唇腭裂手术围手术期疼痛管理的研究进展及基于生物材料治疗新方法的展望[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 397-405.
[3] 杨建波, 马欢, 黄小梅, 刘华柱. 结肠镜辅助下EMR、CSP和RFA术治疗直径<1cm结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 76-79.
[4] 杜伟, 廖土明, 李雄才, 关刚强, 何燊, 吴佳桥, 朱和荣. 2%利多卡因凝胶和润滑剂凝胶在女性尿流动力学检查中应用的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 613-617.
[5] 杨勇军, 曾一鸣, 贺显雅, 卢强, 李远伟. ASA分级≥Ⅲ级患者局麻经会阴前列腺多模态影像融合穿刺的安全性和有效性[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-447.
[6] 何岩, 向文采. 七氟醚与异丙酚联合氯胺酮麻醉在疝修补术中的镇静镇痛效果及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 566-569.
[7] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[8] 丁亚琴, 方旭, 戴彦成. 基于紧密型医联体的“一免三优先政策”在基层消化道肿瘤筛查中的应用探讨[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 481-484.
[9] 丁富贵, 吴泽涛, 董卫国. 家族性腺瘤性息肉病临床特征及生物信息学分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 512-518.
[10] 杭丽, 张耀辉, 孙文恺. 参菝抗瘤液对结直肠腺瘤性息肉术后肠道功能、炎症指标及复发情况的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 413-416.
[11] 王湛, 李文坤, 杨奕, 徐芳, 周敏思, 苏珈仪, 王亚丹, 吴静. 炎症指标在早发性结直肠肿瘤中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 802-810.
[12] 胡小靖, 张华. 妊娠期卵巢囊肿蒂扭转的诊断与治疗[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 197-201.
[13] 牟一, 张力凡, 胡兵. 圈套器冷切除术在结直肠息肉应用中的最新进展[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 253-258.
[14] 赵云云, 柴宁莉, 冯秀雪, 令狐恩强. 胰腺囊腺瘤的诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 263-267.
[15] 王帅, 敖永强, 丁建勇. 胸膜播散或胸膜复发胸腺瘤的新兴治疗策略——手术联合胸腔热灌注化疗[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 236-241.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?