切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (09) : 988 -994. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2023.09.010

临床研究

超声应变力弹性成像联合MRI-DWI靶向引导穿刺在前列腺病变诊断中的应用
赵文毅, 邹冰子, 蔡冠晖, 刘永志, 温红()   
  1. 516001 广东惠州,惠州市中心人民医院超声医学科
    516001 广东惠州,惠州市中心人民医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-06 出版日期:2023-09-15
  • 通信作者: 温红
  • 基金资助:
    广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(A2020554)

Application of ultrasound strain elastography combined with MRI-DWI guided targeted puncture in diagnosis of prostate lesions

Wenyi Zhao, Bingzi Zou, Guanhui Cai, Yongzhi Liu, Hong Wen()   

  1. Ultrasound Medicine Department, Huizhou Central People's Hospital, Huizhou 516001, China
    Radiology Department, Huizhou Central People's Hospital, Huizhou 516001, China
  • Received:2023-04-06 Published:2023-09-15
  • Corresponding author: Hong Wen
引用本文:

赵文毅, 邹冰子, 蔡冠晖, 刘永志, 温红. 超声应变力弹性成像联合MRI-DWI靶向引导穿刺在前列腺病变诊断中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(09): 988-994.

Wenyi Zhao, Bingzi Zou, Guanhui Cai, Yongzhi Liu, Hong Wen. Application of ultrasound strain elastography combined with MRI-DWI guided targeted puncture in diagnosis of prostate lesions[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(09): 988-994.

目的

探讨超声应变力弹性成像(SUE)联合磁共振扩散加权成像(MRI-DWI)靶向引导穿刺诊断前列腺病变的价值。

方法

前瞻性收集2019年5月至2022年5月于惠州市中心人民医院就诊的疑似前列腺占位性病变患者为研究对象,患者穿刺前均进行直肠超声、SUE、MRI-DWI检查,记录可疑区域;患者均进行直肠超声引导下经直肠前列腺系统穿刺,同时对SUE联合MRI-DWI检查的可疑病灶进行靶向穿刺。记录影像学特征;以病理结果为“金标准”,比较系统穿刺与靶向穿刺的阳性检出情况;绘制表观扩散系数(ADC)值的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,分析ADC值诊断前列腺病变的价值;同时比较两种穿刺活检方案的Gleason评分情况。

结果

共105例疑似前列腺占位性病变患者纳入本次研究,其中2例因自身心理原因不配合穿刺退出研究,最终103例患者纳入本次研究。103例患者均成功穿刺并取材送检,其中病理诊断为前列腺癌66例,占64.08%(66/103),均为腺癌;良性前列腺增生为37例,占35.92%(37/103),其中2例合并上皮内瘤变。MRI-DWI联合SUE共59例患者为恶性病变,其中MRI-DWI检查为55例,而SUE检查为57例为恶性病变。在恶性病变患者中MRI-DWI检查T2WI可见病灶,出现结节状低信号,DWI图像成呈高信号,ADC图显示ADC值较小;SUE检查可发现蓝色硬度增高区。直肠超声系统穿刺的恶性病变检查率为48.54%,SUE联合MRI-DWI靶向引导穿刺为57.28%;两者比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。系统穿刺法共穿刺了1181针,其中病理诊断为恶性病变共379针,单针检出率为32.09%;SUE联合MRI-DWI靶向引导共穿刺218针,病理诊断为恶性病变共136针,单针检出率为62.38%,靶向引导穿刺的单针检出率明显高于系统穿刺(P<0.05)。恶性病变者中ADC值为(1.18±0.17)mm2/s,良性病变者中ADC值为(1.42±0.23)mm2/s,恶性病变者ADC值小于良性病变者(t=6.303,P<0.001)。ADC诊断前列腺恶性病变的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.816(95%CI:0.718~0.914),将ADC值取1.34 mm2/s作为界点评估前列腺良恶性病变的敏感度、特异度为为83.33%、67.57%。两种穿刺方案的Gleason评分情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

与系统穿刺相比,SUE联合MRI-DWI靶向引导穿刺可通过较少的穿刺针数获得相似的前列腺恶性病变检出率,且穿刺的阳性率较高。

Objective

To explore the value of ultrasound strain elastography (SUE) combined with magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (MRI-DWI) guided targeted puncture in the diagnosis of prostate lesions.

Methods

Patients with suspected prostate space-occupying lesions who were treated at Huizhou Central People's Hospital from May 2019 to May 2022 were prospectively collected as the research subjects. Rectal ultrasound, SUE, and MRI-DWI were performed before puncture, and the suspicious areas were recorded. All patients underwent transrectal systematic prostate puncture under the guidance of rectal ultrasound, and targeted puncture of suspicious lesions under the guidance of SUE combined with MRI-DWI. The imaging characteristics were recorded. Taking the pathological results as the "gold standard", the positive detection rates by systematic puncture and targeted puncture were compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was plotted to analyze the value of ADC in diagnosing prostate lesions. The Gleason scores of the two puncture biopsy schemes were compared.

Results

A total of 105 patients with suspected prostate space-occupying lesions were included in this study, of which two withdrew from the study due to their own psychological reasons. Finally, 103 patients were included in this study. All 103 patients were successfully punctured and sampled for examination, among which 66 (64.08%) were pathologically diagnosed with prostate cancer (all were adenocarcinoma). There were 37 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia, accounting for 35.92% (37/103), of which two were accompanied by intraepithelial neoplasia. A total of 59 patients were diagnosed with malignant lesions, including 55 cases by MRI-DWI and 57 cases by SUE. In patients with malignant lesions, MRI-DWI examination (T2WI) showed that the lesions had nodular low signal, DWI showed high signal, ADC map showed that the ADC value was low, and SUE examination can find a blue area with increased hardness. The malignant lesion detection rate by systematic puncture was 48.54%, and that of SUE combined with MRI-DWI targeted guided puncture was 57.28%; there was no statistical significant difference between them (P>0.05). A total of 1181 needles were used in systematic puncture, of which 379 achieved a pathological diagnosis of malignant lesions, with a single needle detection rate of 32.09%. A total of 218 needles were punctured under the guidance of SUE and MRI-DWI, and 136 needles achieved a pathological diagnosis of malignant lesions, with a single needle detection rate of 62.38%. The single needle detection rate by targeted guidance puncture was significantly higher than that by systematic puncture (P<0.05). The ADC value in malignant lesions was (1.18±0.17) mm2/s, while in benign lesions it was (1.42±0.23) mm2/s; the ADC value in malignant lesions was lower than that in benign lesions (t=6.303, P<0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of ADC for diagnosis of benign and malignant prostatic lesions was 0.816 (95%CI: 0.718-0.914). The sensitivity and specificity of evaluating benign and malignant prostatic lesions using an ADC value of 1.34 mm2/s as the cutoff point were 83.33% and 67.57%, respectively. There was no statistical significant difference in Gleason scores between the two puncture schemes (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with systematic puncture, SUE combined with MRI-DWI guided targeted puncture can obtain a similar detection rate of prostate malignant lesions with less puncture needles and a higher positive rate of puncture.

图1 MRI-DWI、SUE检查前列腺恶性病变图像特征图。图a为经直肠超声探及前列腺左叶可疑低回声结节(白色箭头);图b为经直肠应变力弹性成像提示蓝色硬度增高区(白色箭头);图c为磁共振T2WI显示中央叶结节状影,累及左侧外周带(白色箭头);图d为DWI显示该病灶呈高信号(白色箭头);图e为ADC图显示该病灶呈低信号(白色箭头);图f为活检病理提示前列腺腺癌(Gleason评分7分) 注:ADC为表观扩散系数;DWI为扩散加权成像
表1 系统穿刺与靶向穿刺的阳性检出情况
图2 ADC值诊断前列腺病变的ROC曲线
表2 ADC值诊断前列腺病变的价值
表3 两种穿刺活检方案的Gleason评分情况[例(%)]
1
庄君龙, 尹皓立, 阚延晟, 等. 经会阴前列腺靶向穿刺和系统穿刺与根治术后病理结果的一致性分析 [J]. 江苏大学学报(医学版), 2020, 30(4): 361-363, 368.
2
Pilatz A, Dimitropoulos K, Veeratterapillay R, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of infectious complications following prostate biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Urol, 2020, 204(2): 224-230.
3
Steinwender T, Manka L, Grindei M, et al. Elastography targeted prostate biopsy in patients under active surveillance [J]. Urol Int, 2020, 104(11-12): 948-953.
4
Morris DC, Chan DY, Lye TH, et al. Multiparametric ultrasound for targeting prostate cancer: combining ARFI, SWEI, QUS and B-Mode [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2020, 46(12): 3426-3439.
5
Yoshida S, Takahara T, Arita Y, et al. Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Diagnosis and follow up of prostate cancer and beyond [J]. Int J Urol, 2021, 28(5): 502-513.
6
Miyagawa T, Tsutsumi M, Matsumura T, et al.Real-time elastography for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: evaluation of elastoimagedata moving images [J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2009, 39(6): 394-398.
7
中华医学会病理学分会泌尿男性生殖系统疾病病理专家组. 前列腺癌规范化标本取材及病理诊断共识 [J]. 中华病理学杂志, 2016, 45(10): 676-680.
8
化宏金, 张智弘. 基于前列腺癌Gleason评分系统的新分级系统 [J]. 中华病理学杂志, 2016, 45(7): 495-497.
9
Tracy CR, Flynn KJ, Sjoberg DD, et al. Optimizing MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: the diagnostic benefit of additional targeted biopsy cores [J]. Urol Oncol, 2021, 39(3): 193.
10
Kim CH, Kim CK, Park JJ, et al. Yield of concurrent systemic biopsy during MRI-targeted biopsy according to prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 in patients with suspected prostate cancer [J]. Eur Radiol, 2021, 31(3): 1667-1675.
11
Zhang Q, Yao J, Cai Y, et al. Elevated hardness of peripheral gland on real-time elastography is an independent marker for high-risk prostate cancers [J]. Radiol Med, 2017, 122(12): 944-951.
12
Kanagaraju V, Ashlyin PVK, Elango N, et al. Role of transrectal ultrasound elastography in the diagnosis of prostate carcinoma [J]. J Med Ultrasound, 2020, 28(3): 173-178.
13
Sato T, Isoda H, Fujimoto K, et al. Evaluation of weighted diffusion subtraction for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 54(6): 1979-1988.
14
Bulten W, Pinckaers H, van Boven H, et al. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2020, 21(2): 233-241.
15
朱云开, 陈亚青, 蒋珺, 等. 前列腺体积对实时弹性成像目标穿刺准确性的影响 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2018, 27(1): 64-68.
[1] 方晔, 谢晓红, 罗辉. 品管圈在提高前列腺癌穿刺检出率中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 722-727.
[2] 曹建辉, 徐栋, 冯斌, 郑俊彪, 黄伟伟. 超声造影在不同前列腺特异抗原含量前列腺癌穿刺活检中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(03): 307-312.
[3] 梁健, 何京伟, 关文峰, 梁其炎, 冯能卓, 黄亦欣, 覃文超. 多参数MRI与超声认知融合引导下前列腺靶向穿刺的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 558-562.
[4] 张凯, 张志鹏, 朱刚, 刘明. 两种核磁靶向穿刺诊断有临床意义前列腺癌精确性的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 293-296.
[5] 郑婧, 杨翠, 周奕, 王然, 杨林. 磁共振弥散加权成像在胃癌诊治中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 393-397.
阅读次数
全文


摘要