切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (01) : 24 -29. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2024.01.005

临床研究

双“8”字捆绑联合双克氏针在陈旧性骨性锤状指中的临床应用
江起庭1,(), 姚翔1, 何兵1, 邱福平1, 程健1, 王斌1, 杨玲玲1   
  1. 1. 210048 南京,南京江北医院手足显微外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-17 出版日期:2024-01-15
  • 通信作者: 江起庭

Clinical application of bundling bone fragments with double figure-of-eight suture combined with double Kirschner wire in bony mallet finger

Qiting Jiang1,(), Xiang Yao1, Bing He1, Fuping Qiu1, Jian Cheng1, Bin Wang1, Lingling Yang1   

  1. 1. Department of Hand and Foot Microsurgery, Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital, Nanjiang 210048, China
  • Received:2023-11-17 Published:2024-01-15
  • Corresponding author: Qiting Jiang
引用本文:

江起庭, 姚翔, 何兵, 邱福平, 程健, 王斌, 杨玲玲. 双“8”字捆绑联合双克氏针在陈旧性骨性锤状指中的临床应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 24-29.

Qiting Jiang, Xiang Yao, Bing He, Fuping Qiu, Jian Cheng, Bin Wang, Lingling Yang. Clinical application of bundling bone fragments with double figure-of-eight suture combined with double Kirschner wire in bony mallet finger[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 24-29.

目的

探讨双“8”字捆绑联合双克氏针在陈旧性骨性锤状指中的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2021年6月至2023年5月南京江北医院手足显微外科收治的24例(指)陈旧性骨性锤状指患者临床资料,缝线双“8”字形捆绑骨块于末节指骨基底部。6周拔除克氏针后逐步加强患指伸屈运动,测量患指及各关节的主动屈伸活动范围,记录手指总的主动活动度(TAM)及远指间关节活动度(ROM);参照美国手外科协会TAM系统评定手指功能。

结果

共纳入24例(24指),男性14例,女性10例,年龄16~54岁。根据Wehbe和Schneider分型:Ⅰ:a型5例,b型5例;Ⅱ:a型8例,b型4例;Ⅲ:a型1例,b型1例。受伤至手术时间21~64 d。切口一期愈合,无断针及脱针现象。骨折处均对位可愈合佳,锤状指畸形均完全矫正。24例患指术后获随访,随访时间为6.0~9.3个月。末次随访患指的远指间关节ROM为28.5°~39.2°[31.5°(31.1°,33.7°)],与对应健指的远指间关节ROM为30.6°~40.2°[31.8°(32.°1,35.2°)]比较无统计学意义(Z=-3.92,P=0.724);患指TAM为229.4°~238.5°[232.2°(230.8°,234.5°)]与对应健指的TAM为230.2°~241.3°[234.1°(233.5°,235.7°)],差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.84,P=0.314)。以TAM系统评定标准:优21例,良3例,优良率为100%。

结论

缝线双“8”字捆绑骨块联合双克氏针,固定牢固且持久,能有效治疗陈旧性骨性锤状指,是一种实用而简便的方法。

Objective

To assess the clinical curative effect of bundling bone fragments with double figure-of-eight suture in bony mallet finger.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 24 patients (24 fingers) with chronic bony mallet finger who underwent surgery at the Department of Hand and Foot Microsurgery of Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital from June 2021 to May 2023. During the procedure, bundling bone fragment with double figure-of-eight suture was performed on the base of the distal phalanx. After removal of the Kirschner wire at postoperative 6 weeks, the flexion and extension of the affected finger were gradually strengthened, the range of motion (ROM) and the total active range of motion (TAM) of the finger were recorded. Finger function was evaluated according to the TAM system of the American Association of Hand Surgeons.

Results

A total of 24 patients were enrolled, including 14 males and 10 females, and the age ranged from 16 to 54 years old. According to the Wehbe and Schneider classification, there were 5 cases of type Ia, 5 cases of type Ib, 8 cases of type IIa, 4 cases of type IIb, 1 cases of type Ⅲa, and 1 cases of type Ⅲb. The range of time from injury to operation was 21 days to 64 days. All incisions healed well, with no broken nail and no shedding nail. Mallet finger deformities were all corrected postoperatively, and all fractures healed well. All the 24 cases were followed, and the follow-up period was 6.0 to 9.3 months. At the last follow-up, the mean active ROM of the distal interphalangeal joint of the injured finger was 28.5°~39.2° [31.5° (31.1°, 33.7°)], and the mean active ROM of the distal interphalangeal joint of the healthy finger was 30.6°~40.2° [31.8° (32.°1, 35.2°)]. There was no significant difference in ROM between the injured finger and the healthy finger (Z=-3.92, P=0.724). The TAM of the injured finger was 229.4°~238.5° [232.2° (230.8°, 234.5°)], and that of the healthy finger was 230.2°~241.3° [234.1° (233.5°, 235.7°)]. There was no significant difference in TAM between the injured finger and the healthy finger (Z=-1.84, P=0.314). According to the evaluation criteria of the TAM system, 21 cases had excellent outcomes, and 3 had good outcomes, and the rate of excellent and good outcomes was 100%.

Conclusion

Satisfactory therapeutic outcomes for bony mallet finger deformity can be achieved by bundling bone fragment with double figure-of-eight suture, and it is an effective and practical method.

图1 双“8”字捆绑联合双克氏针治疗骨性锤状指示意图。图a为缝线双“8”字捆绑骨块联合双克氏针整体示意图;图b为局部放大示意图
图2 患者男,36岁,右小指扭伤后伴锤状指畸形22 d,行缝线双“8”字捆绑骨块联合双克氏针治疗。图a为右小指DIPJ伸直受限-25°,屈曲畸形;图b为术前X线示右小指末节指骨基底部有撕脱骨块;图c为术中见撕脱的骨块(黑箭头指示);图d为术中第一个“8”字捆绑骨块(黑箭头指示);图e为术中第二个“8”字捆绑骨块,形成双“8”字捆绑(黑箭头指示);图f为关闭切口;图g为术后X线侧位片显示右小指2枚克氏针针尾相钩,1枚克氏针过伸位10°穿过DIPJ固定,另1枚克氏针阻挡弹性加压骨块;图h为术后7.4个月右小指DIPJ主动伸直0°;图i为术后7.4个月右小指DIPJ主动活动度为31.5°及右小指TAM为232.2°;图j为术后7.4个月患侧指与健侧指在伸直度数方面比较无差别;图k为术后7.4个月患侧指与健侧指在屈曲度数方面比较也无差别,恢复正常工作及生活
1
Uyar I, Aksam E, Patat E. Evaluation of tautening method in repair of advanced mallet finger without bone fracture[J]. Hand Surg Rehabil, 2022, 41(4): 494-499.
2
Velez MLAM, Medina MAR, Lopez RP, et al. Stack splinting versus kirschner wire treatment in acute closed mallet finger doyle I[J] Plast Surg (Oakv). 2022, 30(2): 117-121.
3
Wehbé MA, Schneider LH. Mallet fractures[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1984, 66(5): 658669.
4
Giddins G. Tendinous and bony mallet finger: mechanisms of injury[J]. J Hand Surg Eur, 2021, 46(6): 682-684.
5
Nashi N, Sebastin SJ. A pragmatic and evidence-based approach to mallet finger[J]. J Hand Surg Asian Pac, 2021, 26(3): 319-332.
6
Ayhan E, Kuzucu Y, Aslaner EE, et alEvaluating stack splint use for mallet finger[J]. J Hand Surg Asian Pac, 2021, 26(1): 47-51.
7
Giddins G. Mallet finger: Two different injuries[J]. Hand Clin, 2022, 38(3): 281-288.
8
江起庭, 李智, 邱福平, 等. 双克氏针结合“8”字捆绑治疗陈旧性骨性锤状指[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2023, 39(8): 744-747.
9
江起庭, 李智, 邱福平, 等. “8”字捆绑联合弹性固定治疗骨性锤状指[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2023, 28(10): 652-656.
10
江起庭, 汪海滨, 孟丛鹏, 等. 经皮八针法缝合修复闭合性 Ⅰ区指伸肌腱断裂[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2021, 41(23): 1701-1707.
11
Wakasugi T, Suzuki H, Shirasaka R. Mallet finger fracture through enchondroma of the distal phalanx[J]. J Hand Microsurg, 2020, 12(3): 208-211.
12
黄少帆, 汪强, 黄健曦. 克氏针固定锤状指畸形效果及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华生物医学工程杂志, 2018, 24(2): 126-129.
13
胡沣, 陈前永, 董志远, 等. 改良石黑法治疗陈旧性骨性锤状指的临床疗效[J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2021, 44(5): 556-567.
14
Rendón-Medina MA, Hanson-Viana E, Mendoza-Vélez MA, et al. Comparison of wire versus Nylon in Bonny-Mallet Finger treated with pull-out surgery[J]. Cir Cir, 2022, 90(S2): 23-28.
15
王光辉, 傅子财, 刘建全, 等. 末节指骨背侧撕脱骨折钩钢板与克氏针固定的疗效分析[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2022, 38(3): 161-164.
16
Toci GR, Tecce ER, Katt BM, et al. Splinting versus Percutaneous Pinning for the Treatment of Soft Tissue Mallet Finger: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis[J]. J Hand Surg Asian Pac. 2022,27(6):952-956.
17
陈乐锋, 陈泽华, 余少校, 等. 克氏针旋转扣压法治疗骨性锤状指[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2019, 35(1): 71-72.
18
杨焕友, 王斌, 李瑞国, 等. 双扣压法治疗骨性锤状指[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2020, 36(6): 469-470.
19
陈金, 王光勇, 李有方, 等. 经末节指骨隧道抗菌缝线固定与单纯克氏针治疗陈旧性骨性锤状指的疗效比较[J] .中华手外科杂志, 2022, 38(5): 399-401.
20
Peng C, Huang RW, Chen SH, et al.Comparative outcomes between surgical treatment and orthosis splint for mallet finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2023,10:1-10.
[1] 欧梁, 齐麒, 胡伟伟, 卢敏, 黄彦昌, 黄维琛, 匡建军. 股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与其它内固定治疗股骨颈骨折对比[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 92-105.
[2] 齐伟亚, 方杰, 吴衡, 刘波. 掌侧小切口联合腕关节镜治疗AO-C型桡骨远端骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 577-582.
[3] 莫亮, 熊贤梅, 马超, 刘予豪, 陈镇秋, 何伟, 周驰. 股骨颈骨折内固定术后因素与股骨头坏死关系的分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 735-744.
[4] 唐小花, 孙建霞, 王君, 王美青. 预测老年股骨粗隆间骨折术后并发症的列线图模型构建[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 677-682.
[5] 周晓强, 孙超, 李志强, 徐人杰, 佘远时, 张向鑫, 陈广祥, 虞宵. 动力抗旋交叉钉治疗不稳定股骨颈骨折的早期疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 670-676.
[6] 毛文文, 陈昊, 李立, 朱友森, 张敏, 陈刚. Pilon骨折术后发生手术部位感染的危险因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 309-314.
[7] 麦绍声, 陈小磊, 李洁云, 谭丹, 黎凌云, 吴春辉. 髌骨骨折钉线张力带固定与早期功能锻炼的评估[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 776-780.
[8] 王广东, 黎立, 闫涛, 李靖扬, 乔为民. 索绑系统治疗不同类型股骨假体周围骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 761-764.
[9] 邓玖征, 袁野, 朱剑津, 何大炜, 赵喆, 赵锋, 孔德敬, 潘勇卫. 基于成人掌骨形态学数据设计的掌骨弹性髓内针治疗掌骨骨折的生物力学研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(04): 330-335.
[10] 张琳袁, 吴佳俊, 崔煦, 沈超, 付备刚, 崔崟, 王秀会, 蔡攀. 大结节解剖钢板与PHILOS内固定治疗伴肩关节脱位的Mutch I/II型肱骨大结节骨折的疗效差异[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 139-145.
[11] 金宇杰, 虞宵, 周晓强, 李志强, 徐人杰, 张向鑫, 陈广祥. 动力交叉钉系统治疗股骨颈骨折其内固定位置与临床疗效的相关性研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 193-200.
[12] 周彤, 尚运涛, 马莹莹, 张延祠, 李军勇. 锚钉技术治疗糖尿病与非糖尿病患者腱性锤状指畸形的疗效分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(01): 29-34.
[13] 高金伟. 经皮伤椎置钉与否对胸腰椎骨折疗效的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(05): 291-297.
[14] 丰瑞兵, 王华松, 庞炯宇, 姜壮, 蔡贤华. 锁定钢板加克氏针埋头技术(Lost K-wire)治疗伴关节面塌陷的尺骨鹰嘴骨折的临床研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2020, 06(06): 334-339.
[15] 孙彦豹, 金宝城. 经皮椎弓根钉内固定结合磷酸钙骨水泥伤椎强化治疗胸腰段骨折[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2020, 06(02): 80-87.
阅读次数
全文


摘要