切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (09) : 811 -819. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2024.09.003

临床研究

股骨前髁预截骨髓外定位技术在全膝关节置换术中的应用
王松雷1, 张贻良1, 孟浩1, 宋威1, 白林晨1, 袁心1, 张辉2,()   
  1. 1.223800 江苏宿迁,宿迁第三医院关节科
    2.100144 北京,北京大学首钢医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-02 出版日期:2024-09-15
  • 通信作者: 张辉

Application of a new extramedullary reference technique with pre-osteotomy of anterior femoral condyle in total knee arthroplasty

Songlei Wang1, Yiliang Zhang1, Hao Meng1, Wei Song1, Linchen Bai1, Xin Yuan1, Hui Zhang2,()   

  1. 1.Department of Joint Diseases, Suqian Third Hospital, Suqian 223800, China
    2.Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing 100144, China
  • Received:2024-06-02 Published:2024-09-15
  • Corresponding author: Hui Zhang
引用本文:

王松雷, 张贻良, 孟浩, 宋威, 白林晨, 袁心, 张辉. 股骨前髁预截骨髓外定位技术在全膝关节置换术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 811-819.

Songlei Wang, Yiliang Zhang, Hao Meng, Wei Song, Linchen Bai, Xin Yuan, Hui Zhang. Application of a new extramedullary reference technique with pre-osteotomy of anterior femoral condyle in total knee arthroplasty[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(09): 811-819.

目的

探讨全膝关节置换术(TKA)中前髁预截骨髓外定位技术的可行性和安全性。

方法

2022年1月至2022年12月在宿迁第三医院行初次TKA手术治疗的膝关节晚期骨关节炎(OA)共160 名患者,被随机分成A 组和B 组,A 组为股骨前髁预截骨髓外定位组,B 组为传统股骨髓内定位组。去除随访小于12 个月的病例,最终A 组68 例,B 组67 例。评估2 组患者的性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、左右侧、术前疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、术前膝关节活动度、术前西安大略和曼彻斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)和牛津膝关节评分(OKS)的差异,比较2 组手术时间、术后引流量、股骨前皮质过度切割发生率以及术后的髋膝踝角(HKA)、胫股角(TFA)、股骨假体屈曲角(FFA)、胫骨平台后倾角(PTS)、胫骨近端内侧角(MPTA)、术后并发症率和术后1 个月、6 个月、12 个月的VAS 评分、膝关节活动度、WOMAC、OKS 并进行统计学分析。

结果

2 组间患者的性别、年龄、BMI、左右侧、术前VAS 评分、术前膝关节活动度、术前WOMAC、OKS的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A 组股骨前皮质过度切割发生率(5.9%)明显小于B 组(17.9%),组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A 组术后引流量(248.9±49.8)ml 少于B 组(378.9±43.7)ml且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2 组间手术时间、术后并发症率以及术后测得的HKA、TFA、FFA、PTS、MPTA 差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),A 组术后1 个月VAS 评分、膝关节活动度、WOMAC、OKS 明显优于B 组(P<0.05),但2 组患者的术后6 个月、12 个月的VAS 评分、膝关节活动度、WOMAC、OKS 差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

前髁预截骨髓外定位技术安全有效,较髓内定位,可显著减少术后引流量并降低股骨前皮质过度切割发生率,在术后1 月内的疼痛缓解、关节功能和活动度方面也具备优势。

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and safety of extramedullary reference with anterior femoral condyle pre-osteotomy technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

A total of 160 patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA) who underwent primary TKA at Suqian Third Hospital from January 2022 to December 2022 were randomly divided into two groups: A and B. In group A, a new extramedullary reference technique was adopted while in group B, standard intramedullary femoral instruments were used. Excluding cases with a follow-up duration less than 12 months, there were 68 cases in group A and 67 cases in group B. Gender, age, body mass index (BMI), affected side, preoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, preoperative range of motion (ROM), preoperative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and preoperative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were evaluated in the two groups. Operation time, postoperative drainage volume, incidence of notching of anterior femoral cortex, postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA), tibiofemoral angle (TFA), femoral flexion angle (FFA),posterior tibial slope (PTS), and proximal tibia medial angle (MPTA), and postoperative complication rate were compared between the two groups, and VAS score, knee ROM, and WOMAC and OKS at 1, 6, and 12 months after operation were analyzed.

Results

There were no significant differences in gender, age, BMI,sides, preoperative VAS score, preoperative ROM, and preoperative WOMAC and OKS between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of anterior femoral cortex notching in group A (5.9%) was significantly lower than that of group B (17.9%; P<0.05). The postoperative drainage volume of group A [(248.9±49.8) ml]was significantly less than that of group B [(378.9±43.7) ml; P<0.05]. There were no significant differences in operation time, postoperative complication rate, HKA, TFA, FFA, PTS, and MPTA between the two groups (P>0.05). The VAS score, ROM, WOMAC, and OKS in group A were significantly better than those of group B at 1 month after operation (P<0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups at 6 and 12 months of follow-up (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The new extramedullary reference technique with pre-osteotomy of anterior femoral condyle in TKA is safe and effective. Compared with the intramedullary alignment system, the new technique not only reduces postoperative drainage volume and the incidence of nothing of anterior femoral cortex, but it is also associated with more pain relief and better joint function and ROM within 1 month after operation.

表1 2 组患者术前一般基线资料
图1 前髁预截骨及髓外定位完成股骨远端初步截骨。图a 为透视定位股骨头中心;图b 为胫骨截骨、股骨前髁预截骨;图c 为力线杆定位确认冠状面力线;图d 为截骨导板定位在预截骨前髁平面;图e 为镰刀片确定截骨平面;图f 为直角器验证截骨平面
图2 术后双下肢全长负重位片和膝关节正侧位片。图a 为术后双下肢全长负重位上测角a 即HKA=179°,角b 即TFA=173°,角c 即MPTA=89°;图b 为术后膝关节正位片示内外侧间隙良好;图c 为术后膝关节侧位片角d 即FFA=90°,角e 即PTS=2°
表2 2 组术后情况的比较
表3 2 组术后影像学参数的比较
1
关振鹏. 立足阶梯化手术治疗理念, 助力膝骨关节炎外科管理 [J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(10): 919-924..
2
Karasavvidis T, Pagan Moldenhauer CA, Lustig S, et al. Definitions and consequences of current alignment techniques and phenotypes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)-there is no winner yet [J]. J Exp Orthop,2023, 10(1): 120.
3
Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, et al. The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis [J]. Int Orthop, 2014, 38(2):379-385.
4
Stamiris D, Gkekas NK, Asteriadis K, et al. Anterior femoral notching ≥ 3 mm is associated with increased risk for supracondylar periprosthetic femoral fracture after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2022, 32(3): 383-393.
5
DeFrance MJ, Scuderi GR. Are 20% of patients actually dissatisfied following total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of the literature[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2023, 38(3): 594-599.
6
Tecame A, Gambineri A, Za P, et al. Is the femoral intramedullary alignment already actual in total knee arthroplasty? [J]. J Exp Orthop,2023, 14, 10(1): 16.
7
Simcox T, Singh V, Oakley C T, et al. A comparison of utilization and short-term complications of technology-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty [J]. Knee Surgery & Related Research, 2022,34(1): 14.
8
Maderbacher G, Schaumburger J, Baier C, et al. Appropriate sagittal femoral component alignment cannot be ensured by intramedullary alignment rods [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016, 24(8):2453-2460.
9
Maderbacher G, Matussek J, Keshmiri A, et al. Rotation of intramedullary alignment rods affects distal femoral cutting plane in total knee arthroplasty [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2018, 26(11): 3311-3316.
10
Ku MC, Chen WJ, Lo CS, et al. Femoral component alignment with a new extramedullary femoral cutting guide technique [J]. Indian J Orthop, 2019, 53(2): 276-281.
11
Wang Q, Zhang X, Shi T, et al. The accuracy of an extramedullary femoral cutting system in total knee arthroplasty in patients with severe coronal femoral bowing: a radiographic study [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2022, 7, 17(1): 257.
12
Skowronek P, Arnold M, Starke C, et al. European Knee Associates(EKA). Intra- and postoperative assessment of femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty: an EKA knee expert group clinical review [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2021, 29(3):772-782.
13
Bonanzinga T, Tanzi P, Pia Neri M, et al. Evaluation of blood loss and implant alignment after total knee arthroplasty with inertial based extramedullary femoral cutting guide [J]. Joints, 2018, 18, 6(3):161-166.
[1] 陈晓玲, 钟永洌, 刘巧梨, 李娜, 张志奇, 廖威明, 黄桂武. 超高龄髋膝关节术后谵妄及心血管并发症风险预测[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 575-584.
[2] 马桥桥, 张传开, 郭开今, 蒋涛, 王子豪, 刘勇, 郝亮. 可降解止血粉减少初次全膝关节置换术失血量的研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 585-589.
[3] 刘涛, 樊保佑, 史仲举, 刘德荣, 王沛. 股骨距是一个容易被误解的人体结构[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 626-629.
[4] 李焕玺, 何淳诺, 田志敏, 周胜虎, 吴昊越, 张浩强. 全膝关节置换术后股骨远端假体周围骨折治疗现状[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 630-637.
[5] 王相迎, 杨长生, 曲铁兵. 固定平台单髁置换假体合适位置的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 638-645.
[6] 苏介茂, 齐岩松, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 马秉贤, 张鹏飞, 魏兴华, 徐永胜. 关节镜手术在早中期膝骨关节炎治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 646-652.
[7] 郭艳波, 马亮, 李刚, 阎伟, 骆帝, 岳亮, 吴伟山. 全膝关节置换术后胫股关节脱位的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 658-671.
[8] 陈翠萍, 李佩君, 杜景榕, 谢青梅, 许一宁, 卓姝妤, 李晓芳. 互联网联合上门护理在老年全髋关节置换术后的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 676-681.
[9] 丁莹莹, 宋恺, 金姬延, 田华. 机器人辅助膝髋关节置换术后精细化临床护理[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 553-557.
[10] 谢江燕, 王亚菲, 贺芳. 妊娠合并血栓性血小板减少性紫癜2例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 556-563.
[11] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[12] 张于, 程亮亮, 王峰, 赵德伟. 2枚与3枚空心钉治疗无移位股骨颈骨折的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 281-286.
[13] 茹江英, 廖启宇, 温国洪, 潘思华, 刘栋, 张皓琛, 牛云飞. 直接前方入路和后外侧入路半髋关节置换治疗老年痴呆股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 287-293.
[14] 单良, 刘怡, 于涛, 徐丽. 老年股骨颈骨折术后患者心理弹性现状及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 294-300.
[15] 张耕毓, 唐冲, 张昆, 张辉, 张清华, 刘家帮. 股骨头坏死髓芯减压术的文献计量学分析及单中心病例报道[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 771-780.
阅读次数
全文


摘要