切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (22) : 2389 -2393. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2017.22.001

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

胃镜活检在胃黏膜病变内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗中的价值
向圆圆1, 吕农华1, 陈幼祥1, 祝荫1, 李国华1,()   
  1. 1. 330006 南昌大学第一附属医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-15 出版日期:2017-11-15
  • 通信作者: 李国华

Value of endoscopic biopsy in treatment of gastric mucosal lesions by endoscopic submucosal dissection

Yuanyuan Xiang1, Nonghua Lyu1, Youxiang Chen1, Yin Zhu1, Guohua Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China
  • Received:2017-10-15 Published:2017-11-15
  • Corresponding author: Guohua Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Guohua, Email:
引用本文:

向圆圆, 吕农华, 陈幼祥, 祝荫, 李国华. 胃镜活检在胃黏膜病变内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗中的价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(22): 2389-2393.

Yuanyuan Xiang, Nonghua Lyu, Youxiang Chen, Yin Zhu, Guohua Li. Value of endoscopic biopsy in treatment of gastric mucosal lesions by endoscopic submucosal dissection[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(22): 2389-2393.

目的

探讨胃镜活检在胃黏膜膜病变内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗中的价值。

方法

选取2016年2月至2017年4月在南昌大学第一附属医院内镜中心行胃镜活检及组织病理学检查确诊为胃黏膜病变并行ESD及ESD术后病理学检查的患者85例进行回顾性研究。采用多个率的χ2检验比较不同病变部位(胃窦、胃体、胃角、贲门、胃底、幽门、残胃)、不同病理类型(低级别瘤变、高级别瘤变、早期胃癌)、不同病变大小ESD术前术后病理一致率的差异,再分别进行不同病变部位、不同病理类型以及不同病变大小的两两比较。

结果

不同病变部位ESD术前术后病理一致率比较(66.7% vs 16.7% vs 22.2% vs 28.5% vs 50.0% vs 50.0% vs 100.0%),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=18.98,P=0.004)。胃窦部的ESD术前术后胃镜活检诊断一致率高达66.7%(30/45),高于胃角部22.2%(2/9)和胃体部16.7%(3/18),且差异具有统计学意义(χ2=10.96,P=0.001;χ2=4.434,P=0.023);不同病理类型ESD术前术后病理诊断一致率比较(88.9% vs 40.6% vs 34.2%),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=15.384,P<0.001)。术前胃镜活检诊断早期胃癌一致率高于高级别瘤变及低级别瘤变,且差异具有统计学意义(χ2=12.115,P<0.001;χ2=9.124,P=0.001);不同胃黏膜病变的病变大小术前术后病理一致率比较(38.5% vs 53.3% vs 53.3% vs 44.4%),差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.121,P=0.772)。35例术前低级别瘤变中,术前轻判占65.7%(23/35),其中有40.0%(14/35)术后提示早期胃癌;32例高级别瘤变中,术后提示早期胃癌的占46.9%(15/32);总计术前轻判共占44.7%(38/85),其中76.3%(29/38)术后都是早期癌。

结论

胃镜活检病理与ESD术后病理的一致率低,但术前病变程度低于实际病变可能性大,术前高级别瘤变患者有一定的恶变性,术前的胃镜活检对ESD指征的把握有较好的价值。

Objective

To assess the value of gastroscopic biopsy in the treatment of gastric mucosal lesions by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

Methods

Eighty-five patients with gastric mucosal lesions who underwent gastroscopic biopsy and histopathologic examination as well as ESD and postoperative pathological examination at the Endoscopy Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from February 2016 to April 2017 were retrospectively studied. The chi square test was used to compare the consistent rate of pathological examinations before and after ESD for lesions with different locations (gastric antrum, gastric angle, gastric body, cardia, gastric fundus, pylorus, and residual stomach), pathological types (low grade neoplasia, high grade neoplasia, and early gastric cancer), or sizes.

Results

The consistent rates of pathological examinations before and after ESD differed significantly for lesions with different locations (66.7%, 16.7%, 22.2%, 28.5%, 50.0%, 50.0%, and 100.0%, respectively; χ2=18.98, P=0.004). The consistent rate was significantly higher for lesions in the gastric antrum than in the gastric angle and body [66.7% (30/45) vs 22.2% (2/9), 16.7% (3/18), χ2=10.96, 4.434, P=0.001, 0.023]. The consistent rates of pathological examinations before and after ESD also differed significantly for lesions with different pathological types (88.9% vs 40.6% vs 34.2%, χ2=15.384, P<0.001). The consistent rate was significantly higher for early gastric cancer than for high grade neoplasia and low grade neoplasia (χ2=12.115, P<0.001; χ2=9.124, P=0.001). The consistent rates of pathological examinations before and after ESD were not statistically significant for lesions with different sizes (38.5% vs 53.3% vs 53.3% vs 44.4%, χ2=1.121, P=0.772). In 35 cases of preoperative low-grade neoplasia, 65.8% (23/35) were under-diagnosed preoperatively, with 40.0% (14/35) being diagnosed as early gastric cancer postoperatively. In 32 cases of high grade neoplasia, 46.9% (15/32) were suggested to be early gastric cancer postoperatively. In total, 44.7% (38/85) of lesions were under-diagnosed preoperatively, of which 76.3% (29/38) were suggested to be cancer postoperatively.

Conclusion

Preoperative diagnosis by gastroscopic biopsy has a low consistent rate with pathological diagnosis after ESD, and it is more likely that gastric mucosal lesions are under-diagnosed preoperatively, especially for patients preoperatively diagnosed with high grade neoplasia.

表1 ESD治疗85例胃黏膜病变及早期胃癌的情况[%(例数)]
表2 85例胃黏膜病变不同病变大小ESD术前与术后病理的差异比较[%(例数)]
[1]
Forsyth CB, Farhadi A, Jakate SM, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for removal of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms: A technical review [J]. World J Gastrointest Endosc, 2012, 4(4): 123-136.
[2]
Xu G, Zhang W, Lv Y, et al. Risk factors for under-diagnosis of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia and early gastric carcinoma in endoscopic forceps biopsy in comparison with endoscopic submucosal dissection in Chinese patients [J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(7): 2716-2722.
[3]
李增山, 李青. 2010年版消化系统肿瘤WHO分类解读 [J]. 中华病理学杂志, 2011, 40(5): 351-354.
[4]
Kato M, Nishida T, Tsutsui S, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric noninvasive neoplasia: a multicenter study by Osaka University ESD Study Group [J]. J Gastroenterol, 2011, 46(3): 325-331.
[5]
Lee CK, Chung IK, Lee SH, et al. Is endoscopic forceps biopsy enough for a definitive diagnosis of gastric epithelial neoplasia? [J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2010, 25(9): 1507-1513.
[6]
袁媛, 周炳喜, 程黎娜, 等. 内镜下黏膜下剥离术治疗69例食管早癌及癌前病变的价值及术后病理分析 [J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2016, 22(8): 90-93.
[7]
孙超, 于莲珍, 凡兰桂, 等. 内镜下黏膜剥离术对早期胃癌及癌前病变的诊断价值 [J/CD]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2015(6): 275-279.
[8]
朱顺其, 卢忠生, 梁浩, 等. 胃镜活检在食管黏膜病变治疗中的价值 [J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2014, 35(5): 427-429.
[9]
陈晓宇, 施尧. 胃镜活组织检查和内镜下黏膜切除标本的病理检查规范 [J]. 内科理论与实践, 2010, 5(3): 252-255.
[10]
Correa P, Piazuelo MB. The gastric precancerous cascade [J]. J Dig Dis, 2015, 13(1): 2-9.
[11]
Kim ES, Jeon SW, Park SY, et al. Where has the tumor gone? The characteristics of cases of negative pathologic diagnosis after endoscopic mucosal resection [J]. Endoscopy, 2009, 41(9): 739-745.
[12]
Hull MJ, Minokenudson M, Nishioka NS, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection: an improved diagnostic procedure for early gastroesophageal epithelial neoplasms [J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2006, 30(1): 114-118.
[13]
Skacel M, Petras RE, Gramlich TL, et al. The diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus and its implications for disease progression [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2000, 95(12): 3383-3387.
[14]
汪鹏, 谢静, 王雷, 等. 中国消化内镜活组织检查与病理学检查规范专家共识(草案) [J]. 中华消化杂志, 2014(9): 862-866.
[15]
焦春花, 冯亚东, 张红杰, 等. 胃黏膜上皮性肿瘤术前活检病理准确性分析 [J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 36(12): 1502-1504.
[16]
王进武, 常玲云, 安梅芳, 等. 胃镜活检与内镜下黏膜切除病理诊断比较 [J]. 中国肿瘤, 2015, 24(9): 797-800.
[1] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[2] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[3] 董杰, 杨松, 杨浩, 陈翔, 张万里. 乙酰辅酶A羧化酶2基因高甲基化与肝细胞癌临床病理因素和生存期的关系[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 433-437.
[4] 闫笑生, 郑智, 翟育豪, 张海翘, 王鈢, 刘小野, 尹杰, 张军. Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌临床诊断、病理特征及预后分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 346-351.
[5] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[6] 陈珊, 胡智强, 张月明, 唐定, 黎蒙, 赵帅. Orai1、Orai3在乳腺癌组织中的表达及与病理学指标的相关性分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 514-517.
[7] 任加发, 邬步云, 邢昌赢, 毛慧娟. 2022年急性肾损伤领域基础与临床研究进展[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 276-281.
[8] 付强, 秦丽媛, 李全波. 神经病理性疼痛患者血清miR-15a水平及意义分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 293-298.
[9] 金刚, 李英真, 施维, 李博. 帕金森病在病理生理学中的研究进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 315-319.
[10] 侯超, 潘美辰, 吴文明, 黄兴广, 李翔, 程凌雪, 朱玉轩, 李文波. 早期食管癌及上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 383-387.
[11] 萨仁高娃, 张英霞, 邓伟, 闫诺, 樊宁. 超声引导下鼠肝消融术后组织病理特征的变化规律及影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 394-398.
[12] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
[13] 徐军, 姬园园, 陈君平, 王健. 伴菊形团结构的脑膜瘤合并颅骨侵犯一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 916-919.
[14] 董青, 丁飞, 郭浩, 李峰. Nesfatin-1/NUCB2在幽门螺杆菌感染相关早期胃癌患者中的表达及临床意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 783-789.
[15] 陈柯豫, 黄艳齐, 张玲利. 同时性多发早期食管癌及高级别上皮内瘤变的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 524-528.
阅读次数
全文


摘要