切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 254 -258. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2019.04.003

所属专题: 超声医学 经典病例 文献

临床研究

介入性核型检测联合超声在无创胎儿非整倍体异常病例中的应用
翟敬芳1,(), 吴杰斌1, 王侠1, 魏苏1, 陶巍1, 冯云1, 张蓓1   
  1. 1. 221009 江苏徐州,徐州医科大学临床学院 徐州市中心医院产前诊断中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-03 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 通信作者: 翟敬芳
  • 基金资助:
    徐州市科学技术局重点研发计划(社会发展)课题(KC18182)

Application of interventional karyotype examination combined with ultrasound in diagnosis of fetal chromosome aneuploidy detected by noninvasive prenatal test

Jingfang Zhai1,(), Jiebin Wu1, Xia Wang1, Su Wei1, Wei Tao1, Yun Feng1, Bei Zhang1   

  1. 1. Xuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Xuzhou Center Hospital, Xuzhou 221009, China
  • Received:2018-08-03 Published:2019-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Jingfang Zhai
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhai Jingfang, Email:
引用本文:

翟敬芳, 吴杰斌, 王侠, 魏苏, 陶巍, 冯云, 张蓓. 介入性核型检测联合超声在无创胎儿非整倍体异常病例中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 254-258.

Jingfang Zhai, Jiebin Wu, Xia Wang, Su Wei, Wei Tao, Yun Feng, Bei Zhang. Application of interventional karyotype examination combined with ultrasound in diagnosis of fetal chromosome aneuploidy detected by noninvasive prenatal test[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 254-258.

目的

探讨介入性核型检测联合超声在胎儿无创非整倍体筛查异常病例中的应用。

方法

收集2015年10月至2017年12月在徐州市中心医院产前诊断中心进行无创产前基因检测(NIPT)的单胎孕妇2640例为研究对象,年龄18~43岁,孕周13~25周,对检测42例异常染色体孕妇进行产前诊断并对妊娠结局进行跟踪统计分析。介入性核型检查与NIPT对胎儿染色体异常结果检测效能的比较采用McNemar χ2检验和Kappa一致性检验。

结果

NIPT异常者42例:其中31例常染色体异常、10例性染色体异常及同时有常染色体及性染色体异常1例,常染色体异常包括:17例21-三体高风险,9例提示18-三体高风险,染色体7-三体、15-三体及13-三体各1例,7号染色体重复51Mb 1例,16号染色体异常1例;10例性染色体异常中45,XO 6例;47,XYY 2例,47,XXX 1例,性染色体XX与XXX嵌合1例。42例中1例放弃产前诊断直接引产,36例羊水穿刺,5例脐静脉穿刺,确诊21-三体14例、18-三体7例和47,XYY 1例,余320~400染色体条带水平未发现异常,其中有12例21-三体和7例18-三体胎儿有超声结构改变,余无超声结构改变,共22例引产,1例流产,19例新生儿结局良好。NIPT对胎儿染色体异常阳性率明显高于介入性核型检查(P<0.05)。

结论

NIPT对21-三体和18-三体检出率较高,但对于常染色体和性染色体仍存在一定的假阳性,NIPT发现异常的孕妇需进行胎儿结构超声及介入性核型检查,避免对无辜胎儿的伤害。

Objective

To explore the application of interventional karyotype examination combined with ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal chromosome aneuploidy detected by the noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT).

Methods

Forty-two cases with abnormal NIPT results were enrolled from October 2015 to December 2017 in prenatal diagnosis center of Xuzhou Center Hospital. Further invasive prenatal examinations such as amniotic fluid or cord blood puncture were accomplished for the definite diagnosis. Conventional Giemsa (G) banding karyotype analyses were conducted for the fetus and parents and all cases were followed for pregnancy outcomes. Comparison of the efficiency of interventional karyotype test and NIPT in the detection of fetal chromosomal abnormalities was made by McNemar χ2 and Kappa consistency tests.

Results

Of the 42 cases with abnormal NIPT results, 31 had autosomal abnormalities, 10 had sex chromosome abnormalities, and 1 had both autosomal and sex chromosome abnormalities. The autosomal abnormalities included 17 cases at high risk for 21-trisomy, 9 cases at high risk for 18-trisomy, and 1 case each of 7-trisomy, 15-trisomy, 13-trisomy, chromosome 7 with 51Mb repeated segment, and chromosome 16 with abnormality. The sex chromosome abnormalities included 6 cases of 45, XO, 2 cases of 47, XYY, and 1 case each of chromosome 47, XXX and 47, XXX with XX. Of the 42 patients, 1 gave up prenatal diagnosis and selected induction of labor, 36 underwent amniocentesis, and 5 underwent umbilical vein puncture. Finally, 14 cases of 21-trisomy, 7 cases of 18- trisomy, and 1 case of 47, XYY were diagnosed. Among the 14 definite cases of 21-trisomy, 12 were complicated with ultrasound structural abnormalities, while the 7 definite cases of 18-trisomy had totally ultrasound structural abnormalities. The other cases showed no abnormalities in the chromosomes of 320-400 bands and had no ultrasound structure changes. A total of 22 cases underwent induced labor, 1 case had abortion, and the other 19 cases were followed with good neonatal outcomes. Therefore, the positive rate of fetal chromosome abnormality detected by the NIPT was significantly higher than that by interventional karyotype examination (P<0.05).

Conclusion

NIPT has a high detection rate for 21-trisomy and 18-trisomy, but there are still false positives for autosomal and sex chromosomes. Fetal structure ultrasound and interventional karyotype examination are still necessary for pregnant women with abnormal NIPT results to avoid harm to innocent fetuses.

表1 31例NIPT常染色体异常与核型检查结果
表2 10例NIPT性染色体异常与核型检查结果
表3 介入性核型检查与NIPT对胎儿染色体异常结果检测效能的比较(例)
1
Jiang F, Ren J, Chen F, et al. Noninvasive Fetal Trisomy (NIFTY) test: an advanced noninvasive prenatal diagnosis methodology for fetal autosomal and sex chromosomal aneuploidies [J]. BMC Medical Genomics, 2012, 5(1): 57.
2
Bianchi DW, Wilkins-Haug L. Integration of noninvasive DNA testing for aneuploidy into prenatal care: what has happened since the rubber met the road? [J]. Clin Chem, 2013, 60(1): 78-87.
3
Benn P, Cuckle H, Pergament E. Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 42(1): 15-33.
4
Lau TK, Jiang FM, Stevenson RJ, et al. Secondary findings from non-invasive prenatal testing for common fetal aneuploidies by whole genome sequencing as a clinical service [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2013, 33(6): 602-608.
5
Van Opstal D, Diderich KEM, Joosten M, et al. Unexpected finding of uniparental disomy mosaicism in term placentas: Is it a common feature in trisomic placentas? [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2018, 38(12): 911-919.
6
Baffero GM, Somigliana E, Crovetto F, et al. Confined placental mosaicism at chorionic villous sampling: risk factors and pregnancy outcome [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2012, 32(11): 1102-1108.
7
Lebo RV, Novak RW, Wolfe K, et al. Discordant circulating fetal DNA and subsequent cytogenetics reveal false negative, placental mosaic, and fetal mosaic cfDNA genotypes [J]. Transl Med, 2015, 13(1): 260.
8
Gil MM, Quezada MS, Revello R, et al. Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for fetal aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 45(3): 249-266.
9
侯巧芳,吴东,楚艳, 等. 孕妇外周血中游离胎儿DNA检测在无创产前诊断中的临床应用 [J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2012, 47(11): 813-817.
10
缪婷婷,张晓青,周琴, 等. 无创DNA检测技术在常州市产前筛查中的应用 [J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(10): 193-195.
11
钟世林,邓玉清,石宇, 等. 胎儿染色体非整倍体与产前超声特征的对比分析 [J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2014, 22(12): 42-44.
12
黄欢,黎新艳,路婧, 等. 13、18及21-三体综合征胎儿产前超声表现对比分析 [J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2017, 32(17): 4199-4202.
13
Hartman RJ, Rasmussen SA, Botto LD, et al. The Contribution of Chromosomal Abnormalities to Congenital Heart Defects: A Population-Based Study [J]. Pediatr Cardiol, 2011, 32(8): 1147-1157.
14
Cai M, Huang H, Su L, et al. Fetal congenital heart disease: Associated anomalies, identification of genetic anomalies by single-nucleotide polymorphism array analysis, and postnatal outcome [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(50): e13617.
15
邓琼,符芳,李茹, 等. 染色体微阵列分析技术在室间隔缺损胎儿中的应用研究 [J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志, 2017, 34(5): 699-704.
16
李姣玲,张蕊,颜璨, 等. 超声与MRI诊断胎儿前脑无裂畸形的比较 [J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(22): 67-71.
17
殷林亮,邓学东,杨忠. 孕11~13~(+6)周胎儿颈项透明层增厚的临床意义[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2014, 11(4): 18-23.
18
McCullough RM, Almasri EA, Guan X, et al. Non-invasive prenatal chromosomal aneuploidy testing--clinical experience: 100,000 clinical samples [J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(10): e109173.
19
罗艳梅,胡华梅,徐聚春, 等. 无创产前基因检测在胎儿染色体非整倍体筛查中的应用研究 [J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2018, 34(6): 464-467.
20
Zhang H, Gao Y, Jiang F, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomies 21, 18 and 13: clinical experience from 146,958 pregnancies [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 45(5): 530-538.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 李晓妮, 卫青, 孟庆龙, 牛丽莉, 田月, 吴伟春, 朱振辉, 王浩. 超声心动图在孤立性左心室心尖发育不良疾病中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 937-942.
[3] 陈慧, 姚静, 张宁, 刘磊, 马秀玲, 王小贤, 方爱娟, 管静静. 超声心动图在多发性骨髓瘤心脏淀粉样变中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 943-949.
[4] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[5] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[6] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[7] 杜祖升, 赵博文, 张帧, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺. 应用二维斑点追踪成像技术评估孕周及心尖方向对中晚孕期正常胎儿左心房应变的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 843-851.
[8] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[9] 包艳娟, 杨小红, 张涛, 赵胜, 张莉. 阴道斜隔综合征的超声诊断与临床分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 859-864.
[10] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[11] 农云洁, 黄小桂, 黄裕兰, 农恒荣. 超声在多重肺部感染诊断中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 872-876.
[12] 刘思锐, 赵辰阳, 张睿, 张一休, 杨萌. 多普勒超声对孕鼠子宫动脉不同节段血流动力学参数的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 877-883.
[13] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[14] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[15] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
阅读次数
全文


摘要