切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (10) : 726 -730. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2019.10.002

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

年龄对心力衰竭患者临床特征及预后的影响
周燕1, 莫卿2, 姜华3, 包亚萍1, 王琳1, 钟荣荣1, 田建立1,()   
  1. 1. 300052 天津医科大学总医院保健医疗部(老年病科)
    2. 300450 天津市滨海新区杭州道街向阳社区卫生服务中心
    3. 300222 天津市胸科医院心内一科
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-30 出版日期:2019-05-15
  • 通信作者: 田建立
  • 基金资助:
    天津市心脏学会医学研究重点项目(20150011)

Effect of aging on clinical features and prognosis of patients with heart failure

Yan Zhou1, Qing Mo2, Hua Jiang3, Yaping Bao1, Lin Wang1, Rongrong Zhong1, Jianli Tian1,()   

  1. 1. Division of Geriatrics, Health and Medical Department, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
    2. Hangzhou Daojie Xiangyang Community Health Service Center, Binhai New Area, Tianjin 300450, China
    3. Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin 300222, China
  • Received:2019-03-30 Published:2019-05-15
  • Corresponding author: Jianli Tian
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tian Jianli, Email:
引用本文:

周燕, 莫卿, 姜华, 包亚萍, 王琳, 钟荣荣, 田建立. 年龄对心力衰竭患者临床特征及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(10): 726-730.

Yan Zhou, Qing Mo, Hua Jiang, Yaping Bao, Lin Wang, Rongrong Zhong, Jianli Tian. Effect of aging on clinical features and prognosis of patients with heart failure[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(10): 726-730.

目的

观察年龄增长对心力衰竭(心衰)患者的临床特征及2年预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析天津医科大学总医院和天津胸科医院两所医院2014年3月至2016年2月以心衰为主要病因、纽约心脏病学会(NYHA)心功能分级Ⅱ~Ⅳ、完成2年终点事件随访且资料完整的患者1747例,按照年龄分为非老年组(<65岁)650例,普通老年组(65~79岁)718例和高龄老年组(≥80岁)379例。分析年龄增长对心衰患者临床特征和2年预后的影响。

结果

非老年组、普通老年组和高龄老年组男性患者比例逐渐下降(分别为74.9%、59.2%、55.1%,χ2=53.85,P<0.001),射血分数降低心衰(HFrEF)患者比例逐渐减少(分别为49.2%、39.8%、34.6%,χ2=23.88,P<0.001),射血分数保留心衰(HFpEF)患者比例逐渐增加(分别为23.2%、32.3%、37.7%,χ2=26.73,P<0.001);而射血分数中间值心衰(HFmrEF)患者比例差异无统计学意义(分别为27.5%、27.9%、27.7%,P>0.05)。非老年组、普通老年组和高龄老年组患者NYHA心功能Ⅳ患者比例逐渐增加(分别为19.5%、27.7%和53.3%,χ2=133.02,P<0.001)、病种数逐渐增加(P<0.001)、平均住院天数明显延长(P<0.05)。经2年随访,非老年组、普通老年组和高龄老年组患者全因死亡率、心衰再入院率及复合终点事件发生率逐渐升高(全因死亡率分别为19.1%、32.6%、44.1%,P<0.001;心衰再入院率分别为20.5%、27.7%、33.5%,P<0.001;复合终点事件发生率分别为32.8%、47.1%、63.1%,P<0.001)。与非老年组相比较,普通老年组、高龄老年组的全因死亡风险比(HR)分别为1.81[95%可信区间(1.45~2.25)]和1.67[95%可信区间(1.49~1.88)],心衰再入院HR分别为1.41[95%可信区间(1.13~1.75)]和1.34[95%可信区间(1.18~1.51)],复合终点事件HR分别为1.54[95%可信区间(1.30~1.83)]和1.53[95%可信区间(1.39~1.68)]。

结论

随年龄增长心衰患者出现明显的性别差异,且HFrEF比例逐渐减少,HFpEF比例逐渐增加,病种数更多,心功能更差,心衰更严重,住院时间更长,2年全因死亡率、心衰再入院率及复合终点事件发生率及风险更高。

Objective

To investigate the effect of aging on clinical features and prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed to collect data at Tianjin Medical University General Hospital and Tianjin Chest Hospital from March 2014 to February 2016. A total of 1747 patients with complete data were followed for 2-year outcome events. These patients mainly had HF and New York Heart Association (NYHA) cardiac function classificationⅡ-Ⅳ. They were categorized into three groups based on age: 650 cases in a non-elderly group (age<65 years), 718 cases in a young elderly group (aged 65-79 years), and 379 cases in an old elderly group (age≥80 years). The effects of aging on clinical features and prognosis of HF patients were analyzed.

Results

In the non-elderly, young elderly, and old elderly groups, the percentages of male patients decreased gradually (74.9%, 59.2%, and 55.1%, respectively, χ2=53.85, P<0.001), the percentage of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) also declined gradually (49.2%, 39.8%, and 34.6%, respectively, χ2=23.88, P<0.001), the percentage of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) increased gradually (23.2%, 32.3%, and 37.7%, respectively, χ2=26.73, P<0.001), the percentage of patients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) was comparable (27.5%, 27.9%, and 27.7%, P>0.05), the percentage of NYHAⅣ HF patients increased gradually (19.5%, 27.7%, and 53.3%, χ2=133.02, P<0.001), the number of comorbidities in HF patients significantly increased (3.1, 3.6, and 4.0, P<0.001), and the average length of hospitalization days significantly became longer (P<0.05). The HF patients were followed for 2-year outcome events. All-cause mortality rate (19.1%, 32.6%, and 44.1%, P<0.001), recurrent HF hospitalization (20.5%, 27.7%, and 33.5%, P<0.001), and the occurrence rate of composite endpoint increased gradually (32.8%, 47.1%, and 63.1%, P<0.001) in the non-elderly, young elderly, and old elderly groups. In contrast with the non-elderly group, the hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality in the young elderly and old elderly groups were 1.81 (95%CI: 1.45-2.25) and 1.67 (95%CI: 1.49-1.88); the HRs of HF hospitalization were 1.41 (95%CI: 1.13-1.75) and 1.34 (95%CI: 1.18-1.51); and the HRs of occurrence of composite endpoint were 1.54 (95%CI: 1.30-1.83) and 1.53 (95%CI: 1.39-1.68), respectively.

Conclusion

The proportions of male patients with HF and HFrEF patients gradually decrease and the percentage of HFpEF patients gradually increases with aging. With aging, HF patients have more comorbidities, worse cardiac function, and longer hospital stay, and the risk of all-cause mortality, HF readmission, and composite endpoint events in 2 years is higher.

表1 不同年龄组心衰患者临床特征及预后比较
图1 不同年龄组心力衰竭患者全因死亡率的比较
图2 不同年龄组心力衰竭患者复合终点事件发生率的比较
图3 不同年龄组患者心力衰竭再入院率的比较
图4 不同年龄组心衰患者全因死亡、心衰再入院及复合终点风险比
1
Mosterd A, Hoes AW. Clinical epidemiology of heart failure [J]. Congest Heart Fail, 1999, 5(6): 260-269.
2
Roger VL. Epidemiology of heart failure [J]. Circ Res, 2013, 113(6): 646-659.
3
Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC [J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2016, 18(8): 891-975.
4
中华医学会心血管病学分会心力衰竭学组, 中国医师协会心力衰竭专业委员会中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南2018 [J].中华心血管病杂志, 2018, 46(10): 760-789.
5
中华医学会心血管病学分会.中国部分地区1980、1990、2000年慢性心力衰竭住院病例回顾性调查 [J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2002, 30(8): 450-454.
6
Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC). The survival of patients with heart failure with preserved or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: an individual patient data meta-analysis [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33(14): 1750-1757.
7
Bhambhani V, Kizer JR, Lima JAC, et al. Predictors and outcomes of heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction [J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2018, 20(4): 651-659.
8
Lund LH, Claggett B, Liu J, et al. Heart failure with midrange ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics,outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum [J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2018, 20(8): 1230-1239.
9
Chioncel O, Lainscak M, Seferovic PM, et al. Epidemiology and one-year outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved, mid-range and reduced ejection fraction: an analysis of the ESC heart failure long-term registry [J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2017, 19(12): 1574-1585.
10
Steinberg BA, Zhao X, Heidenreich PA, et al. Trends in patients hospitalized with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: prevalence, therapies, and outcomes [J]. Circulation, 2012, 126(1): 65-75.
11
Cunha FM, Pereira J, Ribeiro A, et al. Age affects the prognostic impact of diabetes in chronic heart failure [J]. Acta Diabetologica, 2018, 55(3): 271-278.
12
Moskalev AA, Shaposhnikov MV, Plyusnina EN, et al. The role of DNA damage and repair in aging through the prism of Koch-like criteria [J]. Ageing Res Rev, 2013, 12(2): 661-684.
13
van Kan GA, Rolland Y, Houles M, et al. The assessment of frailty in older adults [J]. Clin Geriatr Med, 2010, 26(2): 275-286.
[1] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[6] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[7] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[8] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[9] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[10] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[11] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[12] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[13] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要