切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (10) : 726 -730. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2019.10.002

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

年龄对心力衰竭患者临床特征及预后的影响
周燕1, 莫卿2, 姜华3, 包亚萍1, 王琳1, 钟荣荣1, 田建立1,()   
  1. 1. 300052 天津医科大学总医院保健医疗部(老年病科)
    2. 300450 天津市滨海新区杭州道街向阳社区卫生服务中心
    3. 300222 天津市胸科医院心内一科
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-30 出版日期:2019-05-15
  • 通信作者: 田建立
  • 基金资助:
    天津市心脏学会医学研究重点项目(20150011)

Effect of aging on clinical features and prognosis of patients with heart failure

Yan Zhou1, Qing Mo2, Hua Jiang3, Yaping Bao1, Lin Wang1, Rongrong Zhong1, Jianli Tian1,()   

  1. 1. Division of Geriatrics, Health and Medical Department, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
    2. Hangzhou Daojie Xiangyang Community Health Service Center, Binhai New Area, Tianjin 300450, China
    3. Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin 300222, China
  • Received:2019-03-30 Published:2019-05-15
  • Corresponding author: Jianli Tian
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tian Jianli, Email:
引用本文:

周燕, 莫卿, 姜华, 包亚萍, 王琳, 钟荣荣, 田建立. 年龄对心力衰竭患者临床特征及预后的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(10): 726-730.

Yan Zhou, Qing Mo, Hua Jiang, Yaping Bao, Lin Wang, Rongrong Zhong, Jianli Tian. Effect of aging on clinical features and prognosis of patients with heart failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(10): 726-730.

目的

观察年龄增长对心力衰竭(心衰)患者的临床特征及2年预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析天津医科大学总医院和天津胸科医院两所医院2014年3月至2016年2月以心衰为主要病因、纽约心脏病学会(NYHA)心功能分级Ⅱ~Ⅳ、完成2年终点事件随访且资料完整的患者1747例,按照年龄分为非老年组(<65岁)650例,普通老年组(65~79岁)718例和高龄老年组(≥80岁)379例。分析年龄增长对心衰患者临床特征和2年预后的影响。

结果

非老年组、普通老年组和高龄老年组男性患者比例逐渐下降(分别为74.9%、59.2%、55.1%,χ2=53.85,P<0.001),射血分数降低心衰(HFrEF)患者比例逐渐减少(分别为49.2%、39.8%、34.6%,χ2=23.88,P<0.001),射血分数保留心衰(HFpEF)患者比例逐渐增加(分别为23.2%、32.3%、37.7%,χ2=26.73,P<0.001);而射血分数中间值心衰(HFmrEF)患者比例差异无统计学意义(分别为27.5%、27.9%、27.7%,P>0.05)。非老年组、普通老年组和高龄老年组患者NYHA心功能Ⅳ患者比例逐渐增加(分别为19.5%、27.7%和53.3%,χ2=133.02,P<0.001)、病种数逐渐增加(P<0.001)、平均住院天数明显延长(P<0.05)。经2年随访,非老年组、普通老年组和高龄老年组患者全因死亡率、心衰再入院率及复合终点事件发生率逐渐升高(全因死亡率分别为19.1%、32.6%、44.1%,P<0.001;心衰再入院率分别为20.5%、27.7%、33.5%,P<0.001;复合终点事件发生率分别为32.8%、47.1%、63.1%,P<0.001)。与非老年组相比较,普通老年组、高龄老年组的全因死亡风险比(HR)分别为1.81[95%可信区间(1.45~2.25)]和1.67[95%可信区间(1.49~1.88)],心衰再入院HR分别为1.41[95%可信区间(1.13~1.75)]和1.34[95%可信区间(1.18~1.51)],复合终点事件HR分别为1.54[95%可信区间(1.30~1.83)]和1.53[95%可信区间(1.39~1.68)]。

结论

随年龄增长心衰患者出现明显的性别差异,且HFrEF比例逐渐减少,HFpEF比例逐渐增加,病种数更多,心功能更差,心衰更严重,住院时间更长,2年全因死亡率、心衰再入院率及复合终点事件发生率及风险更高。

Objective

To investigate the effect of aging on clinical features and prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed to collect data at Tianjin Medical University General Hospital and Tianjin Chest Hospital from March 2014 to February 2016. A total of 1747 patients with complete data were followed for 2-year outcome events. These patients mainly had HF and New York Heart Association (NYHA) cardiac function classificationⅡ-Ⅳ. They were categorized into three groups based on age: 650 cases in a non-elderly group (age<65 years), 718 cases in a young elderly group (aged 65-79 years), and 379 cases in an old elderly group (age≥80 years). The effects of aging on clinical features and prognosis of HF patients were analyzed.

Results

In the non-elderly, young elderly, and old elderly groups, the percentages of male patients decreased gradually (74.9%, 59.2%, and 55.1%, respectively, χ2=53.85, P<0.001), the percentage of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) also declined gradually (49.2%, 39.8%, and 34.6%, respectively, χ2=23.88, P<0.001), the percentage of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) increased gradually (23.2%, 32.3%, and 37.7%, respectively, χ2=26.73, P<0.001), the percentage of patients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) was comparable (27.5%, 27.9%, and 27.7%, P>0.05), the percentage of NYHAⅣ HF patients increased gradually (19.5%, 27.7%, and 53.3%, χ2=133.02, P<0.001), the number of comorbidities in HF patients significantly increased (3.1, 3.6, and 4.0, P<0.001), and the average length of hospitalization days significantly became longer (P<0.05). The HF patients were followed for 2-year outcome events. All-cause mortality rate (19.1%, 32.6%, and 44.1%, P<0.001), recurrent HF hospitalization (20.5%, 27.7%, and 33.5%, P<0.001), and the occurrence rate of composite endpoint increased gradually (32.8%, 47.1%, and 63.1%, P<0.001) in the non-elderly, young elderly, and old elderly groups. In contrast with the non-elderly group, the hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality in the young elderly and old elderly groups were 1.81 (95%CI: 1.45-2.25) and 1.67 (95%CI: 1.49-1.88); the HRs of HF hospitalization were 1.41 (95%CI: 1.13-1.75) and 1.34 (95%CI: 1.18-1.51); and the HRs of occurrence of composite endpoint were 1.54 (95%CI: 1.30-1.83) and 1.53 (95%CI: 1.39-1.68), respectively.

Conclusion

The proportions of male patients with HF and HFrEF patients gradually decrease and the percentage of HFpEF patients gradually increases with aging. With aging, HF patients have more comorbidities, worse cardiac function, and longer hospital stay, and the risk of all-cause mortality, HF readmission, and composite endpoint events in 2 years is higher.

表1 不同年龄组心衰患者临床特征及预后比较
图1 不同年龄组心力衰竭患者全因死亡率的比较
图2 不同年龄组心力衰竭患者复合终点事件发生率的比较
图3 不同年龄组患者心力衰竭再入院率的比较
图4 不同年龄组心衰患者全因死亡、心衰再入院及复合终点风险比
1
Mosterd A, Hoes AW. Clinical epidemiology of heart failure [J]. Congest Heart Fail, 1999, 5(6): 260-269.
2
Roger VL. Epidemiology of heart failure [J]. Circ Res, 2013, 113(6): 646-659.
3
Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC [J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2016, 18(8): 891-975.
4
中华医学会心血管病学分会心力衰竭学组, 中国医师协会心力衰竭专业委员会中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南2018 [J].中华心血管病杂志, 2018, 46(10): 760-789.
5
中华医学会心血管病学分会.中国部分地区1980、1990、2000年慢性心力衰竭住院病例回顾性调查 [J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2002, 30(8): 450-454.
6
Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC). The survival of patients with heart failure with preserved or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: an individual patient data meta-analysis [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33(14): 1750-1757.
7
Bhambhani V, Kizer JR, Lima JAC, et al. Predictors and outcomes of heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction [J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2018, 20(4): 651-659.
8
Lund LH, Claggett B, Liu J, et al. Heart failure with midrange ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics,outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum [J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2018, 20(8): 1230-1239.
9
Chioncel O, Lainscak M, Seferovic PM, et al. Epidemiology and one-year outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved, mid-range and reduced ejection fraction: an analysis of the ESC heart failure long-term registry [J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2017, 19(12): 1574-1585.
10
Steinberg BA, Zhao X, Heidenreich PA, et al. Trends in patients hospitalized with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: prevalence, therapies, and outcomes [J]. Circulation, 2012, 126(1): 65-75.
11
Cunha FM, Pereira J, Ribeiro A, et al. Age affects the prognostic impact of diabetes in chronic heart failure [J]. Acta Diabetologica, 2018, 55(3): 271-278.
12
Moskalev AA, Shaposhnikov MV, Plyusnina EN, et al. The role of DNA damage and repair in aging through the prism of Koch-like criteria [J]. Ageing Res Rev, 2013, 12(2): 661-684.
13
van Kan GA, Rolland Y, Houles M, et al. The assessment of frailty in older adults [J]. Clin Geriatr Med, 2010, 26(2): 275-286.
[1] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[2] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[3] 谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[4] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[5] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[6] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[7] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[8] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[9] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[10] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[11] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[12] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要