切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (08) : 599 -603. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2020.08.003

所属专题: 超声医学 文献

临床研究

心肌超声造影对大动脉炎冠状动脉受累患者心肌血流灌注的评价价值
崔艳华1, 严继萍1, 赵文莉1, 蔚俊丽2, 张全斌2,()   
  1. 1. 030012 太原,山西省人民医院超声科
    2. 030008 太原,太原钢铁(集团)有限公司总医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-22 出版日期:2020-08-15
  • 通信作者: 张全斌
  • 基金资助:
    山西省卫生健康委员会科研课题资助项目(2018032)

Role of myocardial contrast echocardiography in assessment of myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery involvement in Takayasu arteritis

Yanhua Cui1, Jiping Yan1, Wenli Zhao1, Junli Yu2, Quanbin Zhang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Shanxi Provincial People′s Hospital, Taiyuan 030012, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound, General Hospital of Tisco, Taiyuan 030008, China
  • Received:2020-02-22 Published:2020-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Quanbin Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Quanbin, Email:
引用本文:

崔艳华, 严继萍, 赵文莉, 蔚俊丽, 张全斌. 心肌超声造影对大动脉炎冠状动脉受累患者心肌血流灌注的评价价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(08): 599-603.

Yanhua Cui, Jiping Yan, Wenli Zhao, Junli Yu, Quanbin Zhang. Role of myocardial contrast echocardiography in assessment of myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery involvement in Takayasu arteritis[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(08): 599-603.

目的

探讨心肌造影超声技术对评价大动脉炎冠状动脉受累患者局部心肌微循环的价值。

方法

选取2017年6月至2019年7月山西省人民医院超声科和太原钢铁(集团)有限公司总医院大动脉炎冠状动脉受累患者15例为大动脉炎冠状动脉受累组,选取同期15名可疑冠状动脉疾病但冠状动脉造影正常的健康人群为对照组。观察大动脉炎冠状动脉受累组冠状动脉狭窄的程度及部位。大动脉炎冠状动脉受累组及对照组均行常规超声心动图检查,采用Simpson法获得左室射血分数。然后,大动脉炎冠状动脉受累组及对照组均行心肌造影超声检查,所测量的心肌血流灌注参数包括灌注开始时间、达峰时间、反映局部心肌血容量的曲线峰值强度A值、反映局部心肌灌注血流速度的曲线斜率β值和局部心肌血流量(A×β值)。使用独立样本t检验比较2组间心肌血流灌注参数的差异。绘制大动脉炎冠状动脉受累心肌灌注参数的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,比较各项参数的曲线下面积,确定最佳临界值。

结果

15例大动脉炎冠状动脉受累患者共22处冠状动脉受累并发生狭窄,狭窄率50%~69%者占13.6%(3/22),狭窄率70%~99%者占81.8%(18/22),完全闭塞者1处占4.5%(1/22)。冠状动脉开口处狭窄受累最多86.4%(19/22),少数位于冠状动脉中远段9%(2/22),而且呈节段性改变,仅1处呈单支冠状动脉弥漫性狭窄4.5%(1/22)。15例行冠状动脉造影的患者中单支冠状动脉病变9例(60.0%,9/15),两支冠状动脉病变5例(33.3%,5/15),三支冠状动脉病变1例(6.7%,1/15)。大动脉炎冠状动脉受累组A值[(6.55±1.48)dB vs(8.09±1.35)dB]、β值[(0.45±0.13)/s vs(0.64±0.07)/s]、A×β值[(2.75±1.03)dB/s vs(5.23±0.51)dB/s]均比对照组小,差异均具有统计学意义(t=9.978、15.178、25.260,P均<0.001)。大动脉炎冠状动脉受累组灌注开始时间[(2.74±0.78)s vs(2.55±0.63)s]、达峰时间[(12.43±0.79)s vs(7.53±0.93)]均比对照组延长,差异均具有统计学意义(t=2.059、50.068,P=0.013、<0.001)。大动脉炎冠状动脉受累组左心室射血分数比对照组低,差异具有统计学意义(t=19.969,P<0.001)。A×β值的ROC曲线下面积为0.949,当截断值为4.0017 dB/s时的诊断效能最高,此时敏感度为94.2%,特异度为81.5%。

结论

大动脉炎冠状动脉受累可引起心肌微循环障碍,导致心脏收缩功能受损。心肌造影可准确定量评价大动脉炎冠状动脉受累的患者的心肌血流灌注情况。

Objective

To evaluate the role of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) in the assessment of myocardial perfusion in patients with Takayasu arteritis with coronary artery involvement.

Methods

Fifteen patients with Takayasu arteritis with coronary artery involvement at Department of Ultrasound of Shanxi Provincial People′s Hospital and Department of Ultrasound of General Hospital of Tisco from June 2017 to July 2019 were selected as a study group, and 15 healthy persons with suspected coronary artery disease but normal coronary angiography were selected as a control group. All of the subjects underwent coronary angiography examination. The degree and location of coronary artery stenosis in the study group were observed based on the results of coronary angiography. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was obtained by Simpson′s method. Then, MCE was performed in both groups. The parameters reflecting myocardial microcirculation were measured, including time to start, time to peak, amplitude of peak intensity (A), slope of curve (β), and A×β. The independent sample t-test was used to compare the differences of myocardial perfusion parameters between the two groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) of each parameter was calculated to determine the optimal critical value.

Results

Twenty-two branches of coronary arteries were involved in the 15 patients with Takayasu arteritis; 13.6% (3/22) of the stenosed coronary artery branches had a stenosis rate of 50%-69%, 81.8% (18/22) had a stenosis rate of 70%-99%, and one was completely occluded, accounting for 4.5% (1/22). Proximal coronary artery stenosis was the most common, with an incidence of 86.4% (19/22). Approximately 9% (2/22) of branches showed segmental changes and were located in the middle or distal segment of the coronary artery. Only one patient presented with a diffuse stenosis of the coronary artery, accounting for 4.5% (1/22). Based on the results of coronary angiography, 60% (9/15) of patients in the study group had a single coronary artery branch involved, 33.3% (5/15) had two coronary artery branches involved, and 6.7% (1/15) had three coronary artery branches involved. The values of A [(6.55±1.48) dB vs (8.09±1.35) dB], β [(0.45±0.13)/s vs (0.64±0.07)/s], and A×β [(2.75±1.03) dB/s vs (5.23±0.51) dB/s] in the study group were significantly lower than those of the control group (t=9.978, 15.178, and 25.260, respectively; P<0.001). Time to start [(2.74±0.78) s vs (2.55±0.63) s] and time to peak [(12.43±0.79) s vs (7.53±0.93) s] were significantly longer in the study group than in the control group (t=2.059, P=0.013; t=50.068, P<0.001). LVEF was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group (t=19.969, P<0.001). With a cut-off value of 4.0017 dB/s, the AUC of A×β was 0.949, with a sensitivity of 94.2% and specificity of 81.5%.

Conclusion

Coronary artery involvement in Takayasu arteritis can cause disturbance of myocardial microcirculation and thus lead to a decrease of cardiac systolic function. MCE can accurately and quantitatively evaluate the myocardial perfusion in patients with Takayasu arteritis with coronary artery involvement.

表1 大动脉炎冠状动脉受累组与健康对照组一般资料比较
表2 大动脉炎冠状动脉受累组与健康对照组心肌灌注参数比较(±s
图1 大动脉炎冠状动脉受累心肌灌注参数受试者工作特征曲线
1
Alibaz-Oner F, Koster MJ, Unal AU, et al. Assessment of the frequency of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with Takayasu′s arteritis [J]. Rheumatology, 2017, 56(11): 1939-1944.
2
冷冉, 陈魁, 姜正明, 等. 大动脉炎累及冠状动脉的临床特点及危险因素分析 [J]. 中国实用医刊, 2019, 46(6): 27-30.
3
Zhang H, Ma X, Zhang Q, et al. Arterioplasty in Takayasu′s Arteritis with Left Main Coronary Artery Involvement [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2018, 105(6): e247-e248.
4
王潇, 党爱民, 吕纳强, 等. 大动脉炎冠状动脉受累的危险因素分析 [J]. 中国心血管杂志, 2016, 21(6): 447-450.
5
Arend WP, Michel BA, Bloch DA, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Takayasu arteritis [J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1990, 33(8): 1129-1134.
6
Fernandes B, Saraiva J, Carvalho L. Takayasus′s Aortitis Induced Ascending Aorta Dissection [J]. Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc, 2017, 24(3-4): 165.
7
Jan R, Zahid S, Owais SM, et al. Total Occlusion of Abdominal Aorta in Takayasu Arteritis [J]. Cureus, 2019, 11(7): e5058.
8
徐冠一, 刘文娴, 杨鲲, 等. 多发性大动脉炎累及冠状动脉的临床特点分析 [J]. 中国医药, 2017, 12(8): 1129-1132.
9
Nishiyama H, Tanabe Y, Kido T, et al. Incremental diagnostic value of whole-heart dynamic computed tomography perfusion imaging for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease [J]. J Cardiol, 2019, 73(5): 425-431.
10
Isobe M. Takayasu arteritis revisited: current diagnosis and treatment [J]. Int J Cardiol, 2013, 168(1): 3-10.
11
Ali N, Patel PA, Malkin CJ. Assessment of coronary physiology - the evidence and implications [J]. Clin Med (Lond), 2019, 19(5): 364-368.
12
Dong W, Li J, Mi H, et al. Relationship between collateral circulation and myocardial viability of 18F-FDG PET/CT subtended by chronic total occluded coronary arteries [J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2018, 32(3): 197-205.
13
Khor CG, Tan BE, Kan SL, et al. Takayasu arteritis in major rheumatology centers in Malaysia [J]. J Clin Rheumatol, 2016, 22(4): 194-197.
14
郑亚国, 许田, 陈亮, 等. 大动脉炎合并冠心病患者的冠状动脉病变特征及介入治疗临床分析 [J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版). 2020, 40(1): 82-85.
15
Li J, Li H, Sun F, et al. Clinical characteristics of heart involvement in Chinese patients with Takayasu arteritis [J]. J Rheumatol, 2017, 44(12): 1867-1874.
[1] 陈思骄, 刘娅妮, 张艺. 右心室心肌自动功能成像对冠状动脉旁路移植术后短期不良事件的风险预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(02): 114-120.
[2] 张婉微, 秦芸芸, 蔡绮哲, 林明明, 田润雨, 金姗, 吕秀章. 心肌收缩早期延长对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉严重狭窄的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1016-1022.
[3] 汤峥丽, 王芳, 王唯坚. 中老年人群幽门螺杆菌感染对非酒精性脂肪肝及冠状动脉粥样硬化影响的关联性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 137-140.
[4] 牟超鹏, 宗斌, 刘奕, 史美英, 徐杜娟, 冯春光. 经远端桡动脉与经常规桡动脉行急诊冠脉介入诊疗后穿刺部位血肿的对比[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 275-282.
[5] 张洪, 王宏宇. 神经酰胺与心脏和血管疾病关系的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(11): 1202-1205.
[6] 邵天朋, 周英文, 陈延鹏, 宋兆伟. 栓塞治疗合并冠状动脉-支气管动脉瘘咯血患者一例[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 284-286.
[7] 林永俭, 谢雪花, 郝莉茹, 刘丽, 马英东. 优化急诊绿色通道对急性心肌梗死介入治疗患者救治时间的影响[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 185-189.
[8] 王文珠, 刘建, 袁常秀, 石亚飞, 尤培军. 竖脊肌平面阻滞对非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中阿片类药物用量的影响[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 155-159.
[9] 郭方明, 赵明俐, 颜凡辉, 刘萌萌, 王阳, 赵英杰, 刘远航, 张艳芬, 詹景冬. 光学相干断层成像在急性心肌梗死冠状动脉分层斑块病变中的应用[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 73-79.
[10] 王林源, 熊鑫, 杨坤, 邓勇志. 基于冠状动脉CT血管成像的影像组学列线图鉴别诊断易损斑块的价值[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 1-8.
[11] 李烽, 陈聿琦, 刘湘, 焦阳, 李晖. 假性Wellens综合征一例[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 54-57.
[12] 姚晨晨, 杨雷, 罗诚诚, 佘会. 低密度脂蛋白胆固醇联合甘油三酯与葡萄糖乘积指数在急性冠脉综合征患者发生主要心血管事件中的预测价值[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 36-41.
[13] 黄锦, 温静, 李佳霖, 韩丹, 刘翠华, 杨殿辉, 张洋洋. 双联抗血小板药物对溃疡性结肠炎患者的影响及处理策略[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 195-199.
[14] 马鸿兰, 李静, 张小用. 经胸超声心动图对老年患者左前降支壁冠状动脉的检测价值[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 26-30.
[15] 周洪千, 张煜坤, 顾天舒, 胡苏涛, 姜超, 张雪, 张昊, 陶华岳, 刘行, 刘彤, 陈康寅. 既往出血性脑卒中患者行经皮冠脉介入治疗后不良事件的危险因素分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 323-329.
阅读次数
全文


摘要