切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (09) : 700 -703. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2020.09.007

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣延迟带蒂转移修复前臂大面积软组织缺损
张功林1, 冯致举1, 师富贵1, 王建东2, 何如祥1, 胡军1,(), 孙萍1, 岳孝太1, 赵文学1, 王伟世1   
  1. 1. 730050 兰州手足外科医院手外科
    2. 734000 甘肃张掖,河西学院附属张掖人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-19 出版日期:2020-09-15
  • 通信作者: 胡军
  • 基金资助:
    兰州市科技局项目(2018-4-60)

Delayed pedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap transfer to repair large forearm soft tissue defects

Gonglin Zhang1, Zhiju Feng1, Fugui Shi1, Jiandong Wang2, Ruxiang He1, Jun Hu1,(), Ping Sun1, Xiaotai Yue1, Wenxue Zhao1, Weishi Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Hand Surgery, Lanzhou Hand and Foot Surgery Hospital, Lanzhou 730050, China
    2. Department of Orthopaedics, Zhangye People’s Hospital Affiliated to Hexi College, Zhangye 734000, China
  • Received:2020-03-19 Published:2020-09-15
  • Corresponding author: Jun Hu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hu Jun, Email:
引用本文:

张功林, 冯致举, 师富贵, 王建东, 何如祥, 胡军, 孙萍, 岳孝太, 赵文学, 王伟世. 腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣延迟带蒂转移修复前臂大面积软组织缺损[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(09): 700-703.

Gonglin Zhang, Zhiju Feng, Fugui Shi, Jiandong Wang, Ruxiang He, Jun Hu, Ping Sun, Xiaotai Yue, Wenxue Zhao, Weishi Wang. Delayed pedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap transfer to repair large forearm soft tissue defects[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(09): 700-703.

目的

探讨腹壁下动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣延迟带蒂转移修复前臂大面积软组织缺损的临床应用价值。

方法

选择2012年1月至2018年1月在兰州手足外科医院就诊的前臂大面积软组织缺损患者9例,采用DIEP皮瓣延迟带蒂转移进行修复,分析其临床效果。患者年龄18~51岁,软组织缺损范围24.0 cm×8.0 cm~32.0 cm×8.5 cm。DIEP皮瓣以外侧穿支供血,供区直接缝合。皮瓣延迟的时间6~10 d;断蒂时间18~21 d。

结果

1例发生小的皮缘裂开,术后2周自然愈合,皮瓣全部成活。术后随访2.0~4.5年,平均(3.8±1.4)年。供区切口愈合好,未发生腹壁切口疝,未见明显功能障碍;受区外形、功能均恢复较好,临床效果均满意。

结论

DIEP皮瓣延迟带蒂转移修复前臂大面积软组织缺损安全、可靠,可降低对供区的损伤。

Objective

To explore the clinical application of delayed pedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap transfer for repairing large forearm soft tissue defects.

Methods

From January 2012 to January 2018, nine patients with large soft-tissue defects in the forearm underwent reconstruction by delayed pedicled DIEP flap transfer at Lanzhou Hand and Foot Surgery Hospital, and the clinial effect was analyzed. They ranged in age from 18 to 51 years (mean, 36 years). The size of soft-tissue defects in the forearm ranged from 24.0 cm×8.0 cm to 32.0 cm×8.5 cm. The lateral branch provided the blood supply to the DIEP flap. The donor site was closed directly. Time of flap delay was 6~10 d. Time of pedicle break was 18-21 d.

Results

One patient developed small wound dehiscence, which spontaneously healed two weeks after surgery. All the flaps had survived completely. Postoperative follow-up period ranged from 2.0 to 4.5 years (mean, 3.8 years). The incision healed well, no abdominal incision hernia occurred, and no obvious dysfunction was found. A good contour was confirmed at the recipient area. Satisfactory clinical results were obtained in the cases.

Conclusion

Delayed pedicled DIEP flap transfer is a good option to repair large soft tissue defects in the forearm. This technique is safe and reliable, with minimal donor site morbidity.

图1 术前右前臂与肩部创面情况
图2 腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣延迟后外形
图3 修复前臂创面后
图4 前臂大面积软组织缺损患者术后5个月前臂外形
1
Vaucher R, Dast S, Bout-Roumazeilles A, et al. Harvesting method of thoracodorsal perforator flap: Adaptation [J]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet, 2019, 64(3): 266-270.
2
Yoshimatsu H, Yamamoto T, Hayashi A, et al. Use of a 72-cm-long extended bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator free flap for reconstruction of a lower leg with no suitable recipient vessel around the injury zone: A case report [J]. Microsurgery, 2018, 38(1): 89-93.
3
Sui X, Cao Z, Pang X, et al. Reconstruction of moderate-sized soft tissue defects in foot and ankle in children: Free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap versus circumflex scapular artery erforator flap [J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2019, 72(9): 1494-1502.
4
Akdag O, Karamese M, Yıldıran GU, et al. Foot and ankle reconstruction with vertically designed deep inferior epigastric perforator flap [J]. Microsurgery, 2018, 38(4): 369-374.
5
Luo Z, Qing L, Zhou Z, et al. Reconstruction of large soft tissue defects of the extremities in children using the kiss deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap to achieve primary closure of donor site [J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2019, 82(1): 64-70.
6
张功林,甄平,陈克明, 等. 腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣游离移植修复四肢软组织缺损 [J]. 中国骨伤, 2014, 27(9): 775-777.

URL    
7
Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction [J]. Ann Plast Surg, 1994, 32(1): 32-38.
8
徐掭发,胡俊勇,余世明, 等. VSD联合逆行比目鱼肌内侧肌瓣治疗伴软组织缺损的慢性胫骨骨髓炎 [J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2017, 40(1): 72-74.
9
张功林,冯致举,何如祥, 等. 腹壁下动脉带蒂肌筋膜瓣转移修复同侧髂部死一例 [J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(2): 154-155.
10
Xue EY, Cen N, Reece E, et al. A standardized approach to deep inferior epigastric perforator flap marking [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2019, 7(10): e2479.
11
Dhar SC, Taylor GI. The delay phenomenon: the story unfolds [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1999, 104(7): 2079-2091.
12
Ali F, Harunarashid H, Yugasmavanan K. Delayed reverse sural flap for cover of heel defect in a patient with associated vascular injury. A case report [J]. Indian J Surg, 2013, 75(Suppl 1): 148-149.

URL    
13
Ince B, Daaci M, Altuntas Z, et al. Versatility of delayed reverse-flow islanded sural flap for reconstructing pretibal defects among high-risk patients [J]. Ann Saudi Med, 2014, 34(3): 235-240.
14
Andejani DF, AlThubaiti GA. Intersection-splitting deep inferior epigastric perforator flap [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2019, 7(10): e2490.
15
Hembd A, Teotia SS, Zhu H, et al. Optimizing perforator selection: a multivariable analysis of predictors for fat necrosis and abdominal morbidity in diep flap breast reconstruction [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018, 142(3): 583-592.
16
Butler DP, Plonczak AM, Reissis D, et al. Factors that predict deep inferior epigastric perforator flap donor site hernia and bulge [J]. J Plast Surg Hand Surg, 2018, 52(6): 338-342.
17
Tan J, Ohjimi H, Takagi S, et al. Rezoning free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps based on perforasome groupings and a new understanding of the vascular architecture of the deep inferior epigastric artery-based flaps [J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2019, 83(6): e59-e67.
18
Mericli AF, Wren J, Garvey PB, et al. A prospective clinical trial comparing visible light spectroscopy to handheld Doppler for postoperative free tissue transfer monitoring [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2017, 140(3): 604-613.
[1] 李友, 唐林峰, 杜伟伟, 刘海亮, 余新水, 沈佳宇, 巨积辉. 皮瓣联合掌长肌腱折叠单排三点式固定治疗指背侧创面伴锤状指畸形的临床效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 485-490.
[2] 雷子威, 凌萍, 沈纵, 魏晨如, 朱邦晖, 伍国胜, 孙瑜. 类器官肺损伤疾病模型构建及应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 531-535.
[3] 王强, 金光哲, 巨积辉, 王凯, 唐晓强, 吕文涛, 程贺云, 杨林, 王海龙. 超声辅助定位下游离臂内侧皮瓣在修复手指创面中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 393-397.
[4] 张茜柳, 余东升. 医源性牙外伤的发生原因和防治策略[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 287-294.
[5] 张洁, 罗小霞, 余鸿. 系统性免疫炎症指数对急性胰腺炎患者并发器官功能损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 68-71.
[6] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[7] 孟令凯, 李大勇, 王宁, 王桂明, 张炳南, 李若彤, 潘立峰. 袖状胃切除术对肥胖伴2型糖尿病大鼠的作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-642.
[8] 唐亦骁, 陈峻, 连正星, 胡海涛, 鲁迪, 徐骁, 卫强. 白果内酯对小鼠肝缺血再灌注损伤保护作用研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 278-282.
[9] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[10] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[11] 孙璐, 蒋亚玲, 陈凌君. 布托啡诺对脑缺血再灌注损伤大鼠神经炎症和JAK2/STAT3信号通路的影响[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 344-350.
[12] 于同, 矫健航, 姜炜博, 王中汉, 王洋, 伍旭辉, 吴敏飞. 体位复位与椎板切除减压内固定术治疗胸腰段爆裂性骨折的对比性研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 331-339.
[13] 张津, 李欣达, 徐如祥. 神经类器官在大脑常见疾病治疗中的应用及在脊髓损伤修复中的应用前景[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 257-263.
[14] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[15] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?