切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (12) : 962 -966. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2020.12.002

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚短时程清醒镇痛镇静术在门诊老年食管异物患者中的应用
刘昕1, 高巨1, 陈婷2, 吴莹莹3,()   
  1. 1. 225000 江苏扬州,江苏省苏北人民医院麻醉科
    2. 225000 江苏扬州,扬州大学医学院
    3. 225000 江苏扬州,江苏省苏北人民医院内镜中心
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-10 出版日期:2020-12-15
  • 通信作者: 吴莹莹
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省苏北人民医院管理课题重点项目(YYGL201902); 江苏省苏北人民医院院级课题一般项目(yzucms201531); 扬州大学大学生科创基金立项项目(X20190775)

Application of short-term conscious analgesia and sedation with Remifentanil and Propofol in elderly outpatients with esophageal foreign body

Xin Liu1, Ju Gao1, Ting Chen2, Yingying Wu3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou 225000, China
    2. Medical College of Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 225000, China
    3. Endocopy Center, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou 225000, China
  • Received:2020-06-10 Published:2020-12-15
  • Corresponding author: Yingying Wu
引用本文:

刘昕, 高巨, 陈婷, 吴莹莹. 瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚短时程清醒镇痛镇静术在门诊老年食管异物患者中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(12): 962-966.

Xin Liu, Ju Gao, Ting Chen, Yingying Wu. Application of short-term conscious analgesia and sedation with Remifentanil and Propofol in elderly outpatients with esophageal foreign body[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(12): 962-966.

目的

探索瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚短时程清醒镇痛镇静技术在食管异物诊疗中的临床应用效果。

方法

选取2018年9月至2019年9月于江苏省苏北人民医院内镜中心接受治疗的60例因食管异物就诊的门诊老年患者。采用随机数字表法分为对照组和清醒镇痛镇静组(CA组),各30例。对照组给予单一丙泊酚麻醉,CA组采用短时程镇痛镇静麻醉方案。对比两组Ramsay镇静评分达标时间、术中低血压发生情况、术中低血氧发生情况、额外的麻醉药物追加次数、患者麻醉苏醒达标时间、术后24 h电话随访恶心呕吐等不适症状发生情况、患者满意度以及内镜操作医生满意度。

结果

Ramsay镇静评分达标时间CA组显著长于对照组[(50.73±6.78)s vs (24.47±7.00)s],差异具有统计学意义(t=14.765,P<0.001);术中低血压发生情况CA组(20.0%,6/30)显著少于对照组(66.7%,20/30),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=13.303,P<0.001);麻醉恢复时间CA组显著短于对照组[(5.63±2.61)min vs (22.63±3.73)min],差异具有统计学意义(t=20.472,P<0.001);术后不适症状发生情况CA组(6.7%,2/30)显著少于对照组(26.7%,8/30),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=4.32,P<0.05)。术中低血氧发生情况、麻醉药额外追加次数、患者满意度和内镜操作医生满意度组间无显著统计学差异(P>0.05)。

结论

瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚的短时程清醒镇痛镇静技术既可保证麻醉效果和术后快速康复,又可减轻术后不适症状,是适合于老年食管异物患者的麻醉方案。

Objective

To explore the clinical application of short-term conscious analgesia and sedation with Remifentanil and Propofol in elderly outpatients with esophageal foreign body.

Methods

Sixty elderly outpatients who were treated for esophageal foreign body at the Endoscopy Center of Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital from September 2018 to September 2019 were selected. Those patients were randomly divided into either a control group or a conscious analgesia and sedation group (CA group) with 30 cases each using a random number table. The control group underwent analgesia with Propofol alone, while the CA group underwent short-term conscious analgesia and sedation. Comparison was made between the two groups in terms of Ramsay sedation score standard time, intraoperative hypotension and hypoxia, additional times of anesthesia, post-anesthesia resuscitation time, telephone follow-up at postoperative 24 h to assess the occurrence of uncomfortable symptoms like nausea and vomiting, patient satisfaction, and endoscopic surgeon satisfaction.

Results

The mean time to predetermined Ramsay score in the CA group was significantly longer than that of the control group [(50.73±6.78) s vs (24.47±7.00) s, t=14.765, P<0.001]. The incidence of intraoperative hypotension in the CA group (20.0%, 6/30) was significantly lower than that of the control group (66.7%, 20/30) (χ2=13.303, P<0.001). Post-anesthesia resuscitation time in the CA group was significantly shorter than that of the control group [(5.63±2.61) min vs (22.63±3.73) min, t=20.472, P<0.001]. The occurrence of postoperative discomfort symptoms in the CA group (6.7%,2/30) was significantly lower than that of the control group (26.7%,8/30) (χ2=4.32, P<0.05). There were no significant differences in intraoperative hypoxemia, additional times of anesthesia, patient satisfaction, or endoscopic surgeon satisfaction between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Remifentanil combined with Propofol for short-term conscious analgesia and sedation can not only ensure intraoperative stability and rapid postoperative resuscitation, but also reduce postoperative uncomfortable symptoms, which is suitable for elderly outpatients with esophageal foreign body.

表1 2组老年食管异物患者一般情况比较
表2 2组老年食管异物患者各指标比较情况
1
谢洪, 尹金淑, 彭洪, 等. 成年食管异物住院患者的临床分析 [J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2018, 24(8): 46-51.
2
刘昕, 高巨, 周罗晶, 等. 门诊无痛胃镜患者术后疲劳综合征的危险因素 [J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2019, 39(10): 1162-1164.
3
王尔华, 郭单单, 杨灿, 等. 瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚清醒镇痛镇静技术在老年患者胃肠镜诊疗中的应用研究 [J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2016,33(6): 384-387.
4
中华医学会消化内镜学分会麻醉协作组. 常见消化内镜手术麻醉管理专家共识 [J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2019, 36(1): 9-19.
5
中华医学会消化内镜学分会, 中华医学会麻醉学分会. 中国消化内镜诊疗镇静/麻醉的专家共识意见 [J]. 中华消化杂志, 2014, 34(8): 505-512.
6
黄亮, 刘恒意. 锲而不舍的硕果天道酬勤的诠释: 丙泊酚研发者荣获拉斯克奖 [J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2019, 39(3): 257-258.
7
刘进, 于布为. 麻醉学 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 187.
8
刘昕‍. 门诊无痛消化道内镜患者POFS临床调查及应对策略研究 [D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2018.
9
Reier CE, Hamelberg W. Conscious analgesia and amnesia for cardioversion [J]. J Am Med Assoc, 1969, 210(11): 2052-2054.
10
Kronish AD. Conscious sedation in dental practice [J]. Clin Implant Dent R, 1974, 21(4): 111.
11
Eskandari N, van Heusden K, Dumont GA. Extended habituating model predictive control of propofol and remifentanil anesthesia [J]. Biomed Sign Process Control, 2020, 55: 1-6.
12
Grossmann B, Nilsson A, Sjöberg F, et al. Patient‐controlled sedation with propofol for endoscopic procedures—A cost analysis [J]. Acta Anaesth Scand, 2020, 64(1): 53-62.
13
Brumby AM, Heiberg J, Te C, et al. Quality of recovery after gastroscopy, colonoscopy, or both endoscopic procedures: an observational pilot study [J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2017, 83(11): 1161-1168.
14
Meng QT, Cao C, Liu H, et al. Safety and efficacy of etomidate and propofol anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing gastroscopy: A double-blind randomized clinical study [J]. Exp Ther Med, 2016, 12(3): 1515-1524.
[1] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[2] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[3] 李婷婷, 吴荷玉, 张悦, 程康, 张晓芳, 程娅婵. 复合保温策略在老年腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 522-525.
[4] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[5] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[6] 张汪, 徐淑英, 张爱华, 夏芬荣, 汪露. 手术室体温护理结合细节护理干预在老年腹股沟疝围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 635-638.
[7] 赵宏霞, 刘静, 李晓薇, 陈金婵, 汪志霞. 腹腔镜下经阴道子宫全切术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗老年子宫脱垂效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 561-565.
[8] 孙伟, 林丽, 师高洋. 超声引导下连续髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中应用效果比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 593-597.
[9] 张宁, 张梦菲, 邱建新, 高闫尧, 陈育, 高靖榆. 腹腔镜下经尿道等离子电切术联合疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟斜疝合并前列腺良性增生[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 441-444.
[10] 杨鹏, 刘冲. PFNA治疗老年股骨转子间骨折后隐匿性失血及其危险因素的横断面研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 301-306.
[11] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[12] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[13] 毛树文, 袁方, 唐昊, 王建民. 针刀调节交感神经对老年胃溃疡患者胃功能和溃疡愈合的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 326-330.
[14] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[15] 晏美娟, 邵礼晖. 高水平脂蛋白(a)与无“三高”老年人群小动脉硬化型脑小血管病的相关性研究[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 458-463.
阅读次数
全文


摘要