切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 182 -186. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2021.03.005

临床研究

早期支气管镜治疗对重症脑外科患者肺部感染的预防价值
季旭清1,(), 童洪杰1, 蒋晨琳1, 陈吉润1   
  1. 1. 321000 浙江金华,浙江大学医学院附属金华医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-08 出版日期:2021-03-15
  • 通信作者: 季旭清
  • 基金资助:
    金华市中心医院中青年科研启动基金资助(JY2017-2-04)

Application value of early bronchoscopy intervention in prevention of pulmonary infection in patients with severe brain surgery

Xuqing Ji1,(), Hongjie Tong1, Chenlin Jiang1, Jirun Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua 321000, China
  • Received:2020-09-08 Published:2021-03-15
  • Corresponding author: Xuqing Ji
引用本文:

季旭清, 童洪杰, 蒋晨琳, 陈吉润. 早期支气管镜治疗对重症脑外科患者肺部感染的预防价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 182-186.

Xuqing Ji, Hongjie Tong, Chenlin Jiang, Jirun Chen. Application value of early bronchoscopy intervention in prevention of pulmonary infection in patients with severe brain surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 182-186.

目的

分析早期支气管镜治疗对重症脑外科术后患者肺部感染预防和降低病死率的价值。

方法

采用随机分组法,将2017年1月至2019年9月由浙江大学医学院附属金华医院急诊行脑外科手术,术后转入重症监护病房治疗,并机械通气时间超过24 h的患者分为观察组和对照组。对照组由临床医师根据病情给予处理,并按需给予常规吸痰治疗;观察组在对照组基础上于术后24 h内首次给予床旁支气管镜吸痰加灌洗治疗,之后按需给予床旁支气管镜吸痰加灌洗治疗。比较2组间早期肺部感染发生率及28 d病死率。

结果

共入组246例,男144例(58.54%),女102例(41.46%);年龄19~94岁,平均(58.52±14.42)岁;脑出血142例(57.72%),脑梗死15例(6.10%),脑外伤89例(36.18%)。111例行床旁支气管镜治疗,观察期内每例行床旁支气管镜治疗1~5次,平均(1.97±1.20)次。共68例继发早期肺部感染,总发生率27.64%,其中,观察组27例(发生率24.32%),对照组41例(发生率29.63%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。87例于28 d内死亡,总全因病死率35.37%,其中,观察组33例(病死率29.73%),对照组54例(病死率40.00%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。亚组分析显示,脑外伤亚组中观察组较对照组肺部感染发生率差异有统计学意义(17.02% vs 38.10%,P=0.025);脑出血亚组中观察组较对照组28 d病死率差异有统计学意义(20.69% vs 39.29%,P=0.019)。观察组中继发早期肺部感染患者血炎症指标峰值较对照组明显下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

早期支气管镜吸痰和灌洗治疗有助于降低脑外伤患者的肺部感染发生率及脑出血患者的病死率,有助于减轻重症脑外科患者早期肺部炎症反应,减少毒素吸收,有利于肺部感染的控制,值得临床推广应用。

Objective

To evaluate the value of early bronchoscopy intervention for prevention of early pulmonary infection and reduction of death rate in patients with severe brain surgery.

Methods

From January 2017 to September 2019, patients admitted to Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine after emergency brain surgery and ventilated for more than 24 hours were enrolled into this study. They were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group. The control group was treated by the clinician according to the condition and given routine sputum suction treatment as needed. In the observation group, on the basis of the treatment for the control group, sputum aspiration and lavage with a bedside bronchoscope were given for the first time within 24 hours after operation, and then, as required, sputum aspiration and lavage with a bedside bronchoscope were given. Early pulmonary infection rates and 28-day mortality were compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 246 patients were enrolled, of whom 144 were male and 102 were female. They ranged in age from 19-94 years, with an average age of (58.52±14.42) years. The diagnoses included cerebral hemorrhage in 142 (57.72%) patients, cerebral infarction in 15 (6.10%), and cerebral trauma in 89 (36.18%). During the observation period, 111 patients were treated by bedside bronchoscopy for 1-5 times, with an average of (1.97±1.20) times. Sixty-eight patients had pulmonary infection with an overall infection rate of 37.64%, among whom 27 (24.32%) were in the treatment group and 41 (29.63%) in the control group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Eighty-seven patients died in 28 days after admission, with an overall mortality of 35.37%, among whom 33 (29.73%) were in the treatment group and 54 (40.00%) in the control group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Sub-group analysis revealed that the infection rate of patients with brain trauma (17.02% vs 38.10%) and the death rate of patients with cerebral hemorrhage (20.69% vs 39.29%) in these two groups had statistical differences (P=0.025 and 0.019, respectively). The peak value of blood inflammation index in patients with early secondary pulmonary infection in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Early bronchoscopic sputum aspiration and lavage can help to reduce the rate of early pulmonary infection of patients with brain trauma, the mortality of patients with cerebral hemorrhage, and early pulmonary inflammatory reaction and absorption of toxins in patients with severe brain surgery and is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 2组重症脑外科患者年龄、疾病严重程度和原发病比较
表2 2组重症脑外科患者肺部感染发生情况比较[例(%)]
表3 2组重症脑外科继发肺部感染患者发热天数及血炎症指标比较(
xˉ
±s
表4 2组重症脑外科患者预后情况比较[例(%)]
1
张新中, 史耀亭, 王玉峰, 等. 脑外伤继发感染与体液免疫抑制 [J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 1997, 13(4): 252.
2
梁坤铃, 方细霞, 曾振坤. 血清PCT、CRP水平对颅脑外伤术后合并肺部感染预后的评价 [J]. 实验与检验医学, 2018, 36(4): 606.
3
梁小松, 宁依群, 陈思桦, 等. 脑外科患者肺部感染的危险因素分析与干预研究 [J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2016, 26(7): 1577-1578, 1584.
4
王群. 重型颅脑外伤患者肺部感染危险因素分析 [J]. 中国乡村医药, 2019, 26(12): 8-9.
5
张爱红, 刘志刚, 李百灵, 等. 重型颅脑损伤患者发生肺部感染危险因素探讨 [J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2019, 18(22): 2422-2425.
6
李树伟, 田秀芬, 印秀玲, 等. 改良吸痰法应用于重型颅脑损伤气管切开患者的效果观察 [J]. 世界临床医学, 2017, 11(2): 95-96.
7
Klompas M, Branson R, Eichenwald EC, et al. Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in acute care hospitals: 2014 update [J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2014, 2(8): 915-936.
8
韦向亮, 李皿, 庞继彦, 等. 经纤维支气管镜灌洗治疗重型颅脑损伤并肺部感染疗效观察 [J]. 广西医科大学学报, 2013, 30(6): 955-956.
9
张辉, 张小燕, 何彩霞, 等. 经纤支镜肺泡灌洗治疗机械通气下重症肺部感染的疗效观察 [J]. 中国现代医生, 2014, 52(1): 140-142.
10
李红艳, 艾文婷, 田应选, 等. 支气管镜灌洗术在老年重症肺部感染治疗中的临床价值 [J]. 中华老年多器官疾病杂志, 2018, 17(1): 25-28.
11
姜交泰, 朱大庆, 黄玉晖. 纤维支气管镜吸痰灌洗治疗呼吸重症监护室肺部感染的临床分析 [J]. 临床合理用药, 2018, 11(1A): 157-159.
12
刘大为. 实用重症医学 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2010: 1026-1028.
13
宋彦彬, 马刘佳. 血糖水平对行机械通气的急性脑损伤患者预后的影响 [J]. 内科急危重症杂志, 2019, 25(4): 322-324.
14
周赛君, 鲍剑虹, 王逸平. 血清神经无特异性烯醇化酶和急性生理与慢性健康评定量表Ⅱ评估心肺复苏后脑损伤预后的临床研究 [J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2018, 51(2): 124-126.
15
杨墙凤, 郑淑美, 王翠娥, 等. 添加谷氨酰胺的肠内营养对急性期重型创伤性脑损伤患者胃肠功能和预后的影响 [J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2018, 34(1): 18-22.
16
中华医学会呼吸病学分会. 中国成人社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗指南(2016年版) [J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2016, 39(4): 253-279.
17
Haddad JJ, Olver RE, Land SC. Antioxidant/pro-oxidant equilibrium regulates HIF-1α and NF-κB redox sensitivity: evidence for inhibition by glutathione oxidation in alveolar epithelial cells [J]. J Biol Chem, 2000, 275(28): 21130-21139.
18
刘松涛, 沈斌, 雷涛, 等. 肺癌术后呼吸机相关性肺炎患者纤维支气管镜治疗的研究 [J]. 中国临床新医学, 2016, 9(8): 669-672.
19
陈汉民, 管定国. 早期机械通气下纤支镜灌洗治疗重型颅脑损伤误吸后急性呼吸衰竭 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2011, 27(15): 2779-2781.
20
Nair GB, Niederman MS. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: present understanding and ongoing debates [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2015, 41(1): 34-48.
21
石泽亚, 秦月兰, 祝益民, 等. 纤维支气管镜肺泡灌洗联合振动排痰治疗重症肺炎机械通气患者的效果观察: 一项286例患者前瞻性随机对照研究 [J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2017, 29(1): 66-70.
[1] 陈经欣, 李梅, 陈洁雅. 肺结节胸腔镜术后肺部感染危险因素分析[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 238-243.
[2] 林亚丽, 朱丹, 李云霞, 刘晓芳. 慢性呼吸衰竭合并肺部念珠菌感染的临床特征及影响因素[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 385-390.
[3] 周杉京, 诸葛金科, 王芳芳. 补肺活血胶囊对COPD患者cCor、ALD、Ang-Ⅱ的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 517-519.
[4] 王庆, 张红联, 吴志勇. COPD合并多重耐药菌肺部感染预后危险因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 557-559.
[5] 刘玲, 肖颖, 王蓉. 严重创伤并发肺部感染死亡病例分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 581-583.
[6] 张晓娟, 邓祥瑞, 陈睿, 钟文. AECOPD伴肺部感染吸入三联疗效与EOS相关性分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 364-366.
[7] 刘思佚, 拉周措毛. 肺尘埃沉着的影像学及支气管镜表现分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 412-414.
[8] 叶晓芳, 杨京华, 武元星, 朱光发. COPD患者冠状动脉旁路移植术后肺部感染的预后影响及危险因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 175-179.
[9] 陶梅梅, 王新霞, 朱光发. 肺癌并发心律失常临床特点及支气管镜检查安全性分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 180-184.
[10] 张沥, 宋俊华, 何皓, 杨雪瑶, 周康. 血清D-D、PAI-1、sICAM-1水平与糖尿病合并肺部感染病情严重程度及预后的关系[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 203-205.
[11] 梁华, 黄承军, 鄂桂香, 李静. 胸腺肽多索茶碱治疗COPD并发肺部感染的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 218-220.
[12] 崔立慧, 李士荣, 李素娟, 孙娴静, 张馨怡. 糖尿病患者肺部感染超敏C反应蛋白和降钙素原检测的临床意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 95-97.
[13] 汪玲玲, 申潇竹, 贾嵘, 包勤文. CRP/AIb、NLR及CD64%对老年肺部感染预后的意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 859-862.
[14] 邱学荣, 张秀琴, 张欢, 刘婷, 高翠琴. 动态监测SAA给予抗生素在电子支气管镜联合普米克令舒治疗重症肺炎中的价值研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 308-313.
[15] 梁宇峰, 王超, 黄献锋, 朱琳玲, 杨芳琼. 内镜面罩与喉罩无创辅助通气在无痛支气管镜诊疗中的应用效果比较[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(07): 652-656.
阅读次数
全文


摘要