切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (08) : 626 -630. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2021.08.013

临床研究

血清脂肪酶、C反应蛋白、降钙素原预测重症胰腺炎后感染性胰腺坏死的价值分析
陈颖彬1, 李英1, 侯宇1, 陈君1, 黄武峰1, 文惠1, 苏醒1,()   
  1. 1. 570125 海口,海口市人民医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-29 出版日期:2021-08-15
  • 通信作者: 苏醒
  • 基金资助:
    海南省卫生计生行业科研项目(19A200164)

Value of serum lipase, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in prediction of infected pancreatic necrosis after severe pancreatitis

Yingbin Chen1, Ying Li1, Yu Hou1, Jun Chen1, Wufeng Huang1, Hui Wen1, Xing Su1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Critical Medicine, Haikou People's Hospital, Haikou 570125, China
  • Received:2021-05-29 Published:2021-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Xing Su
引用本文:

陈颖彬, 李英, 侯宇, 陈君, 黄武峰, 文惠, 苏醒. 血清脂肪酶、C反应蛋白、降钙素原预测重症胰腺炎后感染性胰腺坏死的价值分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(08): 626-630.

Yingbin Chen, Ying Li, Yu Hou, Jun Chen, Wufeng Huang, Hui Wen, Xing Su. Value of serum lipase, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in prediction of infected pancreatic necrosis after severe pancreatitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(08): 626-630.

目的

分析血清脂肪酶、C反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)预测重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)后感染性胰腺坏死(IPN)的价值,为临床诊断和治疗工作提供研究依据。

方法

选取2018年12月至2020年12月海口市人民医院收治的132例SAP患者作为研究对象,根据患者是否发生IPN将其分为IPN组(48例)和非IPN组(84例)。比较2组患者的一般资料及入院时的白细胞计数(WBC)、血红蛋白(HB)、血清白蛋白(ALB)、血清淀粉酶、血清脂肪酶、PCT、CRP水平,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析血清脂肪酶、PCT、CRP水平诊断SAP合并感染性胰腺坏死的价值。

结果

2组患者入院时WBC、HB及血清ALB、淀粉酶水平差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05);IPN组患者血清脂肪酶、PCT、CRP水平分别为(790.60±294.08)U/L、(11.90±5.67)ng/mL、(292.12±67.97)mg/L,均高于非IPN组的(555.09±213.44)U/L、(5.69±3.34)ng/mL、(204.89±44.15)mg/L,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。血清脂肪酶、PCT、CRP水平预测SAP后IPN的ROC曲线下面积(AUCROC)分别为0.727、0.808、0.845(P<0.05),其中CRP的AUCROC值最高,在cutoff值278.841 mg/L下,其敏感度和特异度分别为60.42%和91.67%。

结论

SAP患者疾病早期的血清脂肪酶、PCT、CRP水平对于辅助预测IPN具有一定价值,但存在敏感度不足的局限,不足以满足临床需求,仍需采用多种指标联合检测以提高预测效率。

Objective

To assess the value of serum lipase, C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) in the prediction of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), to provide a research basis for its clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Methods

A total of 132 SAP patients treated at the Haikou People's Hospital from December 2018 to December 2020 were selected as the study subjects. According to whether IPN occurred, the patients were divided into either an IPN group (48 cases) or a non-IPN group (84 cases). The general data and the levels of white blood cells (WBCs), hemoglobin (HB), albumin (ALB), serum amylase, serum lipase, PCT, and CRP were compared between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the value of serum lipase, PCT, and CRP levels in the prediction of IPN after SAP.

Results

The differences of WBCs, HB, ALB and amylase between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05), but the levels of serum lipase, PCT, and CRP in the IPN group were [(790.60±294.08) U/lL, (11.90±5.67) ng/ml, and (292.12±67.97) mg/L, respectively] were significantly higher than those of the non-IPN group [(555.09±213.44) U/L, (5.69±3.34) ng/ml, and (204.89±44.15) mg/L, respectively; P<0.05]. The area under ROC curve (AUCROC) values of serum lipase, PCT, and CRP levels in the diagnosis of IPN after SAP were 0.727, 0.808, and 0.845, respectively (P<0.05), among which the AUC of CRP was the highest, with a sensitivity of 60.42% and of 91.67% at the cutoff value of 278.841 mg/L.

Conclusion

Serum lipase, PCT, and CRP levels in early stage of SAP have appreciated value for auxiliary prediction of IPN, but they are limited by a low sensitivity, which is not enough to meet clinical needs. Multiple indicators should still be used to improve the prediction efficiency.

表1 2组重症急性胰腺炎患者一般资料比较
表2 2组重症急性胰腺炎患者入院实验室指标比较(
xˉ
±s
表3 血清脂肪酶、PCT、CRP水平预测重症急性胰腺炎后感染性胰腺坏死的ROC曲线分析
图1 血清脂肪酶、PCT、CRP水平预测重症急性胰腺炎后感染性胰腺坏死的受试者工作特征曲线注:PCT为降钙素原;CRP为C反应蛋白
1
De Waele E,Malbrain MLNG,Spapen HD. How to deal with severe acute pancreatitis in the critically ill [J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2019, 25(2): 150-156.
2
Siregar GA, Siregar GP. Management of severe acute pancreatitis [J]. Open Access Maced J Med Sci, 2019, 7(19): 3319-3323.
3
Pagliari D, Brizi MG, Saviano A, et al. Clinical assessment and management of severe acute pancreatitis: a multi-disciplinary approach in the XXI century [J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2019, 23(2): 771-787.
4
冯健, 蔡守旺. 重症急性胰腺炎感染性胰腺坏死的微创治疗进展 [J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2018, 33(9): 798-800.
5
Thomson JE, Van Dijk SM, Brand M, et al. Managing infected pancreatic necrosis [J]. Chirurgia (Bucur), 2018, 113(3): 291-299.
6
Rasslan R, Novo FDCF, Bitran A, et al. Management of infected pancreatic necrosis: state of the art [J]. Rev Col Bras Cir, 2017, 44(5): 521-529.
7
Wolbrink DRJ, Kolwijck E, Ten Oever J, et al. Management of infected pancreatic necrosis in the intensive care unit: a narrative review [J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2020, 26(1): 18-25.
8
Leppäniemi A, Tolonen M, Tarasconi A, et al. 2019 WSES guidelines for the management of severe acute pancreatitis [J]. World J Emerg Surg, 2019, 14: 27.
9
American Diabetes Association. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019 [J]. Diabetes Care, 2019, 42(Suppl 1): S13-S28.
10
Unger T, Borghi C, Charchar F, et al. 2020 international society of hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines [J]. Hypertension, 2020, 75(6): 1334-1357.
11
Xu C, Wang J, Jin X, et al. Establishment of a predictive model for outcomes in patients with severe acute pancreatitis by nucleated red blood cells combined with charlson complication index and APACHE Ⅱ score [J]. Turk J Gastroenterol, 2020, 31(12): 936-941.
12
Masamune A, Hamada S, Kikuta K. Implementation of pancreatitis bundles is associated with reduced mortality in patients with severe acute pancreatitis in Japan [J]. Pancreas, 2021, 50(2): e24-e25.
13
Kurdia KC, Irrinki S, Chala AV, et al. Early intra-abdominal hypertension: a reliable bedside prognostic marker for severe acute pancreatitis [J]. JGH Open, 2020, 4(6): 1091-1095.
14
Gupta V, Krishna P, Kochhar R, et al. Hemorrhage complicating the course of severe acute pancreatitis [J]. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2020, 24(3): 292-300.
15
Tan C, Yang L, Shi F, et al. Early systemic inflammatory response syndrome duration predicts infected pancreatic necrosis [J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2020, 24(3): 590-597.
16
Heo J. Infected pancreatic necrosis mimicking pancreatic cancer [J]. Case Rep Gastroenterol, 2020, 14(2): 436-442.
17
Mowbray NG, Ben-Ismaeil B, Hammoda M, et al. The microbiology of infected pancreatic necrosis [J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2018, 17(5): 456-460.
18
Ahmed O, Donohoe CL, Murphy DB, et al. Selective necrosectomy for infected pancreatic necrosis [J]. Dig Surg, 2017, 34(3): 180-185.
19
侯小娟, 白洁, 周璇, 等. 重症急性胰腺炎致感染性胰腺坏死危险因素分析及EUS引导下支架置入引流术的应用价值 [J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2019, 24(10): 1169-1172.
20
杨珠莹, 谢齐贵, 陈湛蕾, 等. 血清CRP与PCT及脂肪酶对重症急性胰腺炎患者发生感染性胰腺坏死的预测 [J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2018, 28(11): 1693-1696.
21
蓝远强, 吴发胜. 动态监测血清TREM-1和LPS水平对重症胰腺炎早期诊断价值 [J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2020, 15(5): 581-583.
22
Covington EW, Roberts MZ, Dong J. Procalcitonin monitoring as a guide for antimicrobial therapy: a review of current literature [J]. Pharmacotherapy, 2018, 38(5): 569-581.
23
王明卉, 苏哲, 张薇, 等. 血清PCT、IL-6及hsTnT动态变化对急性胰腺炎病情预测价值 [J]. 青岛大学学报(医学版), 2019, 62(4): 428-433.
24
Dyer EM, Waterfield T, Baynes H. How to use C-reactive protein [J]. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed, 2019, 104(3): 150-153.
25
何阳寰, 徐萍, 杨志文, 等. 急性坏死性胰腺炎大鼠腹腔巨噬细胞胱天蛋白酶募集域蛋白9、Toll样受体4的作用机制 [J]. 中华胰腺病杂志, 2019, 19(3): 204-207.
[1] 涂家金, 廖武强, 刘金晶, 涂志鹏, 毛远桂. 严重烧伤患者鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 491-497.
[2] 廖锵云, 王震, 林洁玉, 廖夏, 邓锦华, 李杰峰, 邓建维, 李明, 荣新洲. 虎门地区创伤弧菌感染的临床观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 394-398.
[3] 王龙彪, 刘洪, 董天雄. 中心体扩增细胞占比和C反应蛋白-白蛋白比值对胃癌根治术治疗预后的预测价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 352-356.
[4] 冯树森, 张东成, 郭奇, 张皓露, 陈阔. 两种手术方法对急性阑尾炎患者的临床疗效及对炎性因子的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 447-450.
[5] 伍学成, 李远伟, 袁武雄, 王建松, 石泳中, 卢强, 李卓, 陈佳, 刘哲, 滕伊漓, 高智勇. 炎症介质谱联合降钙素原在尿源性脓毒血症中的诊断价值[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 476-480.
[6] 刘立, 陈诚, 李新科, 刘凯, 屠昌明. 血清IL-6、hs-CRP、MMP-9联合检测在腹股沟疝无张力修补术预后评价中的价值分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 405-409.
[7] 安钱, 徐彬, 陈志祥, 徐晶晶, 黄丹丹. PCT、CRP及SAA对呼吸机相关性肺炎病情严重程度和预后分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 544-546.
[8] 芦丹, 杨硕, 刘旭. VEGF、HMGB1、hs-CRP/Alb在AECOPD伴呼吸衰竭中的变化及预后分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 532-534.
[9] 吴庆华, 冒勇, 闫效坤. AECOPD并发AKI的危险因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 529-531.
[10] 李海明, 刘鸿飞, 李俊. 血清脂蛋白酶水平与COPD患者骨骼肌质量减少的关系[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 500-503.
[11] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[12] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[13] 孙旻. 血液淀粉酶、C反应蛋白、降钙素原及乳酸脱氢酶在急性胰腺炎患者病情评价及预后预测中的价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 331-336.
[14] 王庆, 夏婷婷. 未成熟粒细胞计数、C反应蛋白、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞、降钙素原结合MCTSI评分在急性胆源性胰腺炎中的诊断价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 224-228.
[15] 韩优, 郝婧, 董红霞, 戴丽, 周保硕, 高慧贤. 经鼻空肠营养管在急性重症胰腺炎的早期应用及护理方法分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 274-277.
阅读次数
全文


摘要