切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (01) : 28 -32. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2022.01.004

临床研究

DNA甲基化检测在分流阴道镜检查中的应用
孔蕊1, 姚群1, 张小红1, 吴晓博1, 范颖1,()   
  1. 1. 100144 北京,北京大学首钢医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-31 出版日期:2022-01-15
  • 通信作者: 范颖

Application of DNA methylation detection in triage of women undergoing colposcopy

Rui Kong1, Qun Yao1, Xiaohong Zhang1, Xiaobo Wu1, Ying Fan1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing 100144, China
  • Received:2021-05-31 Published:2022-01-15
  • Corresponding author: Ying Fan
引用本文:

孔蕊, 姚群, 张小红, 吴晓博, 范颖. DNA甲基化检测在分流阴道镜检查中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 28-32.

Rui Kong, Qun Yao, Xiaohong Zhang, Xiaobo Wu, Ying Fan. Application of DNA methylation detection in triage of women undergoing colposcopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(01): 28-32.

目的

检测宫颈脱落细胞的抑癌基因MSF1甲基化情况,探讨DNA甲基化检测在分流阴道镜检查中的应用。

方法

选取2019年6月至2020年1月在北京大学首钢医院行阴道镜检查患者100例,其中87例取活检,同时留取宫颈脱落细胞,检测抑癌基因MSF1甲基化情况,分析患者DNA甲基化结果与阴道镜活检病理符合情况。比较宫颈液基细胞学检查(TCT)和人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)联合筛查与DNA甲基化检测对宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)及以上病变的预测结果。根据HPV分型将入组患者分层为1组(HPV16/18阳性)和2组(非16/18型HPV阳性),分别统计分析DNA甲基化结果与阴道镜活检病理符合情况。

结果

(1)与金标准阴道镜活检病理对比,DNA甲基化检测对87阴道镜活检患者宫颈疾病的阴性预测值为95.52%,阳性预测值为90.91%,敏感度为90.91%,特异度为95.52%,曲线下面积(AUC)值为0.83(P<0.05)。(2)在100例阴道镜检查患者中,TCT+HPV联合筛查预测HSIL及以上病变的准确率为33.00%,87例阴道镜活检患者DNA甲基化检测预测HSIL及以上病变准确率为90.91%。(3)HPV16/18阳性组,DNA甲基化检测的阴性预测值为94.74%,阳性预测值为95.83%,敏感度为95.83%,特异度为94.74%,AUC值为0.85(P<0.05)。非16/18型HPV阳性组,DNA甲基化检测的阴性预测值为95.84%,阳性预测值为77.78%,敏感度为77.78%,特异度为95.84%,AUC值为0.836(P<0.05)。

结论

DNA甲基化检测与阴道镜活检病理结果有较高的符合率。DNA甲基化检测预测HSIL的准确性远高于TCT联合HPV筛查。对于HPV16/18型感染且DNA甲基化阳性患者提示宫颈高级别病变可能性更大。

Objective

To detect the methylation of the tumor suppressor gene MSF1 in the cervical cast-off cells, in order to explore the application of DNA methylation detection in the triage of women undergoing colposcopy.

Methods

One hundred patients who underwent colposcopy at Peking University Shougang Hospital from June 2019 to January 2020 were selected, among whom 87 were biopsied. At the same time, cervical exfoliated cells were collected to detect the methylation of the tumor suppressor gene MSF1. The results of DNA methylation and colposcopic biopsy were statistically analyzed. The thinprep cytologic test (TCT) combined with human papilloma virus (HPV) screening was compared with DNA methylation detection for their prediction results for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and above lesions. According to HPV type, the patients were divided into either group 1 (HPV16/18 positive) or group 2 (non-HPV16/18 positive), and the results of DNA methylation and colposcopic biopsy were statistically analyzed.

Results

Compared with the gold standard colposcopic biopsy pathological results, DNA methylation detection in the overall analysis of 87 cases with colposcopic biosy had a negative predictive value of 95.52%, positive predictive value of 90.91%, sensitivity of 90.91%, and specificity of 95.52%, with an AUC value of 0.83 (P<0.05). The rate of HSIL and above lesions predicted by TCT combined with HPV screening in 100 cases patients with colposcopy was 33.00%. The positive predictive rate of HSIL and above lesions by DNA methylation was 90.91%. In the HPV16/18 positive group, the negative predictive value of DNA methylation test was 94.74%, the positive predictive value was 95.83%, the sensitivity was 95.83%, the specificity was 94.74%, and the AUC was 0.85 (P<0.05); in the non-16/18 HPV positive group, the corresponding values were 95.84%, 77.78%, 77.78%, 95.84%, and 0.836 (P<0.05).

Conclusion

There is a high coincidence rate between DNA methylation detection and colposcopy biopsy pathological results. DNA methylation test has a higher accuracy in predicting HSIL than TCT combined with HPV screening. Patients with HPV16/18 infection and positive DNA methylation are more likely to have high-grade cervical lesions.

表1 DNA甲基化检测与金标准阴道镜病理的符合情况(例)
表2 TCT+HPV联合筛查与DNA甲基化检测对HSIL及以上病变的预测情况比较(例)
表3 HPV16/18阳性患者DNA甲基化检测与金标准阴道镜病理的符合情况(例)
表4 非16/18HPV阳性患者DNA甲基化检测与金标准阴道镜病理的符合情况(例)
1
朱军, 林颖, 阮海波, 等. 浙江沿海地区宫颈病变患者中高危型HPV检测及其临床价值 [J]. 中华实验和临床病毒学杂志, 2013, 27(3): 212-214.
2
Baseman JG, Koutsky LA. The epidemiology of human papillomavirus infections [J]. Clin Virol, 2005, 32: S16–S24.
3
赵昀, 魏丽惠. 基于临床实践对2017年ASCCP阴道镜标准的解读与思考 [J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2018, 53(5): 354-357.
4
Sandoval J, Esteller M. Cancer epigenomics: beyond genomics [J]. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 2012, 22(1): 50-55.
5
Werner RJ, Kelly AD, Issa JJ. Epigenetics and precision oncology [J]. Cancer, 2017, 23(5): 262-269.
6
Steenbergen RD, Snijders PJ, Heideman DA, et al. Clinical implications of (epi)genetic changes in HPV-induced cervical precancerous lesions [J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2014, 14(6): 395-405.
7
Jiao X, Zhang S, Jiao J, et al. Promoter methylation of SEPT9 as a potential biomarker for early detection of cervical cancer and its overexpression predicts radioresistance [J]. Clin Epigenetics, 2019, 11(1): 120.
8
焦薪霖. SEPT9在宫颈癌早期诊断及发生发展中的作用机制研究 [D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2020.
9
中国优生科学协会阴道镜和宫颈病理学分会专家委员会. 中国子宫颈癌筛查及异常管理相关问题专家共识 [J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2017, 18(2): 190-192.
10
Steenbergen RD, Snijders PJ, Heideman DA, et al. Clinical implications of (epi)genetic changes in HPV-induced cervical precancerous lesions [J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2014, 14(6): 395-405.
11
Wilting SM, Steenbergen RDM. Molecular events leading to HPV-induced high grade neoplasia [J]. Papillomavirus Res, 2016, 2: 85-88.
12
Luttmer R, De Strooper LM, Berkhof J, et al. Comparing the performance of FAM19A4 methylation analysis,cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping for the detection of cervical (pre) cancer in high-risk HPV-positive women of a gynecologic outpatient population (COMETH study) [J]. Int J Cancer, 2016, 138(4): 992-1002.
13
Scott M, Hyland PL, McGregor G, et al. Multimodality expression profiling shows SEPT9 to be overexpressed in a wide range of human tumours [J]. Oncogene, 2005, 24(29): 4688-700.
14
Van der Weele P, Van Logchem E, Wolffs P, et al. Correlation between viral load, multiplicity of infection, and persistence of HPV16 and HPV18 infection in a Dutch cohort of young women [J]. J Clin Virol, 2016, 83: 6-11.
15
Kang LN, Zhao FH, Chen F, et al. Value of high risk human papillomavirus viral load in predicting cervical lesions and triaging for high risk (HR)-HPV-positive women [J]. Chin J Oncol, 2014, 36(4): 316-320.
16
Bryant D, Tristram A, Liloglou T, et al. Quantitative measurement of human papillomavirus type 16 L1/L2 DNA methylation correlates with cervical disease grade [J]. J Clin Virol, 2014, 59(1): 24-29.
[1] 何路路, 布俏雯, 罗家祺, 辜佳婷, 罗喜平. FAM19A4基因启动子甲基化检测在宫颈癌及其癌前病变筛查的研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(01): 23-29.
[2] 朱金虎, 杨琇玮, 万迎香, 洪小山, 毛婷. 基于全基因组水平的维吾尔族多囊卵巢综合征患者卵巢组织的特异性甲基化谱改变[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(06): 683-690.
[3] 胡静, 王冬芹. 液基细胞学联合人乳头瘤病毒-DNA检测在宫颈病变中的诊断价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2013, 09(02): 222-224.
[4] 陈敬松, 陈惠, 付才宏, 陈慧. 细胞因子信号转导抑制因子1基因甲基化状态与胃癌幽门螺杆菌感染的关系[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 93-97.
[5] 方钦亮, 谢程融, 赵文秀, 孙红光, 尹毅锐, 张盛, 王付强, 彭友缘, 王效民, 尹震宇. DNA甲基化转移酶1/3b与肝癌临床病理特征和预后相关性研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2015, 09(04): 261-266.
[6] 杨敬平, 杨俊俊, 周婵, 刘娜, 徐兴祥. 肺泡灌洗液在肺癌早期诊断方面的研究进展[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(01): 97-99.
[7] 郭小莉, 刘霞, 雷传江, 王关嵩, 王建春. 脂多糖诱导巨噬细胞中核受体协同抑制因子启动子甲基化对炎症因子的调控作用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(02): 157-162.
[8] 汪若凤, 郭永洪, 田勤, 段维鸽. 多能性胚胎干细胞与DNA甲基化的关系[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(03): 188-192.
[9] 杨宏宇, 杨福全. SEPT9在结直肠癌早期检测中的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 08(05): 496-500.
[10] 徐新丽, 于小勇. 表观遗传——中医药治疗糖尿病肾病新视角[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2022, 11(05): 276-280.
[11] 娜迪热·依明, 崔红, 努尔比亚·牙生, 祖莱娅提·阿不都热依木, 祖丽凯麦尔·阿布拉江, 麦麦提力·米吉提. 胶质瘤的表观遗传学发展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 309-315.
[12] 杜鹏, 张晓丽, 赵晓勇. DNA甲基化调控对男性不育的影响及其作用机制[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 10-16.
[13] 孔蕊, 姚群, 吴晓博, 张小红, 范颖. 高危型人乳头状瘤病毒感染类型及载量与子宫颈癌前病变严重程度及病变范围的相关性[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 376-379.
[14] 于妍, 杜启峰, 赵存友, 李淑芬, 张岱威, 蒋廷云. 抑郁发作期双相障碍患者外周血5-HTR1A启动子区甲基化水平与抑郁发作的相关性[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 241-244.
[15] 阿地拉·阿里木, 郭艳英, 王新玲. Graves病表观遗传学的进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(05): 302-305.
阅读次数
全文


摘要